On a CentOS 6 64bit system, I added a couple prototype SAS SSDs on a HP
P411 raid controller (I believe this is a rebranded LSI megaraid with HP
firmware) and am trying to format them for best random IO performance
with something like postgresql.
so, I used the raid command tool to build a raid
Maybe try to partition it to see what happens.
On 10/23/2011 12:07 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On a CentOS 6 64bit system, I added a couple prototype SAS SSDs on a HP
> P411 raid controller (I believe this is a rebranded LSI megaraid with HP
> firmware) and am trying to format them for best rand
On 10/23/11 12:23 AM, Ken godee wrote:
> Maybe try to partition it to see what happens.
with parted at least, I'm stuck with a vicious circle that won't let me
align the data right?
# parted /dev/sdc
GNU Parted 2.1
Using /dev/sdc
Welcome to GNU Parted! Type 'help' to view a list of commands.
(pa
Vreme: 10/23/2011 02:35 AM, Yves Bellefeuille piše:
> I've seen your correction, but I still don't understand where
> this .Trash-root directory comes from.
>
> The user says that he's running CentOS 5.7 and Gnome, but under Gnome
> the trash directory is simply named .Trash, not .Trash-root, and
>
On 10/23/11 2:24 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> My observation is that .Trash is for normal users and .Trash-root is
> when you delete as Root. I sometimes use Krusader (under Gnome) in root
> mode, and that could account for .Thrash-root in my case. Maybe he did
> something similar.
whem I use
On 10/23/2011 09:48 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 10/23/11 12:23 AM, Ken godee wrote:
>> Maybe try to partition it to see what happens.
>
> with parted at least, I'm stuck with a vicious circle that won't let me
> align the data right?
Didn't parted have issues with alignment? Here are two links w
On 21/10/2011 16:27, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Giles Coochey wrote:
I have two Centos 6 servers running BIND.
I have configured the two servers to run internal zones as a master /
slave setup.
My gateway runs DNSmasq and I would like all other requests for lookups t
Vreme: 10/23/2011 01:18 PM, Giles Coochey piše:
> On 21/10/2011 16:27, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Your servers running bind should be able to resolve outside names
>> with or without a forwarder if they have internet access. Are you
>> sure /etc/resolv.conf is pointing to the right nameservers? Try
>>
Hello,
I'm researching the best method of providing about 20 users in a production
environment the same functionality as they would have on a Netapp NFS share.
The O/S I will be using is CentOS 5 or 6 (max flex on which one) and the
hardware is a disk array directly (12 SAS disks 7TB un-configu
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Scott McKenzie wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm researching the best method of providing about 20 users in a production
> environment the same functionality as they would have on a Netapp NFS share.
> The O/S I will be using is CentOS 5 or 6 (max flex on which one) and t
Hi Giles,
Am 23.10.2011 um 13:18 schrieb Giles Coochey :
> ugg
> ... turns out I had a rather embarassing typo in named.conf... it all works
> now.
that tends to happen pretty easily, I know. When I do changes to the BIND
configs, I made a habit of using named-checkconf/named-checkzone every t
For those of you that still are running CentOS 4... I have one system
that is still going... there is a problem with the newest release of
Dovecot under mbox. Certain spam is causing this error when users try to
log on.
file lib.c: line 37 (nearest_power): assertion failed: (num <=
((size_t)1
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 09:56:52AM -0400, Scott McKenzie wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm researching the best method of providing about 20 users in a
> production environment the same functionality as they would have on a
> Netapp NFS share. The O/S I will be using is CentOS 5 or 6 (max flex
> on whic
Hello, is mandatory for you to use Linux?
I am using FreeNAS to share ZFS volumes via NFS and CIFS and it works
really great!
Regards,
El 23/10/11 20:33, Ray Van Dolson escribió:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 09:56:52AM -0400, Scott McKenzie wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm researching the best method of
On 10/23/11 4:00 AM, Patrick Lists wrote:
> Didn't parted have issues with alignment? Here are two links with info
> about alignment of SSDs which I found helpful in the past:
parted handles alignment as well or better than fdisk, which that blog
suggested using.
anyways, I have it formatted and
Look into XFS+LVM.
For XFS, you'll have to yum it via;
yum install kmod-xfs xfs-progs xfs-dump
This is in the centosplus repo.
- aurf
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 6:56 AM, Scott McKenzie wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm researching the best method of providing about 20 users in a production
> environmen
On 10/23/11 7:52 PM, aurf alien wrote:
> Look into XFS+LVM.
>
> For XFS, you'll have to yum it via;
>
> yum install kmod-xfs xfs-progs xfs-dump
>
> This is in the centosplus repo.
XFS is native in C6, you just need xfs-utils from Base
--
john r pierceN 37, W 122
san
17 matches
Mail list logo
