Reported by me 4 days ago, but no reply yet. It seams that nobody pays
attention to that!
VN_
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Leonard den Ottolander <
leon...@den.ottolander.nl> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The links under the CentOS-Fasttrack paragraph at
> http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Re
On 08/18/2012 05:21 AM, Vnpenguin wrote:
> Reported by me 4 days ago, but no reply yet. It seams that nobody pays
> attention to that!
>
> VN_
>
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Leonard den Ottolander <
> leon...@den.ottolander.nl> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> The links under the CentOS-Fasttrack par
Am 18.08.2012 00:06, schrieb Bill Campbell:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012, Theo Band wrote:
>> On 08/16/2012 06:36 PM, Bill Campbell wrote:
> ...
>>> + Set up network bridging on the private LAN so that the Windows system
>>>is accessible via OpenVPN connections from the outside world and by
If you are authenticating your CentOS 6 systems using sssd from a samba4
DC using GSSAPI, I'd like to hear from you. I have been able to get it to
work using only cleartext passwords in sssd.conf, and of course I'd prefer
to use GSSAPI.
Steve
___
Cent
Hi guys,
Could you be so kind to trim those quotes a little?
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 14:40 -0400, Cal Webster wrote:
> Both builds work without problems on single and dual-head systems
> here.
> As with all the other tests, I only replaced the
> tigervnc-server-module
> package on each host.
Some
On 08/16/2012 11:06 PM, fred smith wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 08:27:27PM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
>> On 08/16/12 7:01 PM, fred smith wrote:
>>> I'm getting a gazillion of these probes in my firewall logs. I don't
>>> understand what's going on here,... These all look like bootp requests
>>
On Sat, 18 Aug 2012, Steve Thompson wrote:
> If you are authenticating your CentOS 6 systems using sssd from a samba4
> DC using GSSAPI, I'd like to hear from you. I have been able to get it to
> work using only cleartext passwords in sssd.conf, and of course I'd prefer
> to use GSSAPI.
I found t
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 09:20:56AM -0500, Robert Nichols wrote:
> On 08/16/2012 11:06 PM, fred smith wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 08:27:27PM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> >> On 08/16/12 7:01 PM, fred smith wrote:
> >>> I'm getting a gazillion of these probes in my firewall logs. I don't
> >>>
On 08/16/2012 12:34 AM, Bill Campbell wrote:
> Can somebody point me to a HowTO or other documentation describing the
> tools available under the CentOS 5 KVM package to create and manage a
> Windows 7 Pro VM? All my VM experience to date has been the old free
> VMware Server.
Just for informatio
Hi,
The fact that apparently the last tigervnc update from upstream was
missed triggered me to check for missing updates and packages in 6.3.
Here are my results. Sorry for any false positives that might have crept
in, but note that some of the 6_x updates actually are updates and not a
parsing er
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 5:48 AM, Leonard den Ottolander
wrote:
> ftp://ftp.nluug.nl/site/ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/os/SRPMS/tigervnc-1.0.90-0.15.20110314svn4359.el6_1.1.src.rpm
>
> Seems like this update wasn't picked up even though it's two months old,
> and the previ
Hello Akemi,
On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 08:59 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> That srpm is dated 06/13/2011 (from year 2011). The latest/current
> (tigervnc-1.0.90-0.17.20110314svn4359.el6.src.rpm) is dated 11/09/2011
> (also from year 2011). Note also the difference between -0.15 and
> -0.17. :-)
Right, m
* Les Mikesell [08/16/2012 14:23]:
> When I use copy/paste text into a window running vi, if there is a
> single line starting with '#', in the pasted content, it adds a # to
> all subsequent lines and indents each an additional level. Is there
> some way to eliminate this bizarre behavior, prefe
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Leonard den Ottolander
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The fact that apparently the last tigervnc update from upstream was
> missed triggered me to check for missing updates and packages in 6.3.
> Here are my results. Sorry for any false positives that might have crept
> in, but
Hello Akemi,
On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 10:10 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> You may want to rerun the script after including the FASTTRACK repo
> from CentOS. That will reduce false positives.
Heh :) Good catch.
Still leaves:
CentOS: dmidecode-2.11-2.el6
RHEL63: dmidecode-2.11-2.el6_1 Unless dmidecode-2
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Leonard den Ottolander
wrote:
> Missing packages:
> be2net-4.0.160r-3.el6_1
> bnx2-2.2.1.32.269-1.el6_2
> bnx2fc-1.0.10.32.269-1.el6_2
> bnx2i-2.7.2.1.32.269-1.el6_2
> bnx2x-1.72.00_0.32.269-1.el6_2
> cdrkit-1.1.9-11.el6
> clustermon-0.16.2-18.el6
> cnic-2.5.10.32
On 08/18/2012 10:01 AM, fred smith wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 09:20:56AM -0500, Robert Nichols wrote:
>> Those are BOOTP responses from your ISP's DHCP server to clients requesting
>> an IP address. They have to be broadcast because the client does not yet
>> have an IP address. Go yell at
On 08/18/2012 12:06 AM, Bill Campbell wrote:
> I got things installed yesterday, adding a routed network section
> using virt-manager linked to the private interface, eth1. I left
> the default NAT interface as-is.
>
> After rebooting the machine, two bridge devices, virbr0 and
> virbr1 appear in
On 08/17/2012 06:50 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
> This somewhat describes the situation:
> http://www.adminsehow.com/2011/09/gateway-on-a-different-subnet-on-linux/
That still describes a configuration where the gateway is in a local
broadcast domain.
It's impossible to create a route via a host th
19 matches
Mail list logo
