check out the crontab file if you have these,
SHELL=/bin/bash
PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin
MAILTO=root ===> that's what you are looking for
HOME=/
# run-parts
01 * * * * root run-parts /etc/cron.hourly
02 4 * * * root run-parts /etc/cron.daily
22 4 * * 0 root run-par
On 23/11/2012 10:28, Banyan He wrote:
> check out the crontab file if you have these,
If it's centos 6, maybe /etc/anacrontab
>
> SHELL=/bin/bash
> PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin
> MAILTO=root ===> that's what you are looking for
> HOME=/
>
> # run-parts
> 01 * * * *
Le ven. 23 nov. 2012 10:52:50 CET, Mihamina Rakotomandimby a écrit:
> Hi all
>
> I have a '/etc/cron.daily/push-to-backup' script which the content is:
>
>#!/bin/bash
>/usr/bin/rsync [... long options line ...]
>echo "finished pushing to the backup"
>
> Launched manually, it's OK.
>
Le ven. 23 nov. 2012 10:42:19 CET, Philippe Naudin a écrit:
> ...
> rsync ...options... 2>&1 > LOGFILE
> echo -e "finished pushing to the backup \n$LOGFILE"
Nonsense, sorry.
If the output is short, you can do :
LOGS=$(rsync ... 2>&1)
echo -e "finished pushing to the backup \n$LOGS"
I you expect
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
Johnny Hughes wrote on Thu, 22 Nov 2012 20:11:17 -0600:
Thank you both for the replies.
This was my own mistake combined with some depsolving weirdness of yum.
I have 386 and 686 excluded from the repo's because of the greediness to
install all versions of a package. At least in earlier versions
Hi Hakan,
> "UseDns no" doesn't solve the problem because GSS Api needs reverse
> lookup.
good point. I disable the GSS API along with some other things in routine
initial server hardening anyway so this did not occur to me.
> If (do not need GSS Authentication) then
> put "GSSAPIAuthen
On 11/23/2012 06:46 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Johnny Hughes wrote on Thu, 22 Nov 2012 20:11:17 -0600:
>
> Thank you both for the replies.
> This was my own mistake combined with some depsolving weirdness of yum.
>
> I have 386 and 686 excluded from the repo's because of the greediness to
> install
On 22.11.2012 12:21, Markus Falb wrote:
> On 21.11.2012 17:40, Markus Falb wrote:
>> connect(3, {sa_family=AF_INET6, sin6_port=htons(80), inet_pton(AF_INET6,
>> "2a02:180::1::551f:b966", &sin6_addr), sin6_flowinfo=0,
>> sin6_scope_id=0}, 28
> There are 2 destination unreachables sent, one imm
I have not touched my Centos systems for over a year; it is time to get
current to do some new, interesting things.
So of course, 6.3, but which install?
I run a local repo that I rsync from a mirror near me. So I believe I
can use the Netinstall iso, but which one?
How do I determine if I ha
On 11/23/2012 02:24 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I have not touched my Centos systems for over a year; it is time to get
> current to do some new, interesting things.
>
> So of course, 6.3, but which install?
>
> I run a local repo that I rsync from a mirror near me. So I believe I
> can use
On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 14:24 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> How do I determine if I have a i386 or x86_64 processor?
less /proc/cpuinfo ?
>
> If x86_64 how do I determine if I use EFI or not?
I don't know that much, but would the flags from the above indicate?
>
Bill
On 11/23/2012 02:30 PM, Digimer wrote:
> On 11/23/2012 02:24 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>> I have not touched my Centos systems for over a year; it is time to get
>> current to do some new, interesting things.
>>
>> So of course, 6.3, but which install?
>>
>> I run a local repo that I rsync from
On 11/23/2012 02:37 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 14:24 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>
>> How do I determine if I have a i386 or x86_64 processor?
> less /proc/cpuinfo ?
So I need the liveCD to boot to get to this point? Which one.
Oh, my current systems are running C
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> On 11/23/2012 02:37 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote:
>> On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 14:24 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>>
>>> How do I determine if I have a i386 or x86_64 processor?
>> less /proc/cpuinfo ?
>
> So I need the liveCD to boot to
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 02:54:41PM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> On 11/23/2012 02:30 PM, Digimer wrote:
> > On 11/23/2012 02:24 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> >> I have not touched my Centos systems for over a year; it is time to get
> >> current to do some new, interesting things.
> >>
> >> S
On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 21:12 +0100, Radu Anghel wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Robert Moskowitz
> wrote:
> >
> > On 11/23/2012 02:37 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote:
> >> On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 14:24 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> The i386 one should boot on both 32/64bit pla
On 11/23/2012 03:26 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 21:12 +0100, Radu Anghel wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Robert Moskowitz
>> wrote:
>>> On 11/23/2012 02:37 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote:
On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 14:24 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>
Johnny Hughes wrote on Fri, 23 Nov 2012 09:16:41 -0600:
> multilib_policy=best
Perfect, thanks!
I've never heard of this option before. I've been actively following the
list during the first major CentOS 5 releases and I should have noticed it
:-)
I added it immediately to some systems now.
I
On 11/23/2012 08:26 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 21:12 +0100, Radu Anghel wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Robert Moskowitz
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/23/2012 02:37 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote:
On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 14:24 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
20 matches
Mail list logo
