Hello there,
since yersterday, there's a massive update ready for my CentOS 6 (kept
up-to-date, including w/ cr updates).
The yum update lists many packages from 'base' and 'update' and 2 deps
from 'cr' then fails, see:
[snip]
Installing for dependencies:
perl-CGI
Am 13.12.2011 09:40, schrieb wwp:
> Hello there,
>
>
> since yersterday, there's a massive update ready for my CentOS 6 (kept
> up-to-date, including w/ cr updates).
>
> The yum update lists many packages from 'base' and 'update' and 2 deps
> from 'cr' then fails, see:
With the release of 6.1 p
wwp wrote:
>
> The yum update lists many packages from 'base' and 'update' and 2 deps
> from 'cr' then fails, see:
It's yum. It's fragile.
Whenever it doesn't do what you think it should, run "yun clean all" and
try again.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS
Hello Nicolas, Alexander,
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 10:11:36 +0100 Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
wrote:
> wwp wrote:
> >
> > The yum update lists many packages from 'base' and 'update' and 2 deps
> > from 'cr' then fails, see:
>
> It's yum. It's fragile.
> Whenever it doesn't do what you think it should, ru
Hello all, I'm having an issue with group permissions which I really find hard
to understand why. I have created a group called smbusers which I am a part of
by doing the following: # groupadd smbusers# usermod -G smbusers michael I then
created a directory called foodir, owned by adm with g
Hello all,
Re-sending due to incorrect mapping of linefeeds from hotmail.
I'm having an issue with group permissions.
I have created a group called smbusers which I have added myself to,
with the following commands:
# groupadd smbusers
# usermod -G smbusers michael
I then create a directory ca
On Tuesday, December 13, 2011 12:10:47 PM Michael Velez wrote:
> $ groups michael
> michael: michael, smbusers
>
This seems to be ok but these:
> $ groups
> michael adm
>
> $ id
> uid=500(michael) gid=500(michael) groups=4(adm), 500(michael)
Say otherwise.
Might sound stupid but... did you ma
В Втр, 13/12/2011 в 12:10 +0100, Michael Velez пишет:
> I'm having an issue with group permissions.
>
> I have created a group called smbusers which I have added myself to,
> with the following commands:
>
> # groupadd smbusers
> # usermod -G smbusers michael
usermod -G smbusers,adm michael
> > I'm having an issue with group permissions.
> >
> > I have created a group called smbusers which I have added myself to,
> > with the following commands:
> >
> > # groupadd smbusers
> > # usermod -G smbusers michael
>
> usermod -G smbusers,adm michael
>
I understand what this command doe
> This seems to be ok but these:
>
> > $ groups
> > michael adm
> >
> > $ id
> > uid=500(michael) gid=500(michael) groups=4(adm), 500(michael)
>
> Say otherwise.
>
> Might sound stupid but... did you make sure to logoff and back in with your
> user?
>
> Regards
Ok. I did not know I needed t
Hi,
I'm using system-config-firewall (C6 x86_64, fully up to date) to
configure a gateway/firewall box. 2 nics, eth0 (configured as bridge0,
mtu 7200) connected to the lan, eth1 being connected directly to the
internet (public ip, mtu 1500). ssh port is open and accessible. nat is
working fine. I'
Can you fpaste your firewall rules? I would omit the actual public IP's for
security sake.
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Laurent Wandrebeck
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using system-config-firewall (C6 x86_64, fully up to date) to
> configure a gateway/firewall box. 2 nics, eth0 (configured as bridge0
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Michael Velez
> Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 8:14
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Group permission problems [RESEND]
>
>
> > This seems to be ok but these:
> >
> >
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:44:11 -0500
cliff here wrote:
> Can you fpaste your firewall rules? I would omit the actual public IP's for
> security sake.
http://fpaste.org/wE0L/
If you need anything else, ask :)
Thanks,
Laurent.
pgpIxvcjsW6sV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
actually if you could cat /etc/sysconfig/iptables, i find it easier to
read. also try this to troubleshoot
watch n 1 'iptables -t nat -L -n -v'
it will show you the when a packet hits a rule I find it very helpful when
troubleshooting.
But if not mistake about what your intent is your forwarding
sorry that's watch -n 1 'iptables -t nat -L -n -v'
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:04 AM, cliff here wrote:
> actually if you could cat /etc/sysconfig/iptables, i find it easier to
> read. also try this to troubleshoot
>
> watch n 1 'iptables -t nat -L -n -v'
>
> it will show you the when a packet
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 10:07:41 -0500
cliff here wrote:
> sorry that's watch -n 1 'iptables -t nat -L -n -v'
> > But if not mistake about what your intent is your forwarding rules that
> > you have in prerouting should be in INPUT chain.
> > You're trying to come in from an outside net to your FW
My best guess would be to move your forwarding rules to the INPUT chain
instead of being in the PREROUTING.
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Laurent Wandrebeck wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 10:07:41 -0500
> cliff here wrote:
>
> > sorry that's watch -n 1 'iptables -t nat -L -n -v'
>
> > > But
I am just trying out Zabbix and I have to say it sure is easy to set
up (once you get beyond a few minor quirks). I'm pretty impressed so
far with my evaluation.
--
“Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV”
- Michael Pollan, author of "In Defense of Food"
_
> With Unix unless you are changing X or the kernel, you can most times
> just start a new instance of you. :)
> i.e., `xterm -ls -sb` or
> (in gnome)
> start a terminal
> click Edit -> Current Profile
> click 'Title and Command'
> make sure "Run command as login shell"** is checked, and click
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 10:23:45 -0500
cliff here wrote:
> My best guess would be to move your forwarding rules to the INPUT chain
> instead of being in the PREROUTING.
Will try that once I figure out iptables syntax.
Is it me or I hit a system-config-firewall bug in rules generation ?
Laurent.
_
On 12/13/2011 03:28 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
> I am just trying out Zabbix and I have to say it sure is easy to set
> up (once you get beyond a few minor quirks). I'm pretty impressed so
> far with my evaluation.
>
I've use zabbix quite extensively over the last 2 odd years ( we even
use Zabbix to
Laurent Wandrebeck wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 10:23:45 -0500
> cliff here wrote:
>
>> My best guess would be to move your forwarding rules to the INPUT chain
>> instead of being in the PREROUTING.
> Will try that once I figure out iptables syntax.
> Is it me or I hit a system-config-firewall bug
Also to note, if you edit your /etc/sysconfig/iptables file manually there
is a line in /etc/init.d./iptables at line number 300 that will save on
service iptables restart; meaning if you run that command the buffer will
save over the file and basically revert any changes you just made to the
file.
Hello list,
With my latest proftpd server graphical client error on list (ls) directory:
Error: Could not read from socket: ECONNRESET - Connection reset by peer
Error: Disconnected from server
Error: Failed to retrieve directory listing
So far I've tried both filezilla and cyberduck.
Bu
Here's a really good overview of how the iptables process works
http://fedoraunity.org/Members/kanarip/iptables-howto
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:53 AM, wrote:
> Laurent Wandrebeck wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 10:23:45 -0500
> > cliff here wrote:
> >
> >> My best guess would be to move your
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, cliff here wrote:
> Also to note, if you edit your /etc/sysconfig/iptables file manually there
> is a line in /etc/init.d./iptables at line number 300 that will save on
> service iptables restart; meaning if you run that command the buffer will
> save over the file and basical
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
On 12/12/2011 07:44 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
> On 12/12/11 18:47, Anne Wilson wrote:
>> For a while now I've been seeing skipped-package notices, which I
>> don't really understand. I know it's a version mis-match, but all
>> my attempts to sort it out have failed, so I need help, please.
>> The curr
@John, yea good catch thanks =)
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:59 AM, John Hodrien wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, cliff here wrote:
>
> > Also to note, if you edit your /etc/sysconfig/iptables file manually
> there
> > is a line in /etc/init.d./iptables at line number 300 that will save on
> > service
# yum update
...
--> Running transaction check
--> Processing Dependency: libxerces-c.so.27 for package: phc
---> Package xerces-c.i386 0:2.8.0-1.el5.centos set to be updated
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
phc-0.1.7-1.el5.rf.i386 from installed has depsolving problems
--> Missing Dependency:
On 13 December 2011 19:17, ken wrote:
> # yum update
> ...
> --> Running transaction check
> --> Processing Dependency: libxerces-c.so.27 for package: phc
> ---> Package xerces-c.i386 0:2.8.0-1.el5.centos set to be updated
> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> phc-0.1.7-1.el5.rf.i386 from install
Vreme: 12/13/2011 06:47 PM, Anne Wilson piše:
> To avoid similar problems in the future, can you give me some guidelines
> for priority settings? It seems I got it wrong somewhere:-) Thanks
It is not wise to have third-party repositories overwriting base
packages. This should only be used by h
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Michael Velez wrote:
>
> Hello all, I'm having an issue with group permissions which I really find
> hard to understand why. I have created a group called smbusers which I am a
> part of by doing the following: # groupadd smbusers# usermod -G smbusers
> michael
On 12/13/2011 02:30 PM Lucian wrote:
> On 13 December 2011 19:17, ken wrote:
>> # yum update
>> ...
>> --> Running transaction check
>> --> Processing Dependency: libxerces-c.so.27 for package: phc
>> ---> Package xerces-c.i386 0:2.8.0-1.el5.centos set to be updated
>> --> Finished Dependency Reso
Hi
We use mrepo to keep a local repository. I downloaded the CentOS6.1 iso
and used that as the base. We also have the CR repo added.
I was expecting this change to cause no issues but the following
packages have version issues between the base 6.1 and the CR repo:-
base version
On 12/13/2011 06:05 PM, Philip Manuel wrote:
> Hi
>
> We use mrepo to keep a local repository. I downloaded the CentOS6.1 iso
> and used that as the base. We also have the CR repo added.
>
> I was expecting this change to cause no issues but the following
> packages have version issues betwee
On 12/14/2011 11:17 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 12/13/2011 06:05 PM, Philip Manuel wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> We use mrepo to keep a local repository. I downloaded the CentOS6.1 iso
>> and used that as the base. We also have the CR repo added.
>>
>> I was expecting this change to cause no issues but
On 12/13/2011 02:36 PM, ken wrote:
> On 12/13/2011 02:30 PM Lucian wrote:
>> On 13 December 2011 19:17, ken wrote:
>>> # yum update
>>> ...
>>> --> Running transaction check
>>> --> Processing Dependency: libxerces-c.so.27 for package: phc
>>> ---> Package xerces-c.i386 0:2.8.0-1.el5.centos set to
On 12/13/2011 06:26 PM, Philip Manuel wrote:
>
>
> On 12/14/2011 11:17 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 12/13/2011 06:05 PM, Philip Manuel wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> We use mrepo to keep a local repository. I downloaded the CentOS6.1 iso
>>> and used that as the base. We also have the CR repo added.
>
On 12/14/2011 11:49 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 12/13/2011 06:26 PM, Philip Manuel wrote:
>>
>> On 12/14/2011 11:17 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>> On 12/13/2011 06:05 PM, Philip Manuel wrote:
Hi
We use mrepo to keep a local repository. I downloaded the CentOS6.1 iso
and used
On 12/13/2011 06:54 PM, Philip Manuel wrote:
>
>
> On 12/14/2011 11:49 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 12/13/2011 06:26 PM, Philip Manuel wrote:
>>>
>>> On 12/14/2011 11:17 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 12/13/2011 06:05 PM, Philip Manuel wrote:
> Hi
>
> We use mrepo to keep a local
Vreme: 12/14/2011 01:54 AM, Philip Manuel piše:
> OK but why when there are no i686 packages installed on the machine is
> it trying to look for them? If I remove the offending x86_64 packages
> and put the base equivalent on then the issue goes away, but I shouldn't
> have to do this step.
Your
On 12/13/2011 06:58 PM, Dave Stevens wrote:
> Quoting Johnny Hughes :
>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>>
>> On 12/13/2011 02:36 PM, ken wrote:
>>> On 12/13/2011 02:30 PM Lucian wrote:
On 13 December 2011 19:17, ken wrote:
>
On 12/14/2011 12:07 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 12/13/2011 06:54 PM, Philip Manuel wrote:
>>
>> On 12/14/2011 11:49 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>
> You do have i686 packages on that machine ... that is what the error you
> posted is.
>
> create (or edit( a file called:
>
> /root/.rpmmacros
>
> pu
On 12/13/2011 07:12 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 12/13/2011 06:58 PM, Dave Stevens wrote:
>> Quoting Johnny Hughes :
>>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>>>
>>> On 12/13/2011 02:36 PM, ken wrote:
On 12/13/2011 02:30 PM Lucian wro
Trying to build a more secure version of a desktop with virtualization
enabled. Goal is to perform most Internet surfing and on-line banking
from a special-built and hardened Linux load.
Have built a bunch of complete "Desktop" versions of CentOS 5.5, 5.6,
and 6.0 with this capability. This is t
On Monday 12 December 2011, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> There are known Collision Attacks for the MD5SUM method of hashing,
> so it is possible to modify a file and make it have the same MD5SUM
> as another file. See this link for details on Collision Attacks:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coll
48 matches
Mail list logo
