On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:40:33PM -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 8:47 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
> > (In my basement I have Solaris 1.1.1, 2.4, 2.5, 2.5.1, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10; all
> > but 2.5.1 are original in-box distributions)
>
> You're the right man, then, whom I should a
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:27:09PM -0400, Karl Vogel wrote:
> >> On 07/24/12 4:33 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
> S> I want the ability to "set the default path". That's all.
>
>It sounds like your best bet would be to change the source for su, and
>just be prepared to reinstall it if/when yu
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Stephen Harris wrote:
> Sorry, no. The only consulting special code I ever used was X25-uucp
> on SunOS 4.1.x
Thanks anyway for replying. I lose nothing by asking every former Sun
employee I run across. :))
I once built a small mini-ITX AMD x86 box mobo with ris
Thanks for the recommendations folks!
--
“Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV”
- Michael Pollan, author of "In Defense of Food"
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 12:24 PM, David C. Miller
wrote:
> LSI 9200-8e
BTW, I read the specs on that and it says it is compatible with 6G and
3G SAS which hopefully means it will work with my Sun J4400 SAS1
shelf, right?
I like that it is a JBOD-only card - that is exactly what I want
--
“Don'
Hey guys and gals,
Yesterday I had one of my scientists kill one of my servers when his
program ran amok and gobbled up all the memory, or forked too many
processes, or I'm just not exactly sure what to be honest.
Is there something I can run manually in cron to look for rampant
programs and kill
Is any part of this thread related to CentOS anymore?
❧ Brian Mathis
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
* Alan McKay [07/25/2012 09:36]:
> Yesterday I had one of my scientists kill one of my servers when his
> program ran amok and gobbled up all the memory, or forked too many
> processes, or I'm just not exactly sure what to be honest.
>
> Is there something I can run manually in cron to look for r
Alan McKay wrote:
> Hey guys and gals,
>
> Yesterday I had one of my scientists kill one of my servers when his
> program ran amok and gobbled up all the memory, or forked too many
> processes, or I'm just not exactly sure what to be honest.
>
> Is there something I can run manually in cron to look
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012, Brian Mathis wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: Brian Mathis
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Oracle tries to capture CentOS users
>
> Is any part of this thread related to CentOS anymore?
Yes - the email address still is ;)
Keith
---
I have two HP dc7800 convertible minitowers that are exhibiting the
following issue: every 5-10 minutes, they will "freeze" for about 30
seconds, and then pick right back up again. During the freeze, it seems
that nothing at all happens on the system; the clock doesn't even advance
(it just picks
Vanhorn, Mike wrote:
>
> I have two HP dc7800 convertible minitowers that are exhibiting the
> following issue: every 5-10 minutes, they will "freeze" for about 30
> seconds, and then pick right back up again. During the freeze, it seems
> that nothing at all happens on the system; the clock doesn'
On 07/25/2012 04:34 PM, Vanhorn, Mike wrote:
> I have two HP dc7800 convertible minitowers that are exhibiting the
> following issue: every 5-10 minutes, they will "freeze" for about 30
> seconds, and then pick right back up again. During the freeze, it seems
> that nothing at all happens on the sy
From: "m.r...@5-cent.us"
> Vanhorn, Mike wrote:
>> I have two HP dc7800 convertible minitowers that are exhibiting the
>> following issue: every 5-10 minutes, they will "freeze" for about
>> 30 seconds, and then pick right back up again. During the freeze, it seems
>> that nothing at all happ
Interesting stuff - thanks again guys. Looks like I can get what I
need right here ...
--
“Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV”
- Michael Pollan, author of "In Defense of Food"
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http:/
From: Alan McKay
> Yesterday I had one of my scientists kill one of my servers when his
> program ran amok and gobbled up all the memory, or forked too many
> processes, or I'm just not exactly sure what to be honest.
>
> Is there something I can run manually in cron to look for rampant
> progra
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012, Vanhorn, Mike wrote:
*snip*
> I am stuck, and can't figure out where to even suspect the problem might
> actually be. There are no errors getting logged anywhere that I can find,
> probably because everything just "stops" temporarily, so there's nothing
> for the system to lo
I've posted to the SpamBayes users list, but there seems to be no traffic
there, so I've had no replies.
If there is anyone here using SpamBayes, I'd appreciate some advice or
at least suggestions
I'm running Centos 5.8 here.
Day before yesterday I decided to look and see if there was a newe
On 7/25/2012 7:36 AM, Alan McKay wrote:
>
> Is there something I can run manually in cron to look for rampant
> programs and kill them?
You appear to be under the impression that you have a technical problem.
What you actually have is a people problem.
Go now, and kneel at the feet of the Bastar
fred smith wrote:
> I'm running Centos 5.8 here.
>
> Day before yesterday I decided to look and see if there was a newer
> SpamBayes than I was then using. lo and behold, there was. I was using
> 1.1a4, and there was a 1.1a6.
>
> so I downloaded and installed it. bad move.
*How* did you install i
fred smith wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 01:26:51PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> fred smith wrote:
>>
>> > I'm running Centos 5.8 here.
>> >
>> > Day before yesterday I decided to look and see if there was a newer
>> > SpamBayes than I was then using. lo and behold, there was. I was using
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 01:26:51PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> fred smith wrote:
>
> > I'm running Centos 5.8 here.
> >
> > Day before yesterday I decided to look and see if there was a newer
> > SpamBayes than I was then using. lo and behold, there was. I was using
> > 1.1a4, and there was a
> but, after this, the Nameservers and DNS are working and solving.
>
> Anything to fix those awful messages?
Hello again,
I.
Does your named.conf contain an entry for rndc-key?
Along the lines of:
key "rndc-key" {
algorithm hmac-md5;
secret "";
};
II.
Does rndc.conf have contain:
Yes! its work! Now I know :-)
Thank you so very much for your help Rob.
This has been RESOLVED.
Lawrence
**
*Please consider the environment before printing this email.*
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Rob Kampen
wrote:
> On 07/25/2012 10:31 AM, chiong lawrence wrote:
>
>> Hello there,
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Warren Young wrote:
> Go now, and kneel at the feet of the Bastard Operator From Hell
> (http://bofh.ntk.net/) to learn how to deal with such matters.
Well I was looking for my LART ... seem to have misplaced it over the years :-)
--
“Don't eat anything you've e
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 02:05:05PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> fred smith wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 01:26:51PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> >> fred smith wrote:
> >>
> >> > I'm running Centos 5.8 here.
> >> >
> >> > Day before yesterday I decided to look and see if there was a ne
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 03:10:44PM -0400, fred smith wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 02:05:05PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> > fred smith wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 01:26:51PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> > >> fred smith wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > I'm running Centos 5.8 here.
> > >>
I'm a bit baffled by this and I'm looking for ideas...
background:
two DNS servers (ns1 & ns2)(64bit CentOS 5.8)
one email server (64bit CentOS 5.8 & postfix 2.3.3)
one nagios server (64bit CentOS 5.8 & nagios 3.3.1)
situation:
- all servers configured to use both DNS servers for lookups
- ns1 se
Does dig use libresolv or read directly from resolv.conf? Also do you have a
timeout configured in resolv.conf or are you relying on the os default?
On 25 Jul 2012, at 21:57, Steve Lindemann wrote:
> I'm a bit baffled by this and I'm looking for ideas...
>
> background:
> two DNS servers (ns1
On 07/25/2012 10:57 PM, Steve Lindemann wrote:
> I'm a bit baffled by this and I'm looking for ideas...
>
> background:
> two DNS servers (ns1 & ns2)(64bit CentOS 5.8)
> one email server (64bit CentOS 5.8 & postfix 2.3.3)
> one nagios server (64bit CentOS 5.8 & nagios 3.3.1)
>
> situation:
> - al
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
wrote:
> On 07/25/2012 10:57 PM, Steve Lindemann wrote:
>> I'm a bit baffled by this and I'm looking for ideas...
>>
>> background:
>> two DNS servers (ns1 & ns2)(64bit CentOS 5.8)
>> one email server (64bit CentOS 5.8 & postfix 2.3.3)
>> one
On 7/25/2012 3:21 PM, Tom Brown wrote:
> Does dig use libresolv or read directly from resolv.conf? Also do you have a
> timeout configured in resolv.conf or are you relying on the os default?
dig uses resolv.conf and no timeouts are configured there. I don't know
there the OS would have a defau
On 07/25/12 1:57 PM, Steve Lindemann wrote:
> Anyone have any ideas for why nagios would have trouble testing smtp on
> the email server when the primary dns goes offline? I'm not even sure
> where to look or who else would make sense to ask the question of on
> this one. I'd appreciate any insig
> dig uses resolv.conf and no timeouts are configured there. I don't know
> there the OS would have a default configured or what it is. Another
> reply indicated there would be a 5 second delay. That seems a bit high
> to me.
>
> I used dig from the email svr command line with the primary DNS sv
On 7/25/2012 3:55 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 07/25/12 1:57 PM, Steve Lindemann wrote:
>> Anyone have any ideas for why nagios would have trouble testing smtp on
>> the email server when the primary dns goes offline? I'm not even sure
>> where to look or who else would make sense to ask the ques
On 7/25/2012 3:58 PM, Tom Brown wrote:
>> dig uses resolv.conf and no timeouts are configured there. I don't know
>> there the OS would have a default configured or what it is. Another
>> reply indicated there would be a 5 second delay. That seems a bit high
>> to me.
>>
>> I used dig from the e
Problem: My network uses the 192.168.1.0/24 network. Since is the most common
network in all of the world it begins presenting problems when I want to set up
vpns, or try to do
other routing.
The solution: Change the network from 192.168.1.0/24 to 172.24.24.0/22. This
is somewhere in the m
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Harold Pritchett wrote:
> Problem: My network uses the 192.168.1.0/24 network. Since is the most
> common network in all of the world it begins presenting problems when I want
> to set up vpns, or try to do other routing.
>
> The solution: Change the network fr
>DNS lookups default to using 53/udp, and only use 53/tcp for zone
>transfers. could it be 53/udp is being lost/blocked between this host
>and your ns1 ?
Unfortunately that is a common misconception.
Tcp is used far more often than "only" as stated such as for size of request
exceeding udp respo
On Jul 25, 2012, at 21:27, "Joseph L. Casale" wrote:
>> DNS lookups default to using 53/udp, and only use 53/tcp for zone
>> transfers. could it be 53/udp is being lost/blocked between this host
>> and your ns1 ?
>
> Unfortunately that is a common misconception.
>
> Tcp is used far more often
40 matches
Mail list logo
