From: John R Pierce
> On a CentOS 6 64bit system, I added a couple prototype SAS SSDs on a HP
> P411 raid controller ...
> Disk Name: /dev/sdc
> ...
Just wondering how come the array is detected as /dev/sd* instead of the
classical /dev/cciss/c0d*...
Is the P411 a fake raid?
JD
On 10/25/11 2:16 AM, John Doe wrote:
> Just wondering how come the array is detected as /dev/sd* instead of the
> classical /dev/cciss/c0d*...
> Is the P411 a fake raid?
no, its a seriously fast pci-e SAS2 hardware raid. the physical
devices don't show at all. it has 1GB of writeback cache th
From: John R Pierce
> On 10/25/11 2:16 AM, John Doe wrote:
>> Just wondering how come the array is detected as /dev/sd* instead of the
> classical /dev/cciss/c0d*...
>> Is the P411 a fake raid?
>
> no, its a seriously fast pci-e SAS2 hardware raid. the physical
> devices don't show at all.
Can PHP 5.3.3 be installed on CentOS 5.3, or is it not compatable, and if
so what is the recommended version of CentOS to use?
Thanks,
Robert Anstruther.
SQA Dalkeith is moving. From 21 November 2011 our address will be;
Lowden, 24 Wester Shawfair, Dalkeith, Midlothian, EH22 1FD.
There i
> De: "Bob Anstruther"
> À: centos@centos.org
> Envoyé: Mardi 25 Octobre 2011 12:48:26
> Objet: [CentOS] PHP 5.3.3 question
> Can PHP 5.3.3 be installed on CentOS 5.3, or is it not compatable, and
> if
> so what is the recommended version of CentOS to use?
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Robert Anst
Hi, thank you for the quick response, it will save me time trying to make
things work on CentOS 5.3, as I have been looking at several sites through
google which did not give any definitive information.
thanks,
Robert Anstruther.
SQA Dalkeith is moving. From 21 November 2011 our address will
On 10/25/11 3:20 AM, John Doe wrote:
> Indeed, nice specs.
> How much does it cost...?
it was bundled with a DL180G6 server, I'd have to dig out the quotes to
find the controller price, but I'm seeming to remember about $500
--
john r pierceN 37, W 122
santa cruz c
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:56:54PM +0200, Baptiste AGASSE wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> You must upgrade your box to the latest 5.x version (currently 5.7),
> the php53 (php 5.3.3) package is provided in the main repo.
Can you please learn to properly trim your replies and remove extraneous
text? Thank yo
On 10/25/11 3:48 AM, bob.anstrut...@sqa.org.uk wrote:
> Can PHP 5.3.3 be installed on CentOS 5.3, or is it not compatable, and if
> so what is the recommended version of CentOS to use?
First, run
yum update
to update to 5.7, you're like 2-3 years behind in security and core updates.
seco
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 04:07:07AM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 10/25/11 3:48 AM, bob.anstrut...@sqa.org.uk wrote:
> > Can PHP 5.3.3 be installed on CentOS 5.3, or is it not compatable, and if
> > so what is the recommended version of CentOS to use?
>
> First, run
> yum update
I would
On 10/25/2011 12:20 PM, John Doe wrote:
> Guess this new ctrl does not use the cciss module anymore.
>
If it's like a P410i like what I have it uses the hpsa driver.
Mogens
--
Mogens Kjaer, m...@lemo.dk
http://www.lemo.dk
___
CentOS mailing list
CentO
On 10/25/11 4:48 AM, Mogens Kjaer wrote:
> On 10/25/2011 12:20 PM, John Doe wrote:
>> > Guess this new ctrl does not use the cciss module anymore.
>> >
> If it's like a P410i like what I have it uses the hpsa driver.
yes, says as much on that lspci -v output I pasted earlier tonight in
this thre
YOu will have to do it on the virbr side, if it does not pick it up
automatically. If the bond is set to be your default route, it may just
"do the right thing". More surprising things have happened...
On Mon, 24 Oct 2011, Bob Hoffman wrote:
> Interested in bonding my 2 on board nics along with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks,
Im trying to get the sealert browser to show up on my desktop, but I cant get
it to work.
I have installed all setroubleshoot packages, which provides sealert
and im running sealert -b from the command line over a GUI session on gnome and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/25/2011 10:02 AM, Jeronimo Calvo wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Im trying to get the sealert browser to show up on my desktop, but
> I cant get it to work.
>
> I have installed all setroubleshoot packages, which provides
> sealert
>
> and im running s
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 12:18 +0200, Giles Coochey wrote:
> On Fri, October 21, 2011 12:14, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 16:43 -0400, Al wrote:
> >> Anyone have an update tutorial/howto for samba to authenticate to ldap?
> > This are lots of docs.
> > But DO NOT DO T.
> > A Sa
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25 Oct 2011, at 15:39, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> On 10/25/2011 10:02 AM, Jeronimo Calvo wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> Im trying to get the sealert browser to show up on my desktop, but
>> I cant get it to work.
>>
>> I have installed all setroubleshoot
Jim Wildman wrote
-
YOu will have to do it on the virbr side, if it does not pick it up
automatically. If the bond is set to be your default route, it may just
"do the right thing". More surprising things have happened...
On Mon, 24 Oct 2011, Bob Hoffman wrote:
>/ I
On 10/25/2011 10:48 AM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
> Still working on a solution. Apparently the bond files demand an
> ipaddress, thus there might have to be one for each and
> every single ip coming into the computer...I guess you would have to do
> that anyway just like
> eth0, eth0:0, eth0:1, etc.
> I
On Tuesday, October 25, 2011 11:38 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>> Samba 4 is currently not yet in a state where it can replace existing
>> production deployments. [1]
>> [1] http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4#Current_Status
>
> That is the official story - but try it - it works *BETTER* tha
On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 07:57 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 25, 2011 11:38 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> >> Samba 4 is currently not yet in a state where it can replace existing
> >> production deployments. [1]
> >> [1] http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4#Current_Status
>
On Wednesday, October 26, 2011 10:16 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 07:57 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
>> On Tuesday, October 25, 2011 11:38 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
Samba 4 is currently not yet in a state where it can replace existing
production deployment
I'm still going to stick to trying to get Samba3 and try and get
openldap to work. I've got it going in my test environment with a
clean install of samba and openldap. I'm currently making the
modifications to a dev. version of the production ldap database to see
if I can get it working w
24 matches
Mail list logo
