Hi All,
During updates I see a number preceding the package to be updated as
indicated in the below example:
1:perl-Module-Build-0.3500-119.el6_1.1.x86_64
^
Does anyone know what does this indicates?
Thank you,
Phil
--
Carpe Aptenodytes! (Seize the Penguins!)
_
Hello Phil,
On Fri, 2012-07-13 at 05:52 -0400, Phil Savoie wrote:
> 1:perl-Module-Build-0.3500-119.el6_1.1.x86_64
> ^
> Does anyone know what does this indicates?
It's the epoch, which is essentially a version override, i.e. any
version of a package with an epoch of 1 is more recent than a ve
Am 11.07.2012 00:58, schrieb Gé Weijers:
> It may not be a bug, it may be that RHEL 6.x implements I/O barriers
> correctly, which slows things down but keeps you from losing data
Which is of course no excuse for not even responding to a support
request. "It's not a bug, it's a feature" may no
On 07/13/2012 06:30 AM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hello Phil,
>
> On Fri, 2012-07-13 at 05:52 -0400, Phil Savoie wrote:
>> > 1:perl-Module-Build-0.3500-119.el6_1.1.x86_64
>> > ^
>> > Does anyone know what does this indicates?
> It's the epoch, which is essentially a version override,
On 07/12/12 06:41, Colin Simpson wrote:
> I have tried the async option and that reverts to being as fast as
> previously.
>
> So I guess the choice is use the less safe async and get file creation
> being quick or live with the slow down until a potentially new protocol
> extension appears to help
Hi,
I'm developing kernel modules right now, and the build times are
starting to get under my skin. As a side effect i'm taking way too
many "coffee" breaks during builds.
So i was looking for a way to build only the stuffs i need for my
platform. Chapter 7 and 8 of "linux kernel in a nutshell" g
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Aft nix wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm developing kernel modules right now, and the build times are
> starting to get under my skin. As a side effect i'm taking way too
> many "coffee" breaks during builds.
>
> So i was looking for a way to build only the stuffs i need for m
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 7:12 AM, mark wrote:
>
> *After* I test further, I think it's up to my manager and our users to
> decide if it's worth it to go with less secure - this is a real issue,
> since some of their jobs run days, and one or two weeks, on an HBS* or a
> good sized cluster. (We're s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hello guys
they are the new features of bind version from back port doors
superior to the current version of centos 6.3
inline signing
it is present
what are the new functionality provides for this update
- --
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/look
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 5:29 AM, Aft nix wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm developing kernel modules right now, and the build times are
> starting to get under my skin. As a side effect i'm taking way too
> many "coffee" breaks during builds.
(snip)
> 3) Is there any way i can get the "Centos specific" patches
Aft nix wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm developing kernel modules right now, and the build times are
> starting to get under my skin. As a side effect i'm taking way too
> many "coffee" breaks during builds.
> But Although i understand the stuffs, this is still a lot of tweaks to
> make that work.
>
> 2.6.32
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 7:48 PM, wrote:
> #1: archlinux? Are you working in CentOS or arch linux?
I'm using CentOS. But the problem was "make localmodconfig" is not
working. I don't see how a question related to "building kernel.org
kernel" relates to distribution, just because the problem was
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 5:29 AM, Aft nix wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm developing kernel modules right now, and the build times are
>> starting to get under my skin. As a side effect i'm taking way too
>> many "coffee" breaks during builds.
> (snip)
Aft nix wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 5:29 AM, Aft nix wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm developing kernel modules right now, and the build times are
>>> starting to get under my skin. As a side effect i'm taking way too
>>> many "coffee" breaks d
Hi all,
I'm a complete newbie in Linux and am trying to get my Broadcom BCM4313
working in my Lenovo S10-3t netbook (CentOS 6.3 installed from LiveCD).
I followed the steps in the wiki, which lead me to ELRepo: wl-kmod. I
followed the instructions there until Step 2:
$ mkdir -p ~/rpmbuild/{BUILD,
ot...@lavabit.com wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm a complete newbie in Linux and am trying to get my Broadcom BCM4313
> working in my Lenovo S10-3t netbook (CentOS 6.3 installed from LiveCD).
> I followed the steps in the wiki, which lead me to ELRepo: wl-kmod. I
> followed the instructions there until St
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
This used to work for me last week
I basically need to install maven2 along with all its dependencies
So I follow the suggestions at
http://www.davehodgkinson.com/blog/2011/04/installing-maven-on-a-fresh-redhatcentos-5-5/
Now at the yum update step, I have started seeing lots of HTTP Error 404.
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 9:01 PM, wrote:
> Aft nix wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 5:29 AM, Aft nix wrote:
Hi,
I'm developing kernel modules right now, and the build times are
starting to get under my skin. As a side ef
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 8:35 AM, wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm a complete newbie in Linux and am trying to get my Broadcom BCM4313
> working in my Lenovo S10-3t netbook (CentOS 6.3 installed from LiveCD).
> I followed the steps in the wiki, which lead me to ELRepo: wl-kmod. I
> followed the instructio
On 13-07-12 19:48, Aft nix wrote:
> I know how yum works. i'm a long time centos user. I'm talking about
> the "centos specific patches" for the kernel.
Afaik they are not CentOS specific patches. They are Red Hat patches
(unless CentOS add additional patches).
> if i roll
> these patches over v
Hello Mike,
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 7:45 PM, SilverTip257 wrote:
> Doug,
>
> It's also possible to send ssh to the background and also skip remote
> commands (perfect for tunneling).
>
> Options for ssh command:
> -f .. background
> -N . skip remote commands
>
I think these were
Hello Aft,
On Fri, 2012-07-13 at 23:48 +0600, Aft nix wrote:
> Now centos distributes its kernel sources
> through src-rpms(srpms). Which is "already patched" kernel source.
> What i want is just the patches. so i that i can roll it over vanilla
> kernel
> and get identical source as those distrib
On 13.07.2012 16:35, ot...@lavabit.com wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm a complete newbie in Linux and am trying to get my Broadcom
> BCM4313
> working in my Lenovo S10-3t netbook (CentOS 6.3 installed from
> LiveCD).
> I followed the steps in the wiki, which lead me to ELRepo: wl-kmod. I
> followed the
When my machine installs (CentOS 6.3) the two network cards are
getting reversed. The PCI card is getting eth0 and the motherboard is
getting eth1.
I would like them in reverse order to keep things the same as they used
to be.
How can I easily tell these two to reverse?
Generate the 70-persis
Jerry Geis wrote:
> When my machine installs (CentOS 6.3) the two network cards are
> getting reversed. The PCI card is getting eth0 and the motherboard is
> getting eth1.
> I would like them in reverse order to keep things the same as they used
> to be.
>
> How can I easily tell these two to rev
>
> Edit the existing one? It does persist through reboots, which is what you
> might expect from the name.
>
>mark
Mark
I'd like to automate- Editing is prone to mistakes. Its not just one
machine.
So I'd like to automate it.
jerry
___
CentO
On 07/13/2012 04:23 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> When my machine installs (CentOS 6.3) the two network cards are
> getting reversed. The PCI card is getting eth0 and the motherboard is
> getting eth1.
> I would like them in reverse order to keep things the same as they used
> to be.
>
> How can I e
Jerry Geis wrote:
>>
>> Edit the existing one? It does persist through reboots, which is what
>> you might expect from the name.
>>
> I'd like to automate- Editing is prone to mistakes. Its not just one
> machine.
>
> So I'd like to automate it.
That's a lot more complicated, since each have thei
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> When my machine installs (CentOS 6.3) the two network cards are
> getting reversed. The PCI card is getting eth0 and the motherboard is
> getting eth1.
> I would like them in reverse order to keep things the same as they used
> to be.
>
> How
On 07/10/2012 08:16 AM, mcclnx mcc wrote:
> I unmount file system but can not delete LV. It say "in use".
'lsof' should tell you what has the device open.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 07/08/2012 08:47 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> There are other Xen-based virtualization solutions out there aswell with full
> support.
That's true, but I'm guessing that a lot of people on this list are here
specifically because they're not paying for support.
Whether that's true or not, if
On 07/11/2012 12:22 AM, Eric Viseur wrote:
> To ensure there are no interference with the monitor interface, I set
> iptables to drop all the outbound traffic on eth1 and httpd in bound to the
> IP address of eth0, but I randomly become unable to contact the webserver;
...
> Any clues why this is
On 07/14/2012 12:01 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 07/10/2012 08:16 AM, mcclnx mcc wrote:
>> I unmount file system but can not delete LV. It say "in use".
>
> 'lsof' should tell you what has the device open.
This might not help though if there are kpartx maps linked to that volume.
In that case
Hi
Is python 2.7 available in CentOS 5.8 repos?
Regards
Kaushal
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 07/13/2012 10:10 PM, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is python 2.7 available in CentOS 5.8 repos?
>
> Regards
>
> Kaushal
It's not available in any centos repo. Red Hat doesn't update the
version of anything in Enterprise Linux, beyond bug and security fixes.
CentOS being binary compatible f
36 matches
Mail list logo
