Is a guide to installing Centos 6 32 bit that covers such
things like:
Minimal Kickstart example file
Centos 6 multimedia repos
Plus any other things I need to be aware of when moving from
5.8 to 6.2 (I know the latest version is 6.3 but I will
let yum deal with that when I upgrade the install
Hello Keith,
On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 09:25 +0100, Keith Roberts wrote:
> Is a guide to installing Centos 6 32 bit that covers such
> things like:
>
> Minimal Kickstart example file
> Centos 6 multimedia repos
A lot of documentation can be found at http://docs.redhat.com, amongst
which is
http://d
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: Leonard den Ottolander
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Installing Centos-6 32 bit
>
> Hello Keith,
>
> On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 09:25 +0100, Keith Roberts wrote:
>> Is a guide to installing Centos 6 32 bit that covers suc
Hello Fred,
On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 15:10 -0400, fred smith wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 02:05:05PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> > All I can suggest then is tar -tvfz file.tar.gz > filelist, then feed that
> > to find and exec rm {} \;
>
> yeah, I'm working on that. but it doesn't appear to
- Original Message -
| Is a guide to installing Centos 6 32 bit that covers such
| things like:
|
| Minimal Kickstart example file
| Centos 6 multimedia repos
|
| Plus any other things I need to be aware of when moving from
| 5.8 to 6.2 (I know the latest version is 6.3 but I will
| let y
On 23/07/2012 04:40, Fernando Cassia wrote:
Who was the genius that decided that system-config-network-tui should
NOT be part of the base CentOS 6.3 install ??
Not to mention it has insane deps like wifi firmware packages... not
really if all you want to do is configure eth0 from the command
lin
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012, James A. Peltier wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: James A. Peltier
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Installing Centos-6 32 bit
> If you run an interactive installation on a single
> machine, selecting the components that you want installed,
> the partition layout and so fo
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Giles Coochey wrote:
> echo nameserver e.f.g.h > /etc/resolv.conf
> echo nameserver i.j.k.l >> /etc/resolv.conf
Yes I know BUT for that I have to THINK. Screens and input fields ie
type tab tab tab enter type tab tab tab enter are what is known as
"user friendly"
On 26/07/2012 12:34, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Giles Coochey wrote:
echo nameserver e.f.g.h > /etc/resolv.conf
echo nameserver i.j.k.l >> /etc/resolv.conf
Yes I know BUT for that I have to THINK. Screens and input fields ie
type tab tab tab enter type tab tab tab
I'm creating a firewall HA cluster. The proof of concept for the basic
firewall cluster is OK. I can bring up the cluster, start the iptables
firewall, and move all of this with no problem. I'm using Conga to do
all of this configuration on Centos 6.3 servers.
To extend the "HA" part of this, I
On 26/07/2012 02:40, David McGuffey wrote:
> On Jul 25, 2012, at 21:27, "Joseph L. Casale"
> wrote:
>
>>> DNS lookups default to using 53/udp, and only use 53/tcp for zone
>>> transfers. could it be 53/udp is being lost/blocked between this host
>>> and your ns1 ?
>>
>> Unfortunately that is a
On 7/25/12 11:24 AM, "m.r...@5-cent.us" wrote:
>When you say "swapped the entire machine", what did you do?
I have two of them, and thinking it was the hardware on the one, I moved
the hard drive to the second, but the problem existed there, too. That
points to something with the software, but,
On 7/25/12 12:04 PM, "Mogens Kjaer" wrote:
>I've several HP dc7x00 machines, and I've never seen that problem
>with centos 5 or 6.
I do, too. Things are fine on our 7900s, and the 8000-series machines we
have. I'm only seeing it on these two 7800s.
>Do you also see the problem if you boot in ru
On 7/25/12 12:07 PM, "John Doe" wrote:
>Do you have the latest BIOS?
Yes.
>Did you get a CD to run tests (like Insight Diagnostics Offline)?
Yes, I used my copy of the UBCD to run memory and hard drive diagnostics,
and both passed.
---
Mike VanHorn
Senior Computer Systems Administrator
Colleg
On 7/25/12 12:22 PM, "Keith Roberts" wrote:
>Hi Mike. Are you on 32 or 64 bits ?
64. I have thought of trying 32 bit, just to see if it made a difference,
but if it does, that won't help me because we need 64 bits for the
software we're running, anyway.
---
Mike VanHorn
Senior Computer Systems
Hi,
The server is running CentOS 5.8 Linux OS on Dell PowerEdge R710
having raid controller card 03:00.0 RAID bus controller: LSI Logic
/Symbios Logic MegaRAID SAS 2108 [Liberator] (rev 05)
/usr/sbin/smartctl -a /dev/sda
smartctl version 5.38 [x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu] Copyright (C) 2002-8 Bruce A
> smartctl version 5.38 [x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu] Copyright (C) 2002-8 Bruce
> Allen
> Home page is http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/
>
> Device: DELL PERC H700 Version: 2.10
>
> DELL PERC controllers are not supported.
A newer version of smartmontools does. E.g. the one that comes with
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Lars Hecking
wrote:
>
>> smartctl version 5.38 [x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu] Copyright (C) 2002-8 Bruce
>> Allen
>> Home page is http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/
>>
>> Device: DELL PERC H700 Version: 2.10
>>
>> DELL PERC controllers are not supported.
>
> A newe
> >> DELL PERC controllers are not supported.
> >
> > A newer version of smartmontools does. E.g. the one that comes with
> > CentOS6.
> >
> Lars Hecking,
>
> Is it available for CentOS 5.8?
Not to my knowledge. The CentOS6 SRPM may build on CentOS5, or you could try
and roll your own based
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> do not install servers if you are refuse to think
> really!
Why create GUI installers then?. Let's just package a tarball and let
users unpack it manually.
In fact, are you advocating for the removal of
system-config-network-tui ? how about
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:42:44AM -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > do not install servers if you are refuse to think
> > really!
>
> Why create GUI installers then?. Let's just package a tarball and let
> users unpack it manually.
>
> In
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> Unfortunately, according to folks who have more knowledge than I do
> about these things, in later versions of Fedora, and therefore, probably
> the next version or so of RH, just manually editing
> sysconfig/network-scripts will overlook so
On 26/07/2012 15:50, Scott Robbins wrote:
Unfortunately, according to folks who have more knowledge than I do
about these things, in later versions of Fedora, and therefore,
probably the next version or so of RH, just manually editing
sysconfig/network-scripts will overlook some necessary parts
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:55:07AM -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> My point being that if the networking stack is part of the base OS
> install, so should be system-config-network-tui
No. A "tui" is a pretty user interface. It's not necessary for the
functioning nor configuration of the operatin
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> PS: I had forgotten about echo >> ... good enough for saving me from
> the vi madness. (I know, I know, esc i blah blah esc :w but still, I
> REFUSE -it's a matter of principle not to use vi ;-)
How can anyone deal with command lines and
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Stephen Harris wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:55:07AM -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
>> My point being that if the networking stack is part of the base OS
>> install, so should be system-config-network-tui
>
> No. A "tui" is a pretty user interface. It's not
On Thursday, July 26, 2012 10:55:07 AM Fernando Cassia wrote:
> My point is simple: I install the base config. I'm in text mode. I
> need networking to work to install extra packages and begin setting up
> my system, users, permissions, packages, etc. I have no problem doing
> that manually AFTER I
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:10:47AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Stephen Harris wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:55:07AM -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> >> My point being that if the networking stack is part of the base OS
> >> install, so should be system-con
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Even what most people call
> insert 'mode' is a command that takes an optional repeat count: try
> 20i - to get a dashed line.
> Maybe being old enough to have used keyboards without arrows or
> function keys helps, though...
Sorry, I gre
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
> Remember the "E" in RHEL. Es (in my place we have around 40,000 RHEL
> installs) configure networking during the build phase. Our standard
> install doesn't include this unnecessary component.
OK I'm a SOHO with a single server trying to
On 26/07/2012 16:26, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
Remember the "E" in RHEL. Es (in my place we have around 40,000 RHEL
installs) configure networking during the build phase. Our standard
install doesn't include this unnecessary component.
OK
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
>> Remember the "E" in RHEL. Es (in my place we have around 40,000 RHEL
>> installs) configure networking during the build phase. Our standard
>> install doesn't include this unnec
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> BOAH do SIMPLY NOT make a base-install if it does not
> satisfy you? what is there so complicated?
The installer switched to base mode/text install due to 'low memory'.
I just used the default recommendation by Virtualbox for Linux-RedHat.
Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Les Mikesell
> wrote:
>> Even what most people call
>> insert 'mode' is a command that takes an optional repeat count: try
>> 20i - to get a dashed line.
>> Maybe being old enough to have used keyboards without arrows or
>> function key
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> there is nothing wrong in CentOS or Fedora
Of course, in the grand scheme of things, it's not a "problem". A
"problem" is a crashing kernel or buggy drivers.
My opinion after this experience is that it'd help for CentOS to
include system-c
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> So my practical advice is to get a SOHO router that does
> DHCP if you don't already have one, and if you do have one, configure
> it to give out the IP you want instead of fighting with the Centos
> setup.
I agree in principle. But my per
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:39 PM, wrote:
> Wonder if I could configure the *best* text editor ever to run under wine:
> brief.
Brief was nice. Under OS/2 I also used QEdit which could also... mimic
the Wordstar keystrokes. ;)
FC
___
CentOS mailing lis
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> Yes, let's go back to the days of typing the boot code in hex to get
>> the system started. It's all optional
>
> jesus christ a basic network connection is configured
> within 30 seconds wich some
>
> echo "whatever" >> file
Umm, no.
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> My machines usually have 6 interfaces or so, are set up in one
> location, then moved to the production location with the final
> configuration (including IP's) done by operators that are better at
> windows than linux. Sorry if that doesn't
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> So my practical advice is to get a SOHO router that does
>> DHCP if you don't already have one, and if you do have one, configure
>> it to give out the IP you want instead of figh
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
On 07/26/2012 08:05 AM, Steve Campbell wrote:
> I'm creating a firewall HA cluster. The proof of concept for the basic
> firewall cluster is OK. I can bring up the cluster, start the iptables
> firewall, and move all of this with no problem. I'm using Conga to do
> all of this configuration on Cent
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> My machines usually have 6 interfaces or so, are set up in one
>> location, then moved to the production location with the final
>> configuration (including IP's) done by operators
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:44:20PM -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> DHCP gives "initial" convenience, for "long term hassle". (say you
> want to telnet-in to your ethernet enabled media player)
Like my tivo?
host tivo {
hardware ethernet 00:11:d9:0b:c3:a4;
fixed-address 10.0.0.144;
}
O
On Thursday, July 26, 2012 11:42:05 AM Fernando Cassia wrote:
> My opinion after this experience is that it'd help for CentOS to
> include system-config-network-tui as part of the base install.
The question becomes "Does upstream include it in their upstream EL?" If the
answer is yes, it will be
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 04:56:44PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 26.07.2012 16:50, schrieb Scott Robbins:
> > Unfortunately, according to folks who have more knowledge than I do
> > about these things, in later versions of Fedora, and therefore, probably
> > the next version or so of RH, j
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:53:50PM +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hello Fred,
>
> On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 15:10 -0400, fred smith wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 02:05:05PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> > > All I can suggest then is tar -tvfz file.tar.gz > filelist, then feed that
> >
On 07/26/2012 04:44 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> I agree in principle. But my personal experience led me to have static
> routing on my home LAN.
And you chose not to setup networking at install time ? Had you done
that, you would not be in this situation.
A bare minimal install is targeted at pe
On 07/26/2012 04:42 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> My opinion after this experience is that it'd help for CentOS to
> include system-config-network-tui as part of the base install.
Can you be a bit more specific about what you mean by a 'base install' ?
Its not actually possible to get a minimalist
On 7/26/2012 12:01 PM, Digimer wrote:
> On 07/26/2012 08:05 AM, Steve Campbell wrote:
>> I'm creating a firewall HA cluster. The proof of concept for the basic
>> firewall cluster is OK. I can bring up the cluster, start the iptables
>> firewall, and move all of this with no problem. I'm using Con
On 07/26/2012 01:38 PM, Steve Campbell wrote:
>
> On 7/26/2012 12:01 PM, Digimer wrote:
>> On 07/26/2012 08:05 AM, Steve Campbell wrote:
>>> I'm creating a firewall HA cluster. The proof of concept for the basic
>>> firewall cluster is OK. I can bring up the cluster, start the iptables
>>> firewall
On 2012-07-23, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> Who was the genius that decided that system-config-network-tui should
> NOT be part of the base CentOS 6.3 install ??
>
> Not to mention it has insane deps like wifi firmware packages... not
> really if all you want to do is configure eth0 from the command
>
Greetings,
This is my fist time posting to a mailing list.
For the past few days I have been trying to mimic my former windows
workstation with a centos 6.3 workstation at work.
I have gotten really far but am now facing an issue I cant seem to
solve on my own.
My former workstation had vmware f
On 7/26/2012 1:52 PM, Digimer wrote:
> On 07/26/2012 01:38 PM, Steve Campbell wrote:
>>
>> On 7/26/2012 12:01 PM, Digimer wrote:
>>> On 07/26/2012 08:05 AM, Steve Campbell wrote:
I'm creating a firewall HA cluster. The proof of concept for the basic
firewall cluster is OK. I can bring up
It keeps butting in when I try to install map software from Garmin
under Wine. I'm not nearly competent not willing to apply the remedy it
suggests. How do I get to someplace where I can disable it, or at least
set it to permissive?
___
CentO
On 07/26/2012 02:50 PM, Steve Campbell wrote:
>
> On 7/26/2012 1:52 PM, Digimer wrote:
>> On 07/26/2012 01:38 PM, Steve Campbell wrote:
>>>
>>> On 7/26/2012 12:01 PM, Digimer wrote:
On 07/26/2012 08:05 AM, Steve Campbell wrote:
> I'm creating a firewall HA cluster. The proof of concept for
From: Beartooth
To: centos@centos.org
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2012 12:25 PM
Subject: [CentOS] SELinux in CentOS 6
> It keeps butting in when I try to install map software from Garmin
> under Wine. I'm not nearly competent not willing to apply the remed
2012/7/26 Beartooth :
>
> It keeps butting in when I try to install map software from Garmin
> under Wine. I'm not nearly competent not willing to apply the remedy it
> suggests. How do I get to someplace where I can disable it, or at least
> set it to permissive?
>
> __
On 07/26/2012 06:33 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 26.07.2012 19:27, schrieb Karanbir Singh:
>> On 07/26/2012 04:42 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
>>> My opinion after this experience is that it'd help for CentOS to
>>> include system-config-network-tui as part of the base install.
>>
>> Can you
On 07/26/2012 06:59 PM, Keith Keller wrote:
>> Who was the genius that decided that system-config-network-tui should
>> NOT be part of the base CentOS 6.3 install ??
>>
>> Not to mention it has insane deps like wifi firmware packages... not
>> really if all you want to do is configure eth0 from the
On Wednesday 25 July 2012 17:47, the following was written:
> I used dig from the email svr command line with the primary DNS svr up
> and (naturally) it pulled from there as normal. Then I downed the
> primary DNS svr, saw the nagios check fail and tried again. The same
> dig lookup was act
On 07/26/2012 11:33 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> i do not install every day a Fedora/CentOS
> the is a minimal or whatever option
My apologies. I expected you to have done due diligence before posting
on the subject.
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
I
On 2012-07-26, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 07/26/2012 06:59 PM, Keith Keller wrote:
>>> Who was the genius that decided that system-config-network-tui should
>>> NOT be part of the base CentOS 6.3 install ??
>>>
>>> Not to mention it has insane deps like wifi firmware packages... not
>>> really if
Que tal amigos:
Resulta es que no tengo red despyes de instalar centos 6.2,
sigo la ruta: /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/
y no me aparece el archivo ifcfg-eth0
e visto cosas similares de otros usuarios de centos
donde si encuentran ifcfg-eth0 y tienen que modificar el Onboot a yes, pero
am
On 07/26/2012 10:21 PM, Rodrigo Pichiñual Norin wrote:
> Que tal amigos:
>
> Resulta es que no tengo red despyes de instalar centos 6.2,
> sigo la ruta:/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/
>
> y no me aparece el archivo ifcfg-eth0
>
> e visto cosas similares de otros usuarios de centos
>
> donde si
Hi,
I'm using centos 5.8 running as a production system, my system suddenly
crash because the /var/log/kern.log have a huge file size, and make the
disk full.
this is the message from kern.log
2012-07-26T05:36:39.120185+02:00 NL50-ND019 kernel: EXT4-fs: Can't
allocate: Allocation context detail
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:38 PM, Digimer wrote:
> I tried to translate your question, and I think you're not seeing eth0,
> despite /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 existing
Human translator here ;)
He says he does NOT see ifcfg-eth0 in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/
He adds "I've s
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:42 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> He adds "I've seen other users' reports where they DO find a
> ifcfg-eth0 and they end up adding onboot=yes. but he doesn' t get that
> file. He says he has CentOS 6.2 and did the minimal install.
Ha!, just another reason NOT to include s
68 matches
Mail list logo
