Re: [CentOS] Archive mail format?

2011-11-03 Thread John Doe
From: Les Mikesell > I have a bunch of old mail spread variously across dovecot maildirs > and mbox format files on several machines that are headed for the > trash.  Is there anything considered to be a portable archive format > for mail messages, and if so are there tools to copy into it - or d

Re: [CentOS] Centos Firewall - router with virtual IP

2011-11-03 Thread News
Il 03/11/2011 3.34, Fajar Priyanto ha scritto: > Hi all, > I haven't found anything in Google about this. > > I'm creating a firewall router with Centos with few virtual IP using iptables. > > May I ask for your experience? > Is there any pitfall or bad side of using virtual IP for this purpose? >

Re: [CentOS] Archive mail format?

2011-11-03 Thread Timothy Murphy
Les Mikesell wrote: > I have a bunch of old mail spread variously across dovecot maildirs > and mbox format files on several machines that are headed for the > trash. Is there anything considered to be a portable archive format > for mail messages, and if so are there tools to copy into it - or d

[CentOS] CentOS-5.7 + megaraid + SELinux : update problem

2011-11-03 Thread Philippe Naudin
Hello, After updating to CentOS-5.7, I have a (small) problem : The context of /dev/megadev0 is now defined (in /etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts) as system_u:object_r:removable_device_t:s0. This cause smartmontools to fail : avc: denied { read write } for pid=2847 comm="sm

Re: [CentOS] Centos Firewall - router with virtual IP

2011-11-03 Thread Lorenzo Martínez Rodríguez
El 03/11/11 11:16, News escribió: > Il 03/11/2011 3.34, Fajar Priyanto ha scritto: >> Hi all, >> I haven't found anything in Google about this. >> >> I'm creating a firewall router with Centos with few virtual IP using >> iptables. >> >> May I ask for your experience? >> Is there any pitfall or ba

Re: [CentOS] VirtualBox on CentOS 6.0?

2011-11-03 Thread John Hodrien
On Thu, 3 Nov 2011, Christopher Chan wrote: > How many cores assigned? VT-X/AMD-V enabled? Hardware? Typically 1, yes VT-X is enabled, Core2Duo/Core2Quad and some newer Nehalem based Xeons. IO-apic is enabled as Win7 64bit wouldn't boot with our image without it. jh

Re: [CentOS] Archive mail format?

2011-11-03 Thread Les Mikesell
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > Les Mikesell wrote: > >> I have a bunch of old mail spread variously across dovecot maildirs >> and mbox format files on several machines that are headed for the >> trash.  Is there anything considered to be a portable archive format >> for m

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-5.7 + megaraid + SELinux : update problem

2011-11-03 Thread Daniel J Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/03/2011 08:28 AM, Philippe Naudin wrote: > Hello, > > After updating to CentOS-5.7, I have a (small) problem : > > The context of /dev/megadev0 is now defined (in > /etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts) as > system_u:object_r:rem

Re: [CentOS] Centos Firewall - router with virtual IP

2011-11-03 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Vreme: 11/03/2011 11:16 AM, News piše: > Il 03/11/2011 3.34, Fajar Priyanto ha scritto: >> Hi all, >> I haven't found anything in Google about this. >> >> I'm creating a firewall router with Centos with few virtual IP using >> iptables. >> >> May I ask for your experience? >> Is there any pitfall

Re: [CentOS] Archive mail format?

2011-11-03 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Wed, 2 Nov 2011, John R Pierce wrote: > On 11/02/11 3:43 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: >> I understand the file types and contents - but was hoping that by >> now there would be a standard file type that didn't have to be >> 'imported' to a mail reader's message store before being accessed. > > wel

Re: [CentOS] Archive mail format?

2011-11-03 Thread Windsor Dave L. (AdP/TEF7.1)
On 11/2/2011 4:42 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: >> Vreme: 11/02/2011 07:53 PM, Phoenix, Merka piše: > I have a bunch of old mail spread variously across dovecot maildirs and > mbox format files on several machines that are headed fo

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 81, Issue 3

2011-11-03 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ..

Re: [CentOS] Intel wireless firmware

2011-11-03 Thread Scott Silva
on 10/29/2011 10:41 AM Ron Loftin spake the following: > > This may not be the best place to ask, but Google hasn't given me any > useful information. > > I have an "older" laptop that is using the Intel 2200 wireless > interface. I installed CentOS 5 on it some time ago and everything is > fine.

Re: [CentOS] Centos Firewall - router with virtual IP

2011-11-03 Thread me
On Thu, 3 Nov 2011, Lorenzo Martínez Rodríguez wrote: El 03/11/11 11:16, News escribió: Hi all, I haven't found anything in Google about this. I'm creating a firewall router with Centos with few virtual IP using iptables. May I ask for your experience? Is there any pitfall or bad side of usin

Re: [CentOS] Centos Firewall - router with virtual IP

2011-11-03 Thread John R Pierce
On 11/02/11 7:34 PM, Fajar Priyanto wrote: > I'm creating a firewall router with Centos with few virtual IP using iptables. > > May I ask for your experience? > Is there any pitfall or bad side of using virtual IP for this purpose? > I'm using few virtual IP to accommodate few subnets that go throu

Re: [CentOS] Centos Firewall - router with virtual IP

2011-11-03 Thread Fajar Priyanto
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 6:59 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 11/02/11 7:34 PM, Fajar Priyanto wrote: >> I'm creating a firewall router with Centos with few virtual IP using >> iptables. >> >> May I ask for your experience? >> Is there any pitfall or bad side of using virtual IP for this purpose? >>

Re: [CentOS] Centos Firewall - router with virtual IP

2011-11-03 Thread John R Pierce
On 11/03/11 5:43 PM, Fajar Priyanto wrote: > Now, I'm adding some virtual interface eth1:0, eth1:1... so on to > accommodate new subnets created in the LAN. whats the point of having multiple subnets on the same physical LAN segment ? if you want to isolate separate local networks, you really

Re: [CentOS] Centos Firewall - router with virtual IP

2011-11-03 Thread KevinO
On 11/03/2011 06:54 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 11/03/11 5:43 PM, Fajar Priyanto wrote: >> Now, I'm adding some virtual interface eth1:0, eth1:1... so on to >> accommodate new subnets created in the LAN. > > whats the point of having multiple subnets on the same physical LAN > segment ? if yo

[CentOS] Can't run fail2ban 0.8.4 [CentOS 6]

2011-11-03 Thread Kévin GASPARD
Hi, To begin I'm sorry for my poor English level, that's not my first language. On CentOS 6 I've installed fail2ban 0.8.4 from EPEL repository. I've configured it with this page : http://centoshelp.org/security/fail2ban/ Then I've tried this command : chkconfig --level 23 fail2ban on && servic

Re: [CentOS] Centos Firewall - router with virtual IP

2011-11-03 Thread Fajar Priyanto
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 10:15 AM, KevinO wrote: >> anyways, whatever, yes, you can do it with iptables, but not all off the >> shelf firewall script generators will support multiple LAN subnets.   I >> usually write my own iptables rulesets. >> > I can say first hand that fwbuilder easily handles m

[CentOS] Knowledge Base Software

2011-11-03 Thread Camron W. Fox
Alle, We recently received a requirement to implement a KB/FAQ solution that must: Web based Be searchable Allow registration of users Keep a history of user queries Allow new queries sent to subject matter experts via email and receive email updates when answers have been posted.

Re: [CentOS] Centos Firewall - router with virtual IP

2011-11-03 Thread KevinO
On 11/03/2011 08:03 PM, Fajar Priyanto wrote: > On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 10:15 AM, KevinO wrote: >>> anyways, whatever, yes, you can do it with iptables, but not all off the >>> shelf firewall script generators will support multiple LAN subnets. I >>> usually write my own iptables rulesets. >>> >>