Re: [CentOS] my notes on bond, bridge, network, kvm, host and virtual so far

well, had to add something to it. I found out I was having an issue with the addon ethernet card (e1000) 'link detected no' and it not working. Took it out? Yep? Work? No. However, I did add a second vm and something interesting is happening one vm stays up, one will crash...the one tha

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 vps

Bazy writes: > Hello, > > I'm looking for two hours now for a VPS provider offering CentOS 6 in > DE or UK. Can you please point me to one, maybe where you currently > own a virtual server and have a good experience with it. > +1 Hetzner for DE. In UK check Bytemark.co.uk. ___

Re: [CentOS] Red Hat Extends Linux Support

On 02/02/2012 05:00 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 02/02/12 2:48 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote: >> What do you think this means for CentOS long term support? >> >> http://www.serverwatch.com/server-news/red-hat-extends-linux-support.html > I'd guess that the CentOS team will be supporting EL5 for the addi

Re: [CentOS] looking for lxc rpm for centos 6.2 x86_64

On 02/06/2012 01:44 PM, Barry Brimer wrote: > workload. Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.2 provides application level > containers to separate and control the application resource usage policies ah, interesting. I saw that + didnt see userland lxc tools and stopped looking. On 6.2 virt --connect lxc:/

Re: [CentOS] rsync from rescue boot

On 31 January 2012 22:14, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 4:01 PM,   wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic >>> wrote: On 01/31/2012 09:47 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > No, I'm trying to have rsync make an outbound connection over ssh from > the res

Re: [CentOS] new mysql installation, kinda stuck- sorta solved

On 3 February 2012 07:22, wrote: > Bob Hoffman writes: > > When you run into this kind of problems you can just remove or rename > /var/lib/mysql and restart the service, it should "reset" you back to > square one. Of course, make a backup first! > Sometimes you need to run mysql-db-install as w

Re: [CentOS] SSD Drives

On 2 February 2012 18:19, Matt wrote: > Has anyone installed a high I/O application such as an email server on > SSD drives?  Was thinking about doing two SSD's in RAID1.  It would > solve my I/O latency issues but I have heard that SSD's wear out > quickly in high I/O situations?  Something like

Re: [CentOS] gtar compression achieved

On 02/01/2012 04:18 PM, Alan McKay wrote: > Hey folks, > > I looked at the man page and don't see any way to do this - maybe it is a > function of the compression program used I dunno. > > Is there any way to get gtar to report on the compression it achieved? > > I can't just check file sizes becau

Re: [CentOS] about major version upgrades

On 02/07/2012 07:04 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote: > Hi all, > > In http://goo.gl/Krjfh I read: > > +++ > Upgrading from CentOS-4 or CentOS-5: > We recommend everyone run through a reinstall rather than attempt an > inplace upgrade from CentOS-4 or CentOS-5 >

Re: [CentOS] about major version upgrades

On 02/07/2012 06:39 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > On 02/07/2012 07:04 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> In http://goo.gl/Krjfh I read: >> >> +++ >> Upgrading from CentOS-4 or CentOS-5: >> We recommend everyone run through a reinstall rather than

Re: [CentOS] distributed storage/home-made cloud recommendations

On Feb 5, 2012, at 6:33 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > I just tried a bunch of combinations on a 3 x 11 raid60 configuration > plus 3 global hotspares, and decided that letting the controller (LSI > 9260-8i MegaSAS2) do it was easier all the way around. of course, with > other controllerrs, your

Re: [CentOS] Google video chat on 5.7 using the Fedora RPM

On 02/06/2012 04:22 PM, E Westphal wrote: > I've tried to use the Google recommended RPM to enable video chat on > 5.7. Get a long list of unsatisfied dependencies. Has anyone got this to > work and not created a boat full of problems? Is this something that > does work in 6 and just not in 5.7 - a

[CentOS] where to download CENTOS 4.9 DVD image?

I want to CENTOS site and try to download version 4.9.  I found all download sites ONLY have 4.8 NO 4.9. anyone know where can i download CENTOS 4.9 DVD image? Thanks. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/

Re: [CentOS] about major version upgrades

On Feb 7, 2012, at 7:58 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > The purpose for having enterprise software is so that you can get a > return on your investment and use your code for 7 years (for CentOS > versions before CentOS-4 ... now 10 years in post CentOS-5). But > keeping things for that period of time

Re: [CentOS] where to download CENTOS 4.9 DVD image?

On 02/07/2012 04:10 PM, mcclnx mcc wrote: > I want to CENTOS site and try to download version 4.9. I found all download > sites ONLY have 4.8 NO 4.9. > > anyone know where can i download CENTOS 4.9 DVD image? > > Thanks. > > ___ > CentOS mailing list >

Re: [CentOS] where to download CENTOS 4.9 DVD image?

In article <1328627423.71063.yahoomail...@web74406.mail.tp2.yahoo.com>, mcclnx mcc wrote: > I want to CENTOS site and try to download version 4.9.  I found all download > sites ONLY have > 4.8 NO 4.9. > > anyone know where can i download CENTOS 4.9 DVD image? There isn't one. Please see http:/

Re: [CentOS] distributed storage/home-made cloud recommendations

On 02/04/2012 11:39 AM, Boris Epstein wrote: > On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Laurent Wandrebeck > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm happily running moosefs (packages available in rpmforge repo) for a >> year and a half, 120TB, soon 200. So easy to setup and grow it's >> indecent :) >> >> Laurent. >> >>

[CentOS] schily tools

Let me comment some questions in one single mail: > My basic requirement with what I'm doing is to use standard tools and > formats so that archives I write today can be readable in 10 years. Star becomes 30 in 4 months, any archive created since it's early beginning in summer 1982 can still be

Re: [CentOS] install detecting disk as sdb not sda

Hello, On Sat, 04 Feb 2012 01:29:31 +0100 Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > Hello wwp, > > On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 23:31 +0100, wwp wrote: > > I grabbed the UUID from `lshal` and replaced it in fstab: > > UUID=005374e2_5c18_437d_84d8_8069868fe54e ext4noatime,nodiratime 0 > > 0 > > > > .

Re: [CentOS] schily tools

> Let me comment some questions in one single mail: > >> My basic requirement with what I'm doing is to use standard tools and >> formats so that archives I write today can be readable in 10 years. > > Star becomes 30 in 4 months, any archive created since it's early > beginning in summer 1982 can

Re: [CentOS] about major version upgrades

On Feb 7, 2012, at 8:07 AM, Ross Walker wrote: > On Feb 7, 2012, at 7:58 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> The purpose for having enterprise software is so that you can get a >> return on your investment and use your code for 7 years (for CentOS >> versions before CentOS-4 ... now 10 years in post

Re: [CentOS] schily tools

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote: > > When I implemented incremental restores for star in September 2004, I wrote a > simple script for a incremental testcase and tested the deltas with > ufsdump/ufsrestore, gtar and the star version at that time. Gtar was unable to > deal wit

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 84, Issue 4

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ..

Re: [CentOS] rsync from rescue boot

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 5:22 AM, Michael Simpson wrote: > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724041 >> >> which was fixed nearly a month ago. > > So instead of saying nearly a month ago how about we we say it was only > released 20 days ago. BZ says it was released 03 Aug 11. > >> >> If

Re: [CentOS] new mysql installation, kinda stuck- sorta solved

On 02/07/2012 11:52 AM, Michael Simpson wrote: > Sometimes you need to run mysql-db-install as well if you have del'd > all of the /var/lib/mysql/ directory the init scripts should take care of that, as long as there is no /var/lib/mysql present on the machine. -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389

Re: [CentOS] about major version upgrades

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Craig White wrote: > >> For this reason it is often better to upgrade more frequently then every >> 7-10 years. Personally I have a 5 year max lifetime for my systems. Even >> then upgrades are painful and we try to stagger these so they all aren't due >> to upg

[CentOS] Problems installing 6.2 on HP 8540w laptop

Folks I've been trying to install Centos 6.2 on an HP Mobile Workstation 8540w. For various reasons, I have restarted the install many times.I use the 64-bit DVD image. The install chooses the following options a) Install with Basic Video Driver b) Skip the media scan c) Default Country, L

Re: [CentOS] schily tools

Dennis Clarke wrote: > >> I don't think there is any such general consensus. Are you reading > >> something that favors Solaris/*bsd over GNU based systems? > > > > Schily tools (and in special star) implement support for Linux specific > > extensions. This is what you do not get from gtar at al

Re: [CentOS] schily tools

Les Mikesell wrote: > On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Joerg Schilling > wrote: > > > > When I implemented incremental restores for star in September 2004, I wrote > > a > > simple script for a incremental testcase and tested the deltas with > > ufsdump/ufsrestore, gtar and the star version at t

Re: [CentOS] schily tools

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote: >>> > >> > When I implemented incremental restores for star in September 2004, I >> > wrote a >> > simple script for a incremental testcase and tested the deltas with >> > ufsdump/ufsrestore, gtar and the star version at that time. Gtar was

Re: [CentOS] about major version upgrades

On Feb 7, 2012, at 10:38 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Craig White wrote: >> >>> For this reason it is often better to upgrade more frequently then every >>> 7-10 years. Personally I have a 5 year max lifetime for my systems. Even >>> then upgrades are painful and

Re: [CentOS] about major version upgrades

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Craig White wrote: > >> >> If it is possible to abstract the differences, perhaps you aren't >> using all the new features and didn't have to upgrade after all... > > I suppose that if you believe that, then you are suffering from a lack of > imagination. I ca

Re: [CentOS] SSD Drives

On 02/02/2012 10:19 AM, Matt wrote: > Has anyone installed a high I/O application such as an email server on > SSD drives? Was thinking about doing two SSD's in RAID1. It would > solve my I/O latency issues but I have heard that SSD's wear out > quickly in high I/O situations? Something like eac

[CentOS] Centosplus src rpm

Hi all, I'm looking for latest centosplus kernel source rpm , which should be kernel-2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.centos.plus.src.rpm to date. Maybe someone could provide a link to it? Thank you Luigi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos

Re: [CentOS] about major version upgrades

On Feb 7, 2012, at 12:38 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Craig White wrote: >> >>> >>> If it is possible to abstract the differences, perhaps you aren't >>> using all the new features and didn't have to upgrade after all... >> >> I suppose that if you believe tha

Re: [CentOS] Centosplus src rpm

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:17 PM, wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm looking for latest centosplus kernel source rpm , which should be > kernel-2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.centos.plus.src.rpm to date. > Maybe someone could provide a link to it? I'm afraid it's been forgotten. :( I was told it would be pushed short

Re: [CentOS] Centosplus src rpm

On Tuesday, February 07, 2012 03:17:32 PM cent...@iotti.biz wrote: > I'm looking for latest centosplus kernel source rpm , which should be > kernel-2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.centos.plus.src.rpm to date. > Maybe someone could provide a link to it? Hmm, shouldn't it be: http://vault.centos.org/6.2/centosp

[CentOS] Centos 5.6 3ware raid 5

Hi, I've seen comments about the poor performance of these cards with raid 5 configs. I have an old card with 3 x 500G IDE drives connected in raid 5 and I'm getting around 10mb/s write performance. :-( I'm seeing high iowait figures at times and associated very high cpu load average figures, p

[CentOS] R: Centosplus src rpm

> Da: centos-boun...@centos.org > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] Per conto di Lamar Owen > Inviato: martedì 7 febbraio 2012 21.40 > A: CentOS mailing list > Oggetto: Re: [CentOS] Centosplus src rpm > > > On Tuesday, February 07, 2012 03:17:32 PM cent...@iotti.biz wrote: > > I'm looking for l

Re: [CentOS] network intermitent, not sure if virtualization issue- in progress

Last post on this, sorta solved. original post: --- I have a computer I am using to host a virtual machine. Centos 6, for both, 64 bit. The host machine's network connection seems fine. No problems. Trying to access the virtual machine is usually fine. but then, po

Re: [CentOS] about major version upgrades

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Craig White wrote: > >> >> I'm actually very interested in this, but puppet did not look like the >> right architecture.   http://saltstack.org/ might not be quite ready >> for prime time but it looks like a very reasonable design.  The python >> dependencies are pr

Re: [CentOS] about major version upgrades

On Feb 7, 2012, at 2:00 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > Ruby seems like the only thing that might be worse than python in > terms of long-term version incompatibilities and installation > problems, although python is sort-of a special case on RH systems > since the install tools need it. I think somet

Re: [CentOS] about major version upgrades

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Craig White wrote: > > puppet manifests won't expire because of changes in ruby rather because of > changes in puppet but a startup at this point should be fine for many years > as the path forward seems pretty well defined. Does it keep a self-contained library

Re: [CentOS] about major version upgrades

On Tuesday, February 07, 2012 04:35:29 PM Les Mikesell wrote: > If today's and > yesterday's version of a language have to be different they were > probably both wrong. Like Python2.x versus 3.x? Or even 2.4 versus 2.6? Plone, for one, is still bundling older Python due to incompatibilities wit

Re: [CentOS] about major version upgrades

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Lamar Owen wrote: > On Tuesday, February 07, 2012 04:35:29 PM Les Mikesell wrote: >> If today's and >> yesterday's version of a language have to be different they were >> probably both wrong. > > Like Python2.x versus 3.x?  Or even 2.4 versus 2.6?  Plone, for one, i

Re: [CentOS] about major version upgrades

On Feb 7, 2012, at 2:35 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Craig White wrote: >> >> puppet manifests won't expire because of changes in ruby rather because of >> changes in puppet but a startup at this point should be fine for many years >> as the path forward seems pre

Re: [CentOS] R: Centosplus src rpm

On Tuesday, February 07, 2012 03:57:36 PM cent...@iotti.biz wrote: > Indeed, I should have written "Maybe someone could provide a WORKING link to > it?". Now working at: http://vault.centos.org/6.2/centosplus/Source/SPackages/kernel-2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.centos.plus.src.rpm __

[CentOS] TLS support on postfix

Hi List, I have a postfix server based on CentOS 5 in which I have been trying to add TLS encryption support for SMTP. >From the localhost when I do an EHLO, following is the output [root@xxx ~]# nc localhost 25 220 xxx..xxx.xx ESMTP Postfix EHLO localhost 250-xxx..xxx.xx 2

Re: [CentOS] TLS support on postfix

On 02/07/2012 04:50 PM, Kumar Krishna wrote: > Hi List, > > I have a postfix server based on CentOS 5 in which I have been trying to add > TLS encryption support for SMTP. > > >From the localhost when I do an EHLO, following is the output > > [root@xxx ~]# nc localhost 25 > 220 xxx..xx

[CentOS] PCIe AER support in 5.5

I have a question about getting PCIe advanced error reporting to work on 5.5. The info I need to start with is the following: 1) Is PCIe Advanced Error Reporting (including error injections) known to work in 5.5? 2) What configuration options do I need to select in order to enable it? I'm using

Re: [CentOS] my notes on bond, bridge, network, kvm, host and virtual so far

I have no idea if this is the source of your problem (I wasn't using bonded interfaces), but it's sufficiently similar that you might want to try it. I had a lot of problems with the network stack on VMs, both under VMWare ESXi and Xen where the network would just go numb. After a lot of splunkin

Re: [CentOS] my notes on bond, bridge, network, kvm, host and virtual so far

Devin Reade wrote: [...] > While I had the above command in rc.local, I would also run the > attached script in /etc/cron.hourly as there were some circumstances > where tso would get reenabled. And in case attachments get stripped on the mailing list, you can also get the script here:

Re: [CentOS] my notes on bond, bridge, network, kvm, host and virtual so far

On 02/06/2012 09:28 PM, Bob Hoffman wrote: > I put this page together just so I won't spam the board anymore begging > for help..lol > http://bobhoffman.com/vmissue.html You're using bonding mode 0, which may not work when attached to a bridge. Try changing to mode 1 and playing with the cables.

Re: [CentOS] TLS support on postfix

On Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:04:03 -0800 Nataraj wrote: > On 02/07/2012 04:50 PM, Kumar Krishna wrote: > > Hi List, > > > > I have a postfix server based on CentOS 5 in which I have been > > trying to add TLS encryption support for SMTP. > > > > >From the localhost when I do an EHLO, following is the o

Re: [CentOS] TLS support on postfix

On 02/07/2012 09:50 PM, Kumar Krishna wrote: > On Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:04:03 -0800 > Nataraj wrote: > >> On 02/07/2012 04:50 PM, Kumar Krishna wrote: >>> Hi List, >>> >>> I have a postfix server based on CentOS 5 in which I have been >>> trying to add TLS encryption support for SMTP. >>> >>> >From

Re: [CentOS] TLS support on postfix

On Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:04:03 -0800 Nataraj wrote: > On 02/07/2012 04:50 PM, Kumar Krishna wrote: > > Hi List, > > > > I have a postfix server based on CentOS 5 in which I have been > > trying to add TLS encryption support for SMTP. > > > > >From the localhost when I do an EHLO, following is the o

Re: [CentOS] TLS support on postfix

On 02/07/2012 09:50 PM, Kumar Krishna wrote: > On Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:04:03 -0800 > Nataraj wrote: > >> On 02/07/2012 04:50 PM, Kumar Krishna wrote: >>> Hi List, >>> >>> I have a postfix server based on CentOS 5 in which I have been >>> trying to add TLS encryption support for SMTP. >>> >>> >From

Re: [CentOS] my notes on bond, bridge, network, kvm, host and virtual so far

Although it was written in the context of Xen, you might also want to have a look at the netloop nloopbacks parameter as described in . On a Xen cluster with 3 physical interfaces per node I had to