On 6/14/12, Smithies, Russell wrote:
> How about using one of the backup tools to image the server?
> We use Symantec System Recovery and image all the disks. We then have the
> option of restoring to different hardware (physical or virtual) which works
> very well.
> There's a 60-day evaluation p
A client is insisting to install CentOS 6.2 32 bit version [1] on a
system with 4GB RAM.
Lately, I have done 64 bit installations only; not sure if the 32 bit
kernel supports pae for >= 4GB RAM.
If anyone knows the answer please let me know (will save me time on an
installation in my setup).
[1]
Am 14.06.2012 09:46, schrieb Arun Khan:
> A client is insisting to install CentOS 6.2 32 bit version [1] on a
> system with 4GB RAM.
>
> Lately, I have done 64 bit installations only; not sure if the 32 bit
> kernel supports pae for >= 4GB RAM.
>
> If anyone knows the answer please let me know (w
On 06/14/12 12:46 AM, Arun Khan wrote:
> [1] The Client's ERP vendor has validated the application on the 32
> bit platform only thus the reason for 32 bit version.
the client should find a ERP vendor who's not stuck back in the 90s.
--
john r pierceN 37, W 122
san
Hello everybody,
I installed Centos 6.2 on a computer with an older version of it in
order to dual boot both of them. I managed to install the new OS on a
physically seperated hard drive, and configured grub to make the newly
installed OS the default one. Now the older OS won't boot and this
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>
> https://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/6.0_Release_Notes/kernel.html
>
> see "12.6.1. Physical Address Extension (PAE)"
>
> Not said there, but support is up to 64GB of RAM.
>
Thanks very much for pointing ou
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:46 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 06/14/12 12:46 AM, Arun Khan wrote:
>> [1] The Client's ERP vendor has validated the application on the 32
>> bit platform only thus the reason for 32 bit version.
>
>
> the client should find a ERP vendor who's not stuck back in the 90s.
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin
wrote:
> On 6/14/12, Smithies, Russell wrote:
>> How about using one of the backup tools to image the server?
>> We use Symantec System Recovery and image all the disks. We then have the
>> option of restoring to different hardware (physical or
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
Dear Community Friends,
i badly require CentOS 4x, because one of our application only work with
that version, and current server has failed. The image which is
available in CentOS following sites. CD is not boot able, cannot install.
http://vault.centos.org/4.9/
http://vault.centos.org/
can a
We have a situation here that is a real mystery.
Our MRTG on our outgoing router and a firewall server that protects our
web servers is showing a spike every six hours. I can't find the server
behind the firewall that is generating such an extreme amount of
packets, even though I've looked thr
How about tcpdump?
Mike
On 06/14/2012 01:07 PM, Steve Campbell wrote:
> We have a situation here that is a real mystery.
>
> Our MRTG on our outgoing router and a firewall server that protects our
> web servers is showing a spike every six hours. I can't find the server
> behind the firewall tha
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:11 AM, wrote:
> Boris Epstein wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 2:50 PM, John R. Dennison
> wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 10:59:13AM -0400, Boris Epstein wrote:
>
> > To be specific, I use UNFSD to export a MooseFS file system. MooseFS, by
> > the way, is userla
On 06/14/2012 12:05 PM, Shiv. Nath wrote:
> Dear Community Friends,
>
> i badly require CentOS 4x, because one of our application only work with
> that version, and current server has failed. The image which is
> available in CentOS following sites. CD is not boot able, cannot install.
>
> http:/
> On 06/14/2012 12:05 PM, Shiv. Nath wrote:
>> Dear Community Friends,
>>
>> i badly require CentOS 4x, because one of our application only work with
>> that version, and current server has failed. The image which is
>> available in CentOS following sites. CD is not boot able, cannot
>> install.
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Steve Campbell wrote:
> We have a situation here that is a real mystery.
>
> Our MRTG on our outgoing router and a firewall server that protects our
> web servers is showing a spike every six hours. I can't find the server
> behind the firewall that is generating
Hi all,
Just like to know which secure FTP servers are popular in use on Linux, the
FTP server should provides HTTPS, FTPS and SFTP methods.
Current we are with Serv-U FTP server, but it has been crashed all the time
for unknown reasons -- can not find any causes in its log file at all. Alt
On Jun 13, 2012, at 2:52 AM, Sanjay Arora wrote:
> My machine is on LAN 192.168.1.0/24, has an IP of 192.168.1.3. This
> Network has GW 192.168.1.1 which is an adsl router in the office. No
> firewall on the router. Other LAN machines have IPs in the
> 192.168.1.0/24 network & I'm not allowed to
On Jun 14, 2012, at 1:07 PM, Steve Campbell wrote:
> We have a situation here that is a real mystery.
>
> Our MRTG on our outgoing router and a firewall server that protects our
> web servers is showing a spike every six hours. I can't find the server
> behind the firewall that is generating
On Jun 14, 2012, at 6:44 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
> On Jun 14, 2012, at 1:07 PM, Steve Campbell wrote:
>
>> We have a situation here that is a real mystery.
>>
>> Our MRTG on our outgoing router and a firewall server that protects our
>> web servers is showing a spike every six hours. I can't
On 06/14/12 3:39 PM, Gelen James wrote:
> Just like to know which secure FTP servers are popular in use on Linux, the
> FTP server should provides HTTPS, FTPS and SFTP methods.
sftp is part of SSH, not FTP. https is HTTP not FTP.
ftps (FTP over SSL) is a non-standard mess and should be banned
Hi John,
I had the same idea with you just a few years back that the ftp only servers
FTP protocol. But nowadays a FTP server provides same contents over a lot of
protocols at the same time: FTP/FTPS/SFTP/HTTP/HTTPS.
Please check the wiki
page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_FTP_server_
On 06/14/12 4:08 PM, Gelen James wrote:
> I had the same idea with you just a few years back that the ftp only servers
> FTP protocol. But nowadays a FTP server provides same contents over a lot of
> protocols at the same time: FTP/FTPS/SFTP/HTTP/HTTPS
thats just silly. I suppose we should call
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 6:18 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>>
> thats just silly. I suppose we should call NFS FTP too, because it
> serves files?
What do you call something like Alfresco that emulates all kinds of
file/web services while imposing additional logic compared to what the
OS would do?
-
On 06/14/12 4:08 PM, Gelen James wrote:
> Please check the wiki
> pagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_FTP_server_software. There are so
> many choices
psst? most of those are for MS Windows, which doesn't come with a
decent FTP server built in. many of them are commercial. there's
On 6/14/2012 7:23 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 06/14/12 4:08 PM, Gelen James wrote:
>> Please check the wiki
>> pagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_FTP_server_software. There are so
>> many choices
>
> psst? most of those are for MS Windows, which doesn't come with a
> decent FTP server bu
Dear CentOS Community
Is totally clear there's no support sendmail platform today, but I need to
stop SMTP brute-force attack on sendmail. My server is attacked today, my
maillog look like :
4...@myserver.com>, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=myserver.com [127.0.0.1]
Jun 14 19:07:01 at6412 sendma
On 06/14/12 4:22 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> What do you call something like Alfresco that emulates all kinds of
> file/web services while imposing additional logic compared to what the
> OS would do?
"useless"
hey, you asked what *I* would call it. I have no use for that sort of
silliness. Ma
On 06/14/12 4:33 PM, Gustavo Lacoste wrote:
> I need help for STOP this spamers right now.
>
> Thanks in advance to anyone who can guide me
2 of the three relay IPs listed in your log fragment are listed on
spamhaus' Zen combined list, http://www.spamhaus.org/zen/
this is free for use by low vol
On 06/15/2012 01:28 AM, John Hinton wrote:
> On 6/14/2012 7:23 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>> On 06/14/12 4:08 PM, Gelen James wrote:
>>> Please check the wiki
>>> pagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_FTP_server_software. There are so
>>> many choices
>>
>> psst? most of those are for MS Window
You can use, also, fail2ban
http://www.fail2ban.org/wiki/index.php/Sendmail
http://www.fail2ban.org/wiki/index.php/HOWTOs
Work over the filter.
You can set that if 'x' connection from same IP in 'y' seconds, block
in firewall
--
Diego - Yo no soy paranoico! (pero que me siguen, me siguen)
_
The problem with my server is: I use it to offer webhosting services. Some
customers using Outlook are blocked because they use black listed ips (ips
simply are dynamic).
With Kind Regards,
Gustavo A. Lacoste Z.
Curacautín - Chile
Skype: knxroot
Msn & Gtalk: knx.root [at] gm
If you have disabled open relaying then I would look at grey listing and
throttling to reduce the number of spam per hour that comes in.
Since your routing others emails there is no point in spam analysis cause your
customers are probably doing it already. Just need to dissuade spammers from
f
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Gustavo Lacoste wrote:
> The problem with my server is: I use it to offer webhosting services. Some
> customers using Outlook are blocked because they use black listed ips (ips
> simply are dynamic).
>
Give them logins/passwords and only rely if the connection is
On 06/14/12 5:58 PM, Gustavo Lacoste wrote:
> The problem with my server is: I use it to offer webhosting services. Some
> customers using Outlook are blocked because they use black listed ips (ips
> simply are dynamic).
They should be using smtp auth over SASL, or they should be using their
ISP'
On Jun 15, 2012 12:39 AM, "Gelen James" wrote:
> Just like to know which secure FTP servers are popular in use on Linux,
the FTP server should provides HTTPS, FTPS and SFTP methods.
Proftpd, hands down for the (s)ftp(s) but for http you have to look
somewhere else.
Mikael
__
> Proftpd, hands down for the (s)ftp(s) but for http you have to look
> somewhere else.
k
+1 for ProFTPD. I have not used it for sftp, but I have for ftps. Make
sure on ftps to use ccc - clear command channel which allows the command
channel to be picked up by firewalls that need to know about
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Sanjay Arora
> wrote:
>>
> OK, I don't quite understand what 'reserved for LAN' use means. I'll
> assume it means someone else controls it and they won't cooperate if
Correct.
> you bridge you VM's to th
On 06/14/12 10:51 PM, Sanjay Arora wrote:
> True Enough but the adsl Ip range is not in my control as you have
> assumed correctly.
when you bridge virtual hosts to a LAN, they appear just like they are
real machines plugged into the same LAN. they'll each get their own IP
from the ADSL router'
On 06/14/12 10:51 PM, Sanjay Arora wrote:
>> > You still don't say what kind of access you need
> Basically accessing the VMs from the Internetssh, vnc, rdp, ftp&
> so on...different needs for different vm.
>
how will that work if you have no control over the ADSL internet
router? the in
40 matches
Mail list logo
