On 12/16/2011 04:19 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
> At the base of what I see so far, Zabbix is only able to monitor devices
> that have the Zabbix agent on it - is that correct?
not at all. Zabbix can do active and passive tests, it can even proxy
them via relays and can aggregate results based on condit
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Denniston, Todd A CIV
NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
>> Behalf Of Gene Poole
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 13:08
>> To: centos@centos.org
>> Subject: [Cen
> > Do Zabbix or Zenoss allow for this sort of testing that Nagios has?
>
> yes.
>
OK, thanks. I'll dig more into passive checks
--
“Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV”
- Michael Pollan, author of "In Defense of Food"
___
C
Vreme: 12/17/2011 10:44 AM, Ian Forde piše:
> 2. Yes - you can eliminate NetworkManager. I'm writing this on a
> CentOS 6.1 desktop that's also running KVM. I don't run
> NetworkManager on this, as I want a static IP address defined at boot
> that does not have anything else trying to mess with t
Vreme: 12/17/2011 05:43 AM, Mike Burger piše:
> Hi, Matt.
>
> Sorry for the top post, but my iPad mail client seems averse to allowing me
> to bottom post.
>
> Just wanted to take a moment to note that I believe you've got things a
> little bit reversed.
>
> The use Of the route-ethX files and th
On 12/17/2011 01:25 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
>>> Do Zabbix or Zenoss allow for this sort of testing that Nagios has?
> OK, thanks. I'll dig more into passive checks
>
I think its the active tests you are looking for ( tests run from the
zabbix-server rather than on the agent ). Easy one to start wi
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Do Zabbix or Zenoss allow for this sort of testing that Nagios has?
>> OK, thanks. I'll dig more into passive checks
>>
>
> I think its the active tests you are looking for ( tests run from the
> zabbix-server rather than on the agent
Hello there,
w/ my CentOS6 (up-to-date), running GNOME, I'm struggling with HAL and
mount options for my USB storage devices.
According to what I'm reading from:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/general/hal.html
My old policies in /etc/hal/fdi/policy/ are ignored (and this is true
I've been seeing some random Proliant DL380 G4 64bit crashes. Each time,
on the console are messages relating tojbd2/cciss and something about a
waitfor 120 seconds. Is anybody else seeing anything like this? Oddly, I
can't seem to find this in the logs. I guess it can't write when this
happens
Is there a way to configure vsftpd to limit where you can chdir to?
=== Al
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
You could do a chroot jail
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Chroot_Vsftpd_with_non-system_users
Or are you looking for something else?
-Chris
On Dec 17, 2011, at 7:22 PM, Al Sparks wrote:
> Is there a way to configure vsftpd to limit where you can chdir to?
> === Al
>
> Vreme: 12/17/2011 05:43 AM, Mike Burger pie:
>> Hi, Matt.
>>
>> Sorry for the top post, but my iPad mail client seems averse to allowing
>> me to bottom post.
>>
>> Just wanted to take a moment to note that I believe you've got things a
>> little bit reversed.
>>
>> The use Of the route-ethX fi
> Vreme: 12/17/2011 05:43 AM, Mike Burger pie:
>> Hi, Matt.
>>
>> Sorry for the top post, but my iPad mail client seems averse to allowing
>> me to bottom post.
>>
>> Just wanted to take a moment to note that I believe you've got things a
>> little bit reversed.
>>
>> The use Of the route-ethX fi
13 matches
Mail list logo
