Rob Kampen wrote:
Hi List,
I've been getting the following EDAC memory errors
EDAC MC0: CE page 0xeb0dd, offset 0x0, grain 4096, syndrome 0x45, row
3, channel 0, label "": i82875p CE
and from this seeing that these errors have been corrected.
Checking cat /sys/devices/system/edac/mc/mc0/csrow3/
On 12/05/11 12:17 AM, Rob Kampen wrote:
> Swapped the memory between DIMM 2A and DIMM 2B - still get fault in
> row 3, channel 0 - thus did not move with the RAM??
> Next reboot I'll try swapping 1A and 1B
often an indication the problem is board/socket related rather than
memory DIMM. unless
John R Pierce wrote:
On 12/05/11 12:17 AM, Rob Kampen wrote:
Swapped the memory between DIMM 2A and DIMM 2B - still get fault in
row 3, channel 0 - thus did not move with the RAM??
Next reboot I'll try swapping 1A and 1B
often an indication the problem is board/socket related rather t
Michel Donais wrote:
>> What does dmesg says when you plug it in?
>
> Here it is
> ahc_pci:0:8:0: Illegal cable configuration!!. Only two connectors on the
> adapter may be used at a time!
this looks suspect
try googling for it
___
CentOS mailing list
Rob Kampen wrote:
> John R Pierce wrote:
>> On 12/05/11 12:17 AM, Rob Kampen wrote:
>>> Swapped the memory between DIMM 2A and DIMM 2B - still get fault in
>>> row 3, channel 0 - thus did not move with the RAM??
>>> Next reboot I'll try swapping 1A and 1B
>>
>> often an indication the problem is bo
Vreme: 12/05/2011 01:33 AM, Phil Dobbin piše:
> By co-incidence, as Beartooth posted earlier, I also tried to install CentOS
> 6 on a ThinkPad but it wouldn't take. I used to have a copy of a CentOS 5.7
> Live CD& that worked O.K. on an old Pentium IV i386 so I'm hoping it'll
> work on the ThinkPa
Vreme: 12/05/2011 10:24 AM, Rob Kampen piše:
> However I put a brand new - never used 120G drive in and it too shows
> these errors - something doesn't seem right
> Getting too tired to think straight so I'll leave it limping along until
> tomorrow
> Thanks for thoughts
Download Hiren's BootCD and
On 12/05/11 2:57 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Download Hiren's BootCD and use bundled Memory Test if your way is
> complicated.
that won't do much to detect soft ECC errors, will it?
--
john r pierceN 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coas
Vreme: 12/05/2011 12:00 PM, John R Pierce piše:
> On 12/05/11 2:57 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> Download Hiren's BootCD and use bundled Memory Test if your way is
>> complicated.
>
> that won't do much to detect soft ECC errors, will it?
>
They are (there are 4-5 apps) checking various patter
Somebody could correct me, but if the installed Centos install is on a ext4
file system, then the installed version of grub needs to support it. Which
version of grub are you running and from which distro?
- Rilindo Foster
http://monzell.com
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/rilindo-foster/2/b32/43b
On 5/12/11 10:53, "Ljubomir Ljubojevic" wrote:
> What does "it wouldn't take" means? Can you give us some better idea?
> details.
> Could it be just a graphic mode?
> Did you try to change kernel parameters?
> Was there any error shown?
>
> What were exact models involved so we can see hardware
On 12/05/2011 09:08 AM, Phil Dobbin wrote:
> On 5/12/11 10:53, "Ljubomir Ljubojevic" wrote:
>
>> What does "it wouldn't take" means? Can you give us some better idea?
>> details.
>> Could it be just a graphic mode?
>> Did you try to change kernel parameters?
>> Was there any error shown?
>>
>> Wh
Vreme: 12/05/2011 04:05 PM, Rilindo Foster piše:
> Somebody could correct me, but if the installed Centos install is on a ext4
> file system, then the installed version of grub needs to support it. Which
> version of grub are you running and from which distro?
>
No, "chainloader +1" just passes
On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 11:53:29 +0100, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Vreme: 12/05/2011 01:33 AM, Phil Dobbin piše:
>> By co-incidence, as Beartooth posted earlier, I also tried to install
>> CentOS 6 on a ThinkPad but it wouldn't take. I used to have a copy of a
>> CentOS 5.7 Live CD& that worked O.K
On 12/05/2011 04:52 PM, Beartooth wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 11:53:29 +0100, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>
>> Vreme: 12/05/2011 01:33 AM, Phil Dobbin piše:
>>> By co-incidence, as Beartooth posted earlier, I also tried to install
>>> CentOS 6 on a ThinkPad but it wouldn't take. I used to have a co
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
wrote:
> On 12/05/2011 04:52 PM, Beartooth wrote:
>> I don't even know how to tell what kernel a prospective download
>> has. I do know that some of my other PCs list kernels with and without
>> "PAE" in the grub display.
>
> PAE means p
On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 17:03:12 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
[]
> PAE means physical address extension and allows 32bit cpus to make use
> of memory beyond the 4gb limit addressable with 32bit.
> Centos/RHEL 6 doesn't support cpus without this as it's hard to come by
> a machine t
Beartooth wrote:
> On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 16:00:07 -0600, John R. Dennison wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 09:49:12PM +, Beartooth wrote:
>>>No package dillo available.
>>>No package epiphany available.
>>>No package galeon available.
>>>No package midori available.
>>>No pac
Beartooth wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 11:53:29 +0100, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>
>> Vreme: 12/05/2011 01:33 AM, Phil Dobbin piše:
>>> By co-incidence, as Beartooth posted earlier, I also tried to install
>>> CentOS 6 on a ThinkPad but it wouldn't take. I used to have a copy of a
>>> CentOS 5.7
On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 16:00:07 -0600, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 09:49:12PM +, Beartooth wrote:
>>No package dillo available.
>>No package epiphany available.
>>No package galeon available.
>>No package midori available.
>>No package privoxy available.
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
Vreme: 12/05/2011 05:20 PM, Beartooth piše:
> On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 16:00:07 -0600, John R. Dennison wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 09:49:12PM +, Beartooth wrote:
>>> No package dillo available.
>>> No package epiphany available.
>>> No package galeon available.
>>> No packag
On 12/05/11 8:17 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Ok, so when grub tell you what it's going to boot, hit, then choose
> the non-PAE kernel, and see what happens. Not sure why it installed a PAE
> kernel, if it can't boot it
I thought CentOS6 didn't come with a non-PAE kernel, more specifically,
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 12/05/11 8:17 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Ok, so when grub tell you what it's going to boot, hit, then choose
>> the non-PAE kernel, and see what happens. Not sure why it installed a
>> PAE kernel, if it can't boot it
>
> I thought CentOS6 didn't come with a non-PAE
On 12/05/11 11:00 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> I guarantee that there'll be 32 bit systems for a minimum of 10 more
> years. Esp. in the current depression, everyone will hang onto what they
> have until the boxen die, or look to die. And then there's laptops
then they should stick with older
On 5/12/11 19:11, "John R Pierce" wrote:
> On 12/05/11 11:00 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> I guarantee that there'll be 32 bit systems for a minimum of 10 more
>> years. Esp. in the current depression, everyone will hang onto what they
>> have until the boxen die, or look to die. And then there'
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Phil Dobbin wrote:
>
>>> I guarantee that there'll be 32 bit systems for a minimum of 10 more
>>> years. Esp. in the current depression, everyone will hang onto what they
>>> have until the boxen die, or look to die. And then there's laptops
>>
>> then they shou
On 12/05/11 11:47 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Phil Dobbin wrote:
>>> I guarantee that there'll be 32 bit systems for a minimum of 10 more
>>> years. Esp. in the current depression, everyone will hang onto what
>>> they
>>> have until the boxen
Hello
I have set up NAT with iptables for an openvpn connection, so that the
VPN server could give VPN clients access to the entire sub-net of the
server.
The probelm is if I start system-config-securitylevel to say disable the
firewall, and then again to enable it, my iptable rules are gone !
Phil Dobbin wrote:
> On 5/12/11 19:11, "John R Pierce" wrote:
>
>> On 12/05/11 11:00 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> I guarantee that there'll be 32 bit systems for a minimum of 10 more
>>> years. Esp. in the current depression, everyone will hang onto what
>>> they have until the boxen die, or lo
On Monday, December 05, 2011 02:56:18 PM John R Pierce wrote:
> indeed, that was my point. its silly to expect the latest release of
> ENTERPRISE LINUX, a distribution clearly targeted at servers, to have to
> support every funky old box end users can throw at it.
If EL6 is targeted at servers,
On 12/05/11 12:34 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> Intel's not putting PAE in that era of Pentium M is one of those odd things;
> my older Dell Latitude C-series with a 1.8Ghz P4 can run the PAE kernel just
> fine, but the much faster D610 with the 2GHz Pentium M can't? Something odd
> with that picture
Dec 6, 2011 4:32 AM Timothy Madden 작성:
> Hello
>
> I have set up NAT with iptables for an openvpn connection, so that the
> VPN server could give VPN clients access to the entire sub-net of the
> server.
>
> The probelm is if I start system-config-securitylevel to say disable the
> firewal
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>
>> My circa 2004 Dell
>> Latitude D600 "Dothan" (Pentium-M) laptop? I wouldn't even bother to try.
>
> You know, I don't exactly agree with that. The D600 (and D610) are still
> relatively useful laptops that, with the right desktop environme
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Timothy Madden wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have set up NAT with iptables for an openvpn connection, so that the
> VPN server could give VPN clients access to the entire sub-net of the
> server.
>
> The probelm is if I start system-config-securitylevel to say disable the
>
Vreme: 12/05/2011 09:32 PM, Timothy Madden piše:
> Hello
>
> I have set up NAT with iptables for an openvpn connection, so that the
> VPN server could give VPN clients access to the entire sub-net of the
> server.
>
> The probelm is if I start system-config-securitylevel to say disable the
> firewa
Am 05.12.2011 22:00, schrieb Les Mikesell:
> Not sure what the GUI tool does (I'd assume it clears iptables if you
> tell it to disable the firewall...) but 'service iptables save' writes
> a file named iptables in /etc/sysconfig that you should be able to
> back up somewhere. However, a normal
Hi All,
I am trying to print from a CentOS 5.3 server to a windows LPD
service. After enabling the LPD service on Windows and creating a LPR
port to a particular printer when I execute the following command on
CentOS server I do not come out.
lpr -H winprint:515 -P printer1 file.txt
The above com
Tharun Kumar Allu wrote:
> Hi All,
> I am trying to print from a CentOS 5.3 server to a windows LPD
> service. After enabling the LPD service on Windows and creating a LPR
> port to a particular printer when I execute the following command on
> CentOS server I do not come out.
> lpr -H winprint:515
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> Not sure what the GUI tool does (I'd assume it clears iptables if you
>> tell it to disable the firewall...) but 'service iptables save' writes
>> a file named iptables in /etc/sysconfig that you should be able to
>> back up somewhere. How
On 5/12/11 20:52, "Les Mikesell" wrote:
[snip]
> But back to the 'spirit of open source' - I thought that meant that if
> you didn't like it you could fix it yourself. And I thought someone
> had already done a non-PAE kernel or was working on it to make
> PXE-booted thin clients work. So if
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 4:24 PM, wrote:
> Tharun Kumar Allu wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> I am trying to print from a CentOS 5.3 server to a windows LPD
>> service. After enabling the LPD service on Windows and creating a LPR
>> port to a particular printer when I execute the following command on
>> CentOS
On Dec 5, 2011, at 2:58 PM, Phil Dobbin wrote:
> Just I was a bit surprised at the attitude of "if you haven't got/can't
> afford xyz just stick with what you've got". Not sure Linus Torvalds had
> that kind of thinking in mind when he approached this project. Maybe I'm
> wrong...
well, if y
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Phil Dobbin wrote:
>
>
> Just I was a bit surprised at the attitude of "if you haven't got/can't
> afford xyz just stick with what you've got". Not sure Linus Torvalds had
> that kind of thinking in mind when he approached this project. Maybe I'm
> wrong...
Go back
On Monday, December 05, 2011 03:48:12 PM John R Pierce wrote:
> the chipset doesn't support over 2GB ram. the Pentium-M was based on
> the Pentium-III core, which afaik didn't have PAE. /me shrugs. They
> added it back in for the Core family.
That's the odd thing; PAE has been there since t
On Monday, December 05, 2011 03:52:11 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> > You know, I don't exactly agree with that. The D600 (and D610) are still
> > relatively useful laptops that, with the right desktop environment, can
> > perform quite well, espec
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>
>> > You know, I don't exactly agree with that. The D600 (and D610) are still
>> > relatively useful laptops that, with the right desktop environment, can
>> > perform quite well, especially with the 2.0GHz Pentium M and 2GB of RAM
>> Ummm, no
On Monday, December 05, 2011 06:02:27 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>> It's only when doing multiple things, or doing multithreaded things, that the
>> Core2Duo pulls away.
> OK, but who just runs a single process?
For the purposes of usability, eff
On Monday, December 05, 2011 11:11:45 AM Akemi Yagi wrote:
> FYI, the ELRepo project now provides kernel-ml for EL6 [1] that
> includes a non-PAE kernel [2] (thanks to Alan Bartlett). However, one
> has to create an install disk/image with that kernel to perform the
> installation.
This is good; t
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>>> It's only when doing multiple things, or doing multithreaded things, that
>>> the
>>> Core2Duo pulls away.
>
>> OK, but who just runs a single process?
>
> For the purposes of usability, effectively anyone who spends the day in
> Firefox. A
>>> And 2GB RAM is kind of
>>> minimal - I like lots of disk buffer.
>>
>> What you like is irrelevant to the usefulness of 2GB of RAM to other people.
Can you two stop your senseless arguing. We all already know none of you
are going to back down. Just agree that you agree and be done with it.
On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 00:58 +0100, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> >>> And 2GB RAM is kind of
> >>> minimal - I like lots of disk buffer.
> >>
> >> What you like is irrelevant to the usefulness of 2GB of RAM to other
> >> people.
>
> Can you two stop your senseless arguing. We all already know none
52 matches
Mail list logo
