Hi :)
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 8:47 PM, Keith Keller
wrote:
> On 2012-10-02, John R Pierce wrote:
>>
>> a server makes very little use of its system disks after its booted,
>> everything it needs ends up in cache pretty quickly. and you typically
>> don't reboot a server very often. why waste S
>> On Oct 2, 2012, at 3:29 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
>>
>> I'm wondering how well (or if) that phone will work with Centos 6.
>>
>On 02/10/12 23:48, Craig White wrote:>
>
> That said, the Galaxy S III has a slot for a mini-SD card and you should be
> able to make it exchange files via the usb cable bu
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Dogsbody wrote:
>
>>> On Oct 2, 2012, at 3:29 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm wondering how well (or if) that phone will work with Centos 6.
>>>
>>On 02/10/12 23:48, Craig White wrote:>
>>
>> That said, the Galaxy S III has a slot for a mini-SD card and you should
Hi,
I'm wondering if anyone here has any experience with the "firstaction"
script in logrotate config files, or more specifically, the behaviour
with a non-0 exit status. The logrotate manpage says:
firstaction/endscript
The lines between firstaction and endscript (both of which must
a
On 02.10.2012 23:29, Frank Cox wrote:
> My cell phone provider just sent me a letter stating that my 3 year
> contract is
> up and they will give me a Samsung Galaxy 3 if I will sign a new
> contract.
>
> I'm wondering how well (or if) that phone will work with Centos 6.
> My
> existing Samsung
>
> The routes-x.y-z.diff is a unified patch containing different parts
> which include support for Dead Gateway Detection as well. However,
> since that is limited to the first hop, it is preferable to have a
> userspace script as you are doing. I also use a script to check the
> accessibility of
On 10/3/2012 7:17 AM, Nux! wrote:
> On 02.10.2012 23:29, Frank Cox wrote:
>> My cell phone provider just sent me a letter stating that my 3 year
>> contract is
>> up and they will give me a Samsung Galaxy 3 if I will sign a new
>> contract.
>>
>> I'm wondering how well (or if) that phone will work
Sounds like an issue similar to what I experienced when trying to force
all outgoing ssh traffic on a NAT'ed network to go through a particular
interface. I've forgot the details, but running the following on the
firewall helped
for f in /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/*/rp_filter; do
echo 0 > $f
On 10/03/2012 08:46 AM, Manish Kathuria wrote:
>>
> I was under the impression that you are running a FTP server inside
> and were facing problems with the incoming traffic for the same. If
> you are primarily concerned with the outgoing traffic through two ISP
> links, please follow the following
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
> On 10/03/2012 08:46 AM, Manish Kathuria wrote:
>
> I was under the impression that you are running a FTP server inside
> and were facing problems with the incoming traffic for the same. If
> you are primarily concerned with the outgoing traffic
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
On 2012-10-03, Rafa Griman wrote:
>
> If it works with you ... I mean, there's no perfect partition scheme
> (IMHO), depends greatly on what you do, your budget, workflow, file
> size, ... So if you're happy with this, go ahead. Just some advice:
> test a couple of different options first just in
G'day,
I have a workstation running CentOS 5.8 with
kernel 2.6.18-308.el5. This workstation needs
to mount a NFS4 directory on a server (mysvr in the
example below). If the computer is running the XEN
kernel (uname -a reports ...2.6.18-308.el5xen),
my NFS4 share is mounted but "ls" reports an er
I have a couple development servers running centos 6.3 64bit that have
LSI 9211-8i SAS2 controllers connected to a SAS2 backplane.these
work fine with SATA hard disks (populated with a bunch of 3TB SATA
drives)...
I'm trying to install a OCZ Vertex3 SSD on each of the two servers to do
som
On 10/03/12 12:59 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> # mkfs.ext4 /dev/sda1
>
> and it hangs at 'Discarding device blocks: 0/58607505' which I gather
> is related to 'trim' aka 'discard'.
and exactly the same behavior with the latest kernel
2.6.32-279.9.1.el6.x86_64 and e2fsprogs-1.41.12-12.el6.x8
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 02:18:13PM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 10/03/12 12:59 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> > # mkfs.ext4 /dev/sda1
> >
> > and it hangs at 'Discarding device blocks: 0/58607505' which I gather
> > is related to 'trim' aka 'discard'.
>
> and exactly the same behavior with
On 10/03/12 2:35 PM, Tru Huynh wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 02:18:13PM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
>> >On 10/03/12 12:59 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>>> > > # mkfs.ext4 /dev/sda1
>>> > >
>>> > >and it hangs at 'Discarding device blocks: 0/58607505' which I gather
>>> > >is related to 'trim
On 10/02/12 2:10 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Nux! wrote:
>
>> >I'd use the SSDs for bcache/flashcache.
> Try kmod-flashcache [1] and flashcache-utils [2] from ELRepo. Still in
> the testing repository but seems to work well. Some testimony and
> additional package by J
On 10/03/12 7:25 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> I'm looking for those, but not seeing them...
never mind. My eyes saw EPEL when you said ELrepo. :-/
--
john r pierceN 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast
_
- Original Message -
From: "James Pearson"
> fred smith wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 05:36:19PM -1000, Miranda Hawarden-Ogata wrote:
>>
>>>I have some clients that run centos6 and I need to have users be able to
>>>access the "failsafe terminal" from the login screen. The old options
20 matches
Mail list logo
