From: Rafał Radecki
> Disk /dev/sdc: 120.0 GB, 120034123776 bytes
> 32 heads, 32 sectors/track, 228946 cylinders
> Units = cylinders of 1024 * 512 = 524288 bytes
> Disk /dev/sdd: 120.0 GB, 120034123776 bytes
> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 14593 cylinders
> Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 82252
On 30 May 2012 05:36, Jerry Geis wrote:
> I just installed a KVM guest, centos 6.2 i686 (6.2 x86_64 host) and the
> network module is loaded .
> The modules is/are 8139too,8139cp is what lsmod shows. Dmesg shows link
> up but ifconfig does not give me an address?
> service network restart shows O
> Jerry,
>
> I believe that by default the network is down and the "BOOTPROTO=dhcp" is
> not in the /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ethx. I encountered a
> similar issue on a KVM guest with minimal install
>
Earl
Was there something else missing also?
I not added the BOOTPROTO="DHCP" and same
I 've experimentes a little with OVirt and CentOS. The dreyou packages
works very well. My problems were the others dependencies. In the CentOS
repos are older than OVirt requires. I needed to compile my own packages,
Such as hbsql.
I change to fedora 16 in production until CenOS repos are ready, a
Hello Jesus,
On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 07:59 +0200, Jesus del Valle wrote:
> Hi. Somebody in the Spanish CentOS mailing list is asking how to move from
> CentOS 4.8 to 4.9. He cannot upgrade to 5 or 6 at this moment.
Is that person aware that CentOS-4 is EOL and will not receive any more
(security) u
> On 05/25/2012 07:52 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Max Pyziur wrote:
> I *do* still have an FC2 box.
>
> Would anyone second this procedure:
> http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=14052&forum=37&post_id=47945
>
It might
>
> Is that person aware that CentOS-4 is EOL and will not receive any more
> (security) updates?
> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2012-February/018462.html
Hello Leonard,
Yes he is aware of EOL.
Regards,
Jesus
___
CentOS mailing list
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Max Pyziur wrote:
>>
> The point is to leave configurations, partitions, and other components as
> close as possible to being intact.
Why isn't the point to match the existing CentOS box in production
closely instead?
> Since this is a server environment,
> ther
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Max Pyziur wrote:
>> Since this is a server environment, there are about 700-800 packages,
not the 3000
>> that sit on desktop machine.
>
> If it is a server environment, you should be paying attention to the
> supported life of the distribu
Hello,
I am trying to use SNMP on a CentOS 6.2 server, and am using the
'pass_persist' configuration command:
pass_persist .1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1 /usr/local/sbin/snmp-iostat
I have set the file context of 'snmpd_exec_t' on the snmp-iostat
program.
If I disable SELinux, then it all works fin
On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 16:52 +0100, John Horne wrote:
>
> I am trying to use SNMP on a CentOS 6.2 server, and am using the
> 'pass_persist' configuration command:
>
Sorry, I should have added that nothing appears to be logged
in /var/log/audit/audit.log when snmpd fails to return any values. Nor
is
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Max Pyziur wrote:
>
>>> Since this is a server environment, there are about 700-800 packages,
> not the 3000
>>> that sit on desktop machine.
>>
>> If it is a server environment, you should be paying attention to the
>> supported life of
Hi Guys,
On 05/30/2012 02:45 PM, Claudio Ceballos Paz wrote:
>> I've heard many great things about oVirt. However I would prefer to use a
>> CentOS-based solution in a production environment rather than Fedora.
I'm working on getting a shared buildsys resource together to try and
get a working ov
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Max Pyziur wrote:
>
Last, CentOS is built from Fedora Core 6. Usually, it makes sense to
proceed sequentially.
>>
>> So you're going to upgrate to FC3, 4 and 5 before going to CentOS?
>
> Possibly. Unless someone else can attest to their own experience a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/30/2012 11:58 AM, John Horne wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 16:52 +0100, John Horne wrote:
>>
>> I am trying to use SNMP on a CentOS 6.2 server, and am using the
>> 'pass_persist' configuration command:
>>
> Sorry, I should have added that not
Max Pyziur wrote:
>> Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Max Pyziur wrote:
> To clarify, the machine is a test/development box that also acts as a
> router to a DSL connection that (for the most part) replicates a
> co-located production machine that is currently running Cen
On 05/30/12 9:07 AM, Max Pyziur wrote:
> Possibly. Unless someone else can attest to their own experience and
> knowledge that it's generally ok to move from FC2 to CentOS 5.*. That was
> my point in starting this thread.
sure. take new system, clean install 5.latest on it, configure your
servi
> Max Pyziur wrote:
>>> Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Max Pyziur wrote:
>
>> To clarify, the machine is a test/development box that also acts as a
>> router to a DSL connection that (for the most part) replicates a
>> co-located production machine that is currently ru
On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 12:55 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> On 05/30/2012 11:58 AM, John Horne wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 16:52 +0100, John Horne wrote:
> >>
> >> I am trying to use SNMP on a CentOS 6.2 server, and am using the
> >> 'pass_persist' configuration command:
> >>
> > Sorry, I sh
On 05/30/12 10:26 AM, Max Pyziur wrote:
> I'm not interested in acquiring more hardware but rather hope to use what
> I have. It works satisfactorily in its current configuration; my interest
> is in aligning the OS of the test/backup unit with that of the production
> machine.
then back it up, wi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/30/2012 01:30 PM, John Horne wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 12:55 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>> On 05/30/2012 11:58 AM, John Horne wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 16:52 +0100, John Horne wrote:
I am trying to use SNMP on a CentOS 6.
Max Pyziur wrote:
>> Max Pyziur wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Max Pyziur wrote:
>>
>>> To clarify, the machine is a test/development box that also acts as a
>>> router to a DSL connection that (for the most part) replicates a
>>> co-located production mac
> Max Pyziur wrote:
>>> Max Pyziur wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Max Pyziur wrote:
>>>
To clarify, the machine is a test/development box that also acts as a
router to a DSL connection that (for the most part) replicates a
co-located produ
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Max Pyziur wrote:
>
> Here is what I wrote:
> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2012-May/126307.html
>
> "... It's a test machine that replicates a production server. ..."
>
> How would you improve it in order to remedy the apparent confusion?
But in an ear
On 5/30/2012 2:21 PM, Max Pyziur wrote:
> I appreciate your and others' efforts at advice. I'm simply trying to use
> existing hardware (that's the eco-friendly approach), and trying to build
> my understanding of the Fedora/CentOS operational relationships. Given
> that it has been stated that Cen
On 05/30/12 11:21 AM, Max Pyziur wrote:
> I'm not yet looking
> for a recommendation for a clean install.
there is no other sane approach. you can upgrade the system a half
dozen times through those intermediate versions, and sort out every
issue that comes along, or you can build a clean new
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Max Pyziur wrote:
>>
>> Here is what I wrote:
>> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2012-May/126307.html
>>
>> "... It's a test machine that replicates a production server. ..."
>>
>> How would you improve it in order to remedy the apparent confusion?
>
> B
On 05/30/2012 12:37 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 05/30/12 10:26 AM, Max Pyziur wrote:
>> I'm not interested in acquiring more hardware but rather hope to use what
>> I have. It works satisfactorily in its current configuration; my interest
>> is in aligning the OS of the test/backup unit with that
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 30.05.2012 20:36, schrieb Les Mikesell:
>> Fedora doesn't support/recommend in-place upgrades across major
>> versions or at least didn't for those versions. My experience was
>> that even within a major rev. an update could kill your s
Max Pyziur wrote:
>> Max Pyziur wrote:
Max Pyziur wrote:
>> Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Max Pyziur wrote:
>
> I appreciate your and others' efforts at advice. I'm simply trying to use
> existing hardware (that's the eco-friendly approach), and trying to
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Max Pyziur wrote:
> Thank you; this is very helpful.
>
> My hope is to upgrade; that way I don't have to change/specify partition
> topology,
But that takes a couple of minutes - or you could use the saved
kickstart info if FC2 saved it back then. Or install on t
Greetings,
Are there any summary CentOS numbers available?
The number of subscribers to this email list, and the number of server
installs?
Much thanks,
Max Pyziur
p...@brama.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailm
On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 13:49 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
> restorecon -R -v /var/run
>
> I think the directory is mislabeled.
>
Hello,
Made no difference I'm afraid. Both /var/run and /var/run/net-snmp were
labelled as 'system_u:object_r:var_run_t:s0' before and after the
restorecon.
John.
Hi,
On 05/30/2012 08:26 PM, Max Pyziur wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Are there any summary CentOS numbers available?
yes
> The number of subscribers to this email list, and the number of server
> installs?
There are atleast 8 subscribers to this list, and I know of atleast 4
servers that run CentOS.
On 5/30/2012 3:35 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 05/30/2012 08:26 PM, Max Pyziur wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> Are there any summary CentOS numbers available?
> yes
>
>> The number of subscribers to this email list, and the number of server
>> installs?
> There are atleast 8 subscribers to thi
I am trying, without success, to create an upstart config file to
automatically start and restart an ssh proxy. The command sting that
I use in the script has been checked and verified from the shell but
it fails in the upstart file.
The file contents are:
. . .
# proxy is used to authenticate
> On 5/30/2012 3:35 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 05/30/2012 08:26 PM, Max Pyziur wrote:
>>> Greetings,
>>>
>>> Are there any summary CentOS numbers available?
>> yes
>>
>>> The number of subscribers to this email list, and the number of server
>>> installs?
>> There are atleast 8 subsc
On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 17:00 -0400, Max Pyziur wrote:
> Yes, lol ...
>
> I know enough about mailman that it's a cinch for the list administrator
> to get the headline number of subscribers.
>
Why would you want to know such numbers?
John.
--
John Horne, Plymouth University, UK
Tel: +44 (0)1
John Horne wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 17:00 -0400, Max Pyziur wrote:
>
>> Yes, lol ...
>>
>> I know enough about mailman that it's a cinch for the list administrator
>> to get the headline number of subscribers.
>>
> Why would you want to know such numbers?
>
Because he doesn't like the answers
On 05/30/12 2:00 PM, Max Pyziur wrote:
> I know enough about mailman that it's a cinch for the list administrator
> to get the headline number of subscribers.
>
> So, johnny at centos.org, z00dax at centos.org, ralph at centos.org,
> herrold at centos.org should be able to tell us. No?
this would
On 05/30/2012 10:00 PM, Max Pyziur wrote:
> I know enough about mailman that it's a cinch for the list administrator
> to get the headline number of subscribers.
There are many thousands of people on the list.. The point I was trying
to, badly, make is that there is no tangible manner to audit use
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 05/30/12 2:00 PM, Max Pyziur wrote:
>> I know enough about mailman that it's a cinch for the list administrator
>> to get the headline number of subscribers.
>>
>> So, johnny at centos.org, z00dax at centos.org, ralph at centos.org,
>> herrold at centos.org should be able
On Wed, 30 May 2012 17:21:53 -0400
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Because he doesn't like the answers we've uniformly given him for
> his problem, and is looking for a way to tell himself we're only a
> small group of snot-noses, rather than the opinionated, but
> experienced-to-very-experienced collec
> On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 17:00 -0400, Max Pyziur wrote:
>
>> Yes, lol ...
>>
>> I know enough about mailman that it's a cinch for the list administrator
>> to get the headline number of subscribers.
>>
> Why would you want to know such numbers?
I'm curious about the density of users.
I manage enou
On 30 May 2012 22:00, Max Pyziur wrote:
> Yes, lol ...
lol on.
> I know enough about mailman that it's a cinch for the list administrator
> to get the headline number of subscribers.
>
> So, johnny at centos.org, z00dax at centos.org, ralph at centos.org,
> herrold at centos.org should be able
> John Horne wrote:
>> On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 17:00 -0400, Max Pyziur wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, lol ...
>>>
>>> I know enough about mailman that it's a cinch for the list
>>> administrator
>>> to get the headline number of subscribers.
>>>
>> Why would you want to know such numbers?
>>
> Because he doesn't
On 05/30/2012 02:00 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
> I am trying, without success, to create an upstart config file to
> automatically start and restart an ssh proxy. The command sting that
> I use in the script has been checked and verified from the shell but
> it fails in the upstart file.
>
> The fi
On Wed, 30 May 2012, Max Pyziur wrote:
I also don't see that answers here have been uniform; some, even
many, have been very helpful. So, thank you to those people who have
taken the time to reply and discuss the issues that I've raised.
You haven't raised any issues. You just asked for a cou
> On Wed, 30 May 2012, Max Pyziur wrote:
>
>> I also don't see that answers here have been uniform; some, even
>> many, have been very helpful. So, thank you to those people who have
>> taken the time to reply and discuss the issues that I've raised.
>
> You haven't raised any issues. You just aske
On 5/30/2012 5:50 PM, Hakan Koseoglu wrote:
> I trust the administrators of the centos.org mailing lists not to give
> out any information on my subscription(s) to anyone, even including a
> count of it.
Actually, I would really like them to clean up our email addresses from
the archives.
Those pa
On 05/30/12 3:22 PM, Max Pyziur wrote:
> You are correct. On this thread, I haven't raised any issues; I've simply
> asked for some headline numbers: total installed base of servers, and the
> total number of subscribers to this list. It's just to get a sense of
> size.
>
> Conversely and as an exa
On 30 May 2012 23:36, Bob Hoffman wrote:
> On 5/30/2012 5:50 PM, Hakan Koseoglu wrote:
>> I trust the administrators of the centos.org mailing lists not to give
>> out any information on my subscription(s) to anyone, even including a
>> count of it.
> Actually, I would really like them to clean up
On 05/30/2012 03:36 PM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
> On 5/30/2012 5:50 PM, Hakan Koseoglu wrote:
>> I trust the administrators of the centos.org mailing lists not to give
>> out any information on my subscription(s) to anyone, even including a
>> count of it.
> Actually, I would really like them to clean u
On 5/30/2012 6:49 PM, Nataraj wrote:
> On 05/30/2012 03:36 PM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
>> On 5/30/2012 5:50 PM, Hakan Koseoglu wrote:
>>> I trust the administrators of the centos.org mailing lists not to give
>>> out any information on my subscription(s) to anyone, even including a
>>> count of it.
>> A
Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> Johnny Hughes suggested the command, so on that basis alone
>> I would give it a high probability of success.
>
> If you have ALL the latest glibc/nscd files to replace all the installed
> RPMS in the same place, and if you upgrade them all at the same time
> (including an
Hi,
I am running Nagios on CentOS release 5.5 (Final). Any clue about the below
warning? Please let me know if any one needs any additional information.
/usr/sbin/nagios -v /etc/nagios/nagios.cfg
Nagios 2.12
Copyright (c) 1999-2007 Ethan Galstad (http://www.nagios.org)
Last Modified: 05-19-2008
57 matches
Mail list logo
