On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Miguel Medalha wrote:
> > pfsense for a newbie?
> >
> > A CentOS-like firewall would be ClearOS (formerly Clarkconnect) and
> again would reduce the number of simultaneously-learned layers to wade
> through. While it works very well, it is yet another layer and di
On 02/24/2012 06:50 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> On 02/24/2012 12:05 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 02/23/2012 10:36 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
>>> Just installed stellarium-0.10.2-1.el6.rf(i686) last night with the
>>> Add/Remove Software tool. I'm getting video corruption and this message
>>> in the
I'm building my own openmpi packages derived from upstream SRPMs.
Problem: The ones built with Intel's compiler can only be installed by
force, because Intel doesn't register their provided libs with rpm.
Any idea how this can be done?
(Alternative ideas are appreciated as well -- as long as th
Hi all,
today we've encountered quite strange issues with memory allocation on
one of our VPS running CentOS 6.2. So far I've been unable to determine
what's causing it - hopefully someone here will know what's up.
The VPS is a "small" machine - just 512MB of RAM, 1 CPU, running 6.2.
with current
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 19:45:54 +0100
Michael Lampe wrote:
> I'm building my own openmpi packages derived from upstream SRPMs.
>
> Problem: The ones built with Intel's compiler can only be installed by
> force, because Intel doesn't register their provided libs with rpm.
>
> Any idea how this can
Frank Cox wrote:
> A dependency is supposed to be something that's required for a program to
> work.
> Removing the dependency from the rpm won't magically make a program work if it
> really does require the functionality provided by that dependency.
It's there.
Just not registered with rpm. --
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 20:14:50 +0100
Michael Lampe wrote:
> Frank Cox wrote:
>
> > A dependency is supposed to be something that's required for a program to
> > work. Removing the dependency from the rpm won't magically make a program
> > work if it really does require the functionality provided by
Frank Cox wrote:
> Edit the dependency list to suit.
Maybe I was too dumb to properly explain it:
The Intel stuff is there implicitly. And it _is_ needed. Both for
building and then running.
But it's not registered with rpm by Intel!
So I _can_ build, but the resulting RPM cannot be installed
On 02/26/2012 08:39 PM, Michael Lampe wrote:
> Frank Cox wrote:
>
>> Edit the dependency list to suit.
>
> Maybe I was too dumb to properly explain it:
>
> The Intel stuff is there implicitly. And it _is_ needed. Both for
> building and then running.
>
> But it's not registered with rpm by Intel!
>
On 02/26/2012 12:34 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> You can use Libre Office directly from libreoffice.org ... I do.
LibreOffice rpm's exist in CentOS-Testing repository for 6.x:
http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories
--
Ljubomir Ljubojevic
(Love is in the Air)
PL Computers
Serbia,
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> I totally lost you.
No problem. Play the game of chess like your namesake did so well. :)
> Please provide specifics, what package, is it in rpm
> or not, details please, so we do not chase out own tails.
Gimme a trick: How to unregister an implicit but formally una
On 02/25/2012 12:34 AM, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:23:31 -0600
> I have a small network with two cheap dlink routers on it, one attached to a
> cable modem and the other to a DSL modem. I route certain data through the
> cable modem, and everything else goes through the DSL.
>
> How
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 21:05:22 +0100
Michael Lampe wrote:
> Gimme a trick: How to unregister an implicit but formally unavailable
> runtime dependency in a spec file?
I've given you the solution twice. Here is a more detailed description of the
exact lines that you need to edit in the spec file:
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 21:11:15 +0100
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Can this help? I think friend of mine wrote it, Nenad Opsenica, some 6-7
> years ago, I don't think he will mind:
>
> http://www.plcomputers.net/download/svasta/if-kbps
>
> Use it as "if-kbps eth0" and brake with Ctrl+C.
It looks
Frank Cox wrote:
>> Gimme a trick: How to unregister an implicit but formally unavailable
>> runtime dependency in a spec file?
>
> I've given you the solution twice. Here is a more detailed description of the
> exact lines that you need to edit in the spec file:
>
> http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm/s1
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
>
>> Can this help? I think friend of mine wrote it, Nenad Opsenica, some 6-7
>> years ago, I don't think he will mind:
>>
>> http://www.plcomputers.net/download/svasta/if-kbps
>>
>> Use it as "if-kbps eth0" and brake with Ctrl+C.
>
> It looks like
On 02/26/12 12:21 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
> separate local traffic from
> external traffic.
use some iptables rules to select the specific traffic you want to
monitor, and view the packet and byte counts via iptables -L -vn
--
john r pierceN 37, W 122
santa cruz ca
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Michael Lampe
wrote:
> Frank Cox wrote:
>
>> Edit the dependency list to suit.
>
> Maybe I was too dumb to properly explain it:
>
> The Intel stuff is there implicitly. And it _is_ needed. Both for
> building and then running.
>
> But it's not registered with rpm b
- "Michael Lampe" escreveu:
> De: "Michael Lampe"
> Para: "CentOS mailing list"
> Enviadas: Domingo, 26 de Fevereiro de 2012 17:29:05 (GMT-0300) Auto-Detected
> Assunto: Re: [CentOS] Is there a way to _remove_ dependencies from an RPM
> built from source?
>
> Frank Cox wrote:
>
> >> Gimm
Hello,
I have a HP Pavilion p2 1033wb. I has a 3 core Vision AMD E-300 Processor Dual
Core runs at 3.2 GHZ. CentOS will run ok with this processor won't it Echolink
told me I would have no problem running there program with it. Probably a dumb
question but just checking.
Thanks,
KF7TQV
73.
On 02/26/2012 09:21 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 21:11:15 +0100
> Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>
>> Can this help? I think friend of mine wrote it, Nenad Opsenica, some 6-7
>> years ago, I don't think he will mind:
>>
>> http://www.plcomputers.net/download/svasta/if-kbps
>>
>> Use it as
On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 21:29 +0100, Michael Lampe wrote:
AutoProvReq: no || 0
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Antonio da Silva Martins Junior wrote:
> Have you tried to make a fake src.rpm package that "provides" this
> 'libfoo' and
> install it ? It didn't need to install anything just tell to the rpm library
> that it
> "provides" 'libfoo'.
Normally, I leave the building straightforward.
Of cour
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 14:31:29 -0600
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Without separate interfaces there's not much to distinguish your
> local/external concepts.
As I see it, there's probably some way (that I haven't yet discovered) to
separate the traffic by gateway. Or at least some way to distinguish loca
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 12:39:54 -0800 (PST)
Dennis Whiterock wrote:
> I have a HP Pavilion p2 1033wb. I has a 3 core Vision AMD E-300 Processor
> Dual Core runs at 3.2 GHZ. CentOS will run ok with this processor won't it
> Echolink told me I would have no problem running there program with it.
> Prob
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Michael Lampe
wrote:
>
>> Have you tried to make a fake src.rpm package that "provides" this
>> 'libfoo' and
>> install it ? It didn't need to install anything just tell to the rpm library
>> that it
>> "provides" 'libfoo'.
>
> Normally, I leave the building
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 12:34:34 -0800
John R Pierce wrote:
> use some iptables rules to select the specific traffic you want to
> monitor, and view the packet and byte counts via iptables -L -vn
Interesting. I'll look at that.
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.
What doe;s centOS recommend?
From: Frank Cox
To: centos@centos.org
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2012 2:20 PM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] My Computer
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 12:39:54 -0800 (PST)
Dennis Whiterock wrote:
> I have a HP Pavilion p2 1033wb. I has a 3 core Vis
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
>>
>> Without separate interfaces there's not much to distinguish your
>> local/external concepts.
>
> As I see it, there's probably some way (that I haven't yet discovered) to
> separate the traffic by gateway. Or at least some way to distinguish
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 15:33:08 -0600
Les Mikesell wrote:
> There are tools to do it in iptables, but it is not a
> common operation so you are probably on your own to set up the matches
> and read the counters.
It's apparently not common, as you say, and I really don't understand why.
Folks who bu
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Dennis Whiterock wrote:
> What doe;s centOS recommend?
>
Should be the same as upstream:
https://hardware.redhat.com/
But if it is not there it doesn't mean it won't work - it may not have
been tested.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
_
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Dennis Whiterock wrote:
> What doe;s centOS recommend?
Anything that runs RedHat should run CentOS
https://hardware.redhat.com/list.cgi?product=Red+Hat+Hardware+Certification
> From: Frank Cox
> To: centos@centos.org
> Sent: Su
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
>
>> There are tools to do it in iptables, but it is not a
>> common operation so you are probably on your own to set up the matches
>> and read the counters.
>
> It's apparently not common, as you say, and I really don't understand why.
> Folks wh
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 15:50:32 -0600
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Most people would just look at the router's own bandwidth measurement
> or the one at the ISP's end if that is available.
Possibly, but that wouldn't break it down by machine. And in that situation
I'd think a per-machine breakdown would
On 02/26/12 12:39 PM, Dennis Whiterock wrote:
> I have a HP Pavilion p2 1033wb. I has a 3 core Vision AMD E-300 Processor
> Dual Core runs at 3.2 GHZ. CentOS will run ok with this processor won't it
> Echolink told me I would have no problem running there program with it.
> Probably a dumb quest
On 26.2.2012 21:55, John Stanley wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 21:29 +0100, Michael Lampe wrote:
>
> AutoProvReq: no || 0
Why the || 0 ?
--
Kind Regards, Markus Falb
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
Cent
John Stanley wrote:
> AutoProvReq: no
Seemed like a good hint, but doesn't do the trick on 5.7. The RPMs still
require the Intel libs.
Hmmm ...
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 02/26/12 12:34 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> use some iptables rules to select the specific traffic you want to
> monitor, and view the packet and byte counts via iptables -L -vn
to expand on this, I'd probably write a perl or python script that ran
the iptables -vnL command, and parses the outpu
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
>
>> Most people would just look at the router's own bandwidth measurement
>> or the one at the ISP's end if that is available.
>
> Possibly, but that wouldn't break it down by machine. And in that situation
> I'd think a per-machine breakdown wo
On 02/26/2012 10:55 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 15:50:32 -0600
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>> Most people would just look at the router's own bandwidth measurement
>> or the one at the ISP's end if that is available.
>
> Possibly, but that wouldn't break it down by machine. And in that
On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 20:54 +0100, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> On 02/26/2012 12:34 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > You can use Libre Office directly from libreoffice.org ... I do.
>
>
> LibreOffice rpm's exist in CentOS-Testing repository for 6.x:
> http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Reposi
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 16:06:41 -0800
Anthony Lee Vanover II wrote:
> The best way to install LibreOffice on CentOS:
> http://pastebin.com/ZrsmjF9m
You forgot the helppack.
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com
www.creekfm.com - FIFTY THOUSAND WATTS of POW WOW PO
On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 23:11 +0100, Markus Falb wrote:
> On 26.2.2012 21:55, John Stanley wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 21:29 +0100, Michael Lampe wrote:
> >
> > AutoProvReq: no || 0
>
> Why the || 0 ?
You can use '0' or no.
for el5 try
AutoReq: no
AutoProv: no
Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> Have you tried to make a fake src.rpm package that "provides" this
>>> 'libfoo' and
>>> install it ? It didn't need to install anything just tell to the rpm
>>> library that it
>>> "provides" 'libfoo'.
>>
>> Normally, I leave the building straightforward.
>>
>> Of co
On Sunday 26 February 2012, Dennis Whiterock
wrote:
> I have a HP Pavilion p2 1033wb. I has a 3 core Vision AMD E-300
> Processor Dual Core runs at 3.2 GHZ. CentOS will run ok with this
> processor won't it
I can run Debian on my Aspire One 522 with an AMD C-50 processor, but I
couldn't get Ce
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 02:52 +0100, Michael Lampe wrote:
> To recap: I'm in the middle and still want to build a sensible rpm for
> openmpi with intel:
>
> %define _use_internal_dependency_generator 0
> %define __find_requires %{nil}
---
If you did not want any deps then all y
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 02:21:09PM -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> It looks like it does pretty much the same thing as several other monitoring
> tools that I've looked at. However, none of them separate local traffic from
> external traffic.
check out http://bandwidthd.sourceforge.net/ - It only sup
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 00:26:59 -0500
Luke S. Crawford wrote:
> check out http://bandwidthd.sourceforge.net/ - It only supports IPv4,
> but it's pretty convenient, as you can define what 'local' and 'external'
> means by IP address.
Cool! That looks like it could the the real McCoy.
Now I'm of
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 20:54, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> On 02/26/2012 12:34 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> You can use Libre Office directly from libreoffice.org ... I do.
>
Yep, rpms LO from libreoffice.org work very well on my CentOS box.
___
CentOS
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 11:30:14PM -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 00:26:59 -0500
> Luke S. Crawford wrote:
>
> > check out http://bandwidthd.sourceforge.net/ - It only supports IPv4,
> > but it's pretty convenient, as you can define what 'local' and 'external'
> > means by IP addr
On 02/25/2012 11:30 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> To switch back to X use ctrl-alt-F7.
Strange; on my laptop it's ctrl-alt-F1, on my desktop
it's ctrl-alt-F7. Both CentOS 6.
Maybe it's the nvidia drivers on the laptop?
Mogens
--
Mogens Kjaer, m...@lemo.dk
http://www.lemo.dk
__
On 02/25/2012 01:56 PM, Mustafa Zargar wrote:
> I tried to boot from centos DVD and chose rescue mode to find any log file
> in /var directory but to no success :(
If you don't have any log files in /var/log there must be something
completely wrong with your system. Is the file system full?
Mogen
Le 2012-02-25 22:01, fakessh @ a écrit :
> hi guys
> hi master of "Fu"
>
> any information for dovecot update on centos 5
>
>
> I am looking for information on the people running release 2.1.0 and
> 2.1.1 of dovecot
>
> I edited rpms sources here.
>
> http://ns.fakessh.eu/rpms/dovecot-2.1.0-2.centm
53 matches
Mail list logo
