On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:48 AM, Devin Reade wrote:
> --On Wednesday, January 11, 2012 03:40:20 PM -0500 Alan McKay
> wrote:
>
>> Well, the scientists are talking longer than 7 years so HDs just are not
>> going to cut it
[...]
> For long term storage, you may need to be able to not just put s
Hello,
I have a strange (for me) problem with these two machines :
- Client, a CentOS-5.7 workstation ;
- Server, a CentOS-6.2 headless, up-to-date server.
>From Client, I want to use xauth on Server with the help of rsh (yes, I
know, ssh and all this sort of things... another time.)
When SELin
On Thursday 12 January 2012 18:56:04 Bennett Haselton wrote:
> Or is there a reason that an exploit against OpenVPN would be less
> powerful than an exploit against sshd?
Not really.
The thing is that the tools are there but you have to use them *CORRECTLY*
The OpenVPN server and the SSH server
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone has successfully configured two lsi/3ware 9750-4i
series controllers for multipathing under CentOS 5.7 x86_64?
I've tried some basic setups with both multibus and failover settings, and had
repeatable filesystem corruption over a iscsi(tgtd) or nfs3 connection.
An
On 01/12/2012 08:56 PM, Bennett Haselton wrote:
> On 1/12/2012 5:25 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 01/12/2012 10:31 AM, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
>>> Am 10.01.2012 19:05, schrieb Johnny Hughes:
Limit access to the sshd port from only authorized places ... and
the authorized places can be an o
On Friday, January 13, 2012, Vahan Yerkanian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if anyone has successfully configured two lsi/3ware
9750-4i series controllers for multipathing under CentOS 5.7 x86_64?
>
> I've tried some basic setups with both multibus and failover settings,
and had repeatable files
Cześć.
Aktualnie mam do czynienia z klastrem pocztowym, w którym pliki
wiadomości pocztowych użytkowników są przechowywane na raid
software-owym udostępnianym po NFS. Serwerów NFS jest kilka, każdy
udostępnia podzbiór wiadomości dla odpowiedniego serwera z postfix-em,
który jest klientem NFS. Dane
On Jan 13, 2012, at 6:33 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
> On Friday, January 13, 2012, Vahan Yerkanian wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was wondering if anyone has successfully configured two lsi/3ware 9750-4i
>> series controllers for multipathing under CentOS 5.7 x86_64?
>>
>> I've tried some basic setups with
Hi all,
I having a problem with my sendmail server running on centos 5.7 x64.
Sometimes when we send an email to microsoft exchange servers, sendmail
says deferred or timeout. I do not know what is happening. Here is some
details;
[root@avgw ~]# sendmail -v -qr...@xxx.gov.qa
Running /var/spo
> Cze¶æ.
>
you probably won't get much of an answer if you do not use English.
I for sure do not understand a word of it.
> Aktualnie mam do czynienia z klastrem pocztowym, w którym pliki
> wiadomo¶ci pocztowych u¿ytkowników s± przechowywane na raid
> software-owym udostêpnianym po NFS. Serweró
Me either :))
On 13.01.2012 17:43, Leen de Braal wrote:
>> Cze¶æ.
>>
> you probably won't get much of an answer if you do not use English.
>
> I for sure do not understand a word of it.
>
>> Aktualnie mam do czynienia z klastrem pocztowym, w którym pliki
>> wiadomo¶ci pocztowych u¿ytkowników s± pr
On 13 Jan 2012, at 15:44, Leen de Braal wrote:
> I for sure do not understand a word of it.
Let me Google translate it for you:
Hi. Currently I am dealing with a cluster of mail, in which files mail
messages are stored on users raid software-at that shared by NFS.
Multiple NFS servers, each pr
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Ismail Ozatay wrote:
> I having a problem with my sendmail server running on centos 5.7 x64.
> Sometimes when we send an email to microsoft exchange servers, sendmail
> says deferred or timeout. I do not know what is happening. Here is some
> details;
>
> [root@a
Greetings,
2012/1/13 Rafał Radecki :
> Cześć.
>
> Aktualnie mam do czynienia z klastrem pocztowym, w którym pliki
> wiadomości pocztowych użytkowników są przechowywane na raid
> software-owym udostępnianym po NFS. Serwerów NFS jest kilka, każdy
> udostępnia podzbiór wiadomości dla odpowiedniego se
On 01/11/2012 03:42 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> As far as I can see, it is some sort of rival to dhcpd.
No, DHCP is used to assign network addresses and routes (and other
optional configuration items).
mDNS is used to discover services using IP multicast.
> Is it only used within local LANs?
U
On 01/11/2012 05:40 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I must admit I'm rather confused by UPnP.
UPnP is something completely different. That protocol allows devices
behind a NAT router to request that it open a port forward to them. It
is commonly used by game consoles to open the ports required for
On 01/11/2012 05:10 PM, Florin Andrei wrote:
> Wait a sec, I have that setup (just mediatomb instead of ps3mediaserver)
> and there's no avahi on my network. Yet the PS3 is perfectly capable of
> discovering and using the DLNA server.
Avahi allows the workstation running it to advertise and solici
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
>> As far as I can see, it is some sort of rival to dhcpd.
>
> No, DHCP is used to assign network addresses and routes (and other
> optional configuration items).
There is a larger 'zeroconf' context where if the request to a DHCP
server t
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 01/11/2012 05:40 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> I must admit I'm rather confused by UPnP.
>
> UPnP is something completely different. That protocol allows devices
> behind a NAT router to request that it open a port forward to them. It
>
On 01/13/12 6:41 AM, Vahan Yerkanian wrote:
> multipath -ll showed everything OK, with both sdb and sdc (the same 24 x 3tb
> raid6 array) as active and ready.
are those controllers aware you're using them for multipathing?RAID
cards like that tend to have large caches, and one controllers c
Rafał Radecki :
Please, write in english
2012/1/13 Rajagopal Swaminathan
>
>
> What was that in simple English?
>
>
Currently I am dealing with a cluster of mail, in which files
mail messages are stored on users raid
software-at that shared by NFS. Multiple NFS servers, each
provides a subset of
Earlier last year I had a 5.7 system running with skype. It worked
fine. Later last year I had to reinstall my entire system. I didn't
install skype then. Yesterday I tried to find a version of skype to use
on 5.7, but couldn't find one on skype.com; there's no version for
RH/CentOS 5.7. D
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 15:14:29 -0500
ken wrote:
> Earlier last year I had a 5.7 system running with skype. It worked
> fine. Later last year I had to reinstall my entire system. I didn't
> install skype then. Yesterday I tried to find a version of skype to use
> on 5.7, but couldn't find one
use the tool googletranslate
is well for that
cheers
Le 2012-01-13 20:43, Diego Sanchez a écrit :
> Rafał Radecki :
> Please, write in english
>
> 2012/1/13 Rajagopal Swaminathan
>>
>>
>> What was that in simple English?
>>
>>
>
> Currently I am dealing with a cluster of mail, in which files
>
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:56:40 -0600
>
> THE REMAINING MINOR ISSUE
> For some reason, the upper left two-thirds of the desktop background is darker
> than the rest of the desktop background. It's easier to show than to explain
> how it looks, so a
On 01/13/2012 03:18 PM Frank Cox wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 15:14:29 -0500
> ken wrote:
>
>> Earlier last year I had a 5.7 system running with skype. It worked
>> fine. Later last year I had to reinstall my entire system. I didn't
>> install skype then. Yesterday I tried to find a version
On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 14:34 -0800, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Frank Cox
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:56:40 -0600
> >
> > THE REMAINING MINOR ISSUE
> > For some reason, the upper left two-thirds of the desktop background is
> > darker
> > than the rest of the d
On Friday 13 January 2012, ken wrote:
> This was with skype_static-2.2.0.35, the one recommended for CentOS
> version 5.x in the HOW-TO. So the how-to is either wrong or it's
> missing some information.
The How-To recommends skype_static-2.1.0.47 (not 2.2.x) for CentOS 5.
It's still available
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:34:42 -0800
Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Frank Cox
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:56:40 -0600
> >
> > THE REMAINING MINOR ISSUE
> > For some reason, the upper left two-thirds of the desktop background is
> > darker than the rest of the deskto
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:48:38 +0100
Louis Lagendijk wrote:
> I quite recently had something that looked quite similar on my iMac g5
> when I had a cable plugged in to the VGA port. he system apparently
> overlaid the VGA screen over the screen on the built in LCD. Does the OP
> have a second monito
I have a machine with a recent install of centos
(2.6.32-220.2.1.el6.x86_64 kernel). It crashed 3 times this week, and
sent emails like the one below complaining about kernel taint. I've
gone back to a previous kernel to see if that helps, but otherwise I
don't know how to investigate this. What s
Yves Bellefeuille writes:
> On Friday 13 January 2012, ken wrote:
>
> > This was with skype_static-2.2.0.35, the one recommended for CentOS
> > version 5.x in the HOW-TO. So the how-to is either wrong or it's
> > missing some information.
>
> The How-To recommends skype_static-2.1.0.47 (not 2.2
On Jan 13, 2012, at 2:37 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 01/13/12 6:41 AM, Vahan Yerkanian wrote:
>> multipath -ll showed everything OK, with both sdb and sdc (the same 24 x 3tb
>> raid6 array) as active and ready.
>
>
> are those controllers aware you're using them for multipathing?RAID
>
On 01/13/12 3:46 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
> You will need to publish these disks as straight through individual disks
> with write-through cache and use software RAID if the controllers can't
> communicate with each other.
write-through cache is not even good enough. if a given block is
writt
Am 14.01.2012 00:16, schrieb Thomas Burns:
> I have a machine with a recent install of centos
> (2.6.32-220.2.1.el6.x86_64 kernel). It crashed 3 times this week, and
> sent emails like the one below complaining about kernel taint. I've
> gone back to a previous kernel to see if that helps, but othe
On Jan 13, 2012, at 6:51 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 01/13/12 3:46 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
>> You will need to publish these disks as straight through individual disks
>> with write-through cache and use software RAID if the controllers can't
>> communicate with each other.
>
> write-through
Thanks for the reply, Alexander.
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> Am 14.01.2012 00:16, schrieb Thomas Burns:
>> I have a machine with a recent install of centos
>> (2.6.32-220.2.1.el6.x86_64 kernel). It crashed 3 times this week, and
>> sent emails like the one below com
On 01/10/2012 01:12 AM, Bennett Haselton wrote:
> What about sshd -- assuming that the attacker can connect to sshd at all
> (i.e. not prevented by a firewall), if they find an exploit to let them
> take control of sshd, would that imply immediate total control of the
> machine?
Yes, but the quest
> Hi. Currently I am dealing with a cluster of mail, [...]
For a highly scalable open source mail solution, have a look
at the Cyrus IMAP (+POP) mail system, specifically the Cyrus Murder
configuration. I don't know of any comparable open source
system (and I would stack it against commercial so
On 14/01/12 11:41 AM, Thomas Burns wrote:
> Thanks for the reply, Alexander.
>
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>> > Am 14.01.2012 00:16, schrieb Thomas Burns:
>>> >> I have a machine with a recent install of centos
>>> >> (2.6.32-220.2.1.el6.x86_64 kernel). It crashed 3
40 matches
Mail list logo
