Am 17.11.2011 03:23, schrieb Craig White:
> Consider the upcoming Asus Transformer Prime tablet which has more
> horsepower than my desktop computer (by far) though less RAM and less
> storage. The cloud can be your storage... heck all of my music is
> already on Google Music.
uninteresting beca
centos-boun...@centos.org schrieb am 16.11.2011 17:02:50:
> Ljubomir Ljubojevic
> Gesendet von: centos-boun...@centos.org
>
> 16.11.2011 17:03
>
> Bitte antworten an
> CentOS mailing list
>
> An
>
> CentOS mailing list
>
> Kopie
>
> Thema
>
> Re: [CentOS] Difference in gnome between cen
Fawzy Ibrhim writes:
> I have Centos 5.7 AMD64; is there a way to have Squid 3 with SSLBump feature
> in Centos 5.7? I appreciate any help on that?
3.1? Try this one - http://www.jur-linux.org/rpms/el-updates/5.4/SRPMS/
I'm using the 3.1.15 version here (w/o SSLBump), and it's been working
fl
Vreme: 11/17/2011 09:07 AM, Reindl Harald piše:
>
>
> Am 17.11.2011 03:23, schrieb Craig White:
>> Consider the upcoming Asus Transformer Prime tablet which has more
>> horsepower than my desktop computer (by far) though less RAM and less
>> storage. The cloud can be your storage... heck all of my
On 11/16/2011 09:37 PM, Smithies, Russell wrote:
> I came across an old post comment yesterday (from
> http://echenh.blogspot.com/2010/04/how-to-extend-lvm-on-vmware-guest-os.html
> ) discussing the "hack" of LVM on Linux VM guests and whether it's better not
> to use it to simplify disk managem
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011, Smithies, Russell wrote:
> I came across an old post comment yesterday (from
> http://echenh.blogspot.com/2010/04/how-to-extend-lvm-on-vmware-guest-os.html
> ) discussing the "hack" of LVM on Linux VM guests and whether it's better not
> to use it to simplify disk managem
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:07 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> Consider the upcoming Asus Transformer Prime tablet which has more
>> horsepower than my desktop computer (by far) though less RAM and less
>> storage. The cloud can be your storage... heck all of my music is
>> already on Google Music.
>
Am 17.11.2011 14:44, schrieb Les Mikesell:
> Not sure I understand - a soft keyboard only takes screen space when
> needed. And a very popular device is making news about its voice
> input app that is sort-of usable.
i do not speak about soft-keyboard
i speak about wasting braindead space with
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 7:55 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> I think we are only a few years away from fully usable voice controls
>> which will eliminate any size requirements for your end point device.
>> Keyboard input isn't really that great anyway.
>
> *lol*
>
> you really believe you want to w
On Thursday, November 17, 2011 10:10 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Letters? You mean the things that the Post Office used to deliver?
> Who does that anymore? Maybe a picture or video clip instead...
Gee...business people that's who...at least until we get some to use and
legal digital signing. Bu
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:07 AM, Reindl Harald
> wrote:
>>
> Or embedded devices with remote controls and no keyboard at all...
> Netflix got their popularity by running on just about every device
> that can connect to the internet and a screen. But those are not
> replace
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 7:55 AM, Reindl Harald
> wrote:
>>
>>> I think we are only a few years away from fully usable voice controls
>>> which will eliminate any size requirements for your end point device.
>>> Keyboard input isn't really that great anyway.
>>
>> *lol*
>>
>>
Christopher Chan wrote:
> On Thursday, November 17, 2011 10:10 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>> Letters? You mean the things that the Post Office used to deliver?
>> Who does that anymore? Maybe a picture or video clip instead...
>
> Gee...business people that's who...at least until we get some to us
Greetings,
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 7:49 PM, wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
> or more years, voice computing will never come in: e.g., the employee
> who's just been fired, walks out of the office and yells, FORMAT c:; YES,
> YES, YES!!!
ROTFL!!!
I don't remamber thy guy who invented the qwerty
Am 17.11.2011 15:10, schrieb Les Mikesell:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 7:55 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>> I think we are only a few years away from fully usable voice controls
>>> which will eliminate any size requirements for your end point device.
>>> Keyboard input isn't really that great any
Hi,
This is slightly offtopic, but I have been trying to resolve that problem for
two days now without much success. It looks like this may be something that
works with CENTOS5, but not with CENTOS6!
I have two machines, fileserver1 and server5.
fileserver1 runs on CENTOS6 (virtualized, if this
1.. Is it even possible? Every example I've seen has bridged eth* rather
wlan*.
2.. If it helps here are my scripts:
$ more /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-wlan0
ESSID="snip"
MODE=Managed
KEY_MGMT=WPA-PSK
TYPE=Wireless
BOOTPROTO=dhcp
DEFROUTE=yes
PEERDNS=yes
PEERROUTES=yes
IPV4_FAILURE
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:26:35AM -0500, Joe Tseng wrote:
> 1.. Is it even possible? Every example I've seen has bridged eth* rather
> wlan*.
> 2.. If it helps here are my scripts:
I have an old page on this--written back when VirtualBox couldn't do it
with a mouse click either.
http://hom
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 17.11.2011 15:10, schrieb Les Mikesell:
>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 7:55 AM, Reindl Harald
>> wrote:
>>>
I think we are only a few years away from fully usable voice controls
which will eliminate any size requirements for yo
On Nov 17, 2011, at 6:55 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 17.11.2011 14:44, schrieb Les Mikesell:
>> Not sure I understand - a soft keyboard only takes screen space when
>> needed. And a very popular device is making news about its voice
>> input app that is sort-of usable.
>
> i do not spea
Hello,
- Original Message -
> From: "Russell Smithies"
> To: "CentOS mailing list"
> Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 2:37:54 PM
> Subject: [CentOS] not using LVM for Linux VM guests?
>
> I came across an old post comment yesterday (from
> http://echenh.blogspot.com/2010/04/how-to-ext
Am 17.11.2011 17:02, schrieb Craig White:
> As for the majority... more than 50% of all phones sold now are smart phones.
> Soon everyone, everywhere will have one.
and for you this does mean they have ONLY a smartphone
jesus christ i have a smartphone too and i like optimized interfaces
for i
Craig White wrote:
> On Nov 17, 2011, at 6:55 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 17.11.2011 14:44, schrieb Les Mikesell:
> As for the majority... more than 50% of all phones sold now are smart
> phones. Soon everyone, everywhere will have one.
Ah, now I understand: you've drunk the Kool-Aid.
No, NOT
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011, Jon Detert wrote:
> One thing I do avoid, however, is partitioning the virtual disks that might
> need to grow. This is because of the pain described in part below. The
> kernel often seems to have a hard time letting go of it's view of the
> partition table - either i have
I have some services on Centos5 boxes that use smb authentication
against the Windows domain as a low-maintenance way to handle most of
our office users for things that don't need home directories (web/file
shares, etc.). Running authconfig is all it takes to add it to PAM,
then adding mod_auth_pa
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
> I have some services on Centos5 boxes that use smb authentication
> against the Windows domain as a low-maintenance way to handle most of
> our office users for things that don't need home directories (web/file
> shares, etc.). Running authconfig is all
On 11/17/11 8:02 AM, Craig White wrote:
> As for the majority... more than 50% of all phones sold now are smart phones.
> Soon everyone, everywhere will have one.
So they all can walk off a cliff while fondling their angrybirds like a
bunch of lemmings.
That said, what in Dogs name does this t
I just installed win 7 pro @home in order to be more compatible with
my new @work environment. I am likewise having a problem with samba
shares. The samba shares are on a C5.7 server and were readily
available from the same machine running XP for the last couple of
years.
The new w7pro install i
Ron Young wrote on 11/17/2011 01:11 PM:
> I just installed win 7 pro @home in order to be more compatible with
> my new @work environment. I am likewise having a problem with samba
> shares. The samba shares are on a C5.7 server and were readily
> available from the same machine running XP for th
Phil Schaffner wrote on 11/17/2011 01:18 PM:
> Have you replaced samba packages with samba3x packages?
P.S.
Just noticed I am an accessory to a thread hijacking. This thread is
about CentOS-6. Sorry.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://li
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011, Ron Young wrote:
> I just installed win 7 pro @home in order to be more compatible with
> my new @work environment. I am likewise having a problem with samba
> shares. The samba shares are on a C5.7 server and were readily
> available from the same machine running XP for the
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:30 PM, wrote:
>
>> I just installed win 7 pro @home in order to be more compatible with
>> my new @work environment. I am likewise having a problem with samba
>> shares. The samba shares are on a C5.7 server and were readily
>> available from the same machine running
On 11/17/2011 11:13 AM, Jon Detert wrote:
> Hello,
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Russell Smithies"
>> To: "CentOS mailing list"
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 2:37:54 PM
>> Subject: [CentOS] not using LVM for Linux VM guests?
>>
>> I came across an old post comment yesterday (fr
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:26 AM, John Hodrien wrote:
>
>> I have some services on Centos5 boxes that use smb authentication
>> against the Windows domain as a low-maintenance way to handle most of
>> our office users for things that don't need home directories (web/file
>> shares, etc.). Running
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Jon Detert
> Sent: Friday, 18 November 2011 5:13 a.m.
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] not using LVM for Linux VM guests?
>
> Hello,
>
> - Original Message -
>
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Paul Griffith
> Sent: Friday, 18 November 2011 8:04 a.m.
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] not using LVM for Linux VM guests?
>
> On 11/17/2011 11:13 AM, Jon Detert wrot
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> You don't *have* to join it to the domain, you can use pam_krb5 without
>> joining if you want.
>
> I don't see that as an option in authconfig (or smb either now). Are
> there examples of how to set that up? And does apache have to be
> configured sep
Oops! My apologies for the thread hijacking. Thanks for the reminder Phil.
I was mentally keyed to the samba issues and ignored the C6 and AD
issues. In my case there is no AD domain involved and samba is
already at the 3x level.
Regards,
Ron Young
919-621-9015
http://www.linkedin.com/in/ronh
Am 17.11.2011 20:25, schrieb Smithies, Russell:
> I have the same problem - I can never get the partition table reread without
> a reboot.
> It's a little annoying as I can resize the disk on a Win2k8 VM without a
> reboot but not Linux :-(
Next time simply use the partprobe command.
> --Russe
Tried that, as well as rescanning the scsi bus,
Everything I've tried returns a warning about kernel unable to reread partition
table and requiring a reboot to see any modifications.
--Russell
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
>
Am 17.11.2011 22:36, schrieb Smithies, Russell:
> Tried that, as well as rescanning the scsi bus,
> Everything I've tried returns a warning about kernel unable to reread
> partition
> table and requiring a reboot to see any modifications.
gparted does tell you this since years after modify bu
Perhaps I'm doing it wrong then.
1). In Vmware, extend the existing disk by changing the provisioned size in the
vSphere client.
2). In Centos, create an additional partition with fdisk,
3). Somehow reread the partition table without rebooting??
4). pvcreate
5). vgextend
6). lvextend
7). resize2
Quoting "Smithies, Russell" :
> Perhaps I'm doing it wrong then.
>
> 1). In Vmware, extend the existing disk by changing the provisioned size in
> the vSphere client.
> 2). In Centos, create an additional partition with fdisk,
> 3). Somehow reread the partition table without rebooting??
> 4). pvcr
I've tried that, it returns a warning about kernel unable to reread partition
table and requiring a reboot to see any modifications.
Then the next call to pvcreate fails as it can't find the partition.
--Russell
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun..
On Friday, November 18, 2011 03:53 AM, Ron Young wrote:
> Oops! My apologies for the thread hijacking. Thanks for the reminder Phil.
>
> I was mentally keyed to the samba issues and ignored the C6 and AD
> issues. In my case there is no AD domain involved and samba is
> already at the 3x level.
>
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 3:38 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> That said, what in Dogs name does this thread have to do with
> CentOS?? Can we please STOP already?
Hi,
Not wanting to drag out this topic, or post anything inflamatory. Also
I am not necessarily replying only to John, but to the thread
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 11:14 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Craig White wrote:
> > On Nov 17, 2011, at 6:55 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >> Am 17.11.2011 14:44, schrieb Les Mikesell:
>
> > As for the majority... more than 50% of all phones sold now are smart
> > phones. Soon everyone, everywhere wi
> I've tried that, it returns a warning about kernel unable to reread partition
> table and requiring a reboot to see any modifications.
> Then the next call to pvcreate fails as it can't find the partition.
>
> --Russell
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:c
- Original Message -
| > I've tried that, it returns a warning about kernel unable to reread
| > partition table and requiring a reboot to see any modifications.
| > Then the next call to pvcreate fails as it can't find the partition.
| >
| > --Russell
| >
| >> -Original Message-
|
Op 15-11-11 19:16, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg schreef:
>
> Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> Vreme: 11/15/2011 07:03 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg piše:
>>> So I don't know where you got it from, and how it's packaged.
>> It's in EPEL.
> ah yes, and I see they carry a thunar-volman package. OP, install that
> and
On Thursday, November 17, 2011 08:02:00 AM Craig White wrote:
> development follows the money. Computer sales are flat and convergent
> devices such as smart phones and tablets are selling. Why is it so hard to
> figure out that computer development is following the money?
>
> Recognize that it's
On 11/17/11 5:40 PM, Dan Irwin wrote:
> This all has something to do with CentOS in a round-about way. I am
> using CentOS to host our corporate web apps in a tomcat6 instance.
except, nothing aobut centos's user interface is different than its
upstream source.
so, if you want to champion user i
52 matches
Mail list logo
