On 06/12/12 11:52 PM, Sanjay Arora wrote:
> And I want routing among three as well as Internet access through thet
> NATTED adsl router which has a dynamic IP.
for that sort of routing to work, all the other hosts on hte 2 LANs will
need to know the route to that subnet is via the NIC interfaces
On 12/06/2012 21:45, Michael Kress wrote:
> Am 12.06.2012 22:39, schrieb Reindl Harald:
>> Am 12.06.2012 22:19, schrieb Michael Kress:
>>> Hello, is there any way of getting php4 installed on Centos6? I'd like
>>> to install it in an apache/fastcgi environment.
>>> Has anybody got a link to a desc
On 08/06/2012 17:33, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
> I've got a CentOS 5 server that I want to migrate over into a
> virtualized instance.
> The problem is I need to minimize downtime so was trying to figure out
> a way to "live" clone the original.
>
> Initially, I thought I could do this via exporti
I have a system that is logging:
smartd /dev/sda currently unreadble (pending) sectors
smartd /dev/sda offline uncorrectable sectors
The box continues to run fine.
Doing "smartctl -H /dev/sda" says:
test result: PASSED
I have ran the "smartctl -t offline /dev/sda", after the 300+ seconds I
rebo
Hello,
IIRC, the exit status of "yum install foo bar" was (long ago !) 0 only
if foo *and* bar could be installed.
Nowadays, it is 0 if foo *or* bar (or both) are correctly installed.
Is there a way to get the old behavior ?
Thanks,
--
Philippe Naudin
__
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 2:50 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 10:59:13AM -0400, Boris Epstein wrote:
> >
> > A process implemented in the userland may not be as efficient as one
> > implemented as part of the kernel - but that doesn't mean it can't scale
> > well, does it?
>
>
Boris Epstein wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 2:50 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 10:59:13AM -0400, Boris Epstein wrote:
> To be specific, I use UNFSD to export a MooseFS file system. MooseFS, by
> the way, is userland-process based too.
>
> Be that as it may, I've seen si
I'm using KVM so didn't have the tool.
While Les' suggestion looked like it was going to be pretty useful for
a variety of backup/restore situations, I didn't know if I had the
time to go through the docs and get things working in time.
So in the end I went with the repeated rSync method Scott me
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Sanjay Arora wrote:
>
>> It might be easier to suggest an approach if you describe what you
>> need to do. You can't magically make new public addresses that aren't
>> available appear on an existing network, whether it is on real or
>> virtual NICs. But there
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
Hello,
CentOS 6.2.
I have spent all morning googling and trying different things to get the
permissions
on my ttyUSB0 port set correctly using udev. I am at my wits end. Why is this
so convoluted!?
I would really appreciate it if someone could tell me how to do this.
The default permissions c
Steve Clark wrote:
> Hello,
>
> CentOS 6.2.
>
> I have spent all morning googling and trying different things to get the
> permissions
> on my ttyUSB0 port set correctly using udev. I am at my wits end. Why is this
> so convoluted!?
>
> I would really appreciate it if someone could tell me how
On 06/13/2012 12:29 PM, James Pearson wrote:
> Steve Clark wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> CentOS 6.2.
>>
>> I have spent all morning googling and trying different things to get the
>> permissions
>> on my ttyUSB0 port set correctly using udev. I am at my wits end. Why is
>> this so convoluted!?
>>
>> I w
CentOS 6.2. I have a 2TB drive, one partition, which is used for online
backups. It filled up the other day. I moved a couple of b/u directories
off it, and deleted the originals, which should have given me 42G free. I
also reduced the reserved blocks by 1/3rd.
I've just finished an fsck, which it
On 2012-06-13, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> CentOS 6.2. I have a 2TB drive, one partition, which is used for online
> backups. It filled up the other day. I moved a couple of b/u directories
> off it, and deleted the originals, which should have given me 42G free. I
> also reduced the reserved blocks
On 06/13/2012 12:18 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> CentOS 6.2. I have a 2TB drive, one partition, which is used for online
> backups. It filled up the other day. I moved a couple of b/u directories
> off it, and deleted the originals, which should have given me 42G free. I
> also reduced the reserve
On 06/13/2012 12:18 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> CentOS 6.2. I have a 2TB drive, one partition, which is used for online
> backups. It filled up the other day. I moved a couple of b/u directories
> off it, and deleted the originals, which should have given me 42G free. I
> also reduced the reserve
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 06/13/2012 12:18 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> CentOS 6.2. I have a 2TB drive, one partition, which is used for online
>> backups. It filled up the other day. I moved a couple of b/u directories
>> off it, and deleted the originals, which should have given me 42G free.
>>
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 1:36 PM, wrote:
>>
> Actually, IIRC, one directory was 42G, and the other was 15G or so. That,
> along with reducing the reserved blocks on the f/s should have given me
> 3%-4%. I know that; what's driving me nuts is df, not df -h, is showing
> "available" as a blank.
>
>
Hello Tom,
On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 17:12 +0100, Tom Brown wrote:
> To close the loop on this by making the 32 bit tar package available
> to the system during the update allowed the update to progress as it
> got pulled in as a dep during the yum run and all was happy.
I suppose my idea that this m
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 1:36 PM, wrote:
>>>
>> Actually, IIRC, one directory was 42G, and the other was 15G or so.
>> That, along with reducing the reserved blocks on the f/s should have
given me
>> 3%-4%. I know that; what's driving me nuts is df, not df -h, is showing
>> "
How about using one of the backup tools to image the server?
We use Symantec System Recovery and image all the disks. We then have the
option of restoring to different hardware (physical or virtual) which works
very well.
There's a 60-day evaluation period.
http://www.symantec.com/products/trialw
On Wednesday 13 June 2012, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> If it was 100% full, and if you freed up 42GB, then it would be:
>
> 2006/2048 = 98% full (well, 97.95% to be exact).
>
> so it would only show 2% space free max anyway.
And by default 5% is reserved for root, so a drive can be 5% free and
sti
Did not get any response in the CentOS Virt list.
Posting in the CentOS General list hoping that some one here can
provide clarification.
Thx,
-- Arun Khan
-- Forwarded message --
From: Arun Khan
Date: Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 8:54 PM
Subject: Meaning of "vlan=" and "name=" in Linux
24 matches
Mail list logo
