From: Cal Webster
> Error: Package: nss-3.12.10-2.el6_1.x86_64 (updates)
> Requires: nss-softokn(x86-64) >= 3.12.9
> Installed: nss-softokn-3.12.7-1.1.el6.x86_64
> (@anaconda-CentOS-201106060106.x86_64/6.0)
> nss-softokn(x86-64) = 3.12.7-1.1.el6
> I realize I need to sw
Hi,
2 websites, hosted on 2 different CentOS 5.7 servers (one being very
new, about 3 weeks old) keeps loosing data - but it's more like it's
corrupted than being deleted.
For example, a photo would be uploaded last night and today when we
checked it, it doesn't show on the website. So we check i
From: Rudi Ahlers
> For example, a photo would be uploaded last night and today when we
> checked it, it doesn't show on the website. So we check if the file is
> on the server, and exists but is 0KB in size. Last night it still
> worked fine. The photo is 482Kb in size.
Only the size changed to
On 12/13/2011 07:53 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Vreme: 12/13/2011 06:47 PM, Anne Wilson piše:
>> To avoid similar problems in the future, can you give me some guidelines
>> for priority settings? It seems I got it wrong somewhere:-) Thanks
>
> It is not wise to have third-party repositorie
Hi Rudi
we once had a similar problem on a Web:
This Web had this in particular that its home-page needed to be deleted
daily and of course reinstalled immediately.
Then, in a new version of the Web it did not need this delete/reinstall
cycle any more, so the webadmin just removed the link to th
On 12/10/2011 4:10 AM, Andy Smith wrote:
> On 10 December 2011 10:41, Hakan Koseoglu wrote:
>> On 10/12/11 03:36, An Yang wrote:
>>> I think all the blocks were removed, and 6.2 will be released very soon.
>> Unless it was parked on a hill backwards and now rolling down the hill!
>>
> Damn, and I
On 12/10/2011 6:53 AM, Louis Lagendijk wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 19:01 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> Let's go ahead and get this flame thread started now to save time.
>>
>> The CentOS team sucks ... it took days to do 6.1 ... it is going to
>> take twice as long to get 6.2
>>
>> My mom
On 12/14/2011 01:44 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 12/14/2011 12:30 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> On 12/14/2011 10:53 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>>> Isn't there a better way to handle this without breaking yum?
>>
>> I am sure there is, looking into that right now
>
> posted a potential fix in
On 12/15/2011 07:12 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> On 12/14/2011 01:44 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> On 12/14/2011 12:30 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>>> On 12/14/2011 10:53 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Isn't there a better way to handle this without breaking yum?
>>>
>>> I am sure there i
On 12/14/2011 04:47 PM, Helmut Drodofsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> with CentOS 6, my new server created an UUID entry in ifcfg-eth0 -
> additional to HWADDR entry.
>
> Up to CentOS 5 the connection to the netwark card was defind only by HWADDR.
>
> Now I have a new network card. How can I get the correct
I posted this as a bug to redhat's bugzilla I think in January of 2011.
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
Scott Johnson
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 11:39 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] Unplugging DVI causes
>> From this, is there a way to determine the cause ? kdump is not
>> confirgured nor used, since the fencing of the node renders kdump
>> useless.
>>
>> This is the second time in a few weeks it happens.
>
> /var/log/messages should have more information; could you include it?
No, unfortunentl
Hello Dirce,
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 10:17 -0500, drsyst...@globalcerts.net wrote:
> I did some research on the Internet, but can't find the following
> information: are most of the security fixes that appear in httpd-2.2.21
> applied to the update on httpd-2.2.15-9?
As CentOS is merely a rebuild o
Hello Corey,
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 20:50 -0700, Corey Henderson wrote:
> /var/log/messages should have more information; could you include it?
Please do not ask people to include log files or other attachments to a
public mailing list! Information like that should be pasted online (f.e.
at http:/
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 02:14 -0800, John Doe wrote:
> From: Cal Webster
>
> > Error: Package: nss-3.12.10-2.el6_1.x86_64 (updates)
> > Requires: nss-softokn(x86-64) >= 3.12.9
> > Installed: nss-softokn-3.12.7-1.1.el6.x86_64
> > (@anaconda-CentOS-201106060106.x86_64/6.0)
> >
Vreme: 12/15/2011 12:37 PM, Anne Wilson piše:
> On 12/13/2011 07:53 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> Vreme: 12/13/2011 06:47 PM, Anne Wilson piše:
>>> To avoid similar problems in the future, can you give me some guidelines
>>> for priority settings? It seems I got it wrong somewhere:-) Thanks
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
On 12/15/2011 04:24 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>>
>
> You can keep all desired repositories enabled as long as you have
> yum-plugin-priorities installed and keep third-party repositories with
> lesser priority (larger number). Like base=1, epel=2, repoforge=3,
> rpmfusion-* =3, etc.
>
> H
Adding additional info for posterity, and in case anyone else runs
across this...
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Benjamin Franz wrote:
> On 12/7/2011 10:03 AM, Matt Garman wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> What I basically need to be able to do is this:
>> route add -host h1 gw g1 metric 0
>> rou
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>
> You can keep all desired repositories enabled as long as you have
> yum-plugin-priorities installed and keep third-party repositories with
> lesser priority (larger number). Like base=1, epel=2, repoforge=3,
> rpmfusion-* =3, etc.
D
On 12/15/2011 04:24 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Here is how I decided to setup third party repositories:
> http://rpms.plnet.rs/CentDOS.repo
> There are few changes needed like "torakat" repo with now centosplus
> kernels.
Can you explain, please, about those "exclude=*releases" statements?
On 12/15/2011 01:27 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>>
>> You can keep all desired repositories enabled as long as you have
>> yum-plugin-priorities installed and keep third-party repositories with
>> lesser priority (larger number). Like base
Vreme: 12/15/2011 08:27 PM, Les Mikesell piše:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>>
>> You can keep all desired repositories enabled as long as you have
>> yum-plugin-priorities installed and keep third-party repositories with
>> lesser priority (larger number). Like b
Vreme: 12/15/2011 08:32 PM, Anne Wilson piše:
> On 12/15/2011 04:24 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> Here is how I decided to setup third party repositories:
>> http://rpms.plnet.rs/CentDOS.repo
>> There are few changes needed like "torakat" repo with now centosplus
>> kernels.
>
> Can you explain
In earlier versions 'mii-tool' would iterate over interfaces and show
which have link up. In 6.x it wants an interface as a parameter.
What is the appropriate way to find which of some number of of
interfaces are connected? Better yet, what is the least typing to
get the mac addresses of those
Les Mikesell wrote:
> In earlier versions 'mii-tool' would iterate over interfaces and show
> which have link up. In 6.x it wants an interface as a parameter.
> What is the appropriate way to find which of some number of of
> interfaces are connected? Better yet, what is the least typing to
> g
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:56 PM, wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> In earlier versions 'mii-tool' would iterate over interfaces and show
>> which have link up. In 6.x it wants an interface as a parameter.
>> What is the appropriate way to find which of some number of of
>> interfaces are connecte
I just rebuilt a box to 6.1 for a user. Shortly after I delivered, she
came up to ask about gnome; it had come up as KDE. I looked at the login
screen, and in the session type, saw previous, custom, kde, and default.
When I investigated, I found not all 7,532,340 gnome packages were
installed. Goog
On 12/15/2011 09:21 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> PXEboot file months ago, "GNOME Desktop Environment (RPM Fusion Free)".
So wherever that came from, it wasent CentOS
- KB
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinf
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:56 PM, wrote:
>> Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> In earlier versions 'mii-tool' would iterate over interfaces and show
>>> which have link up. In 6.x it wants an interface as a parameter.
>>> What is the appropriate way to find which of some number of of
Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 12/15/2011 09:21 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> PXEboot file months ago, "GNOME Desktop Environment (RPM Fusion Free)".
>
> So wherever that came from, it wasent CentOS
I dunno - I used it to install a very early version of 6. *shrug*
mark
___
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 1:48 PM, anax wrote:
> Hi Rudi
> we once had a similar problem on a Web:
>
> This Web had this in particular that its home-page needed to be deleted
> daily and of course reinstalled immediately.
> Then, in a new version of the Web it did not need this delete/reinstall
> cy
Am 15.12.2011 22:13, schrieb Les Mikesell:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:56 PM, wrote:
>> Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> In earlier versions 'mii-tool' would iterate over interfaces and show
>>> which have link up. In 6.x it wants an interface as a parameter.
>>> What is the appropriate way to find whic
On 12/15/2011 12:45 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> In earlier versions 'mii-tool' would iterate over interfaces and show
> which have link up. In 6.x it wants an interface as a parameter.
> What is the appropriate way to find which of some number of of
> interfaces are connected? Better yet, what is
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 3:39 PM, wrote:
In earlier versions 'mii-tool' would iterate over interfaces and show
which have link up. In 6.x it wants an interface as a parameter.
What is the appropriate way to find which of some number of of
interfaces are connected? Better y
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Benjamin Franz wrote:
> On 12/15/2011 12:45 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> In earlier versions 'mii-tool' would iterate over interfaces and show
>> which have link up. In 6.x it wants an interface as a parameter.
>> What is the appropriate way to find which of some n
On Thursday, December 15, 2011 09:51:52 AM Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Please do not ask people to include log files or other attachments to a
> public mailing list! Information like that should be pasted online (f.e.
> at http://pastebin.com/ ) and a link to the resource should be used.
I mus
On 12/15/2011 03:37 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 12/15/2011 09:21 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> PXEboot file months ago, "GNOME Desktop Environment (RPM Fusion Free)".
>
> So wherever that came from, it wasent CentOS
yum groupinstall "Desktop Platform" "Desktop" "X Window System"
If you are p
On Dec 15, 2011, at 3:45 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> In earlier versions 'mii-tool' would iterate over interfaces and show
> which have link up. In 6.x it wants an interface as a parameter.
> What is the appropriate way to find which of some number of of
> interfaces are connected? Better yet,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 1:29 PM, John Doe wrote:
> From: Rudi Ahlers
>
>> For example, a photo would be uploaded last night and today when we
>> checked it, it doesn't show on the website. So we check if the file is
>> on the server, and exists but is 0KB in size. Last night it still
>> worked fi
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
>> In earlier versions 'mii-tool' would iterate over interfaces and show
>> which have link up. In 6.x it wants an interface as a parameter.
>> What is the appropriate way to find which of some number of of
>> interfaces are connected? Bette
Vreme: 12/16/2011 12:22 AM, Rudi Ahlers piše:
> John,
>
> Where do I get inotifywait ?
>
>
> yum what provides "*/inotifywait" didn't return anything
>
>
> root@mars:[/]$ yum whatprovides "*/inotifywait"
> Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
> Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
> * base: mirror
42 matches
Mail list logo
