Re: [CentOS] Can't get Grub work on clone of machine

2012-07-22 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 07/15/2012 10:15 PM, Gregory Machin wrote: > # chroot /mnt/sysimage > # grub-install /dev/sda > /dev/sda does not have any corresponding BIOS drive. Typically that error means that "sda" does not appear in /boot/grub/device.map. Your previous system probably used hda instead. Update that f

Re: [CentOS] Oracle tries to capture CentOS users

2012-07-22 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 07/20/2012 08:12 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > And I*love* the chart... never mind that RH changed the build structure > to give Oracle pain, and it hurt us That change affects Oracle because they update and modify the kernel. Since it's not pristine + patches like other SRPMs, Oracle has a m

Re: [CentOS] Oracle tries to capture CentOS users

2012-07-22 Thread Hakan Koseoglu
On 22 July 2012 20:02, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 07/20/2012 08:12 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> And I*love* the chart... never mind that RH changed the build structure >> to give Oracle pain, and it hurt us > That change affects Oracle because they update and modify the kernel. > Since it's not

[CentOS] redirect ssl mailman rpm

2012-07-22 Thread fakessh @
hello guys I encounter a problem with the package mailman and forwarding ssl my precedent conversation to this problem http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users@python.org/msg61411.html mark sapiro was thinking of a httpd problem I call the centos community to provide help me to rewrite the url f

Re: [CentOS] Extracting the window (titlebar) name from a bash script?

2012-07-22 Thread Fernando Cassia
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 3:58 AM, Ron Yorston wrote: > wmctrl with the '-l -p' flags provides a list of windows with names and > PIDs. It's in EPEL for CentOS 6, though not 5. It probably wouldn't be > too hard to build for CentOS 5 if you needed it there. > > Ron Thanks a bunch Ron!. Exactly w

Re: [CentOS] Oracle tries to capture CentOS users

2012-07-22 Thread Fernando Cassia
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 2:33 PM, wrote: > Um, there *is* a free version of Oracle. I thought you meant "free as in freedom" and not "free as in free beer". Yes, probably there is a free - limited - restricted -tryout - development etc version fo Oracle database has IBM as provided of DB2 as well

Re: [CentOS] Oracle tries to capture CentOS users

2012-07-22 Thread Fernando Cassia
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Ken godee wrote: >> Fernando Cassia wrote: > Why don't they just continue to do something more useful > like continue the support for "OpenSolaris"! To be honest, it never had any traction. At least not down here. And it goes back to the Sun days, pre-Oracle. Back

Re: [CentOS] Oracle tries to capture CentOS users

2012-07-22 Thread Fernando Cassia
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Brian Mathis wrote: > Aren't the SRPMs available for OEL? How about an "Indestructible > CentOS" sub-distro? Yes, the srpms are available. That' s completely possible to do :) FC ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.o

Re: [CentOS] Oracle tries to capture CentOS users

2012-07-22 Thread Fernando Cassia
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Craig White wrote: > they want to sell SLA's which they sell cheaper than Red Hat which has caused > a rather sucky side effect which makes it more difficult to produce > customized kernels which would never have happened had Oracle not chosen to > ride the coat

Re: [CentOS] Oracle tries to capture CentOS users

2012-07-22 Thread Fernando Cassia
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 3:31 PM, wrote: > Don't worry, just as soon as Oracle drives RH under, or buys them, they'll > crank up the prices to higher than RH now - I don' t think that would happen anytime soon. AFAIK if you check distrowatch Oracle Linux ranks #50 and CentOS ranks #8. Also, I re

Re: [CentOS] Oracle tries to capture CentOS users

2012-07-22 Thread Fernando Cassia
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 4:33 PM, John R. Dennison wrote: > So for all your ramblings of commercialism these past few posts you > would rather use something free instead of paying? Really? I said that Oracle Database does not interest me, because MySQL / PostgreSQL is enough for my simple needs.

Re: [CentOS] Oracle tries to capture CentOS users

2012-07-22 Thread Fernando Cassia
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Craig White wrote: > >From my experience with Fernando on Fedora-List... Hi there Craig :) FC ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] n00b rsyslog.conf question - how to separate local syslog from network appliance syslog?

2012-07-22 Thread Rogelio
I have several network appliances, and I want aggregate their syslog output for later analysis. Eventually I might think about a Splunk box, but for the interim I'm hoping to just build a CentOS 6 syslog server and have it aggregate everything on it for quick review. I installed rsyslog and am lo

[CentOS] system-config-network-tui not part of base install... wtf

2012-07-22 Thread Fernando Cassia
Who was the genius that decided that system-config-network-tui should NOT be part of the base CentOS 6.3 install ?? Not to mention it has insane deps like wifi firmware packages... not really if all you want to do is configure eth0 from the command line... FC _

[CentOS] 'localyum' alias...

2012-07-22 Thread Fernando Cassia
This alias should be a great default addition to the bashrc... as it helps install packages to a CentOS system from the mounted install CD before you get networking up and running... alias localyum='yum --disablerepo=* localinstall' Does Red Hat care about Requests for Enhancement? or is filing a

Re: [CentOS] 'localyum' alias...

2012-07-22 Thread Fabien Archambault
2012/7/23 Fernando Cassia : > This alias should be a great default addition to the bashrc... as it > helps install packages to a CentOS system from the mounted install CD > before you get networking up and running... > > alias localyum='yum --disablerepo=* localinstall' > > Does Red Hat care about

Re: [CentOS] 'localyum' alias...

2012-07-22 Thread Fernando Cassia
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Fabien Archambault wrote: > Since the latest version of yum obsolete the localinstall option, I > believe that using this alias is useless. I have used yum's localinstall option on my CenOS 6.3 box... and it worked... FC __

Re: [CentOS] 'localyum' alias...

2012-07-22 Thread Fabien Archambault
2012/7/23 Fernando Cassia : > On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Fabien Archambault > wrote: >> Since the latest version of yum obsolete the localinstall option, I >> believe that using this alias is useless. > > I have used yum's localinstall option on my CenOS 6.3 box... and it worked... This opt