Re: [CentOS] 6.1 .iso size?

2011-12-04 Thread Peter Eckel
Hi John, On 03.12.2011, at 23:25, John R Pierce wrote: > On 12/03/11 2:11 PM, Beartooth wrote: >> I don't have that kind of access to any http server. > > in a pinch, enable IIS on a windows system. its a bit funky, but it > works just fine for this sort of thing. or any linux box, you could

Re: [CentOS] 6.1 .iso size?

2011-12-04 Thread Phil Dobbin
On 3/12/11 22:13, "RILINDO FOSTER" wrote: > Here is one for the net install: > > http://www.gtlib.gatech.edu/pub/centos/6.0/isos/x86_64/CentOS-6.0-x86_64-netin > stall.iso > > And for the live media: > > http://www.gtlib.gatech.edu/pub/centos/6.0/isos/x86_64/CentOS-6.0-x86_64-LiveC > D.iso Ha

Re: [CentOS] syncing imap servers with imapsync

2011-12-04 Thread Alexander Dalloz
Am 04.12.2011 06:15, schrieb Tim Dunphy: > Thanks for your reply. The zimbra side (server1) is logging in fine. > The problem appears to be with the postfix side (server2) which is on > courier. > > Thanks for your input. > > Tim imapsync has nothing to do with SMTP (thus no Postfix involved).

[CentOS] Strangely slow disk

2011-12-04 Thread Timothy Murphy
I have a 1.5TB Western Digital hard disk (WD15EADS-00R6B0) on my CentOS-5.7 server, which has become incredibly slow for some operations, eg rsync, BackupPC archive, e2fsck, although it seems to work fine for ordinary file operations, and "smartctl -a /dev/sdb" does not report any errors. For exam

Re: [CentOS] Strangely slow disk

2011-12-04 Thread Ilyas --
Just check smart table: smartctl -a -d ata /dev/sdX Sometimes disk work very slowly without any visible reason. In this case just replace your disk. On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > I have a 1.5TB Western Digital hard disk (WD15EADS-00R6B0) > on my CentOS-5.7 server, wh

Re: [CentOS] 6.1 .iso size?

2011-12-04 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 12/03/2011 08:20 PM, Beartooth wrote: > So I can't get 6.0 onto it in the usual way. But I can wait till > 6.1 comes out; it is possible to predict yet whether it will squeeze in > under the DVD+R limit? > yes, the iso sizes for 6.1 are all under the limit for DVD+R - KB _

Re: [CentOS] Strangely slow disk

2011-12-04 Thread Ho Chaw Ming
Check your bios, and make sure that you did not have IDE mode enabled and AHCI is selected . -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Timothy Murphy Sent: Sunday, 4 December, 2011 8:46 PM To: centos@centos.org Subject: [CentOS] Stra

Re: [CentOS] 6.1 .iso size?

2011-12-04 Thread RILINDO FOSTER
http://www.gtlib.gatech.edu/pub/centos/6.0/isos/i386/CentOS-6.0-i386-LiveDVD.iso http://www.gtlib.gatech.edu/pub/centos/6.0/isos/i386/CentOS-6.0-i386-netinstall.iso On Dec 4, 2011, at 5:52 AM, Phil Dobbin wrote: > On 3/12/11 22:13, "RILINDO FOSTER" wrote: > >> Here is one for the net install: >

Re: [CentOS] duqu

2011-12-04 Thread Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 14:01:36 -0500 John Hinton wrote: > On 11/30/2011 1:55 PM, Benjamin Donnachie wrote: > > On 30 Nov 2011, at 18:51, Les Mikesell > > wrote: > > > >> Ssh is mostly about being able to log in. > > I've always adopted the policy of disabling root logins, making > > admins use a se

[CentOS] external usb hard drve not detected by centos 5

2011-12-04 Thread Michel Donais
Centos 5.6 I have a 80 gig SATA usb drive connected in hub no-1 and a USB key in hub no-2 If I perform the following commands I get some results but there is no sdbXX appearance [root@localhost home]# lsusb Bus 001 Device 001: ID : T: Bus=01 Lev=00 Prnt=00 Port=00 Cnt=00 Dev#= 1 Spd=1

Re: [CentOS] 6.1 .iso size?

2011-12-04 Thread Phil Dobbin
On 4/12/11 17:24, "RILINDO FOSTER" wrote: > http://www.gtlib.gatech.edu/pub/centos/6.0/isos/i386/CentOS-6.0-i386-LiveDVD.i > so > > http://www.gtlib.gatech.edu/pub/centos/6.0/isos/i386/CentOS-6.0-i386-netinstal > l.iso Thanks for that but I'm actually looking for a Live CD of i386 CentOS 5.7. C

Re: [CentOS] Strangely slow disk

2011-12-04 Thread fred smith
On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 10:24:00PM +0800, Ho Chaw Ming wrote: > Check your bios, and make sure that you did not have IDE mode enabled and > AHCI is selected . Also, is this one of the "Green" series of WD disks? Those have a 4KB sector size, not the old/traditional 512B sector size. This has perf

Re: [CentOS] Strangely slow disk

2011-12-04 Thread John R Pierce
On 12/04/11 11:08 AM, fred smith wrote: > On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 10:24:00PM +0800, Ho Chaw Ming wrote: >> > Check your bios, and make sure that you did not have IDE mode enabled and >> > AHCI is selected . > Also, is this one of the "Green" series of WD disks? Those have > a 4KB sector size, not

Re: [CentOS] Strangely slow disk

2011-12-04 Thread Robert Nichols
On 12/04/2011 01:08 PM, fred smith wrote: > On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 10:24:00PM +0800, Ho Chaw Ming wrote: >> Check your bios, and make sure that you did not have IDE mode enabled and >> AHCI is selected . > > Also, is this one of the "Green" series of WD disks? Those have > a 4KB sector size, not t

Re: [CentOS] 6.1 .iso size?

2011-12-04 Thread Beartooth
On Sat, 03 Dec 2011 17:13:56 -0500, RILINDO FOSTER wrote: > Here is one for the net install: > http://www.gtlib.gatech.edu/pub/centos/6.0/isos/x86_64/CentOS-6.0- x86_64-netinstall.iso > And for the live media: > http://www.gtlib.gatech.edu/pub/centos/6.0/isos/x86_64/CentOS-6.0- x86_64-LiveCD

[CentOS] Abrt: kernel crash on boot -- but the system runs fine

2011-12-04 Thread fred smith
using a fully up to date 6.0 (and the CR repo) on my eeepc 901, every time the system boots and log in,, almost immediately (sometimes a few seconds later) get a popup from abrt complaining of a crash in the kernel package. yet the system continues to run fine, as far as I can tell. Package:

Re: [CentOS] Strangely slow disk

2011-12-04 Thread Timothy Murphy
Ho Chaw Ming wrote: > I have a 1.5TB Western Digital hard disk (WD15EADS-00R6B0) on my > CentOS-5.7 server, which has become incredibly slow for some operations, > eg rsync, BackupPC archive, e2fsck, although it seems to work fine for > ordinary file operations, and "smartctl -a /dev/sdb" does not

Re: [CentOS] 6.1 .iso size?

2011-12-04 Thread Artifex Maximus
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Phil Dobbin wrote: > On 4/12/11 17:24, "RILINDO FOSTER" wrote: > >> http://www.gtlib.gatech.edu/pub/centos/6.0/isos/i386/CentOS-6.0-i386-LiveDVD.i >> so >> >> http://www.gtlib.gatech.edu/pub/centos/6.0/isos/i386/CentOS-6.0-i386-netinstal >> l.iso > > Thanks for tha

[CentOS] Sources for extras??

2011-12-04 Thread Beartooth
With invaluable help here, I've just gotten 6.0 onto a PC. I went through the listings in PackageKit, removing things I know I'll never use; ran yum update; installed Opera; went to the epel, rpmfusion, and one whose name slips my mind (It's a new name.); enabled them all; and tried to

Re: [CentOS] Sources for extras??

2011-12-04 Thread John R. Dennison
On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 09:49:12PM +, Beartooth wrote: >No package dillo available. >No package epiphany available. >No package galeon available. >No package midori available. >No package privoxy available. >No package seamonkey available. >Error: Nothing to do None

Re: [CentOS] external usb hard drve not detected by centos 5

2011-12-04 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Vreme: 12/04/2011 07:09 PM, Michel Donais piše: > Centos 5.6 > I have a 80 gig SATA usb drive connected in hub no-1 > and a USB key in hub no-2 > > If I perform the following commands I get some results but there is no sdbXX > appearance > > [root@localhost home]# lsusb > Bus 001 Device 001: ID 000

Re: [CentOS] 6.1 .iso size?

2011-12-04 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 12/04/2011 06:21 PM, Phil Dobbin wrote: > CentOS 6 won't run on my machine whereas 5.7 will. Why is that ? - KB ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Sources for extras??

2011-12-04 Thread Scott Robbins
On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 04:00:07PM -0600, John R. Dennison wrote: > On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 09:49:12PM +, Beartooth wrote: > >No package dillo available. > None of these is packaged by any reputable 3rd party repo that I can > see; privoxy used to be in base but upstream dropped it in EL6

Re: [CentOS] 6.1 .iso size?

2011-12-04 Thread Phil Dobbin
On 4/12/11 23:30, "Karanbir Singh" wrote: > On 12/04/2011 06:21 PM, Phil Dobbin wrote: >> CentOS 6 won't run on my machine whereas 5.7 will. > > Why is that ? By co-incidence, as Beartooth posted earlier, I also tried to install CentOS 6 on a ThinkPad but it wouldn't take. I used to have a copy

Re: [CentOS] Strangely slow disk

2011-12-04 Thread Timothy Murphy
Timothy Murphy wrote: >> Check your bios, and make sure that you did not have IDE mode enabled and >> AHCI is selected . > > Thanks for your response, and for the others received. > > But I should have pointed out that the slow operation > has only started recently, in the last week or so, > aft

Re: [CentOS] 6.1 .iso size?

2011-12-04 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 12/05/2011 12:33 AM, Phil Dobbin wrote: > By co-incidence, as Beartooth posted earlier, I also tried to install CentOS > 6 on a ThinkPad but it wouldn't take. I used to have a copy of a CentOS 5.7 > Live CD & that worked O.K. on an old Pentium IV i386 so I'm hoping it'll > work on the ThinkPad.

Re: [CentOS] external usb hard drve not detected by centos 5

2011-12-04 Thread Michel Donais
>What does dmesg says when you plug it in? Here it is Sorry for the long list but I think it may be usefiull --- dmesg listing begin --- Linux version 2.6.18-238.el5 (mockbu...@builder10.centos.org) (gcc version 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-48)) #1 SMP Thu Jan 13 16:24:

Re: [CentOS] 6.1 .iso size?

2011-12-04 Thread Phil Dobbin
On 5/12/11 00:41, "Karanbir Singh" wrote: > On 12/05/2011 12:33 AM, Phil Dobbin wrote: >> By co-incidence, as Beartooth posted earlier, I also tried to install CentOS >> 6 on a ThinkPad but it wouldn't take. I used to have a copy of a CentOS 5.7 >> Live CD & that worked O.K. on an old Pentium IV

Re: [CentOS] Strangely slow disk

2011-12-04 Thread Alan McKay
Those are slowish times even for a 7200rpm disk. My desktop here at home (Ubuntu) has a slow 7200 drive and hdparam reports a lot faster than that. Well, it is a Caviar "Green" drive which means that 7200 is the fastest speed but it does spin slower too. amckay@amckay-desktop:~$ sudo !! sudo h

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6x86_64: no hypervisor options were found for this connection

2011-12-04 Thread nux
Jason Pyeron writes: > After following http://itscblog.tamu.edu/startup-guide-for-kvm-on-centos-6/ > (because I found out that vmware server 2 does not work on centos 6) I go to > the > point where I tried to create a new VM in the virt-manager. At that point I > get > "no hypervisor options wer

Re: [CentOS] Strangely slow disk

2011-12-04 Thread Alan McKay
You have not said anything yet in this thread about defragging that drive. I just checked your original message and your drive is the exact same as mine except yours is the 1.5 TB version and mine is 1.0. -- “Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV”          - Michael Pollan, author

Re: [CentOS] Strangely slow disk

2011-12-04 Thread Alan McKay
Also - boot a live Linux CD and then from there do hdparam again and compare results, If they differ vastly at least you know it is something in your running system which is the culprit. If they are roughly the same then it is likely the drive gone bad. Though check the man page for hdparam to

Re: [CentOS] Strangely slow disk

2011-12-04 Thread Yves Bellefeuille
On Sunday 04 December 2011 19:38, Timothy Murphy wrote: > The "slow disk" > [tim@helen ~]$ sudo hdparm -t /dev/sdb > /dev/sdb: > Timing buffered disk reads: 168 MB in 3.00 seconds = 55.98 MB/sec > --- > Another disk on the same machine > [tim@blanche ~]$ sudo hd

[CentOS] Booting C 6.0 from C 5.7

2011-12-04 Thread Always Learning
I installed C 6.0 in an empty partition. It functioned. Despite using the usually successful methods of booting into another operating system from C 5.7, I can't get into C 6.0 Tried:- title C6-0 (2.6.32-71.el6.x86_64) rootnoverify (hd0,6) chainloader +1 and root (hd0

Re: [CentOS] Booting C 6.0 from C 5.7

2011-12-04 Thread RILINDO FOSTER
On Dec 4, 2011, at 11:40 PM, Always Learning wrote: > > I installed C 6.0 in an empty partition. It functioned. > > Despite using the usually successful methods of booting into another > operating system from C 5.7, I can't get into C 6.0 > > Tried:- > > title C6-0 (2.6.32-71.el6.x86_64) > >

Re: [CentOS] Booting C 6.0 from C 5.7

2011-12-04 Thread Always Learning
> Despite using the usually successful methods of booting into another > operating system from C 5.7, I can't get into C 6.0 > > Tried:- > > title C6-0 (2.6.32-71.el6.x86_64) > > rootnoverify (hd0,6) > chainloader +1 > > and > > root (hd0,6) > kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.3

[CentOS] Intel SE7210TP1-E giving memory errors

2011-12-04 Thread Rob Kampen
Hi List, I've been getting the following EDAC memory errors EDAC MC0: CE page 0xeb0dd, offset 0x0, grain 4096, syndrome 0x45, row 3, channel 0, label "": i82875p CE and from this seeing that these errors have been corrected. Checking cat /sys/devices/system/edac/mc/mc0/csrow3/ch0_ce_count gives