Hi list,
I have been getting the following types of log messages
Jan 30 08:22:33 ndgonline postfix/smtpd[30538]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from unknown[71.46.229.50]: 450 4.7.1 Client host rejected: cannot find
your hostname, [71.46.229.50]; from=
to= proto=ESMTP helo=
a rdns check shows all is we
On 02/02/2012 11:01 AM, Rob Kampen wrote:
> Hi list,
> I have been getting the following types of log messages
>
> Jan 30 08:22:33 ndgonline postfix/smtpd[30538]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
> from unknown[71.46.229.50]: 450 4.7.1 Client host rejected: cannot find
> your hostname, [71.46.229.50]; from=
>
On 02/02/2012 02:59 AM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> On 01/31/2012 08:16 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
>> Hey Y'all, why am I getting double copies of every email on this list
>> today when it wasn't happening yesterday? Isn't happening on any of my
>> other email.
>>
>
> I didn't change anything since I wro
On 01/02/12 21:06, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Hmm...
>>
>> I just tried this and besides needing ip route "add" default
>>
>> It does not seem to work when I unplug the cable on my primary link.
Well, I should disclose that is an experiment, and I may not have explained the
config fully - see the page
On 02/02/2012 11:28 AM, Nick wrote:
> And if it isn't, is there anything I should bear in mind when hacking a script
> to do this sort of thing, in order to avoid breaking my system or generally
> fighting against the system's assumptions?
>
I would have ping the gateway of primary link (maybe bot
On 02/02/2012 05:41 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> On 02/02/2012 11:28 AM, Nick wrote:
>> And if it isn't, is there anything I should bear in mind when hacking a
>> script
>> to do this sort of thing, in order to avoid breaking my system or generally
>> fighting against the system's assumptions?
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 11:01:52PM +1300, Rob Kampen wrote:
> 50.229.46.71.in-addr.arpa. 777INPTRmail2.orangebankfl.com.
However:
% getent hosts mail2.orangebankfl.com.
71.43.202.234 mail2.orangebankfl.com
71.46.229.50 != 71.43.202.234
Senders DNS is broken. rDNS lookup validatio
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Larry Martell wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 7:11 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>> On Tuesday 31 January 2012 05:34:21 Larry Martell wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Arun Khan wrote:
>>> > On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Ken godee wrote:
>>> >> Maybe
>I use tftp + pxe booting routinely on EL6.2. To get help, you're going
>to need to share much more information about your setup, the errors/log
>messages, and what you've tried to do thus far.
Right, but that's in a ro setup.
SELinux is disabled on this machine, perms on /var/lib/tftpboot are 77
On 02/02/12 10:01, Rob Kampen wrote:
> Hi list,
> I have been getting the following types of log messages
>
> Jan 30 08:22:33 ndgonline postfix/smtpd[30538]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
> from unknown[71.46.229.50]: 450 4.7.1 Client host rejected: cannot find
> your hostname, [71.46.229.50]; from=
> to=
On 2012-02-02 15:39, Ned Slider wrote:
>
> I would recommend removing reject_unknown_client from your
> smtpd_sender_restrictions.
>
I would not recommend that, I would recommend you fix your DNS. If you
have a lot of mail throughput perhaps run a caching-DNS server or proxy
to improve performan
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
On 02/02/12 15:44, Giles Coochey wrote:
> On 2012-02-02 15:39, Ned Slider wrote:
>>
>> I would recommend removing reject_unknown_client from your
>> smtpd_sender_restrictions.
>>
>
> I would not recommend that, I would recommend you fix your DNS. If you
> have a lot of mail throughput perhaps run a
On 02/02/2012 17:35, Ned Slider wrote:
> On 02/02/12 15:44, Giles Coochey wrote:
>> On 2012-02-02 15:39, Ned Slider wrote:
>>> I would recommend removing reject_unknown_client from your
>>> smtpd_sender_restrictions.
>>>
>> I would not recommend that, I would recommend you fix your DNS. If you
>> h
Has anyone installed a high I/O application such as an email server on
SSD drives? Was thinking about doing two SSD's in RAID1. It would
solve my I/O latency issues but I have heard that SSD's wear out
quickly in high I/O situations? Something like each memory location
only has X many writes bef
On 2/2/2012 1:19 PM, Matt wrote:
> Has anyone installed a high I/O application such as an email server on
> SSD drives? Was thinking about doing two SSD's in RAID1. It would
> solve my I/O latency issues but I have heard that SSD's wear out
> quickly in high I/O situations? Something like each m
On Thu, 2 Feb 2012, William Warren wrote:
> On 2/2/2012 1:19 PM, Matt wrote:
>> Has anyone installed a high I/O application such as an email server on
>> SSD drives? Was thinking about doing two SSD's in RAID1. It would
>> solve my I/O latency issues but I have heard that SSD's wear out
>> quick
On 02/02/12 14:05, Mike wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Feb 2012, William Warren wrote:
>
>> On 2/2/2012 1:19 PM, Matt wrote:
>>> Has anyone installed a high I/O application such as an email server on
>>> SSD drives? Was thinking about doing two SSD's in RAID1. It would
>>> solve my I/O latency issues but I h
On 02/03/2012 06:35 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
> On 02/02/12 15:44, Giles Coochey wrote:
>> On 2012-02-02 15:39, Ned Slider wrote:
>>> I would recommend removing reject_unknown_client from your
>>> smtpd_sender_restrictions.
>>>
I think this will allow the mail through - but when I look at my logs
just
On 2/2/2012 2:15 PM, Peter A wrote:
> On 02/02/12 14:05, Mike wrote:
>> On Thu, 2 Feb 2012, William Warren wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/2/2012 1:19 PM, Matt wrote:
Has anyone installed a high I/O application such as an email server on
SSD drives? Was thinking about doing two SSD's in RAID1. It wo
On 02/02/12 17:01, William Warren wrote:
> On 2/2/2012 2:15 PM, Peter A wrote:
>> If you're worried about io reliability, then buy a (way more expensive)
>> SLC drive, rather than the consumer level MLC... We have some SLC drives
>> here that from their manufacturer have been rated at 3 or more yea
On 02/02/2012 10:08 PM, Rob Kampen wrote:
> Final question for the list - does anyone use "reject_unknown_client" -
> it has given me the most grief with legitimate clients that have poorly
> administered domains.
My restrictions are:
permit_mynetworks
permit_sasl_authenticated
reject_unknown_hos
Hey Y'all,
What do you think this means for CentOS long term support?
http://www.serverwatch.com/server-news/red-hat-extends-linux-support.html
--
_
°v°
/(_)\
^ ^ Mark LaPierre
Registerd Linux user No #267004
___
CentOS mailing list
On 02/02/2012 11:48 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> Hey Y'all,
>
> What do you think this means for CentOS long term support?
>
> http://www.serverwatch.com/server-news/red-hat-extends-linux-support.html
>
That CentOS team will have access to src.rpm's not fo r 7 but for 10 years.
--
Ljubomir Ljuboj
On 02/02/12 2:48 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> What do you think this means for CentOS long term support?
>
> http://www.serverwatch.com/server-news/red-hat-extends-linux-support.html
I'd guess that the CentOS team will be supporting EL5 for the additional
3 years, as long as RH makes the SRPM's rea
On Thursday, 02 February, 2012 @01:59 UTC,
Mark LaPierre spake thusly:
> I didn't change anything since I wrote the last time. It's working
> fine now. Only one copy of each email. Hmmm? Must be an AOL issue
> that they fixed. Funny that it only affected the CentOS mail.
I saw exactly 4.
htt
I installed centos 6 as a webserver. It installed mysql.
However, I guess I need mysql-server for me to use it for php and my
website.
I installed that.
I am unable to give root a password and can go no further.
I have tried mysql-secure-installation and I just get stuck at errors
and no progres
after a few yum remove / reinstalls I got this working by doing the
following...
(not fully set up yet, just the very first step)
#yum install mysql mysql-server
#service mysqld start
#chkconfig --levels 235 mysqld on
#mysql --user=root -p
(this is not the syntax I would have normaly used, but
Bob Hoffman writes:
> after a few yum remove / reinstalls I got this working by doing the
> following...
>
> (not fully set up yet, just the very first step)
>
> #yum install mysql mysql-server
> #service mysqld start
> #chkconfig --levels 235 mysqld on
>
> #mysql --user=root -p
First time y
On 02/01/2012 11:03 AM, Nick wrote:
> I believe I can configure the routing table manually like this:
> ip route default scope global \
> nexthop via 192.168.1.1 dev eth1 weight 1 \
> nexthop via 192.168.0.1 dev eth0 weight 2
>
> This kind of thing doesn't seem to fit into the scheme of
>
30 matches
Mail list logo
