Sorry, mail was mentioned for polish centos list.
Best regards,
Rafał.
W dniu 13 stycznia 2012 21:55 użytkownik fakessh napisał:
> use the tool googletranslate
> is well for that
>
>
> cheers
>
> Le 2012-01-13 20:43, Diego Sanchez a écrit :
>> Rafał Radecki :
>> Please, write in english
>>
>> 2
On 01/14/2012 09:41 AM, Rafał Radecki wrote:
> Sorry, mail was mentioned for polish centos list.
>
We dont actually have a polish list, but if there is interest: we should
create one here : http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ all that is
needed are a couple of people, presently visible in t
Hi all.
Currently I am administering a mail cluster in which messages are
stored on software RAID shared with NFS. There are several NFS
servers, every one of them exports a part of all mail files for a
specific frontend with postfix.
We are thinking about replacing these storage hosts with one s
On 01/14/12 1:56 AM, Rafał Radecki wrote:
> We are thinking about replacing these storage hosts with one solution,
> maybe a storage array with appropriate disk space and I/O capacity.
> What are pros and cons of that solution? Do storage arrays have
> appropriate I/O capacity (X*software RAID)? Do
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 01/14/12 1:56 AM, Rafał Radecki wrote:
>> We are thinking about replacing these storage hosts with one solution,
>> maybe a storage array with appropriate disk space and I/O capacity.
>> What are pros and cons of that solution? Do storage arrays have
>> appropriate I/O cap
I have two iptable rules for userspace modification :
iptable -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p udp --dport 9090 -j NFQUEUE
iptable -t mangle -A OUTPUT -p udp --sport 9090 -j NFQUEUE
I have the following network setup:
client >Linux Box or router->server. What
i
Gordon Messmer wrote:
>> Wait a sec, I have that setup (just mediatomb instead of ps3mediaserver)
>> and there's no avahi on my network. Yet the PS3 is perfectly capable of
>> discovering and using the DLNA server.
>
> Avahi allows the workstation running it to advertise and solicit mDNS
> inform
Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 01/11/2012 03:42 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> As far as I can see, it is some sort of rival to dhcpd.
>
> No, DHCP is used to assign network addresses and routes (and other
> optional configuration items).
According to the Wikipedia entry for mDNS,
"Using mDNS allows t
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 12:29:05PM +, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
> > On 01/11/2012 03:42 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> >> As far as I can see, it is some sort of rival to dhcpd.
> >
> > No, DHCP is used to assign network addresses and routes (and other
> > optional configur
On 01/14/2012 12:35 AM, Lars Hecking wrote:
> Yves Bellefeuille writes:
>> On Friday 13 January 2012, ken wrote:
>>
>>> This was with skype_static-2.2.0.35, the one recommended for CentOS
>>> version 5.x in the HOW-TO. So the how-to is either wrong or it's
>>> missing some information.
>>
>> The
Stephen Harris wrote:
>> >> As far as I can see, it is some sort of rival to dhcpd.
>> >
>> > No, DHCP is used to assign network addresses and routes (and other
>> > optional configuration items).
>>
>> According to the Wikipedia entry for mDNS,
>> "Using mDNS allows to determine the IP address
On Jan 14, 2012 3:18 PM, "Timothy Murphy" wrote:
>
> Stephen Harris wrote:
>
> >> >> As far as I can see, it is some sort of rival to dhcpd.
> >> >
> >> > No, DHCP is used to assign network addresses and routes (and other
> >> > optional configuration items).
> >>
> >> According to the Wikipedia e
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 02:17:56PM +, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> OK, I should have said "a rival to ARP + dhcp".
But it's not; ARP+dhcp is all about mapping MAC<->IP. mDNS is dealing
with name<->IP.
mDNS competes with _DNS_; it's a way of doing local DNS without needing
a DNS server.
> As I se
>ARP: In a traditional ethernet network, when you try to connect to a
>machine on your local network with the number 10.20.30.40 then your
>machine will send out an ARP broadcast packet "whois 10.20.30.40" and
>then the machine in question will respond with its MAC address and then
>the machines ca
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>
>>> Isn't that more or less what I said above?
>>
>> It's almost the opposite. mDNS does name->IP and let's people
>> find other machines; DHCP does MAC->IP and let's a machine find _itself_.
>>
>> Or, another way of looking at it. mDNS is
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Marc Deop wrote:
>>ARP: In a traditional ethernet network, when you try to connect to a
>>machine on your local network with the number 10.20.30.40 then your
>>machine will send out an ARP broadcast packet "whois 10.20.30.40" and
>>then the machine in question will
On 01/13/2012 05:59 PM Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
> On Friday 13 January 2012, ken wrote:
>
>> This was with skype_static-2.2.0.35, the one recommended for CentOS
>> version 5.x in the HOW-TO. So the how-to is either wrong or it's
>> missing some information.
>
> The How-To recommends skype_stati
Rafa³ Radecki wrote:
> We are thinking about replacing these storage hosts with one solution,
> maybe a storage array with appropriate disk space and I/O capacity.
As John had mentioned the solution really depends on a complete
analysis of your requirements (average and maximum message size,
nu
On Saturday 14 January 2012, ken wrote:
> Thanks. You're correct. And it runs... sort of. It loads, but
> won't connect. There's some kind of networking problem. I'm trying
> to figure out how to isolate the problem, i.e., where on my network
> the connection is failing.
I've found that Sky
On Saturday 14 January 2012, Ljubomir Ljubojevic
wrote:
> My own rpm, static in rpm, with avatars added:
> http://rpms.plnet.rs/plnet-centos5-i386/RPMS.plnet/skype-2.1.0.81-1.e
> l5.noarch.rpm
Is this the kind of package that's appropriate for the CentOS contrib
repository?
--
Yves Bellefeui
On 01/14/2012 08:08 PM, Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
> On Saturday 14 January 2012, Ljubomir Ljubojevic
> wrote:
>
>> My own rpm, static in rpm, with avatars added:
>> http://rpms.plnet.rs/plnet-centos5-i386/RPMS.plnet/skype-2.1.0.81-1.e
>> l5.noarch.rpm
>
> Is this the kind of package that's appropria
Thanks for the comments folks, your points are damn right. I believe what I
experienced was the data corruption via stale caches..
So much for not opening up the case (actually for the first time, I resisted
due to the lack of time) and not checking if these controllers are somehow
linked toge
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 17:01:16 -0600
Frank Cox wrote:
> I haven't actually tried to place an icon on there. I do know that I can
> place an application window anywhere on the desktop with no problem (that I've
> noticed so far). I'll try putting an icon there when I'm next at that office
> and see
On 01/14/12 2:32 PM, Vahan Yerkanian wrote:
> Thanks for the comments folks, your points are damn right. I believe what I
> experienced was the data corruption via stale caches..
>
> So much for not opening up the case (actually for the first time, I resisted
> due to the lack of time) and not ch
On 01/14/12 2:32 PM, Vahan Yerkanian wrote:
> Going back to the LSI website to check if these 9750 have an option to link
> their caches into one...
I was curious, *all* the LSI sAS RAID cards say 'single controller
multipathing', both the megaraid cards and the 3ware cards (I'm setting
up a se
On Jan 15, 2012, at 2:52 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
>
> who built/configured this system?
>
>
Someone you don't know. ;) A local distributor. The system was shipped with MS
OS with MPIO ISCSI targets installed claiming to be tested. Of course I had to
remove that offending OS and install Cent
On Jan 15, 2012, at 3:52 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 01/14/12 2:32 PM, Vahan Yerkanian wrote:
>> Going back to the LSI website to check if these 9750 have an option to link
>> their caches into one...
>
> I was curious, *all* the LSI sAS RAID cards say 'single controller
> multipathing', both
On 01/14/12 3:55 PM, Vahan Yerkanian wrote:
> At the moment I have two 9750-4i installed, each having a sff8087 x4 cable
> going to the same backplane containing dual-port sas disks.
>
> This was supposed to be a load balanced, multi-controller failover setup.
AFAIK the only way to achieve that i
I hope you will be clustering those storage arrays since email is such a vital
service for any organization. What are your current choices? I don't think
there would be any major issues as long as you plan you current and long term
capacity needs. Let us know what are your plans at the moment.
On 01/14/2012 04:19 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> If running mediatomb avoids the necessity for Avahi,
> can you give a concrete example of a situation where Avahi_is_ needed?
I did. "If two PCs were running a collaborative editor, like gobby,
they'll use mDNS to find each other. Chat clients suc
30 matches
Mail list logo
