Dear All,
I have one VG with one LV inside consist of four disk (and four PV) somehow
the UUID is changed. I try to restore with the last known good
configuration and use
pvcreate --uuid xxx --restorefile xxx
but I think when I first time do it I did use wrong UUID for two device.
but haven't onl
> Try changing the above to:
>
> alias snd-card-0 snd-hda-intel
> options snd-card-0 index=0
> options snd-hda-intel index=0
> remove snd-hda-intel { /usr/sbin/alsactl store 0 >/dev/null 2>&1 || : ;
> }; /sbin/modprobe -r --ignore-remove snd-hda-intel
>
> Save and reboot.
I tried that yester
I'm using the kickstart file we developed for v5 on 6.2 in VM (kvm/qemu
running on a CentOS 5.6),
but it fails:
Error partitioning. Could not allocate requested partitions: not
enough free space on disks.
There's nothing wrong with the disk. Both fdisk and parted works fine,
I can vi
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 12:46:36 +0200, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> part / --fstype ext3 --size 4 --ondrive=sda
Sorry, I've had a really crappy week without any sleep.
40GB is of course larger than 10GB. Doh!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos
Hi,
it's time to start our redundant dhcp server setup and I found some
suggestions and tutorials.
But all setups I found use either static or nonstatic ip adress management.
For the static setup I'd setup two servers and copy the configfile from
the 'master' to the secondary server and do a dhc
The virtio disk driver uses "/dev/vda" instead of "sda", give it a try.
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
Turbo Fredriksson
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 5:47 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] CentOS 6.2 KS/Insta
On 01/19/2012 10:58 AM, Lars Hecking wrote:
>
> I tried that yesterday and it did not work, but I found out that this
> happened for an entirely different reason. Tested again today and it
> works. Thanks, Ned!
>
Can you please inform us as well what was the cause?
--
Ljubomir Ljubojevic
2012/1/19 Götz Reinicke :
> Hi,
>
> it's time to start our redundant dhcp server setup and I found some
> suggestions and tutorials.
>
> But all setups I found use either static or nonstatic ip adress management.
>
> For the static setup I'd setup two servers and copy the configfile from
> the 'mas
Ljubomir Ljubojevic writes:
> On 01/19/2012 10:58 AM, Lars Hecking wrote:
> >
> > I tried that yesterday and it did not work, but I found out that this
> > happened for an entirely different reason. Tested again today and it
> > works. Thanks, Ned!
> >
>
> Can you please inform us as well wh
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
On 01/19/2012 09:00 AM, Tait Clarridge wrote:
>> >
>> > I've Googled until I'm blue in the face, but haven't found a clear
>> > explanation of how I can assign each ethX device directly to the guest
>> > OS rather than going thru the usual bridge configuration. I need to
>> > allow the m0n0wa
On 01/18/2012 03:15 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> On 01/18/2012 11:27 AM, Darrin Wilkinson wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am getting the exact same error on a CentOS 6.2 X86_64 machine that I have
>> just setup.
>>
>> Removed and re-installed ALL the *virt* and *qemu* packages ( re-installed
>> from
>>
> But a new problem arises ... one of the m0n0wall instances needs to use
> DHCP to get a dynamic IP from my ISP (the others are static, so they're
> ok). How do I get the bridge to proxy the DHCP request and forward the
> response to the VM guest? I brought up a test instance of m0n0wall but
On 1/17/2012 2:51 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> frankly, I'd temporarily hang a 1TB drive on that thing, format it as
> a simple volume, and backup your file systems to it, that raid is a
> *MESS*. It would make much more sense to have 1 partition on each
> physical disk be a member of the MD raid5
On 1/17/2012 9:16 PM, Raymond Lillard wrote:
> Just make sure you have a verified backup
> before you do anything !!
>
> If it's not backed up data, it's not important data.
This particular system is actually a mirror of a production server,
a CentOS 5.7 (Final), which is also configured the
Hi all!
One of these days I'm going to upgrade my centos 5.7 box (which is
currently configured with raid-1 on two drives) to 6.x.
i've been given to believe that I should be able to do a fresh install
on top of the existing raid setup, i.e., without having to re-create
the raid array, but just u
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 3:30 PM, fred smith
wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> One of these days I'm going to upgrade my centos 5.7 box (which is
> currently configured with raid-1 on two drives) to 6.x.
>
> i've been given to believe that I should be able to do a fresh install
> on top of the existing raid set
On 01/19/2012 08:50 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
> On 1/17/2012 9:16 PM, Raymond Lillard wrote:
>> I don't remember what version of the ext filesystem
>> was current during the RH7 days, but I would
>> seriously consider dumping the raid and reloading
>> in onto a newly formatted ext4 filesystem.
hello guys
hello centos list
hello master of "Fu"
I write following the announcement on twitter Port centos 6.3 on ppc.
what about the port on ppc64 and PS3 later old school
sincerely
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC2626742
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key C2626
On 01/20/2012 12:18 AM, fakessh @ wrote:
> I write following the announcement on twitter Port centos 6.3 on ppc.
> what about the port on ppc64 and PS3 later old school
the first target is going to be power7 - anything and everything else is
do-able, but it needs more people to come in and help.
Le vendredi 20 janvier 2012 à 00:20 +, Karanbir Singh a écrit :
> On 01/20/2012 12:18 AM, fakessh @ wrote:
> > I write following the announcement on twitter Port centos 6.3 on ppc.
> > what about the port on ppc64 and PS3 later old school
>
> the first target is going to be power7 - anything
On 1/19/2012 5:01 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> You can create mdadm "RAID 10 far" and create separate partitions on
> top that will mimic original/old raid. You can also first create
> partitions and then create "RAID 10 far" for each partion(s).
To what point? I don't really care for
On 01/19/2012 10:30 PM, fred smith wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> One of these days I'm going to upgrade my centos 5.7 box (which is
> currently configured with raid-1 on two drives) to 6.x.
>
> i've been given to believe that I should be able to do a fresh install
> on top of the existing raid setup, i.e.,
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 02:14:16AM +0100, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> On 01/19/2012 10:30 PM, fred smith wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > One of these days I'm going to upgrade my centos 5.7 box (which is
> > currently configured with raid-1 on two drives) to 6.x.
> >
> > i've been given to believe that
24 matches
Mail list logo
