Hi
Are there any future plans for CentOS to build and directly provide oVirt
packages compatible with CentOS 6?
If not, has anyone tried the packages available at
http://www.dreyou.org/ovirt/ and would these be considered fit for a
CentOS-based oVirt production setup?
I've heard many great things
On 18/05/2012 4:21 a.m., Rhugga Harper wrote:
> We have a 2-node Oracle RAC that keeps getting the following error:
> kernel: nfs: RPC call returned error 88
>
> The storage being mounted is netapp. We don't see any errors/issues on the
> storage itself or the switches this client is connecting thr
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 13:08 -0600, Michael Coffman wrote:
> vm.overcommit_ratio = 50
^^
Try changing the commit ratio to a greater value (yes you can go over
100).
Then sysctl -w vm.overcommit_memory=2
Just because one machine fails gracefully does not me
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 6:15 AM, John Stanley wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 13:08 -0600, Michael Coffman wrote:
>
> > vm.overcommit_ratio = 50
> ^^
>
> Try changing the commit ratio to a greater value (yes you can go over
> 100).
> Then sysctl -w vm.overcom
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Michael Coffman
wrote:
>
>> Just because one machine fails gracefully does not mean the next will.
>>
>
> I don't even know what the above means.
>
>
>> But really buy some ram for real. OR solve the real problem.
>>
>>
>
> Well that's just ridiculous. 'Real probl
I tried to upgrade one user's system, a Dell Optiplex GX620, and yum got a
GPF. After *much* grief, I finally gave up, and rebuilt the system.
Or, rather, I'm trying to. First problem: I did a minimal install from the
graphical installer - I don't know if that's relevant - but when it boots,
it do
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> I tried to upgrade one user's system, a Dell Optiplex GX620, and yum got a
> GPF. After *much* grief, I finally gave up, and rebuilt the system.
>
> Or, rather, I'm trying to. First problem: I did a minimal install from the
> graphical installer - I don't know if that's re
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 7:50 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Michael Coffman
> wrote:
> >
> >> Just because one machine fails gracefully does not mean the next will.
> >>
> >
> > I don't even know what the above means.
> >
> >
> >> But really buy some ram for real. OR
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Michael Coffman
wrote:
>
>> If you are already overcommitted, what do you expect to happen when
>> you say not to allow that? The kernel doesn't have a really good way
>> to handle that situation (or any other OOM condition for that
>> matter...).
>>
>>
> OK. S
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Michael Coffman
> wrote:
> >
> >> If you are already overcommitted, what do you expect to happen when
> >> you say not to allow that? The kernel doesn't have a really good way
> >> to handle that situation
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Michael Coffman
> wrote:
> >
> >> If you are already overcommitted, what do you expect to happen when
> >> you say not to allow that? The kernel doesn't have a really good way
> >> to handle that situation
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Michael Coffman
> wrote:
> >
> >> If you are already overcommitted, what do you expect to happen when
> >> you say not to allow that? The kernel doesn't have a really good way
> >> to handle that situation
On 05/18/12 10:09 AM, Michael Coffman wrote:
> 99 2425 1 4052 136382123488
> /opt/ictools/64bit/synopsys-aserver/bin/AServer
^^
well, I dunno what that process is, but thats a HUGE vsize.
--
john r pierceN 37, W 122
sa
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 11:23 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 05/18/12 10:09 AM, Michael Coffman wrote:
> > 99 2425 1 4052 136382123488
> /opt/ictools/64bit/synopsys-aserver/bin/AServer
> ^^
>
> well, I dunno what that process is, but thats a HUGE vsiz
- Original Message -
> - Original Message -
> > Greetings-
> >
> > I'm attempting to install CentOS-6 x86_64 to a virtual machine
> > running via KVM on a Proxmox 1.9 system. The specs are 4x CPUs, 4GB
> > RAM, and 160GB HDD. Installation proceeds fine using either minimal
> > or n
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Tim Nelson wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> - Original Message -
>> > Greetings-
>> >
>> > I'm attempting to install CentOS-6 x86_64 to a virtual machine
>> > running via KVM on a Proxmox 1.9 system. The specs are 4x CPUs, 4GB
>> > RAM, and 160GB HD
On Fri, 18 May 2012, Tim Nelson wrote:
Surely *someone* has installed CentOS 6 in a KVM VM and gotten it to
work? :)
Time after time after time. :-)
--
Paul Heinlein
heinl...@madboa.com
45°38' N, 122°6' W___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
htt
Hi,
I just learned that there exists a "z-stream" channel upstream that
apparently carries some important bugfixes. Does anyone know what the
policies are for this channel and how this relates to centos releases?
Regards,
Dennis
___
CentOS mailing list
On 05/18/2012 11:19 PM, Tim Nelson wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> - Original Message -
>>> Greetings-
>>>
>>> I'm attempting to install CentOS-6 x86_64 to a virtual machine
>>> running via KVM on a Proxmox 1.9 system. The specs are 4x CPUs, 4GB
>>> RAM, and 160GB HDD. Installation
On 05/18/2012 05:32 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> Hi,
> I just learned that there exists a "z-stream" channel upstream that
> apparently carries some important bugfixes. Does anyone know what the
> policies are for this channel and how this relates to centos releases?
>
> Regards,
> Dennis
- Original Message -
> On 05/18/2012 11:19 PM, Tim Nelson wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> >> - Original Message -
> >>> Greetings-
> >>>
> >>> I'm attempting to install CentOS-6 x86_64 to a virtual machine
> >>> running via KVM on a Proxmox 1.9 system. The specs are 4x CPU
Rhugga Harper wrote on 05/17/2012 03:58 PM:
> I just installed CentOS 5.6 32-bit
Have you tried installing the current/supported CentOS-5 release 5.8?
Phil
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> I see a delay after all packages are installed as well sometimes and I
> think this has something to do with post-install jobs that have to be done.
> How big is your boot partition?
I see a huge delay as well, and I think it's unrelated to %post. I've timed
my kickstart file %post section a
- Original Message -
>
> > I see a delay after all packages are installed as well sometimes
> > and I
> > think this has something to do with post-install jobs that have to
> > be done.
> > How big is your boot partition?
>
> I see a huge delay as well, and I think it's unrelated to %po
24 matches
Mail list logo
