On 11/17/2012 09:46 PM, Steven Crothers wrote:
> DRBD is off topic from my original post, as it is not the correct solution.
That may be, but the link you were given was not off topic, entirely:
"iSCSI is a stateful protocol, there is more to it that than just reads
and writes. To run multipath
I have a CentOS6.3 SAMBA file server. All the users are on a Windows Server
2008 Active Directory Domain Controller and authentication is done using
Winbind integration on SAMBA .
Everything works well except that if someone logs on to the Samba Server, they
see all the shared folders there
On 07/23/2012 10:15 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Fabien Archambault
> wrote:
>> I
>> believe that using this alias is useless.
>
> But the removal of localinstall doesn´t mean an easy to remember alias
> wouldn´t be of use, it´d just mean that the syntax would chan
Hello,
We generally use CentOS for some servers, and so do not use a GUI
interface. However, I have recently installed CentOS 6.3 onto a PC with
KDE. I am familiar with KDE as I use it with Fedora for my work PC.
The problem is that we would like to configure the login screen, so that
it does not
Is the "upstream" Storage Server fully open source, or are parts of it
closed source?
Are the RPMs to build one already in the Centos repo? If not, are there
any plans to offer them?
I am looking for something free to use in Haiti, that will offer redundant
file storage and automatic failover
I usually use a "Desktop" option when installing a new machine. This
gives me all I need for an X session and then I add other packages or
grouplists on an as-needed basis.
I'm putting together a couple of machines that will not have network
connectivity until all packages are installed. Is the
I'm thinking I found the answer in the Centos-Media repo.
sorry, I overlooked that originally.
steve campbell
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 19.11.2012 13:48, Ted Miller wrote:
> Is the "upstream" Storage Server fully open source, or are parts of
> it
> closed source?
>
> Are the RPMs to build one already in the Centos repo? If not, are
> there
> any plans to offer them?
>
> I am looking for something free to use in Haiti, that wi
There are two things you can do,
1. for homes share, add "path = /path/to/home/%S"
2. for homes share, change mask from 0775 to 0700
This may help but may not the way you are looking for.
Banyan He
Blog: http://www.rootong.com
Email: ban...@rootong.com
On 2012-11-19 5:10 PM, Bonnie
We use automounted user home directories on our CentOS 6.3 desktops, and on the
desktops on which we start apache, I have noticed that all 900+ home
directories listed in NIS get (and stay!) mounted. If I don't start apache,
this doesn't happen.
We don't need access to home directories from ap
On 19.11.2012 16:14, Alfred von Campe wrote:
> We use automounted user home directories on our CentOS 6.3 desktops,
> and on the desktops on which we start apache, I have noticed that all
> 900+ home directories listed in NIS get (and stay!) mounted. If I
> don't start apache, this doesn't happen.
> We use automounted user home directories on our CentOS 6.3 desktops, and
> on the desktops on which we start apache, I have noticed that all 900+
> home directories listed in NIS get (and stay!) mounted. If I don't start
> apache, this doesn't happen.
>
> We don't need access to home directories
On Nov 19, 2012, at 11:29, Mike Burger wrote:
> If I may...why are you running Apache on your desktops?
The products we develop need access to a web server, and some developers need a
web server to test with. It's all just on our internal network; nothing is
exposed to the Internet.
Alfred
_
On Nov 19, 2012, at 11:20, Nux! wrote:
> Instead of omitting LoadModule you could try to leave it enabled, but
> specify a different userdir, i.e. not under /home.
There is no reference to /home anywhere that I can find. I assume that apache
just expands ~ to list all home directories and then
Ted Miller wrote:
> Is the "upstream" Storage Server fully open source, or are parts of it
> closed source?
>
> Are the RPMs to build one already in the Centos repo? If not, are there
> any plans to offer them?
>
> I am looking for something free to use in Haiti, that will offer redundant
> file s
Alfred von Campe wrote:
> On Nov 19, 2012, at 11:29, Mike Burger wrote:
>
>> If I may...why are you running Apache on your desktops?
>
> The products we develop need access to a web server, and some developers
> need a web server to test with. It's all just on our internal network;
> nothing is ex
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 7:48 AM, Ted Miller wrote:
>
> If RHSS is not available or suitable, other suggestions welcome. I need a
> file system/server with:
>
> * primary function is serving MP3 files for playback in a radio station
> environment in Haiti
> * if the system goes down all your
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Steve Campbell wrote:
> I usually use a "Desktop" option when installing a new machine. This
> gives me all I need for an X session and then I add other packages or
> grouplists on an as-needed basis.
>
> I'm putting together a couple of machines that will not have
I found quite a bit on google about the problem that "Network" does not
show up under the System->Administration menu any more. All the
solutions seem to indicate that I just need to install
system-config-network-tui, but that doesn't change anything.
I've turn off Network Manager before trying
On 19.11.2012 18:58, Steve Campbell wrote:
> I found quite a bit on google about the problem that "Network" does
> not
> show up under the System->Administration menu any more. All the
> solutions seem to indicate that I just need to install
> system-config-network-tui, but that doesn't change any
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:58:47 -0500
Steve Campbell wrote:
> All the
> solutions seem to indicate that I just need to install
> system-config-network-tui, but that doesn't change anything.
system-config-network-tui is just what it says -- Text User Interface.
Open a terminal window and type:
sy
On 11/19/2012 2:06 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:58:47 -0500
> Steve Campbell wrote:
>
>> All the
>> solutions seem to indicate that I just need to install
>> system-config-network-tui, but that doesn't change anything.
> system-config-network-tui is just what it says -- Text User
On Nov 19, 2012, at 12:02, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Not the way I'd do it: where I've worked, and work, we have apache running
> on servers, so we can guarantee their working ->correctly<-, and the
> developers have directories that they can put things in and test that way.
Well, all we need to
On 19.11.2012 20:00, Alfred von Campe wrote:
> On Nov 19, 2012, at 12:02, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> Not the way I'd do it: where I've worked, and work, we have apache
>> running
>> on servers, so we can guarantee their working ->correctly<-, and the
>> developers have directories that they can
> On Nov 19, 2012, at 11:20, Nux! wrote:
>
>> Instead of omitting LoadModule you could try to leave it enabled, but
>> specify a different userdir, i.e. not under /home.
>
> There is no reference to /home anywhere that I can find. I assume that
> apache just expands ~ to list all home directories
Nux! wrote:
> On 19.11.2012 20:00, Alfred von Campe wrote:
>> On Nov 19, 2012, at 12:02, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> I've also seen gnome want to mount *everybody*
>>
>> FWIW, I also have this issue (mounting all home directories) on one
>> of our servers. But only those running 6.3; the syst
On 11/19/12 12:37 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Ah, no. If it's running GUI, which none of our servers are, it wants
> *everyone* who isn't nologin mounted. Including people who've never been
> on that machine, nor will be.
as an aside... while I don't use automounted home directories anymore,
On Nov 19, 2012, at 15:22, Mike Burger wrote:
> Unless you've removed it from each and every Linux system (desktop
> included), /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf contains the following:
I have removed this on one of our test systems, rebooted, and it's still
automounting all home directories.
Alfred
On Nov 19, 2012, at 15:37, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Ah, no. If it's running GUI, which none of our servers are, it wants
> *everyone* who isn't nologin mounted. Including people who've never been
> on that machine, nor will be.
When you say "*it* wants", are you referring to apache or the GUI ma
Alfred von Campe wrote:
> On Nov 19, 2012, at 15:37, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> Ah, no. If it's running GUI, which none of our servers are, it wants
>> *everyone* who isn't nologin mounted. Including people who've never been
>> on that machine, nor will be.
>
> When you say "*it* wants", are you
His flow mostly likes this,
Clients <-> Web services <-> Storage
Even the web servers will be making the call with another http services
for the mp3 resource. He still needs the storage to put the files.
gluster looks a good one to him. It looks like having most features of
commercial products
recreate the menu item and put the command system-config-network over
there. You can regain your menu back then.
Banyan He
Blog: http://www.rootong.com
Email: ban...@rootong.com
On 2012-11-20 3:43 AM, Steve Campbell wrote:
> On 11/19/2012 2:06 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
>> On Mon, 19 Nov
Hi all,
Just encountered an strange bahavior of frequent 'find' command. I tried to use
find to recursively remove .svn directories from my working place, 'find'
command removed all the '.svn' directories successfully but reported errors on
screen. Any one knows why it shows this behavior?
BTW
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 04:44:31PM -0800, Gelen James wrote:
> [root@centos_58_test_box workingDir]# find . -type d -name '.svn' -exec
> /bin/rm -rf '{}' \;
> find: ./.svn: No such file or directory
[...]
"find" is attempting to open the ".svn" directory to see if there are
any subdirectories to
On Nov 19, 2012, at 16:43, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> For me, it's a gnome thing, not apache.
Well, it's a combination of both. Gnome by itself doesn't do this; it only
happens when you add apache to the mix.
I set the init level to 3 on one of my test systems and rebooted. I also
configured
On 11/19/2012 11:57 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Ted Miller wrote:
>> Is the "upstream" Storage Server fully open source, or are parts of it
>> closed source?
>>
>> Are the RPMs to build one already in the Centos repo? If not, are there
>> any plans to offer them?
>>
>> I am looking for something
Thanks a lot.
with -prune option, now the find command works too.
find . -type d -name '.svn' -prune -exec /bin/rm -rf '{}' \;
From: Stephen Harris
To: CentOS mailing list
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 4:52 PM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] strange 'find' tool be
On 11/19/2012 12:12 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 7:48 AM, Ted Miller wrote:
>>
>> If RHSS is not available or suitable, other suggestions welcome. I need a
>> file system/server with:
>>
>> * primary function is serving MP3 files for playback in a radio station
>> environment
> On 2012-11-19 9:48 PM, Ted Miller wrote:
>> Is the "upstream" Storage Server fully open source, or are parts of it
>> closed source?
>>
>> Are the RPMs to build one already in the Centos repo? If not, are there
>> any plans to offer them?
>>
>> I am looking for something free to use in Haiti, tha
On 11/19/2012 07:25 AM, John Horne wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We generally use CentOS for some servers, and so do not use a GUI
> interface. However, I have recently installed CentOS 6.3 onto a PC with
> KDE. I am familiar with KDE as I use it with Fedora for my work PC.
>
> The problem is that we would l
40 matches
Mail list logo
