Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Everything's being rolled into the CR repo, so there do not appear to be > any "ordinary" 6.0 updates. well yes: upstream is at 6.1, so updates are happening for 6.1 and 6.0 won't receive any more "ordinary upates". The update path for 6.0 is through 6.1 . centos is off

[CentOS] Missing stuff in /bin

Hi all Having a weird issue with CentOS 6. I lost a lot of stuff in /bin/ (cp,rpm,cat and others) on one host, but that was a development machine and I'm not really sure what happened there. But now I ran into a similar problem (missing at least /bin/vi and /bin/cp) on a host where I'm a lot more

[CentOS] Centos 6 - named with internal zone file and forwarding

Hi All, I have two Centos 6 servers running BIND. I have configured the two servers to run internal zones as a master / slave setup. My gateway runs DNSmasq and I would like all other requests for lookups to be sent to the DNSmasq system. I have added the following: forward first; forwarders

Re: [CentOS] Back up system

On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 16:43 +0300, Damas Ally wrote: > I have centos 5.7 (server). I need to configure it for backup system, that > means it have to back up or back up documents shall be posted or send to > this server from various users (clients using windows machine and ubuntu). > Can someone hel

Re: [CentOS] Samba + Openldap

On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 16:43 -0400, Al wrote: > Anyone have an update tutorial/howto for samba to authenticate to ldap? This are lots of docs. But DO NOT DO IT. A Samba 3.x DC is very very *obsolete*. The Windows world has moved on to Active Directory. If you want to do that you need Samba 4

Re: [CentOS] Samba + Openldap

On Fri, October 21, 2011 12:14, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 16:43 -0400, Al wrote: >> Anyone have an update tutorial/howto for samba to authenticate to ldap? > > This are lots of docs. > > But DO NOT DO IT. > > A Samba 3.x DC is very very *obsolete*. The Windows world has mo

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

On 10/21/2011 06:09 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: > well yes: upstream is at 6.1, so updates are happening for 6.1 and 6.0 > won't receive any more "ordinary upates". The update path for 6.0 is > through 6.1 . > centos is offering CR which allows you to stay up-to-date even though > C6.1 is not r

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Steve Walsh wrote: > Except. > > If you have a 6.0 machine, and enable the cr/ repo, then you don't just > get the 6.0 updates. You get most of the post-6.0 updates, plus what's > been built for 6.1 (effectively still in QA), plus some post 6.1 updates > (Again, st

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.7 Ethernet bonding - order of enslavement matters?

On 10/19/11, whitivery wrote: > Thank you for the reply, but I don't think that this is the issue. > Otherwise bonding failover wouldn't work at all. When enslaved in order > eth1 eth0, bonding and link detection work properly - with eth0 set as > primary, I pull the eth0 cable, it switches to et

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

On 10/20/2011 01:47 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Jerry Geis wrote: >>Hi gang - Love CentOS - you guys to a fabulous job. >> >> It has been a while since I saw any update... >> I went to twitter.com/centos nothing there, >> twitter.com/centos6 nothing there, >> went to the qa calendar stuff not

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

On 21.10.2011 13:00, Steve Clark wrote: > On 10/20/2011 01:47 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Jerry Geis wrote: >>>Hi gang - Love CentOS - you guys to a fabulous job. >>> >>> It has been a while since I saw any update... >>> I went to twitter.com/centos nothing there, >>> twitter.com/centos6 not

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

- "Steve Clark" escreveu: > De: "Steve Clark" > Para: "CentOS mailing list" > Enviadas: Sexta-feira, 21 de Outubro de 2011 9:00:00 (GMT-0300) Auto-Detected > Assunto: Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1 > > Is there a package for the cr repo? I don't see anything like that > when I do a yum

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

Vreme: 10/21/2011 12:25 PM, Fajar Priyanto piše: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Steve Walsh wrote: >> Except. >> >> If you have a 6.0 machine, and enable the cr/ repo, then you don't just >> get the 6.0 updates. You get most of the post-6.0 updates, plus what's >> been built for 6.1 (effective

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

On 10/21/2011 10:16 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > Vreme: 10/21/2011 12:25 PM, Fajar Priyanto pis(e: > As far as I am aware, how I understood official explanation, packages > that are introduced in CR repo already PASSED QA testing, but are in > limbo because there are issues with building ISO N

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

Vreme: 10/21/2011 01:07 PM, Antonio da Silva Martins Junior piše: > > - "Steve Clark" escreveu: > >> De: "Steve Clark" >> Para: "CentOS mailing list" >> Enviadas: Sexta-feira, 21 de Outubro de 2011 9:00:00 (GMT-0300) Auto-Detected >> Assunto: Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1 >> >> Is there a

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

On 10/21/2011 06:36 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 10/21/2011 06:16 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: >> Vreme: 10/21/2011 12:25 PM, Fajar Priyanto piše: >>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Steve Walsh wrote: Except. If you have a 6.0 machine, and enable the cr/ repo, then you don't ju

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

On 10/21/2011 06:25 AM, Steve Walsh wrote: > On 10/21/2011 10:16 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: >> Vreme: 10/21/2011 12:25 PM, Fajar Priyanto pis(e: >> As far as I am aware, how I understood official explanation, packages >> that are introduced in CR repo already PASSED QA testing, but are in >> li

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

Vreme: 10/21/2011 03:09 PM, Johnny Hughes piše: >> we don't have a CR repo for centosplus ... and I do not see us creating >> one. We are building and testing the plus kernels too and they will be >> there on release of 6.1 ... or you can use the ones from toracat's repo. >> OK, thanks. I already

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

On Fri, October 21, 2011 15:23, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > There is SOME QA ... just not all the QA that they get as part of the > main release. > > They are not right off the build and into the server ... we do our > functionality test suite prior to pushing CR (and other tests, and look > for repo

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

On 10/21/2011 6:22 AM, Steve Walsh wrote: > > Except. > > If you have a 6.0 machine, and enable the cr/ repo, then you don't just > get the 6.0 updates. You get most of the post-6.0 updates, plus what's > been built for 6.1 (effectively still in QA), plus some post 6.1 updates > (Again, still in

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

On 10/21/2011 9:33 AM, Giles Coochey wrote: > > OK. So my question is. I have Centos 6.0 installed on a couple of systems. > > I have not modified any repos or installed any repos etc... > > Am I receiving security updates via 'yum update', which as far as I can > tell hasn't installed any updates

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

On Fri, October 21, 2011 15:39, Bowie Bailey wrote: > On 10/21/2011 9:33 AM, Giles Coochey wrote: >> >> OK. So my question is. I have Centos 6.0 installed on a couple of >> systems. >> >> I have not modified any repos or installed any repos etc... >> >> Am I receiving security updates via 'yum upda

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

On 10/21/2011 08:43 AM, Giles Coochey wrote: > On Fri, October 21, 2011 15:39, Bowie Bailey wrote: >> On 10/21/2011 9:33 AM, Giles Coochey wrote: >>> >>> OK. So my question is. I have Centos 6.0 installed on a couple of >>> systems. >>> >>> I have not modified any repos or installed any repos etc..

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

On 10/21/2011 9:43 AM, Giles Coochey wrote: > On Fri, October 21, 2011 15:39, Bowie Bailey wrote: >> On 10/21/2011 9:33 AM, Giles Coochey wrote: >>> OK. So my question is. I have Centos 6.0 installed on a couple of >>> systems. >>> >>> I have not modified any repos or installed any repos etc... >>>

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

On 10/21/2011 08:43 AM, Giles Coochey wrote: > On Fri, October 21, 2011 15:39, Bowie Bailey wrote: >> On 10/21/2011 9:33 AM, Giles Coochey wrote: >>> >>> OK. So my question is. I have Centos 6.0 installed on a couple of >>> systems. >>> >>> I have not modified any repos or installed any repos etc..

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

Giles Coochey wrote: > So Centos 6.0 is EOL? not familiar with the rhel life cycle are you? Read this: https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Missing stuff in /bin

From: Mikko Koivunen > Having a weird issue with CentOS 6. I lost a lot of stuff in /bin/ > (cp,rpm,cat and others) on one host, but that was a development > machine and I'm not really sure what happened there. > > - coreutils & vim-minimal are installed according to rpm Do you miss all coreuti

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

On Fri, October 21, 2011 16:02, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: > > > Giles Coochey wrote: >> So Centos 6.0 is EOL? > > not familiar with the rhel life cycle are you? > Read this: > https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata/ > ___ Thanks. I see

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

On 10/21/2011 09:17 AM, Giles Coochey wrote: > On Fri, October 21, 2011 16:02, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: >> >> >> Giles Coochey wrote: >>> So Centos 6.0 is EOL? >> >> not familiar with the rhel life cycle are you? >> Read this: >> https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata/ >> __

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

On Fri, October 21, 2011 16:24, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 10/21/2011 09:17 AM, Giles Coochey wrote: >> >> However, if I install whatever latest version of an operating system >> distribution. I expect to be able to run something that will give me >> stable security-updates for that distribution. >>

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 10/21/2011 09:17 AM, Giles Coochey wrote: >> On Fri, October 21, 2011 16:02, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: >>> Giles Coochey wrote: So Centos 6.0 is EOL? >> However, if I install whatever latest version of an operating system >> distribution. I expect to be able to run

Re: [CentOS] Missing stuff in /bin

On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 9:04 AM, John Doe wrote: > >> Having a weird issue with CentOS 6. I lost a lot of stuff in /bin/ >> (cp,rpm,cat and others) on one host, but that was a development >> machine and I'm not really sure what happened there. >> >> - coreutils & vim-minimal are installed accordin

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 8:33 AM, Giles Coochey wrote: > > If not, what do I need to do to get security updates? > > These are not production systems, but I don't want to break anything > unless it's broken already (i.e. security vulnerabilities and bug fixes). I think it is best to assume that al

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > Johnny, chill. I don't blame him for being confused. Up until right now, > you updated to a point release, then, over the weeks and months, there > were updates. All of a sudden, there are *no* updates for the 6.0 point > release, which is a major change in what everyone

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 9:33 AM, wrote: > >> There is nothing BETA about the CR repo ... it is the CR repo. > > Johnny, chill. I don't blame him for being confused. Up until right now, > you updated to a point release, then, over the weeks and months, there > were updates. All of a sudden, there

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: >> Johnny, chill. I don't blame him for being confused. Up until right now, >> you updated to a point release, then, over the weeks and months, there >> were updates. All of a sudden, there are *no* updates for the 6.0 point >> release,

Re: [CentOS] Back up system

On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > If you are backing up to disk be sure to take a look at SDFS > for your backend 'filessystem'.  Block level > duplication can be a *HUGE* win. > Backuppc does file-level dedup - and compression that contin

[CentOS] How to remove a Trash folder from a mounted ntfs partition

CentOS-5.7 using fuse-ntfs-3g I have a HDD from a laptop that is being returned for repair replacement. I wish to remove certain files before sending the laptop back with the HDD. I have mouunted the HDD on my desktop as an ntfs filesystem using an external SATA / USB adapter. As root I then us

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 - named with internal zone file and forwarding

On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Giles Coochey wrote: > > I have two Centos 6 servers running BIND. > > I have configured the two servers to run internal zones as a master / > slave setup. > > My gateway runs DNSmasq and I would like all other requests for lookups to > be sent to the DNSmasq syste

Re: [CentOS] Missing stuff in /bin

On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 5:04 PM, John Doe wrote: > From: Mikko Koivunen >> Having a weird issue with CentOS 6. I lost a lot of stuff in /bin/ >> - coreutils & vim-minimal are installed according to rpm > Do you miss all coreutils files or just a few...? > rpm -qV coreutils Good tip on the -qV op

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 80, Issue 9

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ..

Re: [CentOS] Missing stuff in /bin

On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 9:04 AM, John Doe wrote: >>> Having a weird issue with CentOS 6. I lost a lot of stuff in /bin/ >>> - coreutils & vim-minimal are installed according to rpm > This sounds like a local problem.  'rpm -Va' should show ev

Re: [CentOS] How to remove a Trash folder from a mounted ntfs partition

How about put the HDD back in the laptop, download and burn dban ( http://www.dban.org/download) to a CD and boot the laptop to the CD? Regards, Ron Young 919-621-9015 http://www.linkedin.com/in/ronhyoung +++ Little tiny dreams require little tiny thoughts and little tiny steps.

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

On 10/21/2011 10:01 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg > wrote: > >>> Johnny, chill. I don't blame him for being confused. Up until right now, >>> you updated to a point release, then, over the weeks and months, there >>> were updates. All of a sudden,

Re: [CentOS] Missing stuff in /bin

Mikko Koivunen wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 5:04 PM, John Doe wrote: >> From: Mikko Koivunen >>> Having a weird issue with CentOS 6. I lost a lot of stuff in /bin/ >>> - coreutils & vim-minimal are installed according to rpm >> Do you miss all coreutils files or just a few...? >> rpm -qV core

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 10/21/2011 10:01 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg >> wrote: >> Johnny, chill. I don't blame him for being confused. Up until right now, you updated to a point release, then, over

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

On Fri, 21 Oct 2011, Johnny Hughes wrote: > Yes, and NOW the release process is MUCH harder. [] Thanks for that explanation. I knew that Red Hat's internal development process was throwing wrenches in the CentOS build system, but I hadn't realized how systemic and legally complicated the d

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> > They have created an optional channel in several of those groupings that > is only accessible via RHN and they do not put those RPMS on any ISOs > ... and they have completely changed their "Authorized Use Policy" so > that we can NOT log

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

On 10/21/2011 12:20 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> >> They have created an optional channel in several of those groupings that >> is only accessible via RHN and they do not put those RPMS on any ISOs >> ... and they have completely changed thei

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

On 10/21/11 10:20 AM, "Les Mikesell" wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> >> They have created an optional channel in several of those groupings that >> is only accessible via RHN and they do not put those RPMS on any ISOs >> ... and they have completely changed th

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

Thanks, that is the part I was looking for also...I wish thee was someway that Redhat would work with folks to not make it so difficult, I realize that the original intent was to make it harder for Oracle and the likes but the end up hurting the community more than they hurt the big guys...bummer :

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

On 10/21/11 10:25 AM, "Johnny Hughes" wrote: > On 10/21/2011 12:20 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> They have created an optional channel in several of those groupings that >>> is only accessible via RHN and they do not put those RPMS on

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Gary Greene wrote: > >>> I've never quite understood how anything containing any GPL-covered >>> code could have any redistribution/use restrictions added. >>> >> Trust me ... the Linux Foundation thinks it is OK, so we are SOL. > > I'd rather get the opinion of t

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 10/21/2011 10:01 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg >> wrote: >> Johnny, chill. I don't blame him for being confused. Up until right now, you updated to a point release, then, over the weeks and months, there we

[CentOS] What happened to 6.1

On Fri, 21 Oct 2011, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 10/21/2011 12:20 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> They have created an optional channel in several of those >>> groupings that is only accessible via RHN and they do not >>> put those RPMS on an

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

On 10/21/2011 12:37 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Gary Greene > wrote: >> I've never quite understood how anything containing any GPL-covered code could have any redistribution/use restrictions added. >>> Trust me ... the Linux Foundation thinks it is O

[CentOS] What replaces /sbin/hotplug in CentOS 5?

What subsystem replaces /sbin/hotplug in CentOS 5? The older hotplug package is missing from CentOS 5 and /proc/sys/kernel/hotplug yields an empty string. Since hotpluging for standard devices still seems to work, I presume that something replaces the hotplug helper found on CentOS 4. Can someon

[CentOS] What happened to 6.1

On Fri, 21 Oct 2011, Gary Greene wrote: >> Trust me ... the Linux Foundation thinks it is OK, so we are SOL. > I'd rather get the opinion of the FSF (those whom wrote the > license) instead of LF, as they don't matter as much, > really. Feel free to approach whoever you wish on your own accoun

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 1:04 PM, R P Herrold wrote: > >>> I've never quite understood how anything containing any >>> GPL-covered code could have any redistribution/use >>> restrictions added. > > The GPL, v2, only requires access to sources where one is > providing binaries Where do you see an e

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

On 10/21/2011 12:39 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 10/21/2011 10:01 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: >>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg >>> wrote: >>> > Johnny, chill. I don't blame him for being confused. Up until right > now, you updated to a point

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> >> You'd need a copyright owner to initiate legal action.   And the FSF >> generally is more concerned about source availability although >> binaries are clearly derived from source and covered by the same >> copyright, and I can't see any

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 10/21/2011 12:39 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 10/21/2011 10:01 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: >>> Now, for version 6, they have: >>> >>> Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 6) >

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 10/21/2011 12:39 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 10/21/2011 10:01 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: >>> Now, for version 6, they have: >>> >>> Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 6) >

Re: [CentOS] What replaces /sbin/hotplug in CentOS 5?

Vreme: 10/21/2011 08:07 PM, Robert Heller piše: > What subsystem replaces /sbin/hotplug in CentOS 5? The older hotplug > package is missing from CentOS 5 and /proc/sys/kernel/hotplug yields an > empty string. Since hotpluging for standard devices still seems to > work, I presume that something re

Re: [CentOS] How to remove a Trash folder from a mounted ntfs partition

Vreme: 10/21/2011 06:40 PM, Ron Young piše: > How about put the HDD back in the laptop, download and burn dban ( > http://www.dban.org/download) to a CD and boot the laptop to the CD? > > There is also Hiren's Boot CD with ton of tools and even Mini Windows booted from Hiren's Boot CD not touchin

Re: [CentOS] Live CD boot for KVM guest. How?

On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Müfit Eribol wrote: > Just for learning, could you please provide some more info about booting > up the LiveCD ISO image (uploaded to the host) to work on a guest? How > is the command line? > Invoking kvm (qemu-kvm) from the CLI: kvm \ -boot d \ -cdrom /path/nam

Re: [CentOS] Samba + Openldap

We're a linux mostly enviroment, some of the users have windows. It sounds to me, maybe I should start over instead of trying to implement it in our current openldap enviroment. We're running openldap 2.3.43 and Samba 3.x.. On Oct 21, 2011, at 6:18 AM, Giles Coochey wrote: > On Fri, October 2

Re: [CentOS] Samba + Openldap

On 10/21/11 2:30 PM, Al wrote: > We're a linux mostly enviroment, some of the users have windows. It sounds > to me, maybe I should start over instead of trying to implement it in our > current openldap enviroment. We're running openldap 2.3.43 and Samba 3.x.. what do the windows users authent

Re: [CentOS] How to remove a Trash folder from a mounted ntfs partition

On 22 October 2011 02:24, James B. Byrne wrote: > CentOS-5.7 using fuse-ntfs-3g > > I have a HDD from a laptop that is being returned for > repair replacement.  I wish to remove certain files before > sending the laptop back with the HDD. > > I have mouunted the HDD on my desktop as an ntfs > file

Re: [CentOS] Samba + Openldap

Openldap, I've been able to get it to work in a staging environment, I'm going to try implementing it on one of our dev servers that has the exact openldap setup as productions. It looks to me, I'll be asking more questions if I run into any road blocks, but the information everyone has been pr