On 29/05/2012 06:59, Jesus del Valle wrote:
Hi. Somebody in the Spanish CentOS mailing list is asking how to move from
CentOS 4.8 to 4.9. He cannot upgrade to 5 or 6 at this moment. Any Hints /
Howto? I would pass the translated answer to the Sp. list.
Thanks& Regards,
Jesus
Hi Benjamin, Tait,
Thanks for the advice,
setting up heartbeat to look for an IP was easy, monitoring looks a bit
more complex so i'll have to dive into that.
at least now i know the right direction to look for,
Thanks,
Wessel
On 05/28/2012 09:01 PM, Tait Clarridge wrote:
>> Thanks Mark, that d
Dne 29.5.2012 10:38, Giles Coochey napsal(a):
> Can he not use http://vault.centos.org/4.9/updates/ as a repository
> for updates?
Yes, he can, see
http://www.hrbac.cz/2012/04/sed-oneliner-to-change-centos-4-repos-to-vault-centos-org/
DH
___
CentOS maili
On 05/27/2012 06:03 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> John Stanley wrote:
>
> Now this is my last question:
> Can I be reasonably (say 90%) sure that the above command
> will not stop the server running?
>>> The command in question was: rpm -Uvh --force *.rpm
>>> where the RPMs were glibc and
On 05/28/2012 09:34 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 05/28/2012 12:03 PM, Timothy Madden wrote:
>> Sorry to say this to everyone, but since I installed CentOS 6 a month ago
>> I found that both Mozilla Firefox and Mozilla Thunderbird crash big time
>> (meaning every day and even more than once a da
On 05/28/2012 01:00 PM, Dave Stevens wrote:
> I've got an up-to-date Centos 5.8 and can't seem to get fail2ban to
> get rid of troublesome sshd login attempts. /etc/fail2ban/jail.conf
> has these sections:
>
> [ssh]
>
> enabled = true
> port= ssh
> filter = sshd
> logpath = /var/log/auth.
On 05/26/2012 01:07 PM, David G. Miller wrote:
> Arun Khan writes:
>
>> On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
>>> I have my machine CentOS 6.2 running KVM guest of Windows 7.
>
>>> Then when I remote in using VNC to my machine - the VNC always
>>> works fine. However, when I try to
On 05/25/2012 07:52 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Max Pyziur wrote:
I *do* still have an FC2 box.
Would anyone second this procedure:
http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=14052&forum=37&post_id=47945
>>> It might possibly
David Hrbáč wrote:
> Dne 29.5.2012 10:38, Giles Coochey napsal(a):
> > Can he not use http://vault.centos.org/4.9/updates/ as a repository
> > for updates?
>
> Yes, he can, see
>
> http://www.hrbac.cz/2012/04/sed-oneliner-to-change-centos-4-repos-to-vault-centos-org/
> DH
Hi Giles & David, thank
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
OK, I did the deal and I am in the process of upgrading/migrating from
CentOS 5.8 x86_64 to CentOS 6.2 x86_64. But, I'm stuck with a gnome GUI
that only sees 1024x768. Under CentOS 5.8 it saw 1920x1080 (without much
work from me). The command I was used to , system-config-display, is gone
an
> CentOS 5.8 x86_64 to CentOS 6.2 x86_64. But, I'm stuck with a gnome GUI
> that only sees 1024x768. Under CentOS 5.8 it saw 1920x1080 (without much
> work from me). The command I was used to , system-config-display, is gone
> and I've read that xrandr is the replacement. I can't find a us
b.j. mcclure wrote:
>
>> CentOS 5.8 x86_64 to CentOS 6.2 x86_64. But, I'm stuck with a gnome GUI
>> that only sees 1024x768. Under CentOS 5.8 it saw 1920x1080 (without
>> much work from me). The command I was used to , system-config-display, is
>> gone and I've read that xrandr is the replacemen
On Monday, May 28, 2012 02:22:32 AM David Hrbáč wrote:
> Dne 26.5.2012 18:33, Lamar Owen napsal(a):
> > Which is just as well, since this amavisd-new-milter is different from
> > amavisd-milter, which is currently at version 1.5.0, the version that is
> > compatible with amavisd-new 2.7.0 and up.
Hello,
Need anyone's help regarding issues I encountered during make on
iscsitarget-1.40.20 which I get from "svn co
https://iscsitarget.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/iscsitarget/trunkiscsitarget";
checkout revision 481
Issues where found below after a series of my command, as shown:
[junix@thesis
chiong lawrence wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Need anyone's help regarding issues I encountered during make on
> iscsitarget-1.40.20 which I get from "svn co
> https://iscsitarget.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/iscsitarget/trunkiscsitarget";
> checkout revision 481
>
> Issues where found below after a series of
Hello Mark,
Thanks for your help. Error has been resolved.
I'm now in a right place.
Keep it up!
Kind regards,
lawrence
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:51 PM, wrote:
> chiong lawrence wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Need anyone's help regarding issues I encountered during make on
> > iscsitarget
I just installed a KVM guest, centos 6.2 i686 (6.2 x86_64 host) and the
network module is loaded .
The modules is/are 8139too,8139cp is what lsmod shows. Dmesg shows link
up but ifconfig does not give me an address?
service network restart shows OK no errors but again no address.
I set the ifcfg
Hey, Lawrence,
chiong lawrence wrote:
>
> Thanks for your help. Error has been resolved.
Good deal. Glad to hear it.
>
> I'm now in a right place.
You're welcome.
mark
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/li
> It is even documented on the apache project website for ages
>
> https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/ssl/ssl_faq.html#removepassphrase
Thank's you very much about your respon,, this my problem is solved. i
use options :)
thanks digimer
--
http://mafatahna.web.id
@mafatahna
Is there an lvm command to print out any kind of version information for
the LVM superblock, similar to what "mdmadmin -E" does for raid.
How can I tell whether a mountable device with LVMs on it can be safely
moved between CentOS 5 and CentOS 6 and/or potentially other Linux
distributions? I kno
21 matches
Mail list logo
