Hi,
After yum update on a Cent OS 6.0 IBM x3850 server to Cent OS 6.1, the
kernel crashes on boot.
I have googlet a little, and find that others have the same problem and
there seems not to be a solution yet.
The kernel that crashes is 2.6.32-131.21.1.el6.x86_64.
If i boot the prior kernel 2.
On 12/20/2011 03:24 AM, Thomas Rønshof wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After yum update on a Cent OS 6.0 IBM x3850 server to Cent OS 6.1, the
> kernel crashes on boot.
>
> I have googlet a little, and find that others have the same problem and
> there seems not to be a solution yet.
>
> The kernel that crash
On 12/20/2011 12:59 AM, Barry Brimer wrote:
>> 1. The switch being used has autoneg off and has port set to 100 full duplex.
>> 2. Many times NIC fails to come up properly during PXE boot:
>>
>> Any other ideas?
> udev rules?
> mii-tool?
> ___
> CentOS ma
In article <4ef0939c.9030...@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com>,
William Warren wrote:
> On 12/20/2011 12:59 AM, Barry Brimer wrote:
> >> 1. The switch being used has autoneg off and has port set to 100 full
> >> duplex.
> >> 2. Many times NIC fails to come up properly during PXE boot:
> >>
> >> Any
>
> Message: 37
> Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 09:41:26 -0500
> From: m.r...@5-cent.us
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] java installation failure
> To: "CentOS mailing list"
>
> I would suggest that if openjdk doesn't work, you go with Sun/Oracle's
> java, which is the Source of All Java
>
Sun java was obtained
CentOS-6.1 KVM guest on CentOS-6.1 host.
I am seeing this SEAlert in the /var/log/audit/audit.log
file a new guest immediately after startup. Can someone
tell me what it means and what I should do about it? A
Google search reveals a number of Fedora issues with
similar errors dating back a few ye
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/20/2011 02:44 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
> CentOS-6.1 KVM guest on CentOS-6.1 host.
>
> I am seeing this SEAlert in the /var/log/audit/audit.log file a new
> guest immediately after startup. Can someone tell me what it means
> and what I should d
I finally started yum upgrade for CentOS 6.0+CR x86_64.
yum reports that I have already installed
perl-5.10.1-119.el6_1.1,
but perl-CGI requests for
perl-5.10.1-119.el6 from ISO/base repo.
Can someone advise on the best course of action? Logical would be to
downgrade perl to the one from ISO
On 12/20/2011 03:55 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> I finally started yum upgrade for CentOS 6.0+CR x86_64.
>
> yum reports that I have already installed
>
> perl-5.10.1-119.el6_1.1,
>
> but perl-CGI requests for
>
> perl-5.10.1-119.el6 from ISO/base repo.
>
> Can someone advise on the best course
Vreme: 12/20/2011 03:58 PM, Fabien Archambault piše:
> On 12/20/2011 03:55 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> I finally started yum upgrade for CentOS 6.0+CR x86_64.
>>
>> yum reports that I have already installed
>>
>> perl-5.10.1-119.el6_1.1,
>>
>> but perl-CGI requests for
>>
>> perl-5.10.1-119.e
e-letter wrote:
>> From: m.r...@5-cent.us
>>
>> I would suggest that if openjdk doesn't work, you go with Sun/Oracle's
>> java, which is the Source of All Java
>>
> Sun java was obtained. After attempt to run jedit, the following error
> occurred:
>
> jedit
> Warning: $JAVA_HOME environment variabl
On 12/20/2011 09:55 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> I finally started yum upgrade for CentOS 6.0+CR x86_64.
>
> yum reports that I have already installed
>
> perl-5.10.1-119.el6_1.1,
>
> but perl-CGI requests for
>
> perl-5.10.1-119.el6 from ISO/base repo.
>
> Can someone advise on the best c
On 12/20/2011 09:03 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Vreme: 12/20/2011 03:58 PM, Fabien Archambault piše:
>> On 12/20/2011 03:55 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>>> I finally started yum upgrade for CentOS 6.0+CR x86_64.
>>>
>>> yum reports that I have already installed
>>>
>>> perl-5.10.1-119.el6_1
Vreme: 12/20/2011 04:15 PM, Johnny Hughes piše:
> On 12/20/2011 09:03 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> Vreme: 12/20/2011 03:58 PM, Fabien Archambault piše:
>>> On 12/20/2011 03:55 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
I finally started yum upgrade for CentOS 6.0+CR x86_64.
yum reports that
Vreme: 12/20/2011 04:11 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us piše:
> e-letter wrote:
>>> From: m.r...@5-cent.us
>>>
>>> I would suggest that if openjdk doesn't work, you go with Sun/Oracle's
>>> java, which is the Source of All Java
>>>
>> Sun java was obtained. After attempt to run jedit, the following error
>> o
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Vreme: 12/20/2011 04:11 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us pie:
>> e-letter wrote:
From: m.r...@5-cent.us
I would suggest that if openjdk doesn't work, you go with Sun/Oracle's
java, which is the Source of All Java
>>> Sun java was obtained. After attempt to
Vreme: 12/20/2011 04:20 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic piše:
> Vreme: 12/20/2011 04:15 PM, Johnny Hughes piše:
>> On 12/20/2011 09:03 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>>> Vreme: 12/20/2011 03:58 PM, Fabien Archambault piše:
On 12/20/2011 03:55 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> I finally started yum
Vreme: 12/20/2011 04:34 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us piše:
> Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> Vreme: 12/20/2011 04:11 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us piše:
>>> e-letter wrote:
> From: m.r...@5-cent.us
>
> I would suggest that if openjdk doesn't work, you go with Sun/Oracle's
> java, which is the Source o
On 20 December 2011 14:34, Tony Mountifield wrote:
> In article <4ef0939c.9030...@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com>,
> William Warren wrote:
>> On 12/20/2011 12:59 AM, Barry Brimer wrote:
>> >> 1. The switch being used has autoneg off and has port set to 100 full
>> >> duplex.
>> >> 2. Many times
On Tue, December 20, 2011 09:49, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
> This means somebody is executing a chcon with a context
> that the kernel does not understand. I would look for a
> chcon in an init script.
I tried this and did not find any in the init scripts:
find /etc/rc.d -print | xargs grep chc
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/20/2011 04:55 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> On Tue, December 20, 2011 09:49, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
>>
>> This means somebody is executing a chcon with a context that the
>> kernel does not understand. I would look for a chcon in an init
>>
On Tue, December 20, 2011 13:40, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>>
>
> grep -R chcon /etc/rc.d
>
> Would be an easier way to do this...
>
> ps -eZ | grep initrc
>
# grep -R chcon /etc/rc.d
# ps -eZ | grep initrc
system_u:system_r:initrc_t:s01211 ?00:00:01
miniserv.pl
No chcon found in /etc/rc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/20/2011 07:33 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> On Tue, December 20, 2011 13:40, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
>>>
>>
>> grep -R chcon /etc/rc.d
>>
>> Would be an easier way to do this...
>>
>> ps -eZ | grep initrc
>>
> # grep -R chcon /etc/rc.d # p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Don't know if it is a mirror synch issue or what else.
Given a CentOS 6.1, if I give the commands:
# yum clean all
# yum update
I get this output
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, refresh-packagekit
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* base:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Can confirm that issue but currently only on my i386 boxes. The x86_64
updates fine to 6.2.
Am 20.12.11 20:57, schrieb Luigi Rosa:
> Don't know if it is a mirror synch issue or what else.
>
> Given a CentOS 6.1, if I give the commands:
>
> # yum cle
This is annoying. I ssh to a server, then, it doesn't matter if I su - or
sudo -s, I start a service (motion, if it matters), and when the service
sends an email, it's from me, not from root, or the user the service runs
as.
I've dumped my environment, I've just dumped service's environment. I've
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Shade.GE said the following on 20/12/11 21:04:
> Can confirm that issue but currently only on my i386 boxes. The x86_64
> updates fine to 6.2.
Confirmed.
Tried a yum clean all/yum update on an x86_64 and works as expected.
The problem is limited to
On Tue, December 20, 2011 14:42, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
> On 12/20/2011 07:33 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>>
>> # grep -R chcon /etc/rc.d # ps -eZ | grep initrc
>> system_u:system_r:initrc_t:s01211 ?00:00:01
>> miniserv.pl
>>
>> No chcon found in /etc/rc.d
>>
>> miniserv.pl is the Webmi
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> This is annoying. I ssh to a server, then, it doesn't matter if I su - or
> sudo -s, I start a service (motion, if it matters), and when the service
> sends an email, it's from me, not from root, or the user the service runs
> as.
>
> I've dumped my environment, I've just
On 12/20/2011 02:10 PM, Luigi Rosa wrote:
> Shade.GE said the following on 20/12/11 21:04:
>
>> Can confirm that issue but currently only on my i386 boxes. The x86_64
>> updates fine to 6.2.
>
> Confirmed.
>
> Tried a yum clean all/yum update on an x86_64 and works as expected.
> The problem is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Johnny Hughes said the following on 20/12/11 21:31:
>> Shade.GE said the following on 20/12/11 21:04:
>>
>>> Can confirm that issue but currently only on my i386 boxes. The x86_64
>>> updates fine to 6.2.
>>
>> Confirmed.
>>
>> Tried a yum clean a
On 12/20/2011 12:57 PM, Luigi Rosa wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Don't know if it is a mirror synch issue or what else.
>
> Given a CentOS 6.1, if I give the commands:
>
> # yum clean all
> # yum update
>
>
> I get this output
>
> Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, refres
On 12/20/2011 1:46 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
> I can also verify this error/problem/issue. I had *just* installed a
> fresh system yesterday with 6.1 (which I downloaded the day before as
> the latest) and as of this morning I can not install any packages, and
> after running a 'yum clean al
Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
> On 12/20/2011 1:46 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
>> I can also verify this error/problem/issue. I had *just* installed a
>> fresh system yesterday with 6.1 (which I downloaded the day before as
>> the latest) and as of this morning I can not install any packages, and
>>
On 12/20/2011 1:51 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> If I can suggest a thought, I'm wondering if the mirrors list for i386 has
> either an error, or a permission problem.
I'd say error:
> yum update
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Determining fastest mirrors
* base: mirrors.tummy.com
* extra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
m.r...@5-cent.us said the following on 20/12/11 21:51:
> If I can suggest a thought, I'm wondering if the mirrors list for i386 has
> either an error, or a permission problem.
Dunno; from the client point of view, the directory exists (I verified b
On 12/20/2011 02:49 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
> On 12/20/2011 1:46 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
>> I can also verify this error/problem/issue. I had *just* installed a
>> fresh system yesterday with 6.1 (which I downloaded the day before as
>> the latest) and as of this morning I can not ins
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 12/20/2011 02:49 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
>> On 12/20/2011 1:46 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
>>> I can also verify this error/problem/issue. I had *just* installed a
>>> fresh system yesterday with 6.1 (which I downloaded the day before as
>>> the latest) and as of t
On 12/20/2011 1:58 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> For the short term, you should be able to remark out the mirrorlist=
> line in [base] and un-remark the baseurl=mirror.centos.org line until
> all the external mirrors are caught up.
>
> Mirror.centos.org should be ok ... I have verified the file exists
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Johnny Hughes said the following on 20/12/11 21:58:
> For the short term, you should be able to remark out the mirrorlist= line
> in [base] and un-remark the baseurl=mirror.centos.org line until all the
> external mirrors are caught up.
>
> Mirror.ce
Vreme: 12/20/2011 10:04 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner piše:
> On 12/20/2011 1:58 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> For the short term, you should be able to remark out the mirrorlist=
>> line in [base] and un-remark the baseurl=mirror.centos.org line until
>> all the external mirrors are caught up.
>>
>> Mirror
On 12/20/2011 2:07 PM, Luigi Rosa wrote:
> The line I uncommented is:
>
> baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/os/$basearch/
But did you comment out the one right above it?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos
Vreme: 12/20/2011 10:07 PM, Luigi Rosa piše:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Johnny Hughes said the following on 20/12/11 21:58:
>
>> For the short term, you should be able to remark out the mirrorlist= line
>> in [base] and un-remark the baseurl=mirror.centos.org line until a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ashley M. Kirchner said the following on 20/12/11 22:10:
>> baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/os/$basearch/
>
> But did you comment out the one right above it?
Yes, of course.
Ciao,
luigi
- --
/
+--[Luigi Rosa]--
\
In every
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Johnny Hughes said the following on 20/12/11 21:58:
> For the short term, you should be able to remark out the mirrorlist= line
> in [base] and un-remark the baseurl=mirror.centos.org line until all the
> external mirrors are caught up.
>
> Mirror.ce
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 02:58:57PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 12/20/2011 02:49 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
> > On 12/20/2011 1:46 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
> >> I can also verify this error/problem/issue. I had *just* installed a
> >> fresh system yesterday with 6.1 (which I downloaded
On 12/20/2011 2:09 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Official announcement on www.centos.org is dated today, Dec 20th.
Of course it is. :) How much a difference 24 hours make.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman
Vreme: 12/20/2011 09:46 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner piše:
> On 12/20/2011 12:57 PM, Luigi Rosa wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Don't know if it is a mirror synch issue or what else.
>>
>> Given a CentOS 6.1, if I give the commands:
>>
>> # yum clean all
>> # yum update
>
Le 20/12/2011 22:09, Ljubomir Ljubojevic a écrit :
> Official announcement onwww.centos.org is dated today, Dec 20th.
Congratulations to the developpers for this very quick release of CentOS
6.2. It is a very pleasant surprise. I read some posts saying that the
framework for this release was in
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 03:10:31PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> echo "To: user
>
>
> help
> " | sendmail -t
If you're gonna send automated email, you should specify the from
address as well
echo "To: user
From: my_service_al...@example.com
Subject: testy mctesty
bleh" | /usr/sbin/
I just tried to update to CentOS 6.2, but I am faced with "Errors: Protected
multilib versions" error, the offending packages are:
jasper-libs.i686
krb5-libs.i686
nss.i686
After some investigation, it turns out that there are newer packages in "x86_64
updates" repository, but only for x86_64 ve
> I just tried to update to CentOS 6.2, but I am faced with "Errors: Protected
> multilib versions" error, the offending packages are:
>
> jasper-libs.i686
> krb5-libs.i686
> nss.i686
>
> After some investigation, it turns out that there are newer packages in
> "x86_64 updates" repository, but
On 12/21/2011 08:38 AM, lee_yiu_ch...@yahoo.com wrote:
...
> To solve this problem, I have to manually pick up these packages from
> CentOS/6.2/updates/i386/Packages (i386 update) and install them:
> jasper-libs-1.900.1-15.el6_1.1.i686.rpm
> krb5-libs-1.9-22.el6_2.1.i686.rpm
> nss-3.12.10-17.el6_2.
54 matches
Mail list logo
