Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
I am still having some difficulty understanding what is going on with
routing on 192.168.x.x.
I have removed the IP aliases from the gateway eth1 so that it only
responds to aaa.bbb.ccc.1.
I have changed the netmask on Host B eth1 [192.168.209.43] to
255.255.0.0 and set its gateway to aaa.bbb.ccc
Greetings,
I run my own email server for some domains I administer, on a centos
vps server with a very small number of users.
The only services are smtp, imap/pop, webmail
Everything was running without problems until this morning. I left
home for 1/2 hours, and when I came back everything had be
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Marco Fioretti
wrote:
> Greetings,
> I run my own email server for some domains I administer, on a centos
> vps server with a very small number of users.
>
> The only services are smtp, imap/pop, webmail
>
> Everything was running without problems until this mornin
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:11 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
> I am still having some difficulty understanding what is going on with
> routing on 192.168.x.x.
>
> I have removed the IP aliases from the gateway eth1 so that it only
> responds to aaa.bbb.ccc.1.
>
> I have changed the netmask on Host B eth
> One thing to check is that the DNS servers in /etc/resolv.conf are
> answering quickly (dig some_name.domain @server_ip).
The server runs no DNS server itself.
I ran dig www.google.it @213.179.193.200 (ie the complete real IP of
my primary dns server as listed in /etc/resolv.conf) and this is
On 09/06/2012 01:58 PM, Marco Fioretti wrote:
> 2011 msec
Pretty slow my dig to the same server ran in 113 msec
dig www.google.it @213.179.193.200
; <<>> DiG 9.7.4-P1-RedHat-9.7.4-2.P1.fc14 <<>> www.google.it @213.179.193.200
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY,
Per: Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
Thu Sep 6 13:55:05 EDT 2012
> A 'route -n' should show you where any destination will head
> on the next hop. On host C, what is the line with the
> smallest matching destination/mask? Likewise, on the gateway
> host where you think it is being forwarde
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 1:09 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
>> A 'route -n' should show you where any destination will head
>> on the next hop. On host C, what is the line with the
>> smallest matching destination/mask? Likewise, on the gateway
>> host where you think it is being forwarded the wrong
sorry, didn't realize I had not sent it to the list too.
I have ran the command again several times, and now it is much slower,
~30/40 msec
-- Forwarded message --
From: Marco Fioretti
Date: 2012/9/6
Subject: Re: [CentOS] centos email server suddenly much slower. What to do?
To:
Greetings,
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 12:16 AM, Marco Fioretti
wrote:
> sorry, didn't realize I had not sent it to the list too.
>
> I have ran the command again several times, and now it is much slower,
> ~30/40 msec
>
Innocent, ignorant, curious ramble:
I understand it has something to do with MX
Hi,
I am trying to install a C6 VM on C6 using the text installer using:
# virt-install -n C6_1 -r 3072 --os-variant=rhel6 -l \
ftp://ftp.nluug.nl/site/centos.org/CentOS/6.3/os/x86_64/ --disk \
path=/dev/VG1/vm_c6_1 -w network:default --nographics \
-x "console=ttyS0" --autostart
/dev/VG1/vm_c6_
On 09/06/2012 08:56 PM, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 12:16 AM, Marco Fioretti
> wrote:
>> sorry, didn't realize I had not sent it to the list too.
>>
>> I have ran the command again several times, and now it is much slower,
>> ~30/40 msec
>>
>
> Innocent,
Per: Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
Thu Sep 6 14:20:43 EDT 2012
--->
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 1:09 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
> OK, there is no better match than the default in the route table
> above, so it goes to the default gateway. I assume that's what you
> want if you don't make th
On 6 September 2012 20:58, Leonard den Ottolander
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to install a C6 VM on C6 using the text installer using:
>
> # virt-install -n C6_1 -r 3072 --os-variant=rhel6 -l \
> ftp://ftp.nluug.nl/site/centos.org/CentOS/6.3/os/x86_64/ --disk \
> path=/dev/VG1/vm_c6_1 -w network:
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 2:04 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> What I wanted to have happen was for all traffic destined for
> 192.168.anything to stay inside the LAN and attached to the specified
> address, while any traffic that originated from 192.168.anything
> destined to anywhere else would route
Well, I seem to be getting somewhere, although where exactly is open
to question.
I did this. I put the virtual interface address 192.168.0.1 back onto
eth1 of the gateway host and restarted the network services. The
ifcfg file looked like this:
BOOTPROTO=none
BROADCAST=192.168.255.255
DEVICE=e
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Marco Fioretti wrote:
>>
>> Pretty slow my dig to the same server ran in 113 msec
>>
>
> yes, >2 seconds seemed high to me too. But what does this mean? What
> can the reason be?
It could be your VM's problem if every operation is slow. 1 gig isn't
much RAM these
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 3:54 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> I did this. I put the virtual interface address 192.168.0.1 back onto
> eth1 of the gateway host and restarted the network services. The
> ifcfg file looked like this:
>
> BOOTPROTO=none
> BROADCAST=192.168.255.255
> DEVICE=eth1:192
> IPA
Hi Arek,
On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 21:30 +0200, Arek Czereszewski wrote:
> virt-install -n test -r 2048 --vcpus=2 --os-variant=rhel6 --accelerate
> -v -c /home/iso/c63mini.iso --mac=RANDOM --bridge=br0 --vnc
> --vnclisten=w.x.y.z --disk path=/dev/maszyny/test
I'm not using vnc but a serial tty (--no
Le 2012-09-06 19:14, Marco Fioretti a écrit :
> Greetings,
> I run my own email server for some domains I administer, on a centos
> vps server with a very small number of users.
>
> The only services are smtp, imap/pop, webmail
>
> however, there is something that is using "much more memory than
On 09/06/2012 11:11 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 3:54 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>>
>> I did this. I put the virtual interface address 192.168.0.1 back onto
>> eth1 of the gateway host and restarted the network services. The
>> ifcfg file looked like this:
>>
>> BOOTPROTO=none
> As a completely different approach to HylaFax front-ends we use
> AvantFax on a dedicated Hylafax host and web-server. This gives
> password protected access to the fax resources, logs all traffic,
> automatically converts incoming and outgoing fax transmissions to pdf,
> and archives and indexe
Many thank's Frank, James and Leonard for your help.
---
Michel Donais
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 09/05/2012 12:22 AM, aurfalien wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Does any one have 802.3ad (mode 4) working on there Centos6 KVM setup?
>
> Of course we are also bridging here.
>
> - aurf
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mai
25 matches
Mail list logo
