On 01/31/2012 11:33 AM, Roberto Cantalapiedra wrote:
> I have a server with 2 NIC and 2 different ISP.
> The idea is configure a Load Balance with these 2 providers.
> I reviewed:http://lartc.org/lartc.html#LARTC.RPDB.MULTIPLE-LINKS but I
> would like to know if this is a good method to use with C
Rob Kampen wrote on Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:08:09 +1300:
> My confusion is that a reverse lookup of the IP gives me the clients
> domain (dropping the mail(x) subdomain) thus I assumed it was the helo
> domain name - which does not have rDNS - that was causing the reject -
> maybe it was just a tim
On Friday, January 27, 2012 04:40:09 PM Helmut Drodofsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have found a lot of discussions concerning the LSI Logic scsi driver.
>
> E.g.:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/4/26/335
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16547
> http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-list/2007-A
On Wednesday 01 February 2012 19:03:33 Peter Blajev wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 01:07:31PM -0800, Peter Blajev wrote:
> > > echo " server2
> > > server2" | \
> > > while read confLine; do
> > > echo "--> $confLine"
> > > s
Hello,
The remote code execution issue that got introduced with 5.3.9 has me
worried a bit. I was wondering if the upstream updates released about 14
hours ago are already being built. As this appears to be quite a serious
issue I'm wondering if it's worth the trouble to downgrade php to a per
Jan
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 12:21:28PM +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> many "false" positives. There is no definitive RFC requirement that the
> mapping has to match.
But it's a standard security feature (on Solaris NFS server it was
added around 1996, I think). Without the match I could set my server
Hi all,
Having a 4 NIC server, I want to bridge eth2 and eth3, with a bridge
named br0.
Searching the web I only found about creating a file
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-br0, but did not find where to
explicitely list what ports will be bridged.
Where is it configured?
Thank you.
--
Hello,
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 13:50 +0100, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> I was wondering if the upstream updates released about 14
> hours ago are already being built.
It helps to first check the announce list :) . I hadn't expected such a
quick response, I didn't get a warning from my 4am cron
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Stephen Harris wrote:
>
>> many "false" positives. There is no definitive RFC requirement that the
>> mapping has to match.
>
> But it's a standard security feature (on Solaris NFS server it was
> added around 1996, I think). Without the match I could set my server
On 02/03/2012 08:07 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Having a 4 NIC server, I want to bridge eth2 and eth3, with a bridge
> named br0.
>
> Searching the web I only found about creating a file
> /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-br0, but did not find where to
> explicitely list wh
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 08:02:32AM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Stephen Harris wrote:
> > a forward lookup matches. ?It is commonly considered "broken" for rDNS
> > to return a value that doesn't match forward DNS.
>
> If you say something is "broken", you should q
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> on both sides of the NAt you need a DNS with the correct mapping
> the host on the other side is not interested in your NAT
> it sees a IP, a HELO and DNS-Records
>
> so it is YOUR job as admin to provide the correct HELO for your
> outgoing
On 2/2/2012 5:19 PM, Peter A wrote:
> On 02/02/12 17:01, William Warren wrote:
>> On 2/2/2012 2:15 PM, Peter A wrote:
>>> If you're worried about io reliability, then buy a (way more expensive)
>>> SLC drive, rather than the consumer level MLC... We have some SLC drives
>>> here that from their man
On 02/02/12 21:08, Rob Kampen wrote:
> On 02/03/2012 06:35 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
>> On 02/02/12 15:44, Giles Coochey wrote:
>>> On 2012-02-02 15:39, Ned Slider wrote:
I would recommend removing reject_unknown_client from your
smtpd_sender_restrictions.
> I think this will allow the m
Hi,
For the OLPC school server ("XS") we are planning to move from our
dated F9 setup to CentOS 6.2. Thanks for all the effort involved in
producing this distro.
One important part of this project is a 'respin' of the install media
- we need to add a handful of packages from external repositories
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
From: Daniel Drake
> One important part of this project is a 'respin' of the install media
> - we need to add a handful of packages from external repositories, and
> maybe run a command late in the install.
> Are the scripts/configurations used to produce the CentOS official
> CD/DVDs available? I
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 16:07 +0300, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Having a 4 NIC server, I want to bridge eth2 and eth3, with a bridge
> named br0.
>
> Searching the web I only found about creating a file
> /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-br0, but did not find where to
> e
I am trying to install 6.2 on a machine.
I am using PXE as I have done so a number of times.
My hard disk is being detected as sdb and not sda.
My kickstart config is wanting it at sda.
There are no other disks in the unit. It has and SD slot and an esata
although BIOS does not appear to have a d
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 11:10 AM, John Doe wrote:
> If you are familiar with kickstarts, you do not need anything else...
> Just write your kickstart and add it to either a DVD or a USB key or ...
>
> For the DVD, something like this used to work in the past:
> mount CentOS-*-bin-DVD.iso /mnt/cdrom
Hi Daniel,
On 02/03/2012 04:30 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> For the OLPC school server ("XS") we are planning to move from our
> dated F9 setup to CentOS 6.2. Thanks for all the effort involved in
> producing this distro.
Excellent news!
> One important part of this project is a 'respin' of the ins
On 02/03/2012 12:24 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> I am trying to install 6.2 on a machine.
> I am using PXE as I have done so a number of times.
>
> My hard disk is being detected as sdb and not sda.
> My kickstart config is wanting it at sda.
>
> There are no other disks in the unit. It has and SD slot
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> it is quite easy to know the mail-flow and from what public
> interface mails are going out and hwatever that ip is get
> a A-Record and matching PTR and that is what "myhostname"
> has to be set to
RFC quote, please.
--
Les Mikesell
Hello Jerry,
On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:24:14 -0500 Jerry Geis wrote:
> I am trying to install 6.2 on a machine.
> I am using PXE as I have done so a number of times.
>
> My hard disk is being detected as sdb and not sda.
> My kickstart config is wanting it at sda.
>
> There are no other disks in
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 12:14:13PM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >
> > it is quite easy to know the mail-flow and from what public
> > interface mails are going out and hwatever that ip is get
> > a A-Record and matching PTR and that is what "
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>>> a A-Record and matching PTR and that is what "myhostname"
>>> has to be set to
>>
>> RFC quote, please
>
> you need A RFC to know with what IP your machines connecting outside?
> who should know and write it for you?
> maybe you have the
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 08:04:31PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 03.02.2012 20:01, schrieb Stephen Harris:
> > In this, Les is correct. The RFCs merely say the HELO needs to _a_ valid
> > identifier for the host. Indeed this discussion was on this list back in
> > July ("SPAM on the List") wh
I have a computer I am using to host a virtual machine.
Centos 6, for both, 64 bit.
The host machine's network connection seems fine. No problems.
Trying to access the virtual machine is usually fine.
but then, poof, ssh, http, ftp, all lose connection for about a minute.
Then they come back up.
On 02/03/2012 03:41 PM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
> I have a computer I am using to host a virtual machine.
> Centos 6, for both, 64 bit.
>
> The host machine's network connection seems fine. No problems.
> Trying to access the virtual machine is usually fine.
>
> but then, poof, ssh, http, ftp, all los
This only happens every so often, not like every 5 minutes.
When I woke up today and tried to access VM I could not.
Via the actual host I could see it was running and actually use it via
virtual
manager. I was only able to access ftp, http, etc after a network restart.
The network restart shut do
On Feb 3, 2012, at 1:34 PM, wwp wrote:
> Hello Jerry,
>
>
> On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:24:14 -0500 Jerry Geis wrote:
>
>> I am trying to install 6.2 on a machine.
>> I am using PXE as I have done so a number of times.
>>
>> My hard disk is being detected as sdb and not sda.
>> My kickstart confi
On 02/03/2012 03:55 PM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
> On the virtual machine, which is having the issue, this is my eth0
> (I have been commenting out things to see if anything changes the issue.)
Looks fine.
> on the main machine which experiences no problems.
>
> eth0 and 1 onboard, eth 2 add on card,
I added network and netmask to the eth0 on the vm and I think that may
be it.
I am surprised it worked right without that in there.
Definitely the broadcast ip in ifconfig was wrong.
whee, we shall see if this fixes it.
fyi, the bond0 file worked well with the addresses commented out,
something
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 10:34:20PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 03.02.2012 20:58, schrieb Stephen Harris:
> > On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 08:04:31PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >> does not change that it is a dmaned good idea this days
> >> to make matching A/PTR/HELO and it is EASY to do
Hello Ross,
On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 16:01:53 -0500 Ross Walker wrote:
> On Feb 3, 2012, at 1:34 PM, wwp wrote:
>
> > Hello Jerry,
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:24:14 -0500 Jerry Geis wrote:
> >
> >> I am trying to install 6.2 on a machine.
> >> I am using PXE as I have done so a number of
upgrade question
is it possible to imagine during an upgrade from centos 5 to 6 to keep
the named directory /etc and /var unchanged if an update as simple as
possible.
can this be
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC2626742
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key C2626742
Just take full backup and reinstall and then restore needed files from backup..
--
Eero
2012/2/4 fakessh @ :
> upgrade question
>
> is it possible to imagine during an upgrade from centos 5 to 6 to keep
> the named directory /etc and /var unchanged if an update as simple as
> possible.
>
> can th
Hello Reindl,
On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 23:19:26 +0100 Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 03.02.2012 23:02, schrieb wwp:
> > An aspect of the problem w/ that behaviour change introduced w/ recent
> > kernel updates, is that some mount mapping tables (fstab for instance)
> > are broken if they rely on mo
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 11:17:29PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 03.02.2012 22:58, schrieb Stephen Harris:
> > If your mail server talks to machine with IP address 1.2.3.4 then should
> > it say HELO with the 10 address name or the 91 address name?
>
> if you are not too stupid your internl vie
On 02/03/12 2:11 PM, fakessh @ wrote:
> is it possible to imagine during an upgrade from centos 5 to 6 to keep
> the named directory /etc and /var unchanged if an update as simple as
> possible.
as there are major version upgrades of almost every component that puts
files into those directories,
Le vendredi 03 février 2012 à 14:33 -0800, John R Pierce a écrit :
> On 02/03/12 2:11 PM, fakessh @ wrote:
> > is it possible to imagine during an upgrade from centos 5 to 6 to keep
> > the named directory /etc and /var unchanged if an update as simple as
> > possible.
>
> as there are major versi
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 11:47:06PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 03.02.2012 23:32, schrieb Stephen Harris:
> > If you're telling me that my internal mail servers must talk to each
> > other via the name pool-173-71-187-61.pitbpa.fios.verizon.net then...
> > well, never mind.
>
> i am telling yo
My issue appears to be with the virtual machine just not working via the
network.
I can only describe it as when your windows computer has not been used
for a while and
then the power management takes over and turns it down.
The eth is up, everything is fine and working via the local computer
(
Hello wwp,
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 23:31 +0100, wwp wrote:
> I grabbed the UUID from `lshal` and replaced it in fstab:
> UUID=005374e2_5c18_437d_84d8_8069868fe54e ext4noatime,nodiratime 0 0
>
> .. no luck, it doesn't automount at boot. I think I'll have to
> investigate or get another brai
On 02/03/2012 02:21 AM, Darr247 wrote:
> On Thursday, 02 February, 2012 @01:59 UTC,
> Mark LaPierre spake thusly:
>
>> I didn't change anything since I wrote the last time. It's working
>> fine now. Only one copy of each email. Hmmm? Must be an AOL issue
>> that they fixed. Funny that it only
On Feb 3, 2012, at 5:02 PM, wwp wrote:
> Hello Ross,
>
>
> On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 16:01:53 -0500 Ross Walker wrote:
>
>> On Feb 3, 2012, at 1:34 PM, wwp wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Jerry,
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:24:14 -0500 Jerry Geis wrote:
>>>
I am trying to install 6.2 on a machi
fakessh @ wrote on 02/03/2012 05:43 PM:
> but possible
> or I may strongly advises against
I would strongly advise against blindly overwriting /var and /etc (or
anything else, with the possible exception of /home) from a CentOS-6
install with CentOS-5 versions. Compare the files and make changes
Continuing in my venture to resolve the network issue on the virtual
machine on my centos 6 host machine.
The intermittent 'closing' off all network conditions can only be solved
by service network restart
My last thing I am going to try is to look at the different NIC devices
I can use in vir
On Friday 03 February 2012 08:07, the following was written:
> Hi all,
>
> Having a 4 NIC server, I want to bridge eth2 and eth3, with a bridge
> named br0.
>
> Searching the web I only found about creating a file
> /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-br0, but did not find where to
> explic
On Friday 03 February 2012 09:10, the following was written:
> On 02/03/2012 08:07 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Having a 4 NIC server, I want to bridge eth2 and eth3, with a bridge
> > named br0.
> >
> > Searching the web I only found about creating a file
> > /et
I am thinking adding ethtool opts wol pumbg
(wake on lan, all on)
the ethtool for eth0 on my vm said wol = d, never wake up.
so I set it in the ifcfg to just wake on everything.
will see, that may be the issue. Hopefully.
why in the world would the system set up a webserver install with a lan
On Saturday, February 04, 2012 @00:44 UTC,
Ljubomir Ljubojevic spake thusly:
> As far as I can see, it looks like your Windows Mail client made a
> copy of those 4 mails. You can notice that duplicates do not have
> "Account" information (last/right column), so they look like ghosts,
> not belongi
52 matches
Mail list logo
