Dear Jeff,
On Thu, 24 May 2012 15:16:13 -1000
Jeff Sadino wrote:
> I have a CentOS4 install and I am trying to mount a Windows Server
> 2008 folder. When I use this command:
You can try the sernet samba repositories.
http://www.sernet.de/en/
http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/3.6/centos/4/sernet-
Dear Wessel,
I'd do the following.
give both servers a static non changing IP:
ldapA.yourdomain.tld, e.g. 10.0.0.1 on eth0
ldapB.yourdomain.tld, e.g. 10.0.0.2 on eth0
These two IPs will always be the same. You can access ldapA or ldapB
anytime via it's designated name.
For failover, use an ali
Hello,
I would like to compile python 2.7.3 for centos and was wondering if there
were any instructions I should follow. I would like to keep the standard
python the way it is. I would like to compile to /opt. Any tips or ideas
would be much appreciated.
--
--- Get your facts first, then you c
On Wednesday 23 May 2012 14.23.31 Alan McKay wrote:
> Hey folks,
...
> I used 'arcconf' to create a big RAID60 out of (see below).
>
> But then I mount it and it is way too small
> This should be about 20TB :
...
> /dev/sdb1 186G 60M 176G 1% /mnt/J4400-1
...
> Here is how I create
From: Rita
>I would like to compile python 2.7.3 for centos and was wondering if there
>were any instructions I should follow. I would like to keep the standard
>python the way it is. I would like to compile to /opt. Any tips or ideas
>would be much appreciated.
Read the file README from the py
Rita wrote on 05/25/2012 06:29 AM:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to compile python 2.7.3 for centos and was wondering if there
> were any instructions I should follow. I would like to keep the standard
> python the way it is. I would like to compile to /opt. Any tips or ideas
> would be much appreciate
Hello,
The support for Broadcom Corporation BCM4313 802.11b/g/n Wireless is
native in the kernel since 2.6.37 (module brcm80211, renamed brcmsmac
since 2.6.39).
But is it backported to some kernel available for CentOS ?
Thanks,
--
Philippe Naudin
___
On 25 May 2012 08:39, Philippe Naudin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The support for Broadcom Corporation BCM4313 802.11b/g/n Wireless is
> native in the kernel since 2.6.37 (module brcm80211, renamed brcmsmac
> since 2.6.39).
>
> But is it backported to some kernel available for CentOS ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
Philippe Naudin wrote on 05/25/2012 08:39 AM:
> Hello,
>
> The support for Broadcom Corporation BCM4313 802.11b/g/n Wireless is
> native in the kernel since 2.6.37 (module brcm80211, renamed brcmsmac
> since 2.6.39).
>
> But is it backported to some kernel available for CentOS ?
>
> Thanks,
>
Chec
Hey folks,
I have a 14TB disk array that I want to use for rsnapshot backups, and
am considering putting a dedup FS onto it. I know I've got about a TB
of duplication, at least. And it is not easy to remove manually.
Google lands me LessFS and SDFS as the prime candidates.
thanks,
-Alan
--
“
Whoops, sorry - looking for opinions and personal experiences
--
“Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV”
- Michael Pollan, author of "In Defense of Food"
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/
Johnny Hughes wrote:
First, thanks very much for continuing to help me.
> On 05/23/2012 04:41 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>
---
Error: Protected multilib versions: glibc-2.12-1.47.el6_2.12.x86_64 !=
glibc-2.12-1.47.el6_2.9.i686
>>>
Tim,
Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 05/23/2012 04:41 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>>> Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> 3. The real issue here is to make sure you figure out HOW you got in
>> this position and how NOT to get into it again.
>
> I think I understand how it occurred.
> I tri
Le ven. 25 mai 2012 09:42:14 CEST, Phil Schaffner a écrit:
> Philippe Naudin wrote on 05/25/2012 08:39 AM:
> > Hello,
> >
> > The support for Broadcom Corporation BCM4313 802.11b/g/n Wireless is
> > native in the kernel since 2.6.37 (module brcm80211, renamed brcmsmac
> > since 2.6.39).
> >
> > Bu
Earl Ramirez wrote on 05/25/2012 09:37 AM:
>
> Philippe,
>
> You can try ELRepo, I believe that they have the drivers for boderdom, they
> also have kernel 3.3.x, please read their note about using kernel 3.3.x. I
> have tried it and I did not have any issues with it.
>
> http://elrepo.org/tiki/ker
On 5/24/2012 8:00 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> I'll step out on a limb here and generalize somewhat; I would think that most
> CentOS users use at least one third-party repository, if the traffic on this
> list is any indication (and, again, I reserve the right to be wrong). So
> knowing how to prop
Is there a way to force file permissions by directory (and subdirectories
under it)?
For example, the user's default umask value is 022 but I want it to be 002 in
certain directories.
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com
www.creekfm.com - FIFTY THOUSAND WATTS
From: Bowie Bailey
> On a related note, I have a server that is using both the epel and
> rpmforge repos. Is there a way to determine which packages came from
> which repo?
You could try something like this:
rpm -qa --qf "%-30{NAME}%{VENDOR}\n"
See the man for more useful tags.
JD
_
Frank Cox wrote:
> Is there a way to force file permissions by directory (and subdirectories
> under it)?
>
> For example, the user's default umask value is 022 but I want it to be 002 in
> certain directories.
>
I have cronjobs like this to regularly give group read permissions (and
x for dirs)
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:00 AM, John Doe wrote:
> From: Bowie Bailey
>
>> On a related note, I have a server that is using both the epel and
>> rpmforge repos. Is there a way to determine which packages came from
>> which repo?
>
> You could try something like this:
> rpm -qa --qf "%-30{NAME
>
> > You could try something like this:
> > rpm -qa --qf "%-30{NAME}%{VENDOR}\n"
>
> In 6.x, yum keeps track of where packages were installed from.
> yum history packages-info packagename(s)
>
Hi. From http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=240877
yum list installed | grep repositoryname
On 5/25/2012 12:43 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:00 AM, John Doe wrote:
>> From: Bowie Bailey
>>
>>> On a related note, I have a server that is using both the epel and
>>> rpmforge repos. Is there a way to determine which packages came from
>>> which repo?
>> You could try
I have a client project to implement PCI/DSS compliance.
The PCI/DSS auditor has stipulated that the web server, application
middleware (tomcat), the db server have to be on different systems.
In addition the auditor has also stipulated that there be a NTP
server, a "patch" server,
The Host OS on
Arun Khan wrote:
> I have a client project to implement PCI/DSS compliance.
>
> The PCI/DSS auditor has stipulated that the web server, application
> middleware (tomcat), the db server have to be on different systems.
> In addition the auditor has also stipulated that there be a NTP
> server, a "pa
wow, seems like quite a lot.
What "level" of PCI/DSS compliance are you going for?
The only other thing I might add
Are you hosting the hardware? If it's
hosted else where then the "facility" that's
hosting the hardware needs to be PCI/DSS complaint.
On 5/25/2012 10:22 AM, Arun Khan wrote:
Ken godee wrote:
> wow, seems like quite a lot.
Heh. When I was working for the company, I had a guy who sat in easy
earshot who was one of their folks who dealt with questions from companies
and businesses. The *easiest* one, the lowest level, was 60 or 63
questions. The serious, highest one was
Bowie Bailey wrote on 05/25/2012 01:00 PM:
> Is "Fedora Project" EPEL?
Yes.
Phil
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
2012/5/25 Arun Khan :
> I have a client project to implement PCI/DSS compliance.
>
> The PCI/DSS auditor has stipulated that the web server, application
> middleware (tomcat), the db server have to be on different systems.
requirement "one primary function per server".
> In addition the auditor h
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Philippe Naudin
wrote:
> Le ven. 25 mai 2012 09:42:14 CEST, Phil Schaffner a écrit:
>> Check http://elrepo.org/tiki/kmod-compat-wireless to see if it supports
>> your hardware with the standard kernel.
>
> Phil, Earl,
>
> Thanks for pointing me to elrepo : yes, th
Users on Machine A with rights to log into and run jobs on Machine B using ssh
want to be able to view and cancel print jobs on Machine B.
This is easily accomplished via the commandline with lpq and lprm, but is there
a GUI that I can give them? I have them running things like scribus using
laun
Greetings,
I *do* still have an FC2 box.
Would anyone second this procedure:
http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=14052&forum=37&post_id=47945
Thanks.
Max Pyziur
p...@brama.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lis
Frank Cox wrote:
> Users on Machine A with rights to log into and run jobs on Machine B using ssh
> want to be able to view and cancel print jobs on Machine B.
>
> This is easily accomplished via the commandline with lpq and lprm, but is
> there
> a GUI that I can give them? I have them running t
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Max Pyziur wrote:
>
> I *do* still have an FC2 box.
>
> Would anyone second this procedure:
> http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=14052&forum=37&post_id=47945
>
It might possibly work, but I can't quite imagine why anyone would
want to do it
On Sat, 26 May 2012 00:05:40 +0200
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> Frank Cox wrote:
> > Users on Machine A with rights to log into and run jobs on Machine B using
> > ssh want to be able to view and cancel print jobs on Machine B.
> >
> > This is easily accomplished via the commandline with lpq and
On Fri, 25 May 2012, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Max Pyziur wrote:
>>
>> I *do* still have an FC2 box.
>>
>> Would anyone second this procedure:
>> http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=14052&forum=37&post_id=47945
>>
>
> It might possibly work, but
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Max Pyziur wrote:
>>>
>>> I *do* still have an FC2 box.
>>>
>>> Would anyone second this procedure:
>>> http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=14052&forum=37&post_id=47945
>>>
>>
>> It might possibly work, but I can't quite imagine why anyone wo
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> I think I understand how it occurred.
>> I tried to yum-remove a package
>> (I don't remember which one, but it wasn't important)
>> and I was told that 300+ packages would be removed.
>> I wasn't sure it I would be asked yes/no to this
>> (I know now that I will always
Greetings,
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> I have a Sun J4400 SAS1 disk array with 24 x 1T drives in it connected
> to a Sunfire x2250 running 5.8 ( 64 bit )
You can perhaps think about using GFS apart from XFS
--
Regards,
Rajagopal
_
I just noticed this, which doesn't actually seem to affect anything but does
create a mystery:
[frankcox@mutt temp]$ cat test.c
#include
int main(void)
{
printf("Hello world\n");
return 0;
}
[frankcox@mutt temp]$ gcc -o test test.c
[frankcox@mutt temp]$ file test
t
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Ken godee wrote:
> wow, seems like quite a lot.
>
> What "level" of PCI/DSS compliance are you going for?
I have to check this with the client. Credit card information will
be encrypted and stored in client's own db.
> The only other thing I might add
>
>
Hi Eero,
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 1:12 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> 2012/5/25 Arun Khan :
>> I have a client project to implement PCI/DSS compliance.
>>
>> The PCI/DSS auditor has stipulated that the web server, application
>> middleware (tomcat), the db server have to be on different systems.
>
>
2012/5/26 Arun Khan :
> Hi Eero,
>
> On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 1:12 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>> 2012/5/25 Arun Khan :
>>> I have a client project to implement PCI/DSS compliance.
>>>
>>> The PCI/DSS auditor has stipulated that the web server, application
>>> middleware (tomcat), the db server have
>> What "level" of PCI/DSS compliance are you going for?
>
> I have to check this with the client. Credit card information will
> be encrypted and stored in client's own db.
Yup, this is exactly what they don't want people to do and
I believe in the future they'll strive for just a handful
of pr
2012/5/26 Ken godee :
>>> What "level" of PCI/DSS compliance are you going for?
>>
>> I have to check this with the client. Credit card information will
>> be encrypted and stored in client's own db.
>
> Yup, this is exactly what they don't want people to do and
> I believe in the future they'll
44 matches
Mail list logo
