Hello,
I was not happy with the power consumption of CentOS 6 x86_64 on a new
Lenovo Thinkpad x220 Tablet and I worked on reducing it. I just wanted
to share with the list one of the changes which gave me the most
significant improvement.
As per http://www.williambrownstreet.net/blog/?p=387, add
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
> pcie_aspm=force i915.i915_enable_rc6=1 i915.lvds_downclock=1
> i915.i915_enable_fbc=1
Interesting as now I'm using RHEL 6.3 on T400.
Would that make the notebook slower?
--
http://linux3.arinet.org
>> pcie_aspm=force i915.i915_enable_rc6=1 i915.lvds_downclock=1
>> i915.i915_enable_fbc=1
>
> Interesting as now I'm using RHEL 6.3 on T400.
> Would that make the notebook slower?
I did not notice any change in performance so far.
(Tested with parallelized, offline, Java build and unit tests)
Dear everyone,
I'm creating a virtual appliance based on CentOS 6.3 that will be
packaged as OVF. Is anyone aware of an existing solution for
post-deployment configuration (hostname, network settings and root
password as a minimum) other than editing config files by hand - I'd
like the process
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Brian Mathis
> wrote:
>> Is any part of this thread related to CentOS anymore?
>
> I suggest death by stoning to anyone who dares to engage into light
> chat about OS history while convers
On 03/08/12 08:05, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was not happy with the power consumption of CentOS 6 x86_64 on a new
> Lenovo Thinkpad x220 Tablet and I worked on reducing it. I just wanted
> to share with the list one of the changes which gave me the most
> significant improvement.
>
> As
On 08/03/2012 01:54 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Brian Mathis
> wrote:
>> Is any part of this thread related to CentOS anymore?
>
> I suggest death by stoning to anyone who dares to engage into light
> chat about OS history while conversation drifts from the orig
On 02/08/2012 22:54, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 08/02/12 12:45 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
>> It doesn't work that way... You may think you bought 8 ip's, but you can only
>> pass traffic on 6... That is how it works... You buy 16, and only 14 work.
>> The
>> first and last address are as Johnny said...
In a moment of epic stupidity, having ran out of space on the root
partition of a server due to /var chewing up the space, I added a
separate drive for the purpose of mounting it as /var
To do so, I mounted the new drive as /var2, cp -R (in hindsight should
had rsync to preserve attributes), delet
2012/8/3 Emmanuel Noobadmin :
> In a moment of epic stupidity, having ran out of space on the root
> partition of a server due to /var chewing up the space, I added a
> separate drive for the purpose of mounting it as /var
>
> To do so, I mounted the new drive as /var2, cp -R (in hindsight should
>
On 08/03/2012 04:22 AM, Deyan Stoykov wrote:
> Is anyone aware of an existing solution for post-deployment
> configuration (hostname, network settings and root password
> as a minimum) other than editing config files by hand
Try sys-unconfig (I think it comes by default on the system). I never
On 8/3/12, Darod Zyree wrote:
>
> Did you rewrite the selinux policy on /var or have you tried disabling
> selinux if you haven't do so already?
Thank you so much!
Turning off selinux allowed me get the system running.
However, after running fixfiles to restore the context for /var, I
still cann
Hello Emmanuel,
On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 18:52 +0800, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
> Turning off selinux allowed me get the system running.
> However, after running fixfiles to restore the context for /var, I
> still cannot boot to init 5, with the choke point now NFS statd.
If you copied a live /var o
On 08/03/2012 11:52 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
> I'll probably have to slowly hunt down the relevant selinux context
> one by one when nobody's screaming about the server being down.
Would restorecon not help get this bootrapped ? and then with selinux in
permissive mode, watch the audit log li
On 08/03/2012 12:20 PM, Birta Levente wrote:
> On 02/08/2012 22:54, John R Pierce wrote:
>> On 08/02/12 12:45 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
>>> It doesn't work that way... You may think you bought 8 ip's, but you can
>>> only
>>> pass traffic on 6... That is how it works... You buy 16, and only 14 work.
Hi,
do you look for something like this?
http://www.zmanda.com/quick-backup-setup.html
Viele Grüße
Helmut Drodofsky
Internet XS Service GmbH
Heßbrühlstraße 15
70565 Stuttgart
Geschäftsführung
Dr.-Ing. Roswitha Hahn-Drodofsky
HRB 21091 Stuttgart
USt.ID: DE190582774
Tel. 0711 781941 0
Fax: 0
[For the archives, since I think Johnny just hit the wrong number key.]
On Thursday, August 02, 2012 10:24:27 AM Johnny Hughes wrote:
> If you want 8 usable addresses (including the Network number, a gateway
> address, and a Broadcast address), that would mean you need at least 11
> IPs in tha
On 08/03/2012 08:54 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> [For the archives, since I think Johnny just hit the wrong number key.]
>
> On Thursday, August 02, 2012 10:24:27 AM Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> If you want 8 usable addresses (including the Network number, a gateway
>> address, and a Broadcast address),
On Friday, August 03, 2012 06:24:46 AM Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
> In a moment of epic stupidity, having ran out of space on the root
> partition of a server due to /var chewing up the space, I added a
> separate drive for the purpose of mounting it as /var
...
This sort of things pops up from tim
On 08/03/12 3:24 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
> In a moment of epic stupidity, having ran out of space on the root
> partition of a server due to /var chewing up the space, I added a
> separate drive for the purpose of mounting it as /var
>
> To do so, I mounted the new drive as /var2, cp -R (in h
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
Hi,
On 08/03/2012 04:25 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> rpm -qa | while read line; do echo $line && rpm --setugids $line; done
> should handle ownerships. Then, reenable selinux in permissive mode, and set
> it to relabel on the next boot.
maybe add --setperms as well
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-09993
Greetings- Sorry for the slightly OT post, although this does concern
implementation on a CentOS 5 or 6 server. :)
Long story short, is it possible to configure Samba such that specific users
are able to have 'normal' read/write access on a share, but not the ability to
create new *folders*?
I
We have a simple configuration so we could get by with this
-A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 22 -j
ACCEPT
-A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -s "SOURCIPADDRESS" -j REJECT --reject-with
icmp-host-prohibited
it doesn't scale well but servies the purpose.
___
Marvin,
You're leaving SSH open to the world with that.
If this is a box behind a firewall, then it's not _as much of a
concern_ ... otherwise you're opening that server up to ssh brute
force attempts.
Your existing configuration is probably set up to drop/reject if
traffic does not match any of
- Original Message -
| Hello,
|
| I was not happy with the power consumption of CentOS 6 x86_64 on a
| new
| Lenovo Thinkpad x220 Tablet and I worked on reducing it. I just
| wanted
| to share with the list one of the changes which gave me the most
| significant improvement.
|
| As per ht
On 08/02/2012 08:07 AM, Paul R. Ganci wrote:
> Any suggestions to registry/policy settings to get roaming profiles to
> act as roaming profiles on a Win 7 Professional SP 1 box? I thought I
> ask here first as I am already on this list. Admittedly this might
> better belong on a Samba forum but
On Fri, 3 Aug 2012, SilverTip257 wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: SilverTip257
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] [SOLVED] iptables rule question for Centos 5
>
> Marvin,
>
> You're leaving SSH open to the world with that.
> If this is a box behind a firewall, then it's not _as much of a
> concern
28 matches
Mail list logo
