Re: [CentOS] FreeIPA on Centos 6

2012-06-27 Thread James Hogarth
> Is there a HOWTO for this somewhere? Sounds like a very useful setup All the docs needed to set up that bit can be found on docs.redhat.com ... the identity management guide in the rhel6 section. I've written some more advanced guides on the freeipa wiki (look at how tos under documentation) co

[CentOS] How to handel smtp to public servers

2012-06-27 Thread Götz Reinicke
Hi, we do have some subnetworks for private computers, which are allowed to use there public smtp servers like msn, web.de or whatever with the users private accounts. All our own computers have to send mail trough our mailserver with user authentication. From time to time we are faced with the

Re: [CentOS] How to handel smtp to public servers

2012-06-27 Thread Fajar Priyanto
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Götz Reinicke wrote: > Hi, > > we do have some subnetworks for private computers, which are allowed to > use there public smtp servers like msn, web.de or whatever with the > users private accounts. > > All our own computers have to send mail trough our mailserver

Re: [CentOS] FreeIPA on Centos 6

2012-06-27 Thread Natxo Asenjo
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:39 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > > Named segfaulted here and there, and when the master instance failed, > > takeover didn't work for whatever reason. > > > > I have four IPAs replicating together across two DCs with full DNS and CA > integration plus using it for sudo manag

Re: [CentOS] FreeIPA on Centos 6

2012-06-27 Thread Boris Epstein
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 2:39 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > > Named segfaulted here and there, and when the master instance failed, > > takeover didn't work for whatever reason. > > > > I have four IPAs replicating together across two DCs with full DNS and CA > integration plus using it for sudo manag

Re: [CentOS] How to handel smtp to public servers

2012-06-27 Thread Götz Reinicke
Am 27.06.12 10:29, schrieb Fajar Priyanto: > On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Götz Reinicke > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> we do have some subnetworks for private computers, which are allowed to >> use there public smtp servers like msn, web.de or whatever with the >> users private accounts. >> >> All our

Re: [CentOS] FreeIPA on Centos 6

2012-06-27 Thread Natxo Asenjo
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Boris Epstein wrote: > On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 2:39 AM, James Hogarth >wrote: > > > > Named segfaulted here and there, and when the master instance failed, > > > takeover didn't work for whatever reason. > > > > > > > I have four IPAs replicating together across

Re: [CentOS] FreeIPA on Centos 6

2012-06-27 Thread James Hogarth
> > datacenters? > Bingo ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] How to handel smtp to public servers

2012-06-27 Thread Fajar Priyanto
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 5:15 PM, Götz Reinicke wrote: > Am 27.06.12 10:29, schrieb Fajar Priyanto: >> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Götz Reinicke >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> we do have some subnetworks for private computers, which are allowed to >>> use there public smtp servers like msn, web.de

Re: [CentOS] How to handel smtp to public servers

2012-06-27 Thread John R Pierce
On 06/27/12 2:15 AM, Götz Reinicke wrote: > Hi, thanks for your suggestion. But for the mentioned clients thats not > possible. :/ (For our own we do exactly as you suggest :) ) > > We do have about 100th of freelancers 'flying in and out' of our academy > which we cant 'restrict' by forcing tham t

[CentOS] yum --disablerepo=\*

2012-06-27 Thread hadi motamedi
Dear All To install gimp from the install media on my centos 6.2 , I found the install media from the output of #df command and modified the baseurl inside the /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Media.repo to point to the correct media then issued : #yum --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=c6-media install gimp But

Re: [CentOS] yum --disablerepo=\*

2012-06-27 Thread Mogens Kjaer
On 06/27/2012 12:26 PM, hadi motamedi wrote: > But it is unsuccessful. Please be a little more specific. What error message do you get? Mogens -- Mogens Kjaer, m...@lemo.dk http://www.lemo.dk ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.cen

Re: [CentOS] yum --disablerepo=\*

2012-06-27 Thread hadi motamedi
On 6/27/12, Mogens Kjaer wrote: > On 06/27/2012 12:26 PM, hadi motamedi wrote: >> But it is unsuccessful. > > Please be a little more specific. > > What error message do you get? > > Mogens > > -- > Mogens Kjaer, m...@lemo.dk > http://www.lemo.dk > ___ >

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 bridging problem.

2012-06-27 Thread Rafał Radecki
Yes, it works well, no problems then. Best regards, Rafal, 2012/6/26 Gordon Messmer : > On 06/26/2012 08:51 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: >> Are you absolutely sure that the switch port connected to eth0 is >> configured to deliver tagged packets for VLAN 20 (and that the ping >> source is also on th

Re: [CentOS] XFS-in-a-file

2012-06-27 Thread Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
On 06/27/2012 05:04 AM, Boris Epstein wrote: > Hello listmates, > > Has anybody attempted to run an XFS in a file mounted via -o loop? The file > size is about 20 TB and it resides in a larger XFS filesystem residing on a > disk. That filesystem's size is about 25 TB. What sort of degradation > sh

[CentOS] dhclient-eth0.conf question

2012-06-27 Thread Jerry Geis
I have the line: request tftp-server-name; in my centos 6.2 dhclient-eth0.conf file If the tftp-server-name is given by the DHCP server everything is fine. however, if it is NOT given the client seems to error out and does not get an address and is not on the network. I then take the line out and

Re: [CentOS] yum --disablerepo=\*

2012-06-27 Thread hadi motamedi
On 6/27/12, Mogens Kjaer wrote: > On 06/27/2012 12:26 PM, hadi motamedi wrote: >> But it is unsuccessful. > > Please be a little more specific. > > What error message do you get? > > Mogens > > -- > Mogens Kjaer, m...@lemo.dk > http://www.lemo.dk > ___ >

Re: [CentOS] How to handel smtp to public servers

2012-06-27 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Am 27.06.2012 11:15, schrieb Götz Reinicke: > Am 27.06.12 10:29, schrieb Fajar Priyanto: >> 1. Many malware have their own smtp and can send spam directly. >> To overcome this, block port tcp 25 on your gateway, and only allow >> your mailserver. > Hi, thanks for your suggestion. But for the ment

Re: [CentOS] How to handel smtp to public servers - done

2012-06-27 Thread Götz Reinicke
Am 27.06.12 16:08, schrieb Tilman Schmidt: > Am 27.06.2012 11:15, schrieb Götz Reinicke: >> Am 27.06.12 10:29, schrieb Fajar Priyanto: > >>> 1. Many malware have their own smtp and can send spam directly. >>> To overcome this, block port tcp 25 on your gateway, and only allow >>> your mailserver.

Re: [CentOS] How to handel smtp to public servers - done

2012-06-27 Thread Götz Reinicke
Am 27.06.12 16:08, schrieb Tilman Schmidt: > Am 27.06.2012 11:15, schrieb Götz Reinicke: >> Am 27.06.12 10:29, schrieb Fajar Priyanto: > >>> 1. Many malware have their own smtp and can send spam directly. >>> To overcome this, block port tcp 25 on your gateway, and only allow >>> your mailserver.

Re: [CentOS] How to handel smtp to public servers - done

2012-06-27 Thread m . roth
Götz Reinicke wrote: > Am 27.06.12 16:08, schrieb Tilman Schmidt: >> Am 27.06.2012 11:15, schrieb Götz Reinicke: >>> Am 27.06.12 10:29, schrieb Fajar Priyanto: >> 1. Many malware have their own smtp and can send spam directly. To overcome this, block port tcp 25 on your gateway, and only

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 88, Issue 16

2012-06-27 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ..

[CentOS] unixODBC Centos 5 Testing version

2012-06-27 Thread Tom Bishop
Trying to get a later version of the unixODBC RPM that is in Centos 5, I read in some posting that unixODBC.x86_64 2.2.12-1.el5s2 was in the testing repo but I was unable to locate it, currently it appears that we are runningunixODBC-2.2.11-7.1. I have looked in the Centos 5 Testing repo but do no

[CentOS] Excellent 6.3 QA Status Updates

2012-06-27 Thread Paul Heinlein
Jeff Sheltren has been providing timely and clear updates about the status of the 6.3 release: http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/ They're much appreciated! Thank you very, very much. -- Paul Heinlein heinl...@madboa.com 45°38' N, 122°6' W___ CentOS maili

Re: [CentOS] unixODBC Centos 5 Testing version

2012-06-27 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 06/27/2012 11:18 AM, Tom Bishop wrote: > Trying to get a later version of the unixODBC RPM that is in Centos 5, I > read in some posting that unixODBC.x86_64 2.2.12-1.el5s2 was in the testing > repo but I was unable to locate it, currently it appears that we are > runningunixODBC-2.2.11-7.1. I

Re: [CentOS] Excellent 6.3 QA Status Updates

2012-06-27 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 06/27/2012 01:09 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote: > Jeff Sheltren has been providing timely and clear updates about the > status of the 6.3 release: > > http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/ > > They're much appreciated! Thank you very, very much. Those updates are even correct ... good job Jeff :) We are ma

Re: [CentOS] unixODBC Centos 5 Testing version

2012-06-27 Thread Tom Bishop
-snip- > ftp://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/RHWAS/SRPMS/ > > The latest version available is: > > > ftp://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/RHWAS/SRPMS/unixODBC-2.2.12-8.el5s2.src.rpm > > I am not sure I would use the packages from that repo however ... for >

Re: [CentOS] How to handel smtp to public servers - done

2012-06-27 Thread Scott Silva
on 6/27/2012 7:26 AM Götz Reinicke spake the following: > Am 27.06.12 16:08, schrieb Tilman Schmidt: >> Am 27.06.2012 11:15, schrieb Götz Reinicke: >>> Am 27.06.12 10:29, schrieb Fajar Priyanto: >> 1. Many malware have their own smtp and can send spam directly. To overcome this, block por

Re: [CentOS] How to handel smtp to public servers - done

2012-06-27 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 6/27/12, Götz Reinicke wrote: > Long story short: I advised the use of port 587 two hours ago. > > FYI since than I had 169 outgoing connections to port 20 and 1 to 587. :) Seriously, just force them. I got so tired of one particular app/mail server that keep getting blacklisted because of laz