Le mer 14 déc 2011 12:17:36 CET, Philip Manuel a écrit:
>
>
> On 12/14/2011 12:07 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > On 12/13/2011 06:54 PM, Philip Manuel wrote:
> >>
> >> On 12/14/2011 11:49 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >>
> > You do have i686 packages on that machine ... that is what the error you
> >
Hi,
after the release of 6.1 I have to do a "yum clean all" on all my 6.0
machines in order to make yum work again. The reason is that the old CR
directory on the mirrors is now empty and the new one isn't used until I
actually upgrade the system to 6.1 (or at least the centos-release package).
Vreme: 12/14/2011 03:02 AM, David McGuffey piše:
> Anyone able to do this? Any tips on what might be missing in the load?
If nowone answers, there is centos-virt list better suited for this
question.
--
Ljubomir Ljubojevic
(Love is in the Air)
PL Computers
Serbia, Europe
Google is the Mothe
On 12/14/2011 10:53 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> Isn't there a better way to handle this without breaking yum?
I am sure there is, looking into that right now
>
> I'm also not quite sure why the "yum clean all" is required.
you should not need to do an 'all' for anything really, 'yum cle
On 12/14/2011 12:30 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 12/14/2011 10:53 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>> Isn't there a better way to handle this without breaking yum?
>
> I am sure there is, looking into that right now
posted a potential fix into the metadata, that should peculate through
to mirro
Back in the Fedora docs I found on a google, it mentions that in FC6, the
preferred tool for updates was the "new" yum-updatesd. Anyone know: a)
what theological reason upstream had to drop it altogether, and b) what's
the recommended replacement - is it yum-cron?
I hand-update some servers, and o
Hello,
I am working on a CentOS Linux 2.6.32-71.el6.x86_64 system.
I noticed that the system came with httpd-2.2.15-6 installed.
After I run 'yum update' I get httpd-2.2.15-9.
I did some research on the Internet, but can't find the following
information: are most of the security fixes that appear
drsyst...@globalcerts.net writes:
> Hello,
>
> I am working on a CentOS Linux 2.6.32-71.el6.x86_64 system.
> I noticed that the system came with httpd-2.2.15-6 installed.
> After I run 'yum update' I get httpd-2.2.15-9.
>
> I did some research on the Internet, but can't find the following
> infor
Hello,
with CentOS 6, my new server created an UUID entry in ifcfg-eth0 -
additional to HWADDR entry.
Up to CentOS 5 the connection to the netwark card was defind only by HWADDR.
Now I have a new network card. How can I get the correct UUID?
The server connects correct the network with the upd
Am 12.12.2011 17:01, schrieb Joseph Spenner:
>
>
> From: Joseph Spenner
> To: "centos@centos.org"
> Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 8:51 AM
> Subject: [CentOS] dd disk will not boot - can't find /dev/root
>
> OS= CentOS 5.4, 64bit.
>
> I've always had gr
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Joseph Spenner wrote:
>
> I booted the rescue-cd and reinstalled initrd from RPM. That seemed to fix
> it.
>
> It amazes me how complex the whole boot process needs to be. Or why there
> doesn't exist a simple bootable CD to fix an incorrect or destroyed MBR /b
I am in the middle of a rather confusing situation. At
the moment I am unable to shutdown a KVM guest machine.
Nor am I presently able to open a virt-manager session on
the host.
I am not exactly sure what has happened but the problem
with the vm guest is that issuing a "virsh shutdown 1"
from t
Vreme: 12/14/2011 04:07 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us piše:
> Back in the Fedora docs I found on a google, it mentions that in FC6, the
> preferred tool for updates was the "new" yum-updatesd. Anyone know: a)
> what theological reason upstream had to drop it altogether, and b) what's
> the recommended repla
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 6:47 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
> I am in the middle of a rather confusing situation. At
> the moment I am unable to shutdown a KVM guest machine.
> Nor am I presently able to open a virt-manager session on
> the host.
>
> I am not exactly sure what has happened but the pro
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Vreme: 12/14/2011 04:07 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us pie:
>> Back in the Fedora docs I found on a google, it mentions that in FC6,
>> the preferred tool for updates was the "new" yum-updatesd. Anyone know:
>> a) what theological reason upstream had to drop it altogether, and b
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
You can run this:
Destroy vmname
This is an equivalent to powering off the server.
Obviously, this may cause some issues with vm when you start it up again. . .
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 14, 2011, at 11:47 AM, "James B. Byrne" wrote:
> I am in the middle of a rather confusing situation. At
On Wed, December 14, 2011 11:53, Marius Vaitiekunas wrote:
>
>
> Make sure you have acpid service running in vm.
>
>
[root@vhost01 ~]# service acpid status
acpid (pid 1741) is running...
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@ha
Hello centos-users,
in CentOS 6.1 is /etc/security/limits.conf
the best place to change the number of
max user processes for a daemon process?
(I'm asking because the ".../security/..." part
of the path sounds a bit strange)
Thank you
Alex
___
CentOS m
On Wednesday 14 December 2011 18:41:13 Alexander Farber wrote:
> in CentOS 6.1 is /etc/security/limits.conf
> the best place to change the number of
> max user processes for a daemon process?
>
> (I'm asking because the ".../security/..." part
> of the path sounds a bit strange)
What's wrong with
Vreme: 12/14/2011 05:58 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us piše:
> Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> Vreme: 12/14/2011 04:07 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us piše:
>>> Back in the Fedora docs I found on a google, it mentions that in FC6,
>>> the preferred tool for updates was the "new" yum-updatesd. Anyone know:
>>> a) what the
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> And I worked on Spacewalk in early '09. AAAGHGHGHGHHGHG It
> went from .3 to .4 while I was trying to implement it, and I think it hit
> .5 as I left that contract. It was a nightmare to install and configure; I
> had to tune the free Orac
In my personal environment, I've got 7 machines running, with 4 of those
machines running various flavors of Linux (CentOS 5 x86_64; Fedora 15
x86_64; Fedora 14 i686). Based upon some issues with the Fedora 15 x86_64
machine I'm considering dropping Fedora 15 in favor of CentOS 6.1. My
questi
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Gene Poole
> Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 13:08
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: [CentOS] Network Situation
>
> If I install CentOS 6.0 and sometime later upgrade to CentOS 6.2
Thank you.
> drsyst...@globalcerts.net writes:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am working on a CentOS Linux 2.6.32-71.el6.x86_64 system.
>> I noticed that the system came with httpd-2.2.15-6 installed.
>> After I run 'yum update' I get httpd-2.2.15-9.
>>
>> I did some research on the Internet, but can't find the
@Work requires me to manipulate the MS Access database (mdb) file
located on an XP box that is an integral part of a third party
application that is central to the business.
Does anyone have experience doing so?
I have used odbtp in the recent past but it is extremely difficult to
set up on the l
On 12/14/2011 07:26 PM, Philippe Naudin wrote:
> Le mer 14 déc 2011 12:17:36 CET, Philip Manuel a écrit:
>
>
>>> You do have i686 packages on that machine ... that is what the error you
>>> posted is.
>>>
>>> create (or edit( a file called:
>>>
>>> /root/.rpmmacros
>>>
>>> put this in the that fi
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Ron Young wrote:
> @Work requires me to manipulate the MS Access database (mdb) file
> located on an XP box that is an integral part of a third party
> application that is central to the business.
>
> Does anyone have experience doing so?
>
> I have used odbtp in t
I'm getting yum update errors when attempting to update nss:
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Package: nss-3.12.10-2.el6_1.x86_64 (updates)
Requires: nss-softokn(x86-64) >= 3.12.9
Installed: nss-softokn-3.12.7-1.1.el6.x86_64
(@anaconda-CentOS-201106060106.x
On 12/14/2011 10:55 AM, John Hodrien wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> And I worked on Spacewalk in early '09. AAAGHGHGHGHHGHG It
>> went from .3 to .4 while I was trying to implement it, and I think it hit
>> .5 as I left that contract. It was a nightmare to in
Try the Sybase driver.
I can connect Perl to Microsoft SQL Server using Sybase drivers it so might
work with Access.
Parts of this might be useful: http://www.peceny.de/misc/freetds.html
--Russell
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] O
On 12/14/11 6:05 PM, Smithies, Russell wrote:
> I can connect Perl to Microsoft SQL Server using Sybase drivers it so might
> work with Access.
> Parts of this might be useful:http://www.peceny.de/misc/freetds.html
Access native databases use the 'Jet' database engine, and they are
files accesse
Hi ! On an 8-node cluster, one of the node did a kernel panic.
The only bit of information I have is on a ssh console I had open, which
said :
Message from syslogd@node108 at Dec 14 19:00:15 ...
kernel:[ cut here ]
Message from syslogd@node108 at Dec 14 19:00:15 ...
On 12/14/2011 8:49 PM, Nicolas Ross wrote:
> From this, is there a way to determine the cause ? kdump is not
> confirgured nor used, since the fencing of the node renders kdump useless.
>
> This is the second time in a few weeks it happens.
/var/log/messages should have more information; could y
On Dec 14, 2011, at 10:49 PM, Nicolas Ross wrote:
> Hi ! On an 8-node cluster, one of the node did a kernel panic.
>
> The only bit of information I have is on a ssh console I had open, which
> said :
>
>
> Message from syslogd@node108 at Dec 14 19:00:15 ...
> kernel:[ cut here ]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ron Young said the following on 14/12/11 22:21:
> @Work requires me to manipulate the MS Access database (mdb) file located
> on an XP box that is an integral part of a third party application that is
> central to the business.
>
> Does anyone have ex
On 12/15/2011 05:45 AM, Luigi Rosa wrote:
> I used mdbtools http://mdbtools.sourceforge.net/
This is also found in the epel repository.
Mogens
--
Mogens Kjaer, m...@lemo.dk
http://www.lemo.dk
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.cent
37 matches
Mail list logo
