Hi John,
Thanks for the explanation.
I looked at the BIOS and found the following where the pseudo MAC
address is from:
Planar Ether 1 MAC Address: E4:1F:13:77:16:5F > This is
shown in ifconfig eth0
Plan
Dear All,
I did promise to come back and update you after the problem resolved, but
before that i am grateful and personally thanking to everyone for their
input, efforts & energy.
Dear Markus Falb,
i apologies for my statement yesterday, i actually missed the part of your
email, undoubtedly the
On 04/13/12 1:14 AM, sri wrote:
> BMC MAC Address: E4:1F:13:77:16:61 ==> This is the MAC address my
> SW is showing on the SW port connected to my eth0
>
The BMC ("Baseboard Management Controller" or something like that) is
another name for a management processor, similar to the IPMI I
ment
From: TE Dukes
> Tying to setup bacula but it seems the package(s) are missing the mysql file
> to set up the database. I see some updatedb files to upgrade a mysql
> database but none for a new installation.
I only have some experience on old 2.x versions of bacula but:
# ls -1 /usr/lib64/bacul
On 04/12/2012 12:02 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Vinay Nagrik wrote:
>> Hello Group,
>>
>> I created a VM with 5.7 Centos DVD-1. My task is to compile openssh5.8p2
>> (src.rpm downloaded from openssh site.) on the system. It gave some
>> errors about some buildrequires rpm not found. I took car
On Thursday 12 April 2012 13.36.03 m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Hey, folks,
>
> I've just started seeing
> Apr 12 13:09:59 kernel: [Hardware Error]:
> MC4_STATUS[Over|CE|MiscV|-|AddrV|-|Poison|CECC]: 0xdd0accf2001d011b
> Apr 12 13:09:59 kernel: [Hardware Error]: Northbridge Error (node
> 1, core 1)
On Thursday 12 April 2012 15.02.31 m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Vinay Nagrik wrote:
> > Hello Group,
> >
> > I created a VM with 5.7 Centos DVD-1. My task is to compile openssh5.8p2
> > (src.rpm downloaded from openssh site.) on the system. It gave some
> > errors about some buildrequires rpm not f
> Any ideas why this might be happening? I couldn't find anything related
> in the migration guide, and this looks like a bug to me.
During installation:
# lvdisplay
...
--- Logical volume ---
LV Name/dev/vol0/lvol4
VG Namevol0
LV UUID9
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of John Doe
> Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 4:55 AM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Bacula - missing mysql file?
>
> From: TE Dukes
>
> > Tying to setup bacula but i
Le 13/04/2012 10:29, John R Pierce a écrit :
> The BMC ("Baseboard Management Controller" or something like that) is
> another name for a management processor, similar to the IPMI I
> mentioned. This can be used for monitoring the system status, lights
> out management like remote power off and o
Good morning,
Dell has once again obsoleted out hardware and we're moving forward to the
Optiplex 790 as a shipping platform with the integrated Intel graphics chip.
We're using CentOS 5.6 32 and 64-bit with a 2.6.18 kernel.
What are my options for supporting the newest Intel graphics chipset
OK, I solved this, partially. It turns out that this is
'nearly always caused by a host that is configured on private IP Space (or
using NAT) and that does not have an interface for the public IP address the
server resides on. This can be easily fixed by simply using native IP address
lookups
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn <
denni...@conversis.de> wrote:
> On 04/12/2012 03:14 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
> > Hello listmates,
> >
> > Here's I am, trying to install Centos 6.2 64-bit on a server with 24 TB
> of
> > disk RAIDed as RAID 6. So I get this 18 TB disk (the R
I have an old dell 2450 that was running kernel 2.6.18-308.1.1.el5 I then
upgraded it via yum to 2.6.18-308.1.1.el5. Now when the server boots to the
new kernel, 2.6.18-308.1.1.el5 it hangs on "starting iSCSI" and the weird
thing is when I tried to switch back to the older 2.6.18-308.1.1.el5 kernel
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Paul A wrote:
> I have an old dell 2450 that was running kernel 2.6.18-308.1.1.el5 I then
> upgraded it via yum to 2.6.18-308.1.1.el5. Now when the server boots to the
> new kernel, 2.6.18-308.1.1.el5 it hangs on "starting iSCSI" and the weird
> thing is when I tr
Hello Group,
I am building a company application based on Centos 5.7 OS. The
application was working earlier and creating right partitions both for
hardware as well as VM.
But since we introduced Centos 5.7 OS and start building application with
5.7 anaconda the hardware partitions are duplicate
>> On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:13:14 +0200,
>> Tilman Schmidt said:
T> The most frequent reason for a lot of unmatched entries showing up is
T> that the corresponding logwatch script is out of date wrt the program
T> whose log is being watched. Program maintainers tend to change the
T> wording of mes
I'm running Raid with scsi disks so I'm assuming it's needed correct?
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Dale Dellutri
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 1:32 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] upgrade issue
On Fri, A
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Paul A wrote:
> I'm running Raid with scsi disks so I'm assuming it's needed correct?
iSCSI is for carrying SCSI command s and data over IP networks.
I don't know how your RAID is set up, but it isn't normally done with
iSCSI. See, for example:
http://en.wikipe
Dale, I disabled it and the server came up but im seeing all sorts of kernel
errors when its disabled ( see below ). If this can't be fixed I would
really like to boot the previous kernel however the network script won't
start. Im not really sure how upgrading the kernel caused the network to
stop
Paul A wrote:
> Dale, I disabled it and the server came up but im seeing all sorts of
> kernel
> errors when its disabled ( see below ). If this can't be fixed I would
> really like to boot the previous kernel however the network script won't
> start. Im not really sure how upgrading the kernel cau
Mark, I used the centos repos, this server has centos 5.8.
Iscsi will work on my previous kernel but not on the new one. I wanted to
switch back to the previous kernel but for some reason the network scripts
hangs even though it shows the e100 nic driver loaded.
-Original Message-
From:
On 04/14/2012 04:26 AM, Brian McGrew wrote:
> Good morning,
>
> Dell has once again obsoleted out hardware and we're moving forward to the
> Optiplex 790 as a shipping platform with the integrated Intel graphics chip.
> We're using CentOS 5.6 32 and 64-bit with a 2.6.18 kernel.
>
> What are my o
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Rob Kampen wrote:
> On 04/14/2012 04:26 AM, Brian McGrew wrote:
>> Dell has once again obsoleted out hardware and we're moving forward to the
>> Optiplex 790 as a shipping platform with the integrated Intel graphics chip.
>> We're using CentOS 5.6 32 and 64-bi
On 04/13/12 1:02 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>>> What are my options for supporting the newest Intel graphics chipsets?
>> > try elrepo
> The xorg-x11-drv-intel (and related) packages are available only for EL6. :(
>
> http://elrepo.org/tiki/xorg-x11-drv-intel
sounds like its way past time to upgrade s
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Paul A wrote:
> Dale, I disabled it and the server came up but im seeing all sorts of kernel
> errors when its disabled ( see below ). If this can't be fixed I would
> really like to boot the previous kernel however the network script won't
> start. Im not really s
On 04/13/2012 07:35 PM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
> ons dont seem to be
I did not see any code about smtp connnections...
have you correct connection parameters for your smtp?
smtp server ? smtp authentication(TLS. ldap. or static ip)? smtp port?
with little googling look at the samples...
an
Fixed the network issue by removing the net udev rule, somehow that was
causing the network no to come up. Disabled iscsid since it's not needed and
added did echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs to fix the
megaraid issue.
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mai
On 13.4.2012 19:51, Vinay Nagrik wrote:
> Hello Group,
>
> I am building a company application based on Centos 5.7 OS. The
> application was working earlier and creating right partitions both for
> hardware as well as VM.
>
> But since we introduced Centos 5.7 OS and start building application w
On 13.4.2012 23:23, Paul A wrote:
> did echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs to fix the
> megaraid issue.
You did not fix a megaraid issue, you stopped logging it.
--
Kind Regards, Markus Falb
Resident do not top post guerilla
http://centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=16
(The
On 4/13/2012 2:23 PM, Karl Vogel wrote:
>>> On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:13:14 +0200,
>>> Tilman Schmidt said:
> T> The most frequent reason for a lot of unmatched entries showing up is
> T> that the corresponding logwatch script is out of date wrt the program
> T> whose log is being watched. Program
On 13.4.2012 23:39, Bob Hoffman wrote:
> I was trying to stay with the base centos repo and only grab a few
> programs off of other repos (like phpymyadmin).
>
> Unfortunately, I think it is better, now that I have played with them,
> to skip the repos and go straight to the source for some thi
I just ordered a new machine that's destined to become a Centos 6 application
server for a publishing company, and decided to get one with a 40GB SSD as well
as a standard hard drive.
I'm thinking that I can put most of the operating system on that drive and have
the home directories and whatnot
On 04/13/12 2:59 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
> I just ordered a new machine that's destined to become a Centos 6 application
> server for a publishing company, and decided to get one with a 40GB SSD as
> well
> as a standard hard drive.
>
> I'm thinking that I can put most of the operating system on tha
On 4/13/2012 5:57 PM, Markus Falb wrote:
> On 13.4.2012 23:39, Bob Hoffman wrote:
>
>> I was trying to stay with the base centos repo and only grab a few
>> programs off of other repos (like phpymyadmin).
>>
>> Unfortunately, I think it is better, now that I have played with them,
>> to skip the re
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:27:16 -0700
John R Pierce wrote:
> a server typically makes very little access of the system drive once the
> OS and services are loaded... sure, the boot time will be hugely sped
> up, but how often do you reboot a production server?
This is an application server with
On 04/13/12 3:42 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
> This is an application server with a bunch of terminals that hang off of it.
> The idea is to have "instant on" for stuff like Gimp, Scribus, Inkscape,
> LibreOffice, and whatnot which I'm thinking would live on the SSD. The
> data files, caches and so on wo
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:50:19 -0700
John R Pierce wrote:
> ah, i would call that a 'terminal server', thats quite a different
> workload then. I was thinking of 'application server' as something
> like Tomcat, providing webservices.
I thought about calling it that, but when I think of a termin
On 14.4.2012 00:28, Bob Hoffman wrote:
> On 4/13/2012 5:57 PM, Markus Falb wrote:
>> On 13.4.2012 23:39, Bob Hoffman wrote:
>>
>>> I was trying to stay with the base centos repo and only grab a few
>>> programs off of other repos (like phpymyadmin).
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, I think it is better, now
On Apr 13, 2012, at 5:59 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
> I just ordered a new machine that's destined to become a Centos 6 application
> server for a publishing company, and decided to get one with a 40GB SSD as
> well
> as a standard hard drive.
>
> I'm thinking that I can put most of the operating sy
On 04/13/12 5:18 PM, aurfalien wrote:
> Works fine, stick with the Intel X series, not the M.
he said $100, so I'm guessing a consumer grade SSD like a oCZ, etc.
--
john r pierceN 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast
___
On Apr 13, 2012, at 8:28 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 04/13/12 5:18 PM, aurfalien wrote:
>> Works fine, stick with the Intel X series, not the M.
>
> he said $100, so I'm guessing a consumer grade SSD like a oCZ, etc.
Oh yea, sorry.
Yep you got it, the OCZs.
- aurf
___
I might be needing to utilize one of the provided virtualization packages
either in a headless
console only setup of CentOS or on my desktop. I havent used anything but ESXi
in ages
except virtualbox which I did not like at all. Most of the guests which I will
need to run will be
wnidows based a
On 04/13/12 8:25 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> I might be needing to utilize one of the provided virtualization packages
> either in a headless
> console only setup of CentOS or on my desktop. I havent used anything but
> ESXi in ages
> except virtualbox which I did not like at all. Most of the g
44 matches
Mail list logo
