Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 installation problem on i7 machine

2011-11-14 Thread c sawyer
Thanks, Rajagopal Can't see any graphics driver for RHEL-anything on the HP support site.  No worries - the kmod from elRepo works just fine for me cheers, - cal Greetings, >>On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Rajagopal Swaminathan >>gmail.com> wrote: >>Greetings,  >>AFAIK, HP Website doe

Re: [CentOS] binding additional IP addresses to centos6 on one interface

2011-11-14 Thread nux
Jonathan Vomacka writes: > Reindl, > > A block of 10 IPV4 is not a lot, and they will all eventually be used. > My question is, my server IP is 66.80.x.x and my additional IPS are in > the 50.7.x.x range using a netmask of 255.255.255.248. > > Can the netmask be written in the range file like

Re: [CentOS] binding additional IP addresses to centos6 on one interface

2011-11-14 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 14.11.2011 12:03, schrieb n...@li.nux.ro: > Jonathan Vomacka writes: > >> Reindl, >> >> A block of 10 IPV4 is not a lot, and they will all eventually be used. >> My question is, my server IP is 66.80.x.x and my additional IPS are in >> the 50.7.x.x range using a netmask of 255.255.255.248. >

[CentOS] No more sound since gfx card update

2011-11-14 Thread lhecking
Our workstation vendor EOL'd the gfx card we were buying and replaced it with a different model. With the new card, sound is no longer working. Previous system: # lspci |grep -i audio 00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) HD Audio Controller # aplay /usr/share/sounds

[CentOS] After Latest Update...

2011-11-14 Thread Phil Savoie
Hi All, Using the following to ssh into my home to get mail, I suddenly get this: ssh -o TCPKeepAlive=yes -o ServerAliveInterval=240 -L 110:192.168.100.108:110 phil@FQDN phil@FQDN's password: bind: Cannot assign requested address < Last login: Sun Nov 13 23:45:29 2011 from FQDN I have never

Re: [CentOS] After Latest Update...

2011-11-14 Thread Giles Coochey
On Mon, November 14, 2011 13:39, Phil Savoie wrote: > Hi All, > > Using the following to ssh into my home to get mail, I suddenly get this: > > ssh -o TCPKeepAlive=yes -o ServerAliveInterval=240 -L > 110:192.168.100.108:110 phil@FQDN > phil@FQDN's password: > bind: Cannot assign requested address

Re: [CentOS] After Latest Update...

2011-11-14 Thread Rob Kampen
Phil Savoie wrote: Hi All, Using the following to ssh into my home to get mail, I suddenly get this: ssh -o TCPKeepAlive=yes -o ServerAliveInterval=240 -L 110:192.168.100.108:110 phil@FQDN phil@FQDN's password: bind: Cannot assign requested address < Last login: Sun Nov 13 23:45:29 2011 fr

Re: [CentOS] Postfix mail server procedure

2011-11-14 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
On Sat, 2011-11-12 at 09:47 -0700, Craig White wrote: > On Sat, 2011-11-12 at 21:53 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote: > > On Saturday, November 12, 2011 01:01 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > > Cyrus is incredibly reliable, stable and fast. And the latest 2.4.x > > > series closes numerous potentia

[CentOS] high availability ideas

2011-11-14 Thread nux
Hi, I'm looking for some recommendations. I need to have some sort of high availability for a set of php & mysql web sites, they must be hosted on 2 servers, in separate data centres and obviously on differrent IPs. I can't use a load balancer because that will introduce a single point of fai

[CentOS] VM Philosophy 101 - How many and for what?

2011-11-14 Thread James B. Byrne
We are at the stage, finally, where we are prepared to deploy public facing VM guests. Now we have to answer these questions: How many guests in total should we contemplate and what services are placed on which guests? My question comes down to whether it is considered advisable to run the primar

Re: [CentOS] VM Philosophy 101 - How many and for what?

2011-11-14 Thread Digimer
On 11/14/2011 10:58 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: > We are at the stage, finally, where we are prepared to > deploy public facing VM guests. Now we have to answer > these questions: How many guests in total should we > contemplate and what services are placed on which guests? > > My question comes do

Re: [CentOS] Misterious hang

2011-11-14 Thread Fajar Priyanto
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Fajar Priyanto wrote: > Hi all, > Recently one my Centos 5.7 VM just crashes at least once a day randomly > (hang). > > In /var/log/messages there is nothing at all that there is problem (no > error, no failure). The log just stops. > > The only change I did befor

Re: [CentOS] Redhat vs centos vs ubuntu

2011-11-14 Thread Lamar Owen
On Saturday, November 12, 2011 11:51:42 AM Craig White wrote: > On Sat, 2011-11-12 at 09:25 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > > ... there is a learning curve to get > > proficient at doing Debian/Ubuntu. > > ... There's only what you know, how you > can adapt what you know and how well you can

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 81, Issue 7

2011-11-14 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ..

Re: [CentOS] fdisk on centos 6

2011-11-14 Thread Jerry Geis
On 09/16/2011 08:37 AM, Steve Clark wrote: > On 09/16/2011 08:10 AM, Jerry Geis wrote: >> On 09/16/2011 06:59 AM, Steve Clark wrote: >>> On 09/15/2011 06:03 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: > I think the fdisk in 6 tries to align on 4k boundaries. Does fdisk -c do > the > same thing? >

Re: [CentOS] Misterious hang

2011-11-14 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Vreme: 11/14/2011 05:09 PM, Fajar Priyanto piše: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Fajar Priyanto wrote: >> Hi all, >> Recently one my Centos 5.7 VM just crashes at least once a day randomly >> (hang). >> >> In /var/log/messages there is nothing at all that there is problem (no >> error, no fail

Re: [CentOS] Redhat vs centos vs ubuntu

2011-11-14 Thread m . roth
Christopher Chan wrote: > On Thursday, November 10, 2011 11:33 PM, Craig White wrote: >> >>> 7- The install, of the virtual host, added libvirt. It did not however >>> install things like virt-install or any other virt software. >>> Infact, no guest installation tools were added, though things like

Re: [CentOS] Redhat vs centos vs ubuntu

2011-11-14 Thread m . roth
Craig White wrote: > On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 01:05 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote: >> James A. Peltier wrote: >> >> > Fedora 16 moved to GRUB 2 as well. It will be in RHEL/CentOS in the >> next >> > release. Get used to it. ;) >> >> Grub2 really seems extraordinarily verbose. >> One can't help wonderi

[CentOS] bond of bonds

2011-11-14 Thread Paras pradhan
Hi, I am trying to use Link-aggregation with redundancy between switches that doesnot support SMLT in switches. I have 4 network ports. First two are connected to a switch and LACP/LAG is enabled. Third and Fourth ports connect to another switch with another LAG group. I was thinking create two

[CentOS] CentOS versus Scientific

2011-11-14 Thread Alan McKay
Hey folks, I was just reminded of the Scientific distro, which on the surface appears to be quite similar to CentOS even when the developers over there are rather coy about which Enterprise Linux distro they base theirs on. I wonder if anyone here has done a comparison of the two that they'd care

Re: [CentOS] Redhat vs centos vs ubuntu

2011-11-14 Thread Alan McKay
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Bob Hoffman wrote: > This is  a continuation of the thread about redhat vs centos and the > thought of moving from centos > due to redhats new business model. Can someone fill me in on this new business model? Is there a thread here on the list about it already?

Re: [CentOS] CentOS versus Scientific

2011-11-14 Thread Hakan Koseoglu
On 14 November 2011 20:31, Alan McKay wrote: > Hey folks, > > I was just reminded of the Scientific distro, which on the surface > appears to be quite similar to CentOS even when the developers over > there are rather coy about which Enterprise Linux distro they base > theirs on. http://en.wikiped

Re: [CentOS] CentOS versus Scientific

2011-11-14 Thread Les Mikesell
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Alan McKay wrote: > > I was just reminded of the Scientific distro, which on the surface > appears to be quite similar to CentOS even when the developers over > there are rather coy about which Enterprise Linux distro they base > theirs on. > > I wonder if anyone h

Re: [CentOS] CentOS versus Scientific

2011-11-14 Thread Alain Péan
Le 14/11/2011 21:31, Alan McKay a écrit : > Hey folks, > > I was just reminded of the Scientific distro, which on the surface > appears to be quite similar to CentOS even when the developers over > there are rather coy about which Enterprise Linux distro they base > theirs on. > > I wonder if anyon

Re: [CentOS] Redhat vs centos vs ubuntu

2011-11-14 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Vreme: 11/14/2011 09:34 PM, Alan McKay piše: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Bob Hoffman wrote: >> This is a continuation of the thread about redhat vs centos and the >> thought of moving from centos >> due to redhats new business model. > > Can someone fill me in on this new business model?

Re: [CentOS] After Latest Update...

2011-11-14 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 4:39 AM, Phil Savoie wrote: > Hi All, > > Using the following to ssh into my home to get mail, I suddenly get this: > > ssh  -o TCPKeepAlive=yes -o ServerAliveInterval=240 -L > 110:192.168.100.108:110 phil@FQDN > phil@FQDN's password: > bind: Cannot assign requested address

Re: [CentOS] Redhat vs centos vs ubuntu

2011-11-14 Thread Alan McKay
> And search for it. I hope nobody will start at it again, but AFTER you > read the Archives and have *specific* questions feel free to ask. > OK, I"ll do some googling. I have the last several years of this list in my gmail so away I go ... -- “Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on

Re: [CentOS] Redhat vs centos vs ubuntu

2011-11-14 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Vreme: 11/14/2011 11:18 PM, Alan McKay piše: >> And search for it. I hope nobody will start at it again, but AFTER you >> read the Archives and have *specific* questions feel free to ask. >> > > OK, I"ll do some googling. I have the last several years of this list > in my gmail so away I go ... >

Re: [CentOS] Redhat vs centos vs ubuntu

2011-11-14 Thread Les Mikesell
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > Vreme: 11/14/2011 11:18 PM, Alan McKay piše: >>> And search for it. I hope nobody will start at it again, but AFTER you >>> read the Archives and have *specific* questions feel free to ask. >>> >> >> OK, I"ll do some googling.  I have t

Re: [CentOS] Redhat vs centos vs ubuntu

2011-11-14 Thread Edward Martinez
On 11/14/11 14:18, Alan McKay wrote: >> And search for it. I hope nobody will start at it again, but AFTER you >> read the Archives and have *specific* questions feel free to ask. >> > OK, I"ll do some googling. I have the last several years of this list > in my gmail so away I go ... > it's

Re: [CentOS] Redhat vs centos vs ubuntu

2011-11-14 Thread Alan McKay
>     it's close to 200 replies. I'm new to centos so i had plenty of > emails to read;-) Which thread is it, I poked around but have not found it. What is the subject? -- “Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV”          - Michael Pollan, author of "In Defense of Food" _

Re: [CentOS] Centos v3.3 CD 2

2011-11-14 Thread Scott Silva
on 10/29/2004 5:55 AM Luis-Miguel Astudillo spake the following: > Sorry, I have been away for a while. has anyone fixed CD2 fotr CentOS v3.3 ? > CentOS 3.3 is out of production and off support... For a while now... ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos

Re: [CentOS] Centos v3.3 CD 2

2011-11-14 Thread Scott Silva
on 11/14/2011 4:09 PM Scott Silva spake the following: > on 10/29/2004 5:55 AM Luis-Miguel Astudillo spake the following: >> Sorry, I have been away for a while. has anyone fixed CD2 fotr CentOS v3.3 ? >> > CentOS 3.3 is out of production and off support... For a while now... Sorry... For some reas

Re: [CentOS] Redhat vs centos vs ubuntu

2011-11-14 Thread Edward Martinez
On 11/14/11 16:05, Alan McKay wrote: >> it's close to 200 replies. I'm new to centos so i had plenty of >> emails to read;-) > Which thread is it, I poked around but have not found it. > > What is the subject? > > scroll all the way down until you come to the first "redhat vs centos" e

Re: [CentOS] Centos v3.3 CD 2

2011-11-14 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Vreme: 11/15/2011 01:10 AM, Scott Silva piše: > on 11/14/2011 4:09 PM Scott Silva spake the following: >> on 10/29/2004 5:55 AM Luis-Miguel Astudillo spake the following: >>> Sorry, I have been away for a while. has anyone fixed CD2 fotr CentOS v3.3 ? >>> >> CentOS 3.3 is out of production and off

Re: [CentOS] Redhat vs centos vs ubuntu

2011-11-14 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Vreme: 11/15/2011 02:39 AM, Edward Martinez piše: > On 11/14/11 16:05, Alan McKay wrote: >>> it's close to 200 replies. I'm new to centos so i had plenty of >>> emails to read;-) >> Which thread is it, I poked around but have not found it. >> >> What is the subject? >> >> > scroll all t

Re: [CentOS] Centos v3.3 CD 2

2011-11-14 Thread Jonathan Nilsson
> Nice mail database... apparently the mail client has some "nice" features too: > on 11/14/2011 4:09 PM Scott Silva spake the following: > >> on 10/29/2004 5:55 AM Luis-Miguel Astudillo spake the following: > wouldst thou be willing to divulge thy mail client and/or plugin which spake in such

[CentOS] Changes at Red Hat confouding CentOS (was: What happened to 6.1)

2011-11-14 Thread Alan McKay
These seems to me to be the first message in the series and provides a really good summary of the changes at Red Hat which seem to be making life a lot more difficult for CentOS. Just figured I'd pull it out of that thread and change the subject line. Below Johnny's email I've copied another from

[CentOS] Centos 5.7--desktop icons are now a blank sheet of paper with the .desktop filename and they don't work

2011-11-14 Thread fred smith
Just rebooted my box (switched keyboards, and since it's a PS/2 keyboard, it needs to be done at poweroff) and when it came back up, (almost) all the desktop icons I've created (as distinct from the ones that came with the system) now don't display correctly. Instead of the graphic assigned to eac

Re: [CentOS] Changes at Red Hat confouding CentOS (was: What happened to 6.1)

2011-11-14 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Alan McKay wrote: > Basically from what I gather, while Red Hat cannot restrict access to > sources, they can restrict access to binaries.  And since CentOS has a > goal of binary compatibility with upstream, they are essentially left > trying to hit an unknown ta

Re: [CentOS] Changes at Red Hat confouding CentOS (was: What happened to 6.1)

2011-11-14 Thread Alan McKay
> Both CentOS and Scientific Linux *aim* at 100% binary compatibility > and they are both doing their best toward that goal. However, neither > is perfect. That's interesting. So how is it they've managed to come out with 6.1 (and so long ago at that)? -- “Don't eat anything you've ever seen a

Re: [CentOS] Centos v3.3 CD 2

2011-11-14 Thread Peter Eckel
Hi Jonathan, > wouldst thou be willing to divulge thy mail client and/or plugin which > spake in such a manner? thou shalt read the headers: > Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:8.0) Gecko/2005 Thunderbird/8.0 Peter. ___ CentOS mailing list CentO