On Aug 11, 2012 2:00 AM, "Alan Batie" wrote:
>
> On 8/10/12 5:50 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 05:24:12PM -0700, Alan Batie wrote:
> >> IPV6_DEFROUTE=yes
> >
> > Not sure where you get that from.
>
> That's not something normally in our configs, I think it was in the
> defa
On 08/10/2012 06:13 PM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just noticed there's a security update for openldap on C6 that's a few
> days old. However my box is not receiving the update. I've checked both
> ftp://ftp.plusline.de and ftp://ftp.nluug.nl. Both have the updates in
> the Packag
Greetings,
I had downloaded c6 64 bits ISO, selected all packages to be installed.
One dependency warning relating to Emacs appeared. I chose to
continue. Unfortunately I was multitasking and did not note down the
package name
Twice this issue appeared -- first time around aborted install due to
installing all packages is very bad idea. many of them may conflict in
installation process or after it.
———
Ashkan R
On Aug 11, 2012 8:41 PM, "Rajagopal Swaminathan"
wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I had downloaded c6 64 bits ISO, selected all packages to be installed.
>
> One dependency warning relati
Greetings,
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 9:43 PM, ashkab rahmani wrote:
> installing all packages is very bad idea. many of them may conflict in
> installation process or after it.
Completely agree.
>> /ducks
>> I know no sysadmin installs everything on a centos box... But then it
>> is just a singl
On 8/11/12, Alan Batie wrote:
> We've been running ipv6 for a year or so now, but some of our newer
> instances (all on an ESX cluster) are not working. It looks like it's
> all of our Centos 6 instances. I'm hoping someone can point me in the
> right direction...
> [27] # cat ifcfg-eth0
> DEV
Hello Ashkab,
Be so kind not to top post and trim your replies.
On Sat, 2012-08-11 at 20:43 +0430, ashkab rahmani wrote:
> installing all packages is very bad idea. many of them may conflict in
> installation process or after it.
The distribution is build by upstream so packages within a release
This was taken out of RHEL in 5 and was to be replaced.
However, I've not seen where, though I've not looked at 6 yet
_
"He's no failure. He's not dead yet."
William Lloyd George
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun..
hi,
firstly, you haven't pointed out what the problem was.
On 08/11/2012 05:19 PM, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
>> installing all packages is very bad idea. many of them may conflict in
>> installation process or after it.
> Completely agree.
I can also confirm that its impossible to install eve
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 07:34:15PM +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> hi,
>
> firstly, you haven't pointed out what the problem was.
>
> On 08/11/2012 05:19 PM, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
> >> installing all packages is very bad idea. many of them may conflict in
> >> installation process or after
On 08/11/2012 07:40 PM, fred smith wrote:
>> I can also confirm that its impossible to install everything on
>> CentOS-6. That is by design, there are functional overlaps that are
>> enforced at the rpm level that prevent you from doing so.
> KB: I assume this was done for some useful purpose, not
I am trying to transport a dd image between to hosts over a cross
linked gigabit connection. Both hosts have an eth1 configured to a
non routable ip addr on a shared network. No other devices exist on
this link.
When transferring via sftp I received a stall warning. Checking the
logs I see thi
On 08/09/2012 12:33 PM, Russell Jones wrote:
> The hardware clock is configured in local time. /etc/sysconfig/clock
> is set to UTC=false and ZONE="America/Chicago".
What other settings are in that file?
The system is treating your hardware clock as if it were UTC. Actually
setting it to UTC is
On 08/09/2012 11:31 AM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> It's another idea from Fedora, the theory, IIRC, was that this way,
> devices would always have the same name, whereas under the method
> that has been used device names could change on a reboot.
The idea actually came from Dell. It's frequently desc
Greetings,
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 12:19 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 08/11/2012 07:40 PM, fred smith wrote:
>>> I can also confirm that its impossible to install everything on
>>> CentOS-6. That is by design, there are functional overlaps that are
>>> enforced at the rpm level that prevent you
On 08/08/2012 11:34 AM, Brian Mathis wrote:
> Capturing history files is error-prone and a very bad way to approach
> this problem. You should instead look into using process accounting,
> provided by the psacct package. You can read about it here:
> http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/howto-log-user-a
On 08/04/2012 07:01 AM, ashkab rahmani wrote:
> i want to share it on network via nfs.
> which file system is better for it?
I have a hard time imagining that you'd get useful information from
cross-posting this to the FreeBSD and CentOS lists. Their
implementations of filesystems are completel
On 08/11/2012 07:30 PM, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 12:19 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> On 08/11/2012 07:40 PM, fred smith wrote:
I can also confirm that its impossible to install everything on
CentOS-6. That is by design, there are functional ove
18 matches
Mail list logo
