On 6/19/2012 2:31 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> But now I'm seeing the same from Azerbaijan, and France, and elsewhere.
> Two questions: first, are other folks seeing this? and second, I can't
> imagine malware this stupid, to keep hitting the same sites over and over
> when it's not found, rather
Just fyi, since yesterday evening RHEL 6.3 is available on rhn, but I
see no announcement yet.
[root@rhel6-test ~]# uname -a
Linux rhel6-test 2.6.32-279.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Jun 13 18:24:36 EDT
2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
[root@rhel6-test ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release
Red Hat Enterprise L
On 19/06/12 23:59, Keith Roberts wrote:
> I'm running Centos 5.7 32 bit with Firefox 10.0.5 ESR
>
> Not sure if this has been mentioned on the list yet, but the
> latest version of Adobe flash-plugin 11.2.202 has a bug
> which causes it to hang and not play SWF files.
>
> I've been pulling my hair
On 2012-06-20 02:11, Diego Sanchez wrote:
> find /whe/re -mtime +2 -exec echo {} \;
>
> If you get "Argument list too long" error, you can use
>
> find . -name "*" -print | xargs rm
>
Be very careful using that line!
If you have files or directories with whitespace or other special items
in the
Am 20.06.2012 12:07, schrieb Ned Slider:
> On 19/06/12 23:59, Keith Roberts wrote:
>> I finally found the answer here:
>> https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1080414
>>
>> I have downgraded the flash-plugin now to version 10.3.183
>> from rpmforge repo. It works fine now :)
>>
>> I've also
On 20/06/12 11:39, Rainer Traut wrote:
> Am 20.06.2012 12:07, schrieb Ned Slider:
>> On 19/06/12 23:59, Keith Roberts wrote:
>>>
>>> I've also added exclude=flash-plugin to the end
>>> of /etc/yum.conf file, to make sure this does not get
>>> upgraded again.
>>>
>>
>> That's a bad idea. Unpatched c
On Jun 20, 2012, at 2:18 AM, "Hugh E Cruickshank" wrote:
> Thanks for all the responses and suggestions. I have been doing some
> more research and I believe that it may be possible to go 64-bit. I
> am going to leave this for now and have another look at it in the
> morning when I am, hopefully,
Everyone,
Most of the time I am over my head in trying to troubleshoot problems.
However, after reading manuals, man pages, and getting advice from this
list I have been able to work my way through difficulties, and at the
end, I usually have a better understanding of what 'is going on'. I can
on
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> I have been chasing a problem with a pci-e TrendNet(TEG-ECTX) gigabit
> card. After adding the card to a machine with a new Centos 6.2 install
> and naming it 'eth4' it works well for 6 to 12 hours and then fails.
> The failure is characterized by dropping its connection
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> I have been chasing a problem with a pci-e TrendNet(TEG-ECTX) gigabit
> card. After adding the card to a machine with a new Centos 6.2 install
> and naming it 'eth4' it works well for 6 to 12 hours and then fails.
> The failure is characterized by dropping its connection
On 6/20/2012 10:27 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>
>> I have been chasing a problem with a pci-e TrendNet(TEG-ECTX) gigabit
>> card. After adding the card to a machine with a new Centos 6.2 install
>> and naming it 'eth4' it works well for 6 to 12 hours and then fails.
>>
Greg,
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>> Some additional information that may be useful. The TrendNet card is
>> the second TrendNet card I have used. The first card had the same
>> symptoms, and I deduced the card was bad, and purchased another one. The
>> symptoms are the sa
John Hinton wrote:
> On 6/20/2012 10:27 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>> Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>>
>>> I have been chasing a problem with a pci-e TrendNet(TEG-ECTX) gigabit
>>> card. After adding the card to a machine with a new Centos 6.2 install
> If you are having to fully 'cold boot' the syst
>> Some additional information that may be useful. The TrendNet card is
>> the second TrendNet card I have used. The first card had the same
>> symptoms, and I deduced the card was bad, and purchased another one. The
>> symptoms are the same with the second card.
>
> Several questions: do you h
> Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>
>> I have been chasing a problem with a pci-e TrendNet(TEG-ECTX) gigabit
>> card. After adding the card to a machine with a new Centos 6.2 install
>> and naming it 'eth4' it works well for 6 to 12 hours and then fails.
>> The failure is characterized by dropping its co
Greg,
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>
>>> Some additional information that may be useful. The TrendNet card is
>>> the second TrendNet card I have used. The first card had the same
>>> symptoms, and I deduced the card was bad, and purchased another one.
>>> The symptoms are the same with the second c
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>
>>> Some additional information that may be useful. The TrendNet card is
>>> the second TrendNet card I have used. The first card had the same
>>> symptoms, and I deduced the card was bad, and purchased another one.
>>> The symptoms are the same with the second card.
>>
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>>
Some additional information that may be useful. The TrendNet card is
the second TrendNet card I have used. The first card had the same
symptoms, and I deduced the card was bad, and purchased another one.
The symptoms are th
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
On 6/20/2012 11:13 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>> Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>>
>>> I have been chasing a problem with a pci-e TrendNet(TEG-ECTX) gigabit
>>> card. After adding the card to a machine with a new Centos 6.2 install
>>> and naming it 'eth4' it works well for 6 to 12 hours and then fails
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Arun Khan wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 1:00 AM, wrote:
>
> snip
>
>> For one thing, edit grub.conf and get *rid* of that idiot rhgb and quiet,
>> so you can actually see what's happening. Sounds to me as though it's
>> trying to switch root to a re
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>>
Some additional information that may be useful. The TrendNet card is
the second TrendNet card I have used. The first card had the same
symptoms, and I deduced the card was bad, and purchased another one.
The symptoms are th
On 6/20/2012 11:13 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>> Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>>
>>> I have been chasing a problem with a pci-e TrendNet(TEG-ECTX) gigabit
>>> card. After adding the card to a machine with a new Centos 6.2 install
>>> and naming it 'eth4' it works well for 6 to 12 hours and then fails
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012, Ned Slider wrote:
*snip*
>>> That's a bad idea. Unpatched critical vulnerabilities in Flash (along
>>> with Java) is one of the most likely routes of infection of your machine
>>> and not updating it is asking for trouble.
>>
>>
>> In general yes, but afaik flash player 10.3 is
On 6/20/2012 9:34 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>
> I have been chasing a problem with a pci-e TrendNet(TEG-ECTX) gigabit
> card. After adding the card to a machine with a new Centos 6.2 install
> and naming it 'eth4' it works well for 6 to 12 hours and then fails.
Try moving the network card to a
On 6/20/2012 12:31 PM, Keith Roberts wrote:
>
> Is there not a free alternative to Adobe's flash plugin
> please?
>
I haven't tried them myself, but I think both Gnash and Lightspark aim
to be open source replacements for Adobe Flash. I think one of them
even works well enough to play YouTube v
Arun Khan wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Arun Khan wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 1:00 AM, wrote:
>>
>> snip
>>
>>> For one thing, edit grub.conf and get *rid* of that idiot rhgb and
>>> quiet,
>>> edit the kernel line in grub, and add rdshell at the end, so you boot
>>
On Jun 18, 2012, at 5:55 PM, Woodchuck wrote:
[snipped swap/pagefile list of statements]
> Thanks to the list for any answers!
Nothing in your list was phrased as a question. What are you trying to
determine? If the list of statements was accurate?
Nate
___
On 6/20/2012 11:09 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> That's interesting. Here are the log entries for the previous card as
> well as the eth4 that is currently installed.
>
> # PCI device 0x10ec:0x8168 (r8169)
> SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*",
> ATTR{address}=="00:e0:b3:10:f6:81", ATT
On 06/20/12 8:44 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> 01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
> RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller (rev ff)
pure unmitigated junk.
--
john r pierceN 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Chris Beattie wrote:
> On 6/20/2012 9:34 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>>
>> I have been chasing a problem with a pci-e TrendNet(TEG-ECTX) gigabit
>> card. After adding the card to a machine with a new Centos 6.2 install
>> and naming it 'eth4' it works well for 6
On 06/20/12 11:17 AM, Dale Dellutri wrote:
> Or it could mean that the PCI-e slots are not providing enough power
> for this card, or the slots are specialized to run only certain types of
> cards. What motherboard does the OP have?
more likely, it means once again Fry's is selling junk that belo
On 06/20/12 11:17 AM, Dale Dellutri wrote:
> Or it could mean that the PCI-e slots are not providing enough power
> for this card, or the slots are specialized to run only certain types of
> cards. What motherboard does the OP have?
more likely, it means once again Fry's is selling junk that belo
Kernel 2.6.18-308.8.2.el5
I recently experienced an odd problem with a host at our warm-site
location. The facility we use suffered an hvac failure during
elevated ambient temperatures (30C+) on Monday past and the equipment
room reportedly cooked for some hours. It was sufficient that our
equip
James B. Byrne wrote:
> Kernel 2.6.18-308.8.2.el5
>
> I recently experienced an odd problem with a host at our warm-site
> location. The facility we use suffered an hvac failure during
> elevated ambient temperatures (30C+) on Monday past and the equipment
> room reportedly cooked for some hours.
On 06/20/12 12:21 PM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> I am being persuaded that you are right. I'll have to look at the
> mother board to answer Dale's question; the machine and the nic card
> came from Fry's. I have had pretty good luck with Fry's in the past,
> but this has turned out to be a real pa
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 06/20/12 12:21 PM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>> I am being persuaded that you are right. I'll have to look at the
>> mother board to answer Dale's question; the machine and the nic card
>> came from Fry's. I have had pretty good luck with Fry's in the past,
>> but this has
Greetings all, newbie to CentOS here. Also newbie to 64 bit installs.
Package Manager problem:
I found a yumex, which is not part of the 64 bit install, but it wants a
way older version of python-2.4 whereas we have 2.6.6-something after the
post install upgrade.
1st Question:
Is there anythi
On 20/06/12 17:31, Keith Roberts wrote:
>
> Does anybody have the latest flash plugin 11.2. working on
> Centos 5.7 32 bit please?
>
I have the latest 32-bit flash-plugin from the Adobe repo installed and
running on 64-bit 5.8 (latest) with 32-bit Firefox from the distro (I
run 32-bit FF and plu
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 10:57 PM, wrote:
> Arun Khan wrote:
>> Reboot the system with disk1 removed, the kernel boots, the 'md'
>> driver tries to bind sda. At this point the systems seems to hang
>> for a few seconds and then 'dracut' reports that it cannot find
>> /dev/md_dop1 (the root part
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012, Ned Slider wrote:
> To: centos@centos.org
> From: Ned Slider
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Bug in Latest Adobe Flash Plugin
>
> On 20/06/12 17:31, Keith Roberts wrote:
>>
>> Does anybody have the latest flash plugin 11.2. working on
>> Centos 5.7 32 bit please?
>>
>
> I have the l
On Jun 20, 2012, at 1:59 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> I found a yumex, which is not part of the 64 bit install, but it wants a
> way older version of python-2.4 whereas we have 2.6.6-something after the
> post install upgrade.
>
> 1st Question:
> Is there anything that can be done about this? Or
On Wednesday 20 June 2012 17:08:11 Nate Duehr did opine:
> On Jun 20, 2012, at 1:59 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > I found a yumex, which is not part of the 64 bit install, but it wants
> > a way older version of python-2.4 whereas we have 2.6.6-something
> > after the post install upgrade.
> >
> > 1
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> I'm getting close to that in N. Central WV, phone and internet are on the
> local cable, getting about 385k/sec dl speeds on average. But I have kept
> my own email corpus here since 1998, over 7Gb of it now, and old, probably
> bad habits
On Wednesday, June 20, 2012, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>
> I think google/gmail gives you 10 gigs for free these days. Or at the
> cost of ignoring the ads on the right side if you use the web
> interface, but you can use imap if you want. Before they offered imap
> I used to use fetchmail to pull to
I got a spam today (from a yahoo server, surprise!) with nothing but a
single link.
http:// 2927755261/
I separated the http so it would not be a link in your email... suggest
not going to it without proper measures.
it takes you to a record search site.
When I look up this number block her
On 6/20/2012 11:21 PM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
> I got a spam today (from a yahoo server, surprise!) with nothing but a
> single link.
>
> http:// 2927755261/
> I separated the http so it would not be a link in your email... suggest
> not going to it without proper measures.
> it takes you to a reco
On Wednesday 20 June 2012, Bob Hoffman wrote:
> I got a spam today (from a yahoo server, surprise!) with nothing but
> a single link.
>
> http:// 2927755261/
2927755261 in hexadecimal is AE81FFFD. If you change this to AE.81.FF.FD
and convert it back to decimal, you get 174.129.255.253, wh
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:21:41PM -0400, Bob Hoffman wrote:
> I got a spam today (from a yahoo server, surprise!) with nothing but a
> single link.
>
> http:// 2927755261/
> I separated the http so it would not be a link in your email... suggest
> not going to it without proper measures.
>
On 06/21/2012 04:11 AM, Arun Khan wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Arun Khan wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 1:00 AM, wrote:
snip
For one thing, edit grub.conf and get *rid* of that idiot rhgb and quiet,
so you can actually see what's happening. Sounds to me as though it's
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Rob Kampen
wrote:
snip
> sounds like the mirror is not in synch - when it is running with both
> drives, what does
>>cat /proc/mdstat
System boots up fully functional with both disks
root@centos62-raid1 ~ >
# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid1]
51 matches
Mail list logo
