Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Bug Fix Announcements

2011-10-31 Thread Ian Stirling
On 28/10/2011 23:15, Lamar Owen wrote: > FWIW, announcements or no announcements, I've been pretty happy to see the > updates coming through CR, and I thank you and the team for this. Back when > it was first mentioned I wasn't actually too enthralled with the idea, but > what a difference a fe

Re: [CentOS] read failed after messages of non existing harddisks

2011-10-31 Thread Götz Reinicke
Hi, a cat /proc/partitions shows the two disks. They were direct connected to an scsi port. (Old ide 2 scsi Raids). I disconnected tham a long time ago and never worried about the errors, as the system was up and running very smooth. But now I connect other iscsi systems and the dmes and log is

Re: [CentOS] Duplicated packages in CR repo?

2011-10-31 Thread Patrick Hurrelmann
On 28.10.2011 15:42, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 10/28/2011 02:31 PM, Tom Brown wrote: >> do you have a list of the bad packages so that i can remove them from >> our spacewalk before they cause us an issue? > > sure, here is the list I removed : > > ./x86_64/RPMS/xorg-x11-server-Xnest-1.7.7-29el6

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

2011-10-31 Thread William Warren
On 10/30/2011 8:33 PM, Christopher Chan wrote: > On Sunday, October 30, 2011 08:38 PM, William Warren wrote: > >> Or move to another distro that has timely security updates and long term >> support like Centos. > What...Ubuntu "LTS"? > ___ > CentOS mailin

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading MySQL

2011-10-31 Thread John Doe
From: Jack Fredrikson > Upon trying to run django, I get this error: > ImproperlyConfigured: MySQLdb-1.2.1p2 or newer is required; you have 1.2.1 > If I run yum update mysql I don't upgrade (expected). What do? Why are you trying to update mysql when the error says 'MySQLdb'? Check also the versi

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

2011-10-31 Thread Lamar Owen
On Monday, October 31, 2011 07:46:59 AM William Warren wrote: > Like I said before It it too > bad RH is doing what they are doing. It is going to mean the death of > RHEL rebuilds...look at what is happening to Centos. Per Johnny's > statement they can't truly maintain 100% binary compatibili

Re: [CentOS] read failed after messages of non existing harddisks

2011-10-31 Thread Richard Mollel
I would assume you have rebooted since removing the drives, in which case they should not be seen by "cat /proc/partition", which is a representation of scanned disks during bootup, unless you have other drives still connected that you are not aware of? "cat /proc/scsi/scsi" should help in narro

[CentOS] c6-cr kernel update -- joystick enabled?

2011-10-31 Thread Frank Cox
Does the new kernel in the Centos 6 cr repository have the joystick enabled again, or is the rpm from elrepo still required to use one? -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com www.creekfm.com - FIFTY THOUSAND WATTS of POW WOW POWER! ___

[CentOS] CentOS Download Mirrors

2011-10-31 Thread Jonathan Vomacka
Guys, Is there a difference between CentOS 6.0 and centos 6 on the mirror list? Each mirror seems to have a folder for 6.0 and 6 separately. http://mirrors.lga7.us.voxel.net/centos/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mail

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Download Mirrors

2011-10-31 Thread John R Pierce
On 10/31/11 12:46 PM, Jonathan Vomacka wrote: > Is there a difference between CentOS 6.0 and centos 6 on the mirror > list? Each mirror seems to have a folder for 6.0 and 6 separately. same difference for now. $ ls -l 6 6.0 6: total 8 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Jul 10 16:59 centospl

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

2011-10-31 Thread Ron Blizzard
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 7:36 AM, William Warren > I think many of us would like to see releases in a timely manner. > Centos is now months behind in nearly every version with the onset of > cent6.  I've started moving boxes to ubuntu due to this increasing > delay.  The security of many machines is

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

2011-10-31 Thread Craig White
On Oct 31, 2011, at 1:50 PM, Ron Blizzard wrote: > On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 7:36 AM, William Warren >> I think many of us would like to see releases in a timely manner. >> Centos is now months behind in nearly every version with the onset of >> cent6. I've started moving boxes to ubuntu due to th

Re: [CentOS] openldap missing modules

2011-10-31 Thread Wessel van der Aart
thanks for the tip, does this dynamic configuration come with openldap 2.4? the version they use in the book is 2.3 which is also the version on centos 5.7 so i guess i'm safe there , but now i'm wondering if this isn't too outdated. does it make's sense to start with learning an older version? i'

[CentOS] NSS ldap problems

2011-10-31 Thread Mitch Patenaude
I'm having trouble setting up ldap based authenication. I have a virtual (KVM) CentOS 5.4 box set up to authenticate to a 389 (fedora) directory server, and that works fine. However, I set up a virtual box running CentOS 6, and I can't get it to authenicate. I've run authconfig with the approp

Re: [CentOS] openldap missing modules

2011-10-31 Thread Craig White
For learning purposes, I think the flat file is much easier to master. I thought Apple's Open-Directory was forked from an older version of OpenLDAP (perhaps 2.1.x). I gather that upstream 6.x and thus CentOS 6.x is using OpenLDAP 2.4.x and probably also dynamic configuration but I haven't inst

Re: [CentOS] ibm m1015 w/sandy bridge boot failure

2011-10-31 Thread Matt Garman
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 09:18:56AM -0500, Matt Garman wrote: > I have a server running CentOS 6.0. Last night I replaced the CPU and > motherboard. Old hardware: Supermicro x8sil-f + x3440. New hardware: > Supermicro x9scl+-f + E3-1230. This is a new Sandy Bridge Xeon. > > Everything else rema

Re: [CentOS] NSS ldap problems

2011-10-31 Thread Craig White
On Oct 31, 2011, at 3:10 PM, Mitch Patenaude wrote: > I'm having trouble setting up ldap based authenication. > > I have a virtual (KVM) CentOS 5.4 box set up to authenticate to a 389 > (fedora) directory server, and that works fine. > > However, I set up a virtual box running CentOS 6, and I

Re: [CentOS] NSS ldap problems

2011-10-31 Thread Jack Bailey
On 10/31/2011 4:46 PM, Craig White wrote: >> Here are the ldap related packaged installed on the 6.0 box: >> > [root@vburntest02 ~]# rpm -qa | grep ldap >> > openldap-2.4.19-15.el6_0.2.x86_64 >> > pam_ldap-185-5.el6.x86_64 >> > nss-pam-ldapd-0.7.5-3.el6.x86_64 >> > openldap-clients-2.4.19-15.e

Re: [CentOS] NSS ldap problems

2011-10-31 Thread Trey Dockendorf
One difference I ran into with samba authentication is in cent 5 /etc/pam.d/system-auth-ac is the file to change but in cent 6 its /etc/pam.d/password-auth-ac. I found that changes I made only to system-auth-ac in 5 had to be made to both system-auth-ac and password-auth-ac in 6. This was to have

[CentOS] redhat vs centos

2011-10-31 Thread Bob Hoffman
I have been reading the threads on here with great ernest about redhat making a move to throw off centos compilations. I read some stories about microsoft wanting to work closer with centos http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/05/17/microsoft_and_centos/ I have to update to centos 6 due to some need

Re: [CentOS] redhat vs centos

2011-10-31 Thread Eero Volotinen
2011/11/1 Bob Hoffman : > I have been reading the threads on here with great ernest about redhat > making a move to throw off centos compilations. > I read some stories about microsoft wanting to work closer with centos > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/05/17/microsoft_and_centos/ > > I have to u