Re: [CentOS] Upgrading FC2 to CentOS 5.* - anyone second this? - general report

2012-06-03 Thread Max Pyziur
> On Wednesday, May 30, 2012 02:56:24 PM Max Pyziur wrote: >> My hope is to upgrade; that way I don't have to change/specify partition >> topology, and hopefully only minimally adjust the existing >> configurations. > > I have tried this type of upgrade before; I have not had it go well for > the m

[CentOS] wins option in nsswitch.conf not working

2012-06-03 Thread Peter Peltonen
I am trying to get BackupPC working with automount as documented in this CentOS HowTo: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/BackupPC I think my CentOS6 box's NetBIOS name resolving is not working correctly as when I try to access the mount for Win7 machine called Parallels I get this: [root@au ~]# ls /wi

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading FC2 to CentOS 5.* - anyone second this? - general report

2012-06-03 Thread Ross Walker
On Jun 3, 2012, at 12:55 PM, "Max Pyziur" wrote: >> On Wednesday, May 30, 2012 02:56:24 PM Max Pyziur wrote: >>> My hope is to upgrade; that way I don't have to change/specify partition >>> topology, and hopefully only minimally adjust the existing >>> configurations. >> >> I have tried this typ

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading FC2 to CentOS 5.* - anyone second this? - general report

2012-06-03 Thread Les Mikesell
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Max Pyziur wrote: > > I recognize that most of the comments were from sysadmins, more involved > in managing server farms, and steeped in that knowledge/experience base. And in upgrades, and thus have experience with the difference in effort and results And y

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading FC2 to CentOS 5.* - anyone second this? - general report

2012-06-03 Thread Max Pyziur
On Sun, 3 Jun 2012, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Max Pyziur wrote: >> >> I recognize that most of the comments were from sysadmins, more involved >> in managing server farms, and steeped in that knowledge/experience base. > > And in upgrades, and thus have experience wit

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading FC2 to CentOS 5.* - anyone second this? - general report

2012-06-03 Thread Max Pyziur
On Sun, 3 Jun 2012, Ross Walker wrote: > On Jun 3, 2012, at 12:55 PM, "Max Pyziur" wrote: > [... deleted for the sake of brevity ...] >> Much thanks to thoughtful comments and cautions, > > > You might want to crawl /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr and /var for files not under > management and see if

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading FC2 to CentOS 5.* - anyone second this? - general report

2012-06-03 Thread Les Mikesell
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Max Pyziur wrote: > > My personal goal was to preserve the topology of the disk layout, as well > as the configurations. Which are trivial to reproduce. And potentially improve in the process. >> And you still have yet to explain what you think the result of the

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading FC2 to CentOS 5.* - anyone second this? - general report

2012-06-03 Thread Max Pyziur
On Sun, 3 Jun 2012, Les Mikesell wrote: On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Max Pyziur wrote: My personal goal was to preserve the topology of the disk layout, as well as the configurations. Which are trivial to reproduce. And potentially improve in the process. It may be trivial for you, b

Re: [CentOS] wins option in nsswitch.conf not working

2012-06-03 Thread Brett Serkez
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Peter Peltonen wrote: > > If I add "wins" at the end of the hosts section in /etc/nsswitch.conf > the resolver seems to get "stuck" as after ping it just hangs (there > is no output, I have to quit it with CTRL+C) > > Works on my network, my nsswitch.conf looks like

Re: [CentOS] wins option in nsswitch.conf not working

2012-06-03 Thread Cliff Pratt
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 5:50 AM, Peter Peltonen wrote: > I am trying to get BackupPC working with automount as documented in > this CentOS HowTo: > http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/BackupPC > > I think my CentOS6 box's NetBIOS name resolving is not working > correctly as when I try to access the mount

[CentOS] nodejs based website

2012-06-03 Thread Tim Dunphy
Hello, I am trying to setup a node.js based website called 'hummingbird'. It's a monitoring package that you can read about here: http://projects.nuttnet.net/hummingbird/ My question is when I hit the site all I see is a directory listing http://107.21.183.42/hummingbird/ Similar to what wo

Re: [CentOS] nodejs based website

2012-06-03 Thread Edo
Hi, This is probably OT but... On Monday, June 4, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to setup a node.js based website called 'hummingbird'. > It's a monitoring package that you can read about here: > > http://projects.nuttnet.net/hummingbird/ > > My question is

Re: [CentOS] nodejs based website

2012-06-03 Thread Tim Dunphy
awesome! thank edo! that got the interface working.. now just to configure it. thanks for pointing me in the right direction!! tim On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 12:03 AM, Edo wrote: > Hi, > > This is probably OT but... > > > On Monday, June 4, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I am