On Fri, 25 May 2012 22:52:13 +0530
Arun Khan wrote:
> I have a client project to implement PCI/DSS compliance.
Some advice from my practical professional knowledge...
> The PCI/DSS auditor has stipulated that the web server, application
> middleware (tomcat), the db server have to be on differe
Le ven. 25 mai 2012 13:45:27 CEST, Akemi Yagi a écrit:
> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Philippe Naudin
> wrote:
> > Le ven. 25 mai 2012 09:42:14 CEST, Phil Schaffner a écrit:
>
> >> Check http://elrepo.org/tiki/kmod-compat-wireless to see if it supports
> >> your hardware with the standard ke
On Fri, 25 May 2012 13:47:12 -0400
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Arun Khan wrote:
> > I have a client project to implement PCI/DSS compliance.
> >
> > The PCI/DSS auditor has stipulated that the web server, application
> > middleware (tomcat), the db server have to be on different systems.
> > In addi
Dne 25.5.2012 02:00, Lamar Owen napsal(a):
> At the moment both EPEL and RPMforge are on a 2.6.x amavisd-new; 2.7 makes
> some changes in the AM.PDP protocol that can break, for instance,
> amavisd-milter (distinct from the much less useful amavis-milter). Neither
> repo has amavisd-milter, so
Ran into something weird.
I have my machine CentOS 6.2 running KVM guest of Windows 7.
This works fine while I'm in the office...
Then when I remote in using VNC to my machine - the VNC always
works fine. However, when I try to access the KVM session its like
the mouse has lost its brain.
Anyone
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Based on your errors, what I would do is this:
Thanking you again for all your help.
I have one last question, and then I promise to ask no more!
Could the rpm --force suggestion you make possibly stop the server working?
> 1. You only need 1 version of glibc-common.x86_
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 12:40 AM, Philippe Naudin
wrote:
> Le ven. 25 mai 2012 13:45:27 CEST, Akemi Yagi a écrit:
>> Thank you for the note. The kmod-compat-wireless wiki page has been
>> updated using your lines as an example for installation.
>
> Oh. After re-reading my post, I found a couple o
On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 12:45 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Now this is my last question:
> Can I be reasonably (say 90%) sure that the above command
> will not stop the server running?
No you can NOT and don't ever assume that. That's a mistake thinking
that.
> The problem is that the server is
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> I have my machine CentOS 6.2 running KVM guest of Windows 7.
> This works fine while I'm in the office...
>
> Then when I remote in using VNC to my machine - the VNC always
> works fine. However, when I try to access the KVM session its like
> t
Thanks to all who responded to my query. Collectively, you raised my
awareness PCI/DSS, related tool sets and such.
I have submitted my proposal to the client and I am sure I will
discover a lot more if the proposal is accepted and I begin the
implementation.
@ Rui Miguel Silva Seabra - appreci
On Saturday, May 26, 2012 05:15:41 AM David Hrbáč wrote:
> Dne 25.5.2012 02:00, Lamar Owen napsal(a):
> > At the moment both EPEL and RPMforge are on a 2.6.x amavisd-new; 2.7 makes
> > some changes in the AM.PDP protocol that can break, for instance,
> > amavisd-milter (distinct from the much les
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> >
> To my knowledge no repos have the amavisd-milter package available; I've
> built my own for six years or so. I've used both, and the amavisd-new-milter
> (/usr/sbin/amavis-milter) is not nearly as useful as this amavisd-milter. In
> fa
Arun Khan writes:
>
> On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> > I have my machine CentOS 6.2 running KVM guest of Windows 7.
> > Then when I remote in using VNC to my machine - the VNC always
> > works fine. However, when I try to access the KVM session its like
> > the mouse has
On Sat, 26 May 2012 10:25:54 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
> > Why does the output from file say "Linux 2.6.18" when the actual kernel in
> > use is 2.6.32?
>
> it DOES NOT, learn to read outputs - it speaks about the elfutils
> why should their output reflect the current kernel point version
> it i
On Saturday, May 26, 2012 12:47:04 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
> Have you looked at MimeDefang's ability to run all of your scanners
> out of one milter?
Yes.
Doing the same thing with amavisd-new on the few sendmail installs I still have
running; amavisd-new runs clam (or, at one site, the sopho
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Frank Cox wrote:
>> it DOES NOT, learn to read outputs - it speaks about the elfutils
>> why should their output reflect the current kernel point version
>> it is not their job because "uname" exists
A mail is missing i guess ?
>
> [frankcox@mutt ~]$ rpm -q
Hello,
pardon my chaotic question, but does anybody have an idea,
why can't I suspend vim-enhanced-7.2.411-1.6.el6.x86_64
with a CTRL-Z, then execute few commands at my bash prompt
and then get back to the vim session again with "fg"?
It has stopped working at my CentOS 6.2 machine (I haven't
not
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Alexander Farber
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> pardon my chaotic question, but does anybody have an idea,
> why can't I suspend vim-enhanced-7.2.411-1.6.el6.x86_64
> with a CTRL-Z, then execute few commands at my bash prompt
> and then get back to the vim session again with
On Sat, 26 May 2012 21:32:52 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
> from the binary, "file" does only print what a file contains
Ok, then where does it come from, since it's not the current kernel version and
it's not the elfutils version? gcc somehow finds that number and inserts it
into the binary. Whe
Hi subscribers,
the sponsor of the machine our mailserver runs on will be physically
moving the machine at around May 27th 04:00 UTC. This move will take
until around May 27th 07:00 UTC (or shorter).
This means that there will be no activity on the mailing lists during
that time. We all hope that
John Stanley wrote:
>> Now this is my last question:
>> Can I be reasonably (say 90%) sure that the above command
>> will not stop the server running?
The command in question was: rpm -Uvh --force *.rpm
where the RPMs were glibc and glibc-common.
> No you can NOT and don't ever assume that.
>
On Sun, 2012-05-27 at 01:01 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> John Stanley wrote:
>
> >> Now this is my last question:
> >> Can I be reasonably (say 90%) sure that the above command
> >> will not stop the server running?
>
> The command in question was: rpm -Uvh --force *.rpm
> where the RPMs were g
On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 17:21 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> Ok, then where does it come from, since it's not the current kernel version
> and
> it's not the elfutils version? gcc somehow finds that number and inserts it
> into the binary. Where did it find it and why is that number not the same as
>
23 matches
Mail list logo
