On 10/12/11 03:36, An Yang wrote:
> I think all the blocks were removed, and 6.2 will be released very soon.
Unless it was parked on a hill backwards and now rolling down the hill!
Congratulations to the CentOS team again!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@
On 10 December 2011 10:41, Hakan Koseoglu wrote:
> On 10/12/11 03:36, An Yang wrote:
>> I think all the blocks were removed, and 6.2 will be released very soon.
> Unless it was parked on a hill backwards and now rolling down the hill!
>
Damn, and I haven't even installed 6.0 yet ... slow down !! s
Hello,
I've encountered an error updating nx/freenx:
Package nx-3.5.0-1.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm is not signed
Both nx and freenx packages in Centos 6 extras repo are not signed, is
this correct?
Andrzej
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Johnny,
> Let's go ahead and get this flame thread started now to save time.
>
> The CentOS team sucks ... it took days to do 6.1 ... it is going to
> take twice as long to get 6.2
>
> My mom said CentOS blows.
>
> kbsingh is ugly.
>
> hu
On 12/10/2011 05:33 AM, Andrzej Szymański wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've encountered an error updating nx/freenx:
>
> Package nx-3.5.0-1.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm is not signed
>
> Both nx and freenx packages in Centos 6 extras repo are not signed, is
> this correct?
>
No, it is an error.
New files ha
On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 19:01 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Let's go ahead and get this flame thread started now to save time.
>
> The CentOS team sucks ... it took days to do 6.1 ... it is going to
> take twice as long to get 6.2
>
> My mom said CentOS blows.
>
> kbsingh is ugly.
>
> hughes
Hi Louis,
> come on Johnny, there are still plenty of people that appreciate the
> work you guys do and are happy to see 6.1 released. Please give us first
> a chance to say "thank you so much!"
Indeed, and since I omitted that in my last post (I probably was too busy
chuckling), I'd like to chi
Thanks a lot!
Andrzej
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
A big thank you to the CentOS team for the 6.1 release.
And nice to see that there will be a CR repo again.
See you all at FOSDEM2012.
Maarten
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hello,
until a more official rebuild shows up, I have recomppiled the
RHEL 6.2 kernel src.rpm and copied the binary rpms to:
http://jur-linux.org/download/redhat-kernel/6/220.el6/
This is running happily on a dozen machines now.
best regards,
Florian La Roche
___
On 10/12/11 01:01, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Let's go ahead and get this flame thread started now to save time.
>
> The CentOS team sucks ... it took days to do 6.1 ... it is going to
> take twice as long to get 6.2
>
> My mom said CentOS blows.
>
> kbsingh is ugly.
>
> hughesjr is old and fa
Vreme: 12/10/2011 02:01 AM, Johnny Hughes piše:
> Let's go ahead and get this flame thread started now to save time.
>
> The CentOS team sucks ... it took days to do 6.1 ... it is going to
> take twice as long to get 6.2
>
> My mom said CentOS blows.
>
> kbsingh is ugly.
>
> hughesjr is old an
On 12/10/2011 02:02 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
6.2 should arrive really fast, believe me !
and if you use the CR repo, you should already be up-to-date, all
updated packages are going to be soon in it before the complete tree is
built for 6.2 !
# CentOS-CR.repo
#
# The continuous release (
I would like to create a single installation directory from the DVD1 and DVD2
CentOS 6.1 release DVD images, suitable for network (NFS) installation.
If I mount each of the ISO images and copy their files to a single directory,
will that work? That is, are the files on each DVD unique such that
> The Dell 6224 or 6248 switches are priced low
Hmmm, we seem to have different definitions of "priced low" :-)
http://search.dell.com/results.aspx?s=bsd&c=ca&l=en&cs=cabsdt1&k=PowerConnect+6224&cat=all&x=0&y=0
$2000 for the 24 port.
I can get a Cisco small business switch for less than 1/4 tha
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
- Original Message -
| Hey folks,
|
| I had some general questions and when reading through the list
| archives I
| came across an iSCSI discussion back in February where a couple of
| individuals were going back and forth about drafting up a "best
| practices"
| doc and putting it into a
On Dec 10, 2011, at 9:35 AM, Alan McKay wrote:
>> The Dell 6224 or 6248 switches are priced low
>
> Hmmm, we seem to have different definitions of "priced low" :-)
>
> http://search.dell.com/results.aspx?s=bsd&c=ca&l=en&cs=cabsdt1&k=PowerConnect+6224&cat=all&x=0&y=0
>
> $2000 for the 24 port.
- Original Message -
| > The Dell 6224 or 6248 switches are priced low
|
| Hmmm, we seem to have different definitions of "priced low" :-)
|
|
http://search.dell.com/results.aspx?s=bsd&c=ca&l=en&cs=cabsdt1&k=PowerConnect+6224&cat=all&x=0&y=0
|
| $2000 for the 24 port.
|
| I can get a C
On Dec 10, 2011, at 1:49 PM, "James A. Peltier" wrote:
> Jumbo frames is really the important thing when it comes to iSCSI. Having
> 9000 byte packets verses 1500 byte packets will dramatically increase your
> performance per interrupt. Most cheaper unmanaged switches cannot do this.
I want
- Original Message -
| On Dec 10, 2011, at 1:49 PM, "James A. Peltier"
| wrote:
|
| > Jumbo frames is really the important thing when it comes to iSCSI.
| > Having 9000 byte packets verses 1500 byte packets will dramatically
| > increase your performance per interrupt. Most cheaper unmana
I have CentOS 6 and with webmin/virtualmin panel, and each time that I
reboot Apache can't start:
Starting httpd: (98)Address already in use: make_sock: could not bind
to address [::]:80
(98)Address already in use: make_sock: could not bind to address 0.0.0.0:80
no listening sockets available
- Original Message -
| I have CentOS 6 and with webmin/virtualmin panel, and each time that I
| reboot Apache can't start:
|
|
| Starting httpd: (98)Address already in use: make_sock: could not bind
| to address [::]:80
| (98)Address already in use: make_sock: could not bind to address
|
> I have CentOS 6 and with webmin/virtualmin panel, and each time that I
> reboot Apache can't start:
>
>
> Starting httpd: (98)Address already in use: make_sock: could not bind
> to address [::]:80
> (98)Address already in use: make_sock: could not bind to address 0.0.0.0:80
> no listening sockets
On Dec 10, 2011, at 2:05 PM, "James A. Peltier" wrote:
> - Original Message -
> | On Dec 10, 2011, at 1:49 PM, "James A. Peltier"
> | wrote:
> |
> | > Jumbo frames is really the important thing when it comes to iSCSI.
> | > Having 9000 byte packets verses 1500 byte packets will dramatic
>
> LOL! Cisco. If I told you that that particular device used to be called
> Linksys, would it change your opinion of the device? I've got a Linksys
> ADSL gateway that I'm quite sure couldn't keep up with the Dell. In fact,
> I used to have that *exact* Linksys device and it died within 18 mon
Quoting "James A. Peltier" :
> - Original Message -
> | I have CentOS 6 and with webmin/virtualmin panel, and each time that I
> | reboot Apache can't start:
> |
> |
> | Starting httpd: (98)Address already in use: make_sock: could not bind
> | to address [::]:80
> | (98)Address already in
On Dec 10, 2011, at 2:36 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
>>
>> LOL! Cisco. If I told you that that particular device used to be called
>> Linksys, would it change your opinion of the device? I've got a Linksys
>> ADSL gateway that I'm quite sure couldn't keep up with the Dell. In fact,
>> I used to hav
Vreme: 12/10/2011 08:44 PM, Weplica piše:
> Quoting "James A. Peltier":
>
>> - Original Message -
>> | I have CentOS 6 and with webmin/virtualmin panel, and each time that I
>> | reboot Apache can't start:
>> |
>> |
>> | Starting httpd: (98)Address already in use: make_sock: could not bind
On Sat, 2011-12-10 at 14:44 -0500, Weplica wrote:
> Quoting "James A. Peltier" :
>
> > - Original Message -
> > | I have CentOS 6 and with webmin/virtualmin panel, and each time that I
> > | reboot Apache can't start:
> > |
> > |
> > | Starting httpd: (98)Address already in use: make_sock:
Webmin doesn't need Apache to run
it uses miniserv.pl
Apache and miniserv.pl are trying to bind to the same ip.
That is unless you have set up a virtual server to run webmin under
Apache? Default, webmin does not use Apache.
On 12/10/2011 12:59 PM, Craig White wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-12-10 at 1
Quoting Ljubomir Ljubojevic :
> Vreme: 12/10/2011 08:44 PM, Weplica piše:
>> Quoting "James A. Peltier":
>>
>>> - Original Message -
>>> | I have CentOS 6 and with webmin/virtualmin panel, and each time that I
>>> | reboot Apache can't start:
>>> |
>>> |
>>> | Starting httpd: (98)Address a
One would have to change the default port of miniserv.pl from 1 to
80 and seeing that the output of lsof indicates all of the apache
modules attached to the same pid, it's pretty clear that it is apache
that is running on port 80 (which was the reason that James asked him to
output from lsof)
> When I start manual way:
>
> # killall -9 httpd
> # service httpd start
>
> Starting httpd: Apache/2.2.15 mod_ssl/2.2.15 (Pass Phrase Dialog)
> Some of your private key files are encrypted for security reasons.
> In order to read them you have to provide the pass phrases.
>
> Server kuales.com:44
On Sat, 2011-12-10 at 15:12 -0500, Weplica wrote:
> Quoting Ljubomir Ljubojevic :
>
> > Vreme: 12/10/2011 08:44 PM, Weplica piše:
> >> Quoting "James A. Peltier":
> >>
> >>> - Original Message -
> >>> | I have CentOS 6 and with webmin/virtualmin panel, and each time that I
> >>> | reboot A
Quoting Craig White :
> On Sat, 2011-12-10 at 15:12 -0500, Weplica wrote:
>> Quoting Ljubomir Ljubojevic :
>>
>> > Vreme: 12/10/2011 08:44 PM, Weplica piše:
>> >> Quoting "James A. Peltier":
>> >>
>> >>> - Original Message -
>> >>> | I have CentOS 6 and with webmin/virtualmin panel, and ea
Vreme: 12/10/2011 09:32 PM, Weplica piše:
>
> I think RSA key was the problem, It's not secure remove pass phrase,
> so I have disable Apache on init as service and each time I reboot I
> start it whith the RSA key.
>
Check this out:
http://www.pc-freak.net/blog/auto-insert-password-for-a-trusted-
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Alan McKay wrote:
> So 2 questions :
> - how important is it to have it on its own network?
> - is it OK to use an unmanaged switch (as long as it is Gigabit), or are
> there some features of a managed switch that are desirable/required with
> iSCSI?
>
At the ver
On 12/10/11 8:56 PM, Ryan Wagoner wrote:
>> So 2 questions :
>> > - how important is it to have it on its own network?
>> > - is it OK to use an unmanaged switch (as long as it is Gigabit), or are
>> > there some features of a managed switch that are desirable/required with
>> > iSCSI?
>> >
> A
39 matches
Mail list logo
