Hi,
recently I noticed, that we have some performance issues regarding our
central samba fileserver. Red Hat EL 5.8, samba3x-3.5.10-0.109.
Doing a rsync, scp or accessing a share from a client and copy large
files (e.g. 3 GB ISO), I do get a read / write average about 60 to 90
MB/sec. So LAN and
Dear Friends,
When I am running this command
yum install --enablerepo=milter-manager-development -y milter-manager
*
So I am getting this error Message . *
milter-manager/primary | 7.0 kB
00:01
milter-manager
40/40
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/milte
Hello Jiten,
On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 12:37 +0530, jiten jha wrote:
> yum install --enablerepo=milter-manager-development -y milter-manager
You should probably inform the owner of that particular repository about
your issues. As this is an external repo there is nothing the CentOS
crew can do to hel
On 04/09/2012 07:31, Artifex Maximus wrote:
The first time (16:39:13.653674) client cannot sync to the server but
second time (16:39:43.145984) that was successful even if there is a
'bad udp cksum'. BTW, is it normal? Tcpdump says there was traffic and
sync happened later so rule is OK I think.
From: Michael Hennebry
> How do I set up a subversion repository so
> that svn can use an svnserve running locally?
> I own the repository.
> svnserve -d -r ... runs as me.
> svn mkdir -m 'make trunk' svn://localhost/redeye/trunk
> fails with
> svn: Authorization failed
> There is no request for
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Giles Coochey wrote:
> On 04/09/2012 07:31, Artifex Maximus wrote:
>>
>>
>> The first time (16:39:13.653674) client cannot sync to the server but
>> second time (16:39:43.145984) that was successful even if there is a
>> 'bad udp cksum'. BTW, is it normal? Tcpdump
Hi,
I've just got possession of a Dell PE R720 with 2 MD1200 disk
enclosures.
Both MD1200 are fully populated with 12 x 3 TB disks
The system will basically be a student file-server running CentOS 6.x
serving various size files from small c programs to multi gigabyte
audio and video files o
Hi Tony,
because I suggest just something very general I post off list :)
From my POV as I'm currently facing similar setups with different
hardware rolling back from fine granular setups to simple 'bigger' less
complex configurations. (we do have 6 iscsi storages from 2TB (sun ZFS)
up to 32 TB)
On 09/04/2012 09:06 AM, Götz Reinicke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> recently I noticed, that we have some performance issues regarding our
> central samba fileserver. Red Hat EL 5.8, samba3x-3.5.10-0.109.
>
> Doing a rsync, scp or accessing a share from a client and copy large
> files (e.g. 3 GB ISO), I do get
Tony Molloy wrote the following on 9/4/2012 6:10 AM:
> Hi,
>
> I've just got possession of a Dell PE R720 with 2 MD1200 disk
> enclosures.
>
> Both MD1200 are fully populated with 12 x 3 TB disks
>
> The system will basically be a student file-server running CentOS 6.x
> serving various size files
>
> The second MD1200 will be used to backup the first, using BackupPC and
> for other storage purposes.
>
> As I won't know the storage requirements for the "backup partition"
> and they will probably change over time anyway. I was thinking of
> using LVM for it. So how to partition the MD1200 for
Are these packages still available for RHEL6/CentOS6? If so then
where does one get them? If not then have they been replaced with
something else? There does not seem to be a listing for them at epel.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemail
On Tue, 4 Sep 2012, John Doe wrote:
> From: Michael Hennebry
>
>> How do I set up a subversion repository so
>> that svn can use an svnserve running locally?
>> I own the repository.
>> svnserve -d -r ... runs as me.
>> svn mkdir -m 'make trunk' svn://localhost/redeye/trunk
>> fails with
>> svn:
From: James B. Byrne
> Are these packages still available for RHEL6/CentOS6?
RH only or just missing?
You can grab the source maybe:
http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/os/SRPMS/lsvpd-1.6.7-3.el6.src.rpm
JD
___
CentOS mailing
Suppose you have server A and server B. Server B is running 60
seconds too fast, while server A is accurate. Is there a way to
gradually move server B's time back into sync with server A, without
making a drastic, immediate change to the clock? In other words, we
would like to 'smear' the differ
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Sean Carolan wrote:
> Suppose you have server A and server B. Server B is running 60
> seconds too fast, while server A is accurate. Is there a way to
> gradually move server B's time back into sync with server A, without
> making a drastic, immediate change to t
> This is already how ntpd works. When you first start the service
> (usually upon reboot), it will use 'ntpdate' to do a hard set of the
> clock, then ntpd picks up and adjusts the clock back and forth to keep
> it correct.
My understanding was that ntpd will use "slewing" for adjustments of
les
> What I'm trying to avoid is abruptly resetting the clock from 12:06 to
> 12:05 all at once. Instead we want to slowly turn the clock back that
> one minute, but spread the changes across several hours or days.
I think the "-x" option may be our solution; I R'd the FM and it says:
"...If the -x
On Tuesday 04 September 2012 12:44:26 Götz Reinicke wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> because I suggest just something very general I post off list :)
>
> From my POV as I'm currently facing similar setups with different
> hardware rolling back from fine granular setups to simple 'bigger'
> less complex con
On Sep 4, 2012, at 5:10 AM, Tony Molloy wrote:
> Just remember I'm due to retire at the end of this month so this will
> be my last big job for the Dept. And due to financial constraints I
> will not be replaced. So I will be handing this machine over to a co-
> worker who is basically a Windo
We use a dual homed CentOS-6.3 host for our Internet gateway router.
Its internal nic (eth1) is configured such that the address
192.168.0.1 is one of its aliases.
# cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1:192BOOTPROTO=none
BROADCAST=192.168.255.255
DEVICE=eth1:192
IPADDR=192.168.0.1
IPV6IN
On Tuesday 04 September 2012 19:25:05 Nate Duehr wrote:
> On Sep 4, 2012, at 5:10 AM, Tony Molloy wrote:
> > Just remember I'm due to retire at the end of this month so this
> > will be my last big job for the Dept. And due to financial
> > constraints I will not be replaced. So I will be handing
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 1:34 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
> We use a dual homed CentOS-6.3 host for our Internet gateway router.
> Its internal nic (eth1) is configured such that the address
> 192.168.0.1 is one of its aliases.
>
> # cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1:192BOOTPROTO=none
>> D
On Tue, September 4, 2012 14:34, James B. Byrne wrote:
> We use a dual homed CentOS-6.3 host for our Internet gateway router.
> Its internal nic (eth1) is configured such that the address
> 192.168.0.1 is one of its aliases.
>
per: Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
Tue Sep 4 15:01:18 EDT 2012
The setup is 4 1TB drives running RAID10. I was using the Gnome Disk
Utility to verify the integrity of the array (which is a 500MB mirrored md0
and the rest a R10 md1).
I believe one of the drives is bad but prior to the system going offline it
showed that 2 drives were detached from the array bu
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 2:18 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> On Tue, September 4, 2012 14:34, James B. Byrne wrote:
>> We use a dual homed CentOS-6.3 host for our Internet gateway router.
>> Its internal nic (eth1) is configured such that the address
>> 192.168.0.1 is one of its aliases.
>>
>
> per:
On 09/04/12 12:18 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
> There are presently two subnets on the lan, 192.168.209.0 and
> 192.168.209.0. I believe that the present netmask is correct in these
> circumstances.
um, those are both the same? I assume you meant one of them to be
different?
when you say therre
On 09/04/12 12:18 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
> There are presently two subnets on the lan, 192.168.209.0 and
> 192.168.209.0. I believe that the present netmask is correct in these
> circumstances.
um, those are both the same? I assume you meant one of them to be
different?
You are correct. I
James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> On 09/04/12 12:18 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>> There are presently two subnets on the lan, 192.168.209.0 and
>> 192.168.209.0. I believe that the present netmask is correct in these
>> circumstances.
>
> um, those are both the same? I assume you meant one of them to be
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 3:25 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> On 09/04/12 12:18 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>> There are presently two subnets on the lan, 192.168.209.0 and
>> 192.168.209.0. I believe that the present netmask is correct in these
>> circumstances.
>
> um, those are both the same? I as
On 09/04/12 1:25 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
> I have host A with eth0[aaa.bbb.ccc.A] and eth1[192.168.216.A]
>
> I have host B with eth0[aaa.bbb.ccc.B] and eth1[192.168.209.B]
what are the subnet masks defined on 192.168.216.A and 192.168.209.B ?
> and I have host C as the gateway with eth0 being
per: Nicolas Thierry-Mieg Nicolas.Thierry-Mieg at imag.fr
Tue Sep 4 16:42:57 EDT 2012
> could you show the result of the route command on host C?
[root@gway01 ~]# ip route
216.185.64.52/30 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 216.185.64.54
10.0.0.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 10
On Tue, September 4, 2012 16:51, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
> That should happen directly without C's involvement if the netmask is
> 255.255.0.0 on A and B's eth1 interfaces.
It is not. The netmask on those interfaces is 255.255.255.0.
>
>> Instead it goes to Eth0 on C where it dies as one would
>>
On 09/04/12 2:00 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
> I am experimenting to see if this arrangement is workable. I want to
> know if it is possible to have two separate 192.168.x subnets on the
> same network. Why? I do not have a purpose in mind. I am just
> checking out whether it can work or not.
>
>
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:00 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> On Tue, September 4, 2012 16:51, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>
>> That should happen directly without C's involvement if the netmask is
>> 255.255.0.0 on A and B's eth1 interfaces.
>
> It is not. The netmask on those interfaces is 255.255.255.0.
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 4:00 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
>> That should happen directly without C's involvement if the netmask is
>> 255.255.0.0 on A and B's eth1 interfaces.
>
> It is not. The netmask on those interfaces is 255.255.255.0.
Netmasks apply to (and describe) connected subnets, not i
Am 04.09.2012 um 20:34 schrieb James B. Byrne:
> We use a dual homed CentOS-6.3 host for our Internet gateway router.
> Its internal nic (eth1) is configured such that the address
> 192.168.0.1 is one of its aliases.
>
> # cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1:192BOOTPROTO=none
> BROADCAS
Hi all,
Does any one have 802.3ad (mode 4) working on there Centos6 KVM setup?
Of course we are also bridging here.
- aurf
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
It's been fixed. The drives were ok but nothing would reassemble. The
drives were marked as faulty so I followed the suggestions here:
http://anders.com/cms/411/Linux/Software.RAID/inactive/mdadm
Thanks!
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Jacob Hydeman wrote:
> The setup is 4 1TB drives running R
I'm too settig up Hylafax and found ajhfc to be more user friendly than all
the other cited fax frontend in the Hylafax repository.
Hylafax-Server 6.0.5-1rhel5.i386.rpm
Hylafax-Client-6.0.5-1rhel5.i386.rpm
Centos 5.8
I downloaded and tried to install but failed
yajhfc-0.5.2-1.noarch.rp
Dear Friends,
I have done basic postfix mail server configuration but problem is when I
try to login then it is not taking my name . it is taking full name with
domain name.
My domain name is *"studen.ac.in"*
My user name is jiten when I try to login with my name in a log it is
showing
*" Sep 5 1
On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 21:47:06 -0400
Michel Donais wrote:
> I can't find a place to get rpmlibs(PayloadIsLzma)
Having never heard of your yajhfc program before, three minutes of Google
searching has told me the following:
rpmlib(PayloadIsLzma) appears to be a Suse-ism. So your rpm is for Suse
Li
Dear Friends ,
I have postfix mail server it is in running condition. But suddenly it is
giving me error *Unknown user or password incorrect.
*
when I check log it is showing me
*"Sep 5 10:26:51 student dovecot: imap-login: Aborted login (auth failed,
1 attempts): user=, method=PLAIN, rip=192.168
David C. Miller writes:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "John Doe"
> > To: "Cent O Smailinglist"
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 3:14:29 AM
> > Subject: [CentOS] Is glusterfs ready?
> >
> > Hey,
> >
> > since RH took control of glusterfs, I've been looking to convert our
> >
44 matches
Mail list logo
