On Sunday 18 March 2012 19.40.21 Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 08:04:14PM +0100, Markus Falb wrote:
...
> > What filesystem? Assuming ext3, this cannot shrunk without unmounting.
> > I believe the following *should* work for ext3
> >
> > $ umount /home
> > $ e2fsck -f /dev/vg_web
On 03/19/12 2:14 AM, Peter Kjellström wrote:
> I can also add that I've successfully managed to shrink ext3 before but a
> verified backup is probably good advice..
does resize2fs relocate blocks or is it restricted to shrinking only to
last high water block in use ?
--
john r pierce
Jake Shipton writes:
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 01:33:36 +
> n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've just updated the RPMs for Libreoffice to match version 3.4.5
>> (from Fedora 16). If you have my repo[1] installed simply do a:
>> yum --enablerepo=nux-libreoffice-testing update libreoffice*
>
Le lun. 19 mars 2012 09:50:21 CET, n...@li.nux.ro a écrit:
> ...
> I see this trend a lot, to make repos out of official rpms (at least
> Ljubomir is also doing it). Maybe it's worth doing this on a bigger scale.
> Care to share what exactly you are doing? Are you using any "meta" packages?
One i
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:50:21 +
n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
> Jake,
>
> Sure, 3.5 is on the to do list.
> I see this trend a lot, to make repos out of official rpms (at least
> Ljubomir is also doing it). Maybe it's worth doing this on a bigger
> scale. Care to share what exactly you are doing? Are
Philippe Naudin writes:
> Le lun. 19 mars 2012 09:50:21 CET, n...@li.nux.ro a écrit:
>> ...
>> I see this trend a lot, to make repos out of official rpms (at least
>> Ljubomir is also doing it). Maybe it's worth doing this on a bigger scale.
>> Care to share what exactly you are doing? Are you us
Jake Shipton writes:
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:50:21 +
> n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
>
>> Jake,
>>
>> Sure, 3.5 is on the to do list.
>> I see this trend a lot, to make repos out of official rpms (at least
>> Ljubomir is also doing it). Maybe it's worth doing this on a bigger
>> scale. Care to sha
Arif,
You would want to run tcpdump (or some other sniffer() on the host server, so
that you can confirm that there is two-way traffic. If tcpdump on the host
server does not show any traffic from your client, something is blocking
inbound. If you see traffic coming into the server, but nothing
On 03/18/2012 10:34 AM, madu...@gmail.com wrote:
> I need to shrink /home(755G) to 150GB and use free space to add to the
> existing /(50G).
...
> Need to have the step, can this be done online or need to go offline
> (umount) the file systems.
To shink an ext3 filesystem, it'll have to be offline
Hey folks,
I turned on process accounting and had a peek at the man page for dump-acct
but I am still left wondering how best to make use of this info.
We want to be able to produce some monthly stats on which labs are using
how much of our clusters.I know our clustering software has the abil
Hi all,
Wondering if any one has seen odd NFS client behavior with a 5.8 NFS
server?
While by Nix and OSX clients are fine, my Windows clients are acting up.
I can no longer mount any NFS share from a 5.8 NFS server box on my
Winblowz clients.
I'll keep digging around but nothing has change
Greetings -
I have a Centos 6 box fully updated that intermittently sends me an
"[abrt] full crash report" email. I am not familiar with these at all and
in my limited google search have not found good information to interpret
this information. The most recent (and the most frequent one)
OK, I've got 2 machines running CentOS. One running CentOS x86_64 6.2
and the other running CentOS x86_64 5.8. At some upgrade point I've
lost all sound using Firefox and Thunderbird with my Gnome desktop.
When I bring up 'System', 'Preferences', 'Sound' and go to the
hardware tab and test
13 matches
Mail list logo
