On 19.3.2012 10:14, Peter Kjellström wrote:
> On Sunday 18 March 2012 19.40.21 Ray Van Dolson wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 08:04:14PM +0100, Markus Falb wrote:
>>> What filesystem? Assuming ext3, this cannot shrunk without unmounting.
>>> I believe the following *should* work for ext3
>>>
>>>
On 19.3.2012 10:16, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 03/19/12 2:14 AM, Peter Kjellström wrote:
>> I can also add that I've successfully managed to shrink ext3 before but a
>> verified backup is probably good advice..
>
> does resize2fs relocate blocks or is it restricted to shrinking only to
> last high
From: Jeff Boyce
> I have a Centos 6 box fully updated that intermittently sends me an
> "[abrt] full crash report" email. I am not familiar with these at all
> and ...
> Mar 19 15:07:10 tempbackup kernel: rpm[19022]: segfault at 8b96000 ip
> 008a3fcc sp bfe251e0 error 4 in libc-2.12.so[8
From: Alan McKay
> I turned on process accounting and had a peek at the man page for dump-acct
> but I am still left wondering how best to make use of this info.
> We want to be able to produce some monthly stats on which labs are using
> how much of our clusters. I know our clustering softwar
Done!
Attention: Shrink/Extend a filesystem may damage the data on it, pls backup
date before.
1. Decrease /dev/mapper/vg_web-lv_home
# umount /dev/mapper/vg_web-lv_home
# e2fsck -f /dev/mapper/vg_web-lv_home
# resize2fs /dev/mapper/vg_web-lv_home
# lvresize -L /dev/mapper/vg0-lv_h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 3/20/2012 5:25 AM, Markus Falb wrote:
> On 19.3.2012 10:14, Peter Kjellström wrote:
>> On Sunday 18 March 2012 19.40.21 Ray Van Dolson wrote:
>>> On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 08:04:14PM +0100, Markus Falb wrote:
>
What filesystem? Assuming ext3, th
On Tuesday 20 March 2012 10.25.38 Markus Falb wrote:
> On 19.3.2012 10:14, Peter Kjellström wrote:
> > On Sunday 18 March 2012 19.40.21 Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> >> On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 08:04:14PM +0100, Markus Falb wrote:
> >>> What filesystem? Assuming ext3, this cannot shrunk without unmounting
I can not disable the auto-negotiation (eth1) on my centos 6.2 via
ethtool or /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1
the eth1 is a private network on a cheap gigabit-switch (under controll
from a serverhoster). sometime the ethernet-card lost the "speed" and
"duplex" information and change i
On 20 March 2012 14:29, sebastian wrote:
> I can not disable the auto-negotiation (eth1) on my centos 6.2 via
> ethtool or /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1
>
Autonegotiation is mandatory for 1000BASE-T as both sides have to work
out which pairs they are going to use.
Check:
1)cable
2)swi
Michael Simpson wrote:
> On 20 March 2012 14:29, sebastian wrote:
>> I can not disable the auto-negotiation (eth1) on my centos 6.2 via
>> ethtool or /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1
>>
>
> Autonegotiation is mandatory for 1000BASE-T as both sides have to work
> out which pairs they are g
Am 20.03.2012 16:33, schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us:
> Michael Simpson wrote:
>> On 20 March 2012 14:29, sebastian wrote:
>>> I can not disable the auto-negotiation (eth1) on my centos 6.2 via
>>> ethtool or /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1
>>>
>> Autonegotiation is mandatory for 1000BASE-T a
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:47 AM, sebastian wrote:
> Am 20.03.2012 16:33, schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us:
>> Michael Simpson wrote:
>>> On 20 March 2012 14:29, sebastian wrote:
I can not disable the auto-negotiation (eth1) on my centos 6.2 via
ethtool or /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-e
Does anyone here know which CentOS release added support for 8086:1521,
some I350 class device? We cannot get it to work under 5.4/igb driver
version 1.3.16-k2. There must have been some major updates since,
5.8 driver is 3.0.6-k2-2 and current is 3.3.6.
__
On 20/03/12 16:38, lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
>
> Does anyone here know which CentOS release added support for 8086:1521,
> some I350 class device? We cannot get it to work under 5.4/igb driver
> version 1.3.16-k2. There must have been some major updates since,
> 5.8 driver is 3.
sebastian wrote:
> Am 20.03.2012 16:33, schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us:
>> Michael Simpson wrote:
>>> On 20 March 2012 14:29, sebastian wrote:
I can not disable the auto-negotiation (eth1) on my centos 6.2 via
ethtool or /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1
>>> Autonegotiation is man
I am not sure, but I was having a lot of problems with the stock driver in
6.2...I updated to the latest 3.3.6 and it all seems normal now.
>>> 3/20/2012 12:38 PM >>>
Does anyone here know which CentOS release added support for 8086:1521,
some I350 class device? We cannot get it to work under 5
Hello,
I have several CentOS 6.2 hosts (2.6.32-220.7.1.el6.x86_64) that lock up
when attempting to use the Gnome desktop from the console. I can always
log in, but then all I get is the blue root window, the round initial
mouse pointer, and nothing else. The last process associated with the
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 11:21:19 -0700
Jack Bailey wrote:
> Has anyone seen this before and/or know how to troubleshoot it?
Does it work if you set up a new user and log in as the new user?
If not, have you made any changes in /etc/skel?
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvill
On 20.03.2012 14:21, Jack Bailey wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have several CentOS 6.2 hosts (2.6.32-220.7.1.el6.x86_64) that lock
> up
> when attempting to use the Gnome desktop from the console. I can
> always
> log in, but then all I get is the blue root window, the round initial
> mouse pointer, and
On 03/20/12 11:59, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
> My first reaction would be to look at /etc/X11/xorg.conf, if there is
> one - the few that don't might have some odd differences from generic.
> Should I assume that the ones that hang are USB mice& keyboards? How
> old are the ones that hang?
Thank
On 20.03.2012 15:11, Jack Bailey wrote:
> On 03/20/12 11:59, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>
>> My first reaction would be to look at /etc/X11/xorg.conf, if there
>> is
>> one - the few that don't might have some odd differences from
>> generic.
>> Should I assume that the ones that hang are USB mice
On 03/20/12 12:19, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> On 20.03.2012 15:11, Jack Bailey wrote:
>> On 03/20/12 11:59, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>>
>>> My first reaction would be to look at /etc/X11/xorg.conf, if there
>>> is
>>> one - the few that don't might have some odd differences from
>>> generic.
>>> Sh
On 20.03.2012 16:21, Jack Bailey wrote:
> On 03/20/12 12:19, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> On 20.03.2012 15:11, Jack Bailey wrote:
>>> On 03/20/12 11:59, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
My first reaction would be to look at /etc/X11/xorg.conf, if there
is one - the few that don't might have so
On 03/20/2012 02:21 PM Jack Bailey wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have several CentOS 6.2 hosts (2.6.32-220.7.1.el6.x86_64) that lock up
> when attempting to use the Gnome desktop from the console. I can always
> log in, but then all I get is the blue root window, the round initial
> mouse pointer, and
On 20.03.2012 17:09, ken wrote:
> On 03/20/2012 02:21 PM Jack Bailey wrote:
> Also you may want to try invoking startx from runlevel 5.
That doesn't make sense to me - runlevel 5, AFAIK, *is* X running.
mark
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@cento
On 03/20/12 14:11, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> On 20.03.2012 17:09, ken wrote:
>> On 03/20/2012 02:21 PM Jack Bailey wrote:
>
>> Also you may want to try invoking startx from runlevel 5.
> That doesn't make sense to me - runlevel 5, AFAIK, *is* X running.
Right. I am running at run level 3 so I ca
Hi.
I have a CentOS 6.2 virtual machine in a vmware ESXi 4.0 host 4G Ram 4
virtaul cpus and with about 4 TB of disk space formatted with XFS .
I'm seeing a lot of :
Mar 21 10:49:42 nzhmlfpr05 kernel: XFS (dm-4): xlog_space_left: head behind tail
Mar 21 10:49:42 nzhmlfpr05 kernel: tail_cycle = 12
On 03/20/12 2:54 PM, Gregory Machin wrote:
> I have a CentOS 6.2 virtual machine in a vmware ESXi 4.0 host 4G Ram 4
> virtaul cpus and with about 4 TB of disk space formatted with XFS .
> I'm seeing a lot of :
>
> Mar 21 10:49:42 nzhmlfpr05 kernel: XFS (dm-4): xlog_space_left: head behind
> tail
>
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:13 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 03/20/12 2:54 PM, Gregory Machin wrote:
>> I have a CentOS 6.2 virtual machine in a vmware ESXi 4.0 host 4G Ram 4
>> virtaul cpus and with about 4 TB of disk space formatted with XFS .
>> I'm seeing a lot of :
>>
>> Mar 21 10:49:42 nzhmlf
On 03/20/2012 04:31 PM, Jack Bailey wrote:
> On 03/20/12 14:11, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> On 20.03.2012 17:09, ken wrote:
>>> On 03/20/2012 02:21 PM Jack Bailey wrote:
>>
>>> Also you may want to try invoking startx from runlevel 5.
>> That doesn't make sense to me - runlevel 5, AFAIK, *is* X run
31 matches
Mail list logo
