Hi all,
I have strange problem with my persistent names applied to iscsi
disks. I have configured an udev rule to assign static iscsi disk
names:
KERNEL=="sd[a-z]", SUBSYSTEM=="block", PROGRAM="/sbin/scsi_id
--whitelisted --replace-whitespace --device=/dev/$name",
RESULT=="1iTGTDSK9a2c73ce654d0c
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 07:48:14PM -0700, Nataraj wrote:
> On 03/12/2012 02:25 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> > Here's a question: is there any way to inspect an email's headers, and
> > reject it if the alleged FWDN in the From:" doesn't match the oldest
> > "Received: "?
> That would be a good t
*Nataraj*
/Tue Mar 13 02:01:36 EDT 2012/ wrote:
>On 03/12/2012 10:06 PM, Nataraj wrote:
>>/ On 03/12/2012 09:08 PM, Ron Loftin wrote:
/>>>/ I'm going to chuck in my 2 cents worth here, as I've been using Postfix
/>>>/ as a first-line filter for some years now.
//
/>pbl.spamhaus.org (dynamic IP
On most of the CentOS 5 machines I manage, if I run "yum list
installed" the third column just says "installed" for all
packages. But on one machine, some lines show instead a repo
name preceded by an @ sign. Apparently the repo from which the
package was installed, which would be immensely useful.
Hello,
I am confused by a warning from mkswap :
When making a swap on a LVM volume, I see the following warning :
mkswap: /dev/vg_SDB1/swap_test6_64: warning: don't erase bootbits
sectors on whole disk. Use -f to force.
Setting up swapspace version 1, size = 1048572 KiB
Is it safe to use m
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 23:39 +0100, Jure Pečar wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:12:13 -0400
> Bob Hoffman wrote:
> > On my centos 5 server I just used sendmail with spamassassin and it
> > killed a lot. Still, 100s, sometimes more made it through. Then
> > thunderbird would weed out more, learned
On Mar 12, 2012, at 5:25 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Here's a question: is there any way to inspect an email's headers, and
> reject it if the alleged FWDN in the From:" doesn't match the oldest
> "Received: "?
That would be problematic with dual homed mail gateways that received on
internal i
Ross Walker wrote:
> On Mar 12, 2012, at 5:25 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> Here's a question: is there any way to inspect an email's headers, and
>> reject it if the alleged FWDN in the From:" doesn't match the oldest
>> "Received: "?
>
> That would be problematic with dual homed mail gateways
Am 13.03.2012 00:48, schrieb Nataraj:
> I have been sucessfully using 8GB dual layer DVDs for some of my
> backups/archiving and now that the price of Blu ray has come down I am
> about to experiment with that. I have been writing dump format files to
> the DVD's and then writing an SHA256 checksu
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 08:53:06 -0400
Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> > > Now I have set up a centos 6 box using postfix. Today I decided to try
> > > to add smtpd restrictions. After a lot of reading and testing I 'seem'
> > > to be doing incredible.
> > I've switched to postfix back in 2001 and yes
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Jure Pečar wrote:
> >
>> It does seem like this should be out-of-the box on this point.
>
> Then add user management, webmail, webmail extensions that enable users to
> manage their own settings, antispam policies, vacations, addressbooks and
> whatnot.
I think
Tilman Schmidt wrote:
> Am 13.03.2012 00:48, schrieb Nataraj:
>> I have been sucessfully using 8GB dual layer DVDs for some of my
>> backups/archiving and now that the price of Blu ray has come down I am
>> about to experiment with that. I have been writing dump format files to
>> the DVD's and th
Well, I updated my system late last week, and just thought to look: yes,
I'm on t-bird 10.0.1, and I pull up the search messages window, and click
on the dropdown... and there is NO OPTION to search the content of the
messages.
Maybe kmail, or maybe mutt
mark
_
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:30 AM, C. L. Martinez wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have strange problem with my persistent names applied to iscsi
> disks. I have configured an udev rule to assign static iscsi disk
> names:
>
> KERNEL=="sd[a-z]", SUBSYSTEM=="block", PROGRAM="/sbin/scsi_id
> --whitelisted --re
A couple weeks ago, after we moved a user's home directory from a 5.7 box
to 6.2, he came to complain about slowness.
Unpack file from NFS-mounted directory to local disk, like /tmp,
everything's normal. cd to the NFS-mounted directory, and unpack it there,
and it was six to seven times slower. We
I have a virtual machine on linode.com that runs dual stack IPv4 and
IPv6. On Sunday I upgraded to Centos 5.8 and now I cannot connect with
ssh on IPv4. I get a 'connection refused' because there is no listener
on the ssh port for IPv4. It appears to work just fine for IPv6, but I
cannot acces
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:14 AM, wrote:
> Well, I updated my system late last week, and just thought to look: yes,
> I'm on t-bird 10.0.1, and I pull up the search messages window, and click
> on the dropdown... and there is NO OPTION to search the content of the
> messages.
Did yours go throug
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 11:14:30 -0400
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Well, I updated my system late last week, and just thought to look:
> yes, I'm on t-bird 10.0.1, and I pull up the search messages window,
> and click on the dropdown... and there is NO OPTION to search the
> content of the messages.
>
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
Hey folks,
I have 1 system ( Sunfire x2250 running 5.7 ) that is having issues with
RAM, but I'm not sure how to debug it. And unfortunately it is not under
support anymore.
I started the job about 4 months ago and when I came aboard the guy who
handed stuff over to me told me this issue was on
Hi,
Can someone give me some pointer or links to understand how Filelocking and
rquotad works on NFS ?
I searched a lot on google , didn't get any good articles on that.
--
Regards
Basil
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.o
On 03/13/2012 07:02 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Ross Walker wrote:
>> On Mar 12, 2012, at 5:25 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>
>>> Here's a question: is there any way to inspect an email's headers, and
>>> reject it if the alleged FWDN in the From:" doesn't match the oldest
>>> "Received: "?
>> Th
On 03/13/2012 10:14 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Well, I updated my system late last week, and just thought to look: yes,
> I'm on t-bird 10.0.1, and I pull up the search messages window, and click
> on the dropdown... and there is NO OPTION to search the content of the
> messages.
>
> Maybe kmail
On Tuesday 13 March 2012 13.07.52 Tilman Schmidt wrote:
> On most of the CentOS 5 machines I manage, if I run "yum list
> installed" the third column just says "installed" for all
> packages. But on one machine, some lines show instead a repo
> name preceded by an @ sign. Apparently the repo from w
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Alan McKay wrote:
>
> Back about 3 months ago I took this system down and removed all the RAM,
> and stuck individual chips into it and booted it, testing each chip on its
> own. At that time every single one of them worked! But I'm about to try
> this again t
On Tuesday 13 March 2012 13.41.53 Philippe Naudin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am confused by a warning from mkswap :
>
> When making a swap on a LVM volume, I see the following warning :
> mkswap: /dev/vg_SDB1/swap_test6_64: warning: don't erase bootbits
> sectors on whole disk. Use -f to force.
>
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:14 AM, wrote:
>> Well, I updated my system late last week, and just thought to look: yes,
>> I'm on t-bird 10.0.1, and I pull up the search messages window, and
>> click on the dropdown... and there is NO OPTION to search the content
of the
>> mess
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 03/13/2012 10:14 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Well, I updated my system late last week, and just thought to look: yes,
>> I'm on t-bird 10.0.1, and I pull up the search messages window, and
>> click on the dropdown... and there is NO OPTION to search the content
of the
>
On 03/13/2012 04:21 AM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
> *Nataraj*
> /Tue Mar 13 02:01:36 EDT 2012/ wrote:
>
>> On 03/12/2012 10:06 PM, Nataraj wrote:
>>> / On 03/12/2012 09:08 PM, Ron Loftin wrote:
> />>>/ I'm going to chuck in my 2 cents worth here, as I've been using Postfix
> />>>/ as a first-line filt
Alan McKay wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> I have 1 system ( Sunfire x2250 running 5.7 ) that is having issues with
> RAM, but I'm not sure how to debug it. And unfortunately it is not under
> support anymore.
Oy, as they say, vey. You still *might* be able to email Sun, er, Oracle
support without payin
Peter Kjellström wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 March 2012 13.41.53 Philippe Naudin wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am confused by a warning from mkswap :
>>
>> When making a swap on a LVM volume, I see the following warning :
>> mkswap: /dev/vg_SDB1/swap_test6_64: warning: don't erase bootbits
>> sectors on
Nataraj wrote:
> In any case, I used to have very large numbers in the category you
> described, but since I started doing agressive blocking with fail2ban
> (matching on repeated mail delivery failures), now I just completely
> block all those with IPtables, so that postfix never sees them. I ha
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:01:10 -0500
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 03/13/2012 10:14 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> > Well, I updated my system late last week, and just thought to look:
> > yes, I'm on t-bird 10.0.1, and I pull up the search messages
> > window, and click on the dropdown... and there is
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:11 PM, wrote:
>>
>> did you pick the 'sync' option for the account? After doing that,
>
> No. I didn't know what it did.
It very specifically mentioned improving the search capability in the
dialog where you made that choice...
>> mine has 'body' in the search, and y
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:11 PM, wrote:
>>>
>>> did you pick the 'sync' option for the account? After doing that,
>>
>> No. I didn't know what it did.
>
> It very specifically mentioned improving the search capability in the
> dialog wher
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Jake Shipton wrote:
>
> Oh? I have, I found Claws to have quite advanced search, filters,
> actions etc. It's one of the main reasons I switched :-)
>
> Here's a screenshot of claws extended search:
>
> http://i.imgur.com/Hmwyv.png
Nothing in particular jumps out
On 03/13/2012 08:09 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Tilman Schmidt wrote:
>> Am 13.03.2012 00:48, schrieb Nataraj:
>>> I have been sucessfully using 8GB dual layer DVDs for some of my
>>> backups/archiving and now that the price of Blu ray has come down I am
>>> about to experiment with that. I have
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:11 PM, wrote:
>>>
>>> did you pick the 'sync' option for the account? After doing that,
>>
>> No. I didn't know what it did.
>
> It very specifically mentioned improving the search capability in the
> dialog where you made that choice...
Yeah, bu
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Les Mikesell
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:11 PM, wrote:
did you pick the 'sync' option for the account? After doing that,
>>>
>>> No. I didn't know what it did.
>>
>> It very specifically mentioned improving the search
On 03/13/12 8:19 AM, C. L. Martinez wrote:
> Please, any help?
avoid using ANY device names for SCSI class devices, they are near
useless.mount the volumes via label or uUID.
--
john r pierceN 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Nataraj wrote:
>>
> Ok, so it wouldn't work to just use the oldest received, but a smarter
> inspection could check to see weather it actually passed through a
> server owned by the claimed domain. The reality is that what is need is
> to input this into a scorin
On Mar 13, 2012, at 12:50 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
> Back about 3 months ago I took this system down and removed all the RAM,
> and stuck individual chips into it and booted it, testing each chip on its
> own. At that time every single one of them worked! But I'm about to try
> this again to see
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
> It could be a bad physical RAM slot on the motherboard.
>
>
Oh dang, why didn't I think of that! I'll try that next
--
“Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV”
- Michael Pollan, author of "In Defense of Food"
_
on 3/13/2012 11:07 AM Ross Walker spake the following:
> On Mar 13, 2012, at 12:50 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
>
>> Back about 3 months ago I took this system down and removed all the RAM,
>> and stuck individual chips into it and booted it, testing each chip on its
>> own. At that time every single o
On 03/13/2012 11:05 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Nataraj wrote:
>> Ok, so it wouldn't work to just use the oldest received, but a smarter
>> inspection could check to see weather it actually passed through a
>> server owned by the claimed domain. The reality is that
On 12.3.2012 01:37, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> Tape, and tape drives, have a bad reputation. They are difficult and
> time consuming to verify.
Harddisks have a bad reputation too. They fail regulary.
Anyway, I would not feel comfortable about backing up data residing on a
harddisk to another harddi
Nataraj
I need something for a very small shop and have been looking...been
reading the comments. Is vpostmaster easy to setup and maintain, I'm
looking for something lightweight and works for spam, I support them after
hours and looking for something that just works
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:57 PM, wrote:
>
>> Try 'Help/Migration Assistant'
>
> Well, import didn't have it; I did go to account settings->synchronization
> & storage, and it has message synchronizing checked, and sync all messages
> regardless of age.
>
>> Worst case, you might delete the accou
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Markus Falb wrote:
>
>> Tape, and tape drives, have a bad reputation. They are difficult and
>> time consuming to verify.
>
> Harddisks have a bad reputation too. They fail regulary.
Yes, but if they are online, in raid, with smart monitoring, you swap
them (mayb
Markus Falb wrote:
> On 12.3.2012 01:37, Mark LaPierre wrote:
>> Tape, and tape drives, have a bad reputation. They are difficult and
>> time consuming to verify.
>
> Harddisks have a bad reputation too. They fail regulary.
>
Not that frequently.
> Anyway, I would not feel comfortable about backi
On 03/13/2012 11:28 AM, Tom Bishop wrote:
> Nataraj
>
> I need something for a very small shop and have been looking...been
> reading the comments. Is vpostmaster easy to setup and maintain, I'm
> looking for something lightweight and works for spam, I support them after
> hours and looking for s
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:57 PM, wrote:
>> The gov laptop is at home. I turn it on *only* when I have to
>
> I like lots of pixels in front of me so I park my laptop beside the
> desktop and run synergy on both to share the desktop keyboard/mouse
> and get cut/paste ac
One more thing, I did a quick search and it appears that they are now
supporting 6.x code...have you given that a try yet...I already have a
centos 6.2 vmware template that would make it quick and easy to spool up...
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Nataraj wrote:
> On 03/13/2012 11:28 AM, Tom B
Hello,
I have server CentOS 5.7. It has mysql-community installed.
I need to run perl-based tool (mysqlreport) and it requires perl-DBD-MySQL
(not a surprise)
When I am trying to install perl-DBD-MySQL via yum -- it says it requires
libmysqlclient.*15 *and it conflicts with libmysqlclient.*16 *w
On 03/13/2012 12:03 PM, Tom Bishop wrote:
> One more thing, I did a quick search and it appears that they are now
> supporting 6.x code...have you given that a try yet...I already have a
> centos 6.2 vmware template that would make it quick and easy to spool up...
I'm still running on CentOS 5, bu
Good point, will add it to my long list of things to get done :)
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Nataraj wrote:
> On 03/13/2012 12:03 PM, Tom Bishop wrote:
> > One more thing, I did a quick search and it appears that they are now
> > supporting 6.x code...have you given that a try yet...I alrea
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 1:57 PM, wrote:
>
>
>>> The gov laptop is at home. I turn it on *only* when I have to
>>
>> I like lots of pixels in front of me so I park my laptop beside the
>> desktop and run synergy on both to share the desktop keyboard/mouse
>> and get cut/paste across them. No
On Mon, March 12, 2012 15:03, James B. Byrne wrote:
> CentOS-6.2
>
> We moved a cron job from a CentOS-5.7 host to a CentOS-6.2
> host. The MAILTO variable is set to supp...@harte-lyne.ca
> in both instances. On the CentOS-6 host instead of
> receiving the mail with the output we see this in
>
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
> It could also be a power supply problem... Add memory load, and a bit of
> heat,
> and voltage drops a bit...
>
Problem is that even if I leave it unplugged for some time I can get the
problem. And I have the heat sensors all graphed, and
Ilya Kazakevich wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have server CentOS 5.7. It has mysql-community installed.
>
> I need to run perl-based tool (mysqlreport) and it requires perl-DBD-MySQL
> (not a surprise)
>
> When I am trying to install perl-DBD-MySQL via yum -- it says it requires
> libmysqlclient.*15 *and i
*Nataraj*
/Tue Mar 13 13:17:32 EDT 2012 wrote
==
/
Also anyone using rbl's should also review the RBL's policy. Most RBL's
charge a license fee for high volume queries and will cut you off if you
violate their policy.
our logwatch format is very nice, t
I wrote:
> A couple weeks ago, after we moved a user's home directory from a 5.7
box to 6.2, he came
> to complain about slowness.
> Unpack file from NFS-mounted directory to local disk, like /tmp,
> everything's normal. cd to the NFS-mounted directory, and unpack it
there, and it was
> six to sev
Thanks.
My problem is stupid: person who installed MySQL on this server did not use
yum repositories at all!
I have "MySQL-shared-community-5.*1*.57-1.rhel5" installed (according to
rpm -qa) while yum repositories have 5.*0*.95 (according to repoquery -i
mysql) and it leads to inconsistency. I thin
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Ilya Kazakevich
wrote:
> Thanks.
> My problem is stupid: person who installed MySQL on this server did not use
> yum repositories at all!
> I have "MySQL-shared-community-5.*1*.57-1.rhel5" installed (according to
> rpm -qa) while yum repositories have 5.*0*.95 (acc
On 13.3.2012 19:46, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Markus Falb wrote:
>> What about if a firmware bug destroys all data on day XXX on all
>> harddisks ? Well, extra paranoid maybe and of course I have not thought
>> of all possible things that *could* happen.
>
> Are you saying that you only buy one mo
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 1:45 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Ilya Kazakevich
> wrote:
> > Thanks.
> > My problem is stupid: person who installed MySQL on this server did not
> use
> > yum repositories at all!
> > I have "MySQL-shared-community-5.*1*.57-1.rhel5" install
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Markus Falb wrote:
> On 13.3.2012 19:46, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Markus Falb wrote:
>>> What about if a firmware bug destroys all data on day XXX on all
>>> harddisks ? Well, extra paranoid maybe and of course I have not thought
>>> of all possible things that *
On Mar 13, 2012, at 10:02 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> I'm just trying to think of ways around a blacklist... *esp* the way
> dnsorb does, where they'll blacklist an entire block that belongs to a
> hosting provider, who provides one external delivery address.
When I did spamassassin I relied on
On Mar 13, 2012, at 2:56 PM, Nataraj wrote:
> For a small site it runs
> very well in a VM. A VM is certainly adequate for testing.
Hehe, I run my complete environment in a VM, it isn't the CPU/memory that
limits VM deployments it's network/disk.
Got enough network and disk spindles and I can
Am 13.03.2012 19:46, schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us:
> Markus Falb wrote:
>> On 12.3.2012 01:37, Mark LaPierre wrote:
>>> Tape, and tape drives, have a bad reputation. They are difficult and
>>> time consuming to verify.
>>
>> Harddisks have a bad reputation too. They fail regulary.
>>
> Not that freque
here's my tentative plans for a d2d backup in my lab.
2 identical servers, each with lots of SATA bays. each server
configured with 2 raids, raid1 is this servers storage, and raid2 is a
DRBD mirror of the other servers storage.
each server runs KVM and under KVM runs a CentOS virtual machi
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:42:44 -0500
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Jake Shipton
> wrote:
> >
> > Oh? I have, I found Claws to have quite advanced search, filters,
> > actions etc. It's one of the main reasons I switched :-)
> >
> > Here's a screenshot of claws extended se
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Tilman Schmidt
wrote:
> Am 13.03.2012 19:46, schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us:
>> Markus Falb wrote:
>>> On 12.3.2012 01:37, Mark LaPierre wrote:
Tape, and tape drives, have a bad reputation. They are difficult and
time consuming to verify.
>>>
>>> Harddisks hav
We were using the CentOS 5 testing repo on dev.centos.org to update our
webservers' PHP to 5.2. However, we've just tried building a new
machine lately and found that the repo seems to be empty. Is this a
temporary fault, or has it gone away now that CentOS 6 is out?
If it has gone away, where can
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Tilman Schmidt
wrote:
> Am 13.03.2012 19:46, schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us:
>> Markus Falb wrote:
>>> On 12.3.2012 01:37, Mark LaPierre wrote:
Tape, and tape drives, have a bad reputation. They are difficult and
time consuming to verify.
>>>
>>> Harddisks hav
I have a new server with multiple nics running Centos 6.2 and I'd like to force
all NFS traffic over one nic.
We're using FreeNAS to dish out NFS shares and I have different IPs on my 2
nics but how can I get the server to mount the share over one particular nic?
Or is there a better way to do it
On 03/13/2012 07:58 PM, Spiro Harvey wrote:
> We were using the CentOS 5 testing repo on dev.centos.org to update our
> webservers' PHP to 5.2. However, we've just tried building a new
> machine lately and found that the repo seems to be empty. Is this a
> temporary fault, or has it gone away now t
On 03/13/2012 05:23 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Tilman Schmidt
> wrote:
>> Am 13.03.2012 19:46, schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us:
>>> Markus Falb wrote:
On 12.3.2012 01:37, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> Tape, and tape drives, have a bad reputation. They are difficult and
>I have a new server with multiple nics running Centos 6.2 and I'd like to
>force all NFS traffic over one nic.
>We're using FreeNAS to dish out NFS shares and I have different IPs on my 2
>nics but how can I get the server to mount the share over one >particular nic?
>Or is there a better way to
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Smithies, Russell
wrote:
> I have a new server with multiple nics running Centos 6.2 and I'd like to
> force all NFS traffic over one nic.
> We're using FreeNAS to dish out NFS shares and I have different IPs on my 2
> nics but how can I get the server to mount t
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Smithies, Russell
> wrote:
>> I have a new server with multiple nics running Centos 6.2 and I'd like to
>> force all NFS traffic over one nic.
>> We're using FreeNAS to dish out NFS shares and I have diffe
I suspected some subnetting would be involved but hoped I could get away with
different IPs on the nics.
Might have to get the networking books out, it's not my strong suit :-(
--Russell
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behal
On 03/13/12 7:05 PM, Nataraj wrote:
> I would have to dig up some references, but I have read some articles
> that claim that the reliability of a drive that is in full time
> operation in a server, running 24hrs/day and maybe even seeking under
> heavy load is way different than a drive that you r
On 03/13/12 8:42 PM, Smithies, Russell wrote:
> I suspected some subnetting would be involved but hoped I could get away with
> different IPs on the nics.
> Might have to get the networking books out, it's not my strong suit :-(
differnet IPs on the same subnet is just oging to cause confusion.
On 03/13/2012 09:17 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 03/13/12 7:05 PM, Nataraj wrote:
>> I would have to dig up some references, but I have read some articles
>> that claim that the reliability of a drive that is in full time
>> operation in a server, running 24hrs/day and maybe even seeking under
>>
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Smithies, Russell
wrote:
> I suspected some subnetting would be involved but hoped I could get away with
> different IPs on the nics.
> Might have to get the networking books out, it's not my strong suit :-(
If you look at network addresses and subnet masks in
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:26 PM, Nataraj wrote:
>
> You could take your chances on the dyes with optical media. Some say
> that in a proper controlled environment, they will last much longer.
> The best media I think are the ones from Japan and singapore. There are
> several places in Japan tha
On 03/13/2012 10:42 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Jake Shipton
> wrote:
>> Oh? I have, I found Claws to have quite advanced search, filters,
>> actions etc. It's one of the main reasons I switched :-)
>>
>> Here's a screenshot of claws extended search:
>>
>> http://i
88 matches
Mail list logo
