Le 26/11/2011 20:01, John R Pierce a écrit :
> On 11/26/11 2:42 AM, Guitart Francesc wrote:
>> I'm talking of one local account in the CentOS machine without
>> permissions to the network (this is why i'm trying to give them acces to
>> the NAS as your own network user account) where the users run
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Guitart Francesc
wrote:
>> if all the user processes are running as the same user ID, how do you
>> expect the file system to know what user is supposed to have access to
>> which share? what you're asking for is physically impossible. once
>> user "A" logged o
On 11/28/11 12:22 AM, Guitart Francesc wrote:
> Sorry, maybe I haven't been clear. What I can do with Debian is to
> forget the SMB password every time I get connect to NAS, in such a way
> several network users can use the same local account. While, if I
> understand correctly, you are talking on
On Sat, 26 Nov 2011, Guitart Francesc wrote:
El vie, 25-11-2011 a las 11:03 +, John Hodrien escribió:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011, Guitart Francesc wrote:
> Thanks for your comment. You're right, but the problem arises with your
> solution is that all users are using the CentOS machine login local
You can try zabbix
www.zabbix.com
On 11/27/2011 08:01 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> What's available to remotely monitor services? What I'd like is something
> that can run scripts for each service to connect to a port and verify that
> it's up, and then send me an SMS message (phone text) to let m
Am 25.11.2011 14:43, schrieb Nicolas Thierry-Mieg:
> Rainer Traut wrote:
>> Hi List,
>>
>> I'm looking for an editor with file compare capabilities.
>> Gedit and kate don't seem to do this?
>
> emacs does this
Thx guys, for all the answers, I tried the "Diffuse Merge Tool" and that
was well enoug
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> What's available to remotely monitor services? What I'd like is something
> that can run scripts for each service to connect to a port and verify that
> it's up, and then send me an SMS message (phone text) to let me know which,
> if any, ar
Le 28/11/2011 09:27, Fajar Priyanto a écrit :
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Guitart Francesc
> wrote:
>>> if all the user processes are running as the same user ID, how do you
>>> expect the file system to know what user is supposed to have access to
>>> which share? what you're asking for
Le 28/11/2011 09:36, John R Pierce a écrit :
> On 11/28/11 12:22 AM, Guitart Francesc wrote:
>> Sorry, maybe I haven't been clear. What I can do with Debian is to
>> forget the SMB password every time I get connect to NAS, in such a way
>> several network users can use the same local account. While
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Guitart Francesc
wrote:
>
>> 1. Why use shared account?
>
> Good question. This is a server that was already running when I started
> working here. I don't know the software that has installed and prefer
> not to touch a lot. That's the only reason I have for to co
Le 28/11/2011 14:56, Les Mikesell a écrit :
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Guitart Francesc
> wrote:
>>
>>> 1. Why use shared account?
>>
>> Good question. This is a server that was already running when I started
>> working here. I don't know the software that has installed and prefer
>> not
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Guitart Francesc
wrote:
>
>> So what happened when all the users log in at once to the shared
>> account? I'd expect the mounted NAS to be available to everyone
>> regardless of who mounted it first. And if that's the case, why does
>> it matter if that continue
- "Akemi Yagi" escreveu:
> De: "Akemi Yagi"
> Para: "CentOS mailing list"
> Enviadas: Sexta-feira, 25 de Novembro de 2011 17:56:21 (GMT-0300)
> Auto-Detected
> Assunto: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.1- RPS/RFS kernel patch
>
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Karanbir Singh
> wrote:
> > On 11/2
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Logging out of the Gnome desktop should do it, but the whole concept
> seems very wrong. Even if all the users are working at the same
> console, they should have different logins.
+1
If you don't have separate logins, or delete and fully recreate the
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
On Monday, November 28, 2011 11:23:57 AM Les Mikesell wrote:
> Even if all the users are working at the same
> console, they should have different logins.
You know, reading through this thread is frustrating.
Frustrating in that the OP's question has yet to be answered; instead, yet
again, the O
Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Monday, November 28, 2011 11:23:57 AM Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Even if all the users are working at the same
>> console, they should have different logins.
>
> You know, reading through this thread is frustrating.
Yup.
>
> Frustrating in that the OP's question has yet to be an
On Monday, November 28, 2011 12:40:59 PM m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> You missed one: he may not have the authority to do so.
Yep, I did. I keep forgetting that others don't have the flexibility that I
do, so thanks for that reminder.
___
CentOS mailing l
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Monday, November 28, 2011 12:40:59 PM m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> You missed one: he may not have the authority to do so.
>
> Yep, I did. I keep forgetting that others don't have the flexibility that I
> do, so thanks for that reminder.
>
On Sun, 27 Nov 2011, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> What's available to remotely monitor services? What I'd like is
> something that can run scripts for each service to connect to a port
> and verify that it's up, and then send me an SMS message (phone
> text) to let me know which, if any, are down.
I finally decided to install the CR repo on one of my CentOS 6 machines that I
use as a host for some VMs (also running CentOS 6).
Before updating the host I updated a VM that was not critical to test the
process and was able to boot that VM, so I went ahead with updating the host
and the two V
Is this available for CentOS and if so then where is this
package located? Yum cannot find it in the configured
repositories and I can seemingly only locate the
Scientific Linux version through Google.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemai
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>> On Monday, November 28, 2011 12:40:59 PM m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> You missed one: he may not have the authority to do so.
>>
>> Yep, I did. I keep forgetting that others don't have the flexibility
>> that I do, so tha
On 11/28/11 5:51 AM, Guitart Francesc wrote:
>> are you using smb mounts, or just smbclient with 'get/put' ftp-style
>> > file access?
> I don't know, how I can check it? What are using when you connect by
> "Connect to server">> "Shared Windows" ?
no idea, I hardly ever use gnome.
--
john r
On Monday, November 28, 2011 01:15:30 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
> None of which justifies someone else helping to continue a misguided
> and insecure practice...
Not all systems are Internet connected, and not all sites need the same
security; one size does not fit all.
In the OP, we have a basic
On Wednesday, November 23, 2011 06:11:31 AM Guitart Francesc wrote:
> How I can force always the request of login and password?
In System -> Administration -> Authentication, 'Options' tab, is 'Cache User
Information' checked?
___
CentOS mailing list
C
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 4:03 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 23, 2011 06:11:31 AM Guitart Francesc wrote:
>> How I can force always the request of login and password?
>
> In System -> Administration -> Authentication, 'Options' tab, is 'Cache User
> Information' checked?
I think C
Vreme: 11/28/2011 08:19 PM, James B. Byrne piše:
> Is this available for CentOS and if so then where is this
> package located? Yum cannot find it in the configured
> repositories and I can seemingly only locate the
> Scientific Linux version through Google.
>
>
As I can see, there is no such pack
Hello,
Can someone explain why I don't get a timeout when I use the community string
"public" even if I don't have it
defined in my snmpd.conf file. It doesn't return data but it also doesn't
timeout. See example below.
...
rocommunity nobody 127.0.0.1
...
[root@L703108 pgsql]# snmpwalk -v 1 -c
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:19 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
> Is this available for CentOS and if so then where is this
> package located? Yum cannot find it in the configured
> repositories and I can seemingly only locate the
> Scientific Linux version through Google.
I suggest you file a request t
CentOS 5.7 x86_64. Lots of hosts NFS mounting a file system. All are
configured identically (same LDAP servers, same DNS, same autofs config,
same patches, etc). On some of them I see an NFS mount displaying a host
name:
% df -P | grep smt
:/mnt/foo 1651345888 264620688 1386725200 17% /fs/home
Hey guys and gals,
Anyone know of a half decent tool like DNSstuff.com only free?
I need to run some diag on a few domains but it is basically a 1 shot
deal and hard to justify buying.
thanks,
-Alan
--
“Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV”
- Michael Pollan, author of
Am 28.11.2011 22:52, schrieb Alan McKay:
> Hey guys and gals,
>
> Anyone know of a half decent tool like DNSstuff.com only free?
>
> I need to run some diag on a few domains but it is basically a 1 shot
> deal and hard to justify buying.
man dig
man nslookup
man whois
man traceroute
signatu
> man dig
> man nslookup
> man whois
> man traceroute
Clearly you've never used DNSstuff.com
Yeah, I can do all that, but the above tool does a full diagnosis for
you and makes debugging problems really quick and painless.
I could transmit this message via RFC1149, too, but it just would take
a
- Original Message -
> Hey guys and gals,
>
> Anyone know of a half decent tool like DNSstuff.com only free?
>
> I need to run some diag on a few domains but it is basically a 1 shot
> deal and hard to justify buying.
>
> thanks,
> -Alan
Check out:
http://www.intodns.com
--Tim
___
Am 28.11.2011 22:58, schrieb Alan McKay:
>> man dig
>> man nslookup
>> man whois
>> man traceroute
>
> Clearly you've never used DNSstuff.com
yes becuase no need
> Yeah, I can do all that, but the above tool does a full diagnosis for
> you and makes debugging problems really quick and painless
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Steve Thompson wrote:
> CentOS 5.7 x86_64. Lots of hosts NFS mounting a file system. All are
> configured identically (same LDAP servers, same DNS, same autofs config,
> same patches, etc). On some of them I see an NFS mount displaying a host
> name:
>
> % df -P |
On 11/28/11 1:58 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
>> man dig
>> > man nslookup
>> > man whois
>> > man traceroute
> Clearly you've never used DNSstuff.com
actually, i have, and its failed to identify issues with stale and lame
NS records that I was able to easily find by hand with the 'hosts'
command wh
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Emmett Culley wrote:
> I finally decided to install the CR repo on one of my CentOS 6 machines that
> I use as a host for some VMs (also running CentOS 6).
>
> Before updating the host I updated a VM that was not critical to test the
> process and was able to bo
Folks
I am trying to use the CR repo in for yum, but find that nothing is
getting updated. The repository isn't even listed in the yum run.
The file contents of /etc/yum.repo.d/CentOS-CR, after I adjusted the
priority is:
# CentOS-CR.repo
#
# The continuous release ( CR ) repository contains
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 14:33:42 -0800
Akemi Yagi wrote:
> Yes. The version of autofs must be different. It's a known issue and
> has been resolved in later versions of autofs. Please see:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725536
You are not authorized to access bug #725536. To see thi
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 14:33:42 -0800
> Akemi Yagi wrote:
>
>> Yes. The version of autofs must be different. It's a known issue and
>> has been resolved in later versions of autofs. Please see:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=72553
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 03:25:33PM -0800, david wrote:
> priority=3
Priority must be the same or lower than base/updates.
John
--
"Whenever two people meet, there are really six people present. There is each
man as he sees himself, each
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:31:06 -0800
Akemi Yagi wrote:
> How about this one?
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735935
> and
> http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1318.html
Those are public and readable.
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com
www.c
On 11/28/2011 02:48 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Emmett Culley
> wrote:
>> I finally decided to install the CR repo on one of my CentOS 6 machines that
>> I use as a host for some VMs (also running CentOS 6).
>>
>> Before updating the host I updated a VM that was not
Priority
How is it ordered.
Is priority=1 more important than priority=2? If so, then I already have
at priority 1:
base, centosplus, updates, extras
at priority 2:
contrib
at priority 3
cr
at priority 10
epel
Or do I have it backwards?
At 03:34 PM 11/28/2011, you wrote:
>On Mo
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 04:07:27PM -0800, david wrote:
Please do not top-post to the centos mailing lists - thank you.
> Is priority=1 more important than priority=2? If so, then I already have
Yes. "highest" priority is 0; "lowest" priority is 99.
> at priority 1:
> base, centosplus, updat
At 04:32 PM 11/28/2011, you wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 04:07:27PM -0800, david wrote:
>
>Please do not top-post to the centos mailing lists - thank you.
>
> > Is priority=1 more important than priority=2? If so, then I already have
>
>Yes. "highest" priority is 0; "lowest" priority is 99.
>
On 11/28/2011 2:13 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can someone explain why I don't get a timeout when I use the community string
> "public" even if I don't have it
> defined in my snmpd.conf file. It doesn't return data but it also doesn't
> timeout. See example below.
> ...
> rocommunity nob
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 6:25 PM, david wrote:
> Folks
>
> I am trying to use the CR repo in for yum, but find that nothing is
> getting updated. The repository isn't even listed in the yum run.
>
> The file contents of /etc/yum.repo.d/CentOS-CR
Is this a typo, or is the .repo extension really mi
At 07:34 PM 11/28/2011, you wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 6:25 PM, david wrote:
> > Folks
> >
> > I am trying to use the CR repo in for yum, but find that nothing is
> > getting updated. The repository isn't even listed in the yum run.
> >
> > The file contents of /etc/yum.repo.d/CentOS-CR
>
>I
51 matches
Mail list logo
