Re: [CentOS] Intel wireless firmware

2011-10-30 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Vreme: 10/30/2011 02:23 AM, Ron Loftin piše: > I don't see a way to file an issue on the repoforge Web site. I just > filed an RFE with ELRepo to ask for this. Note in Repoforge's spec says: "EL6 ships with ipw2200-firmware-3.1-4.el6" so there is no need to update it, it should work out of the b

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

2011-10-30 Thread William Warren
On 10/21/2011 9:23 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 10/21/2011 06:25 AM, Steve Walsh wrote: >> On 10/21/2011 10:16 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: >>> Vreme: 10/21/2011 12:25 PM, Fajar Priyanto pis(e: >>> As far as I am aware, how I understood official explanation, packages >>> that are introduced in C

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

2011-10-30 Thread William Warren
On 10/21/2011 10:17 AM, Giles Coochey wrote: > On Fri, October 21, 2011 16:02, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: >> >> Giles Coochey wrote: >>> So Centos 6.0 is EOL? >> not familiar with the rhel life cycle are you? >> Read this: >> https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata/ >>

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

2011-10-30 Thread William Warren
On 10/21/2011 12:54 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 10/21/2011 10:01 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg >> wrote: >> Johnny, chill. I don't blame him for being confused. Up until right now, you updated to a point release, then, over the weeks

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

2011-10-30 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Vreme: 10/30/2011 01:44 PM, William Warren piše: > And that Johnny has been the answer we have been requesting for a > long time now. I figured the upstream packaging changes broke your > systems even when lance said that wasn't the case. The results speak > for themselves. Nothing against t

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

2011-10-30 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Vreme: 10/30/2011 01:36 PM, William Warren piše: > I think many of us would like to see releases in a timely manner. > Centos is now months behind in nearly every version with the onset of > cent6. I've started moving boxes to ubuntu due to this increasing > delay. The security of many machines i

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

2011-10-30 Thread Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
On 10/30/2011 02:14 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > Vreme: 10/30/2011 01:44 PM, William Warren piše: >> And that Johnny has been the answer we have been requesting for a >> long time now. I figured the upstream packaging changes broke your >> systems even when lance said that wasn't the case.

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

2011-10-30 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Vreme: 10/30/2011 03:46 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn piše: > On 10/30/2011 02:14 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: >> I do not think there is much to be worried for now. Most/all security >> patches will come out fairly fast now that CR repo is in place. >> >> If need be, there can always be another repo

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

2011-10-30 Thread Christopher Chan
On Monday, October 31, 2011 12:11 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > Vreme: 10/30/2011 03:46 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn piše: >> On 10/30/2011 02:14 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: >>> I do not think there is much to be worried for now. Most/all security >>> patches will come out fairly fast now that C

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

2011-10-30 Thread Christopher Chan
On Sunday, October 30, 2011 04:31 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Craig White wrote: >>> >>> >>> /me is puzzled. You spelt it correctly. Maybe not so keen on learning >>> the intricacies of Debian and the 'Debian way'. >> >> Linux is still Linux and while there is s

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

2011-10-30 Thread Christopher Chan
On Sunday, October 30, 2011 08:38 PM, William Warren wrote: > Or move to another distro that has timely security updates and long term > support like Centos. What...Ubuntu "LTS"? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/